Human Prototypes

[Approaching Infinity]

On the subject of human origins, the C's said the following:

Q: What is number 3 prototype?
A: Known as Neanderthal man.
Q: And what are we?
A: Number 4 types c and d. Translation into English comprehension. [...]
Q: Are you saying that the physical bodies on planet earth, the various types of mankind such as Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, Australopithicus, etc., were generated on that other planet and then brought here?
A: Yes.

The C's have said that Prototype 3 (Neanderthal) appeared on earth 5.3 million years ago, and coexisted for 233 years with Cro-Magnon, which "landed" approx. 70,000 years ago. The point the Michael Cremo and Richard Thompson make in their book Forbidden Archaeology is that there doesn't seem to be any clear evidence in the fossil record of a clear progression from one hominid species to the other. This supports the C's data. The point out many problems with the fossil record and possible misidentification and combination of separate species in examples of Australopithecus, Homo habilis and Homo erectus. Australopithecine species have been found not only in Africa, but in China, Indonesia, and SE Asia. Their anatomy also indicates the lived on trees, not on land, indicating they were simply an ape species. For the record, here's the "official" as summarized by Cremo, with a little extra research thrown in.

20-5 MYA - Dryopithecine apes
6-7 MYA - hominids arrival
6 MYA - Orrorin tugensis / Millenium man (possibly just an upright ape)
4.4-5.8 MYA - Ardepithecus (probably extinct ape)
4-5 - Australopithecus afarensis, followed by A. robustus, A. boisei, A. anamensis, and A. aethiopicus (probably extinct ape)
3.5 MYA - Kenyanthropus platyops (Meave Leakey proposed this as alternative to Australopithecus as human ancestor)
2 MYA - H. habilis (latest found 1.8 MYA)
1.6 MYA - H. erectus
500 KYA - H. neanderthalensis (earliest fossil is 130 KYA, disappeared 20 KYA)
200 KYA - H. sapiens
150 KYA - H. sapiens idaltu (extinct)
100 KYA - H. sapiens sapiens (anatomically modern humans)
35 KYA - Cro-Magnon

Wikipedia lists the following as hominids:

* Homo – immediate ancestors of modern humans
o Homo habilis†
o Homo rudolfensis†
o Homo ergaster†
o Homo georgicus†
o Homo erectus†
o Homo cepranensis†
o Homo antecessor†
o Homo heidelbergensis†
o Homo rhodesiensis†
o Homo neanderthalensis†
o Homo sapiens
+ Homo sapiens idaltu†
+ Archaic Homo sapiens (Cro-magnon)†
o Homo floresiensis†
* Oreopithecus†
* Paranthropus†
* Australopithecus†
* Sahelanthropus†(hominid status highly problematic)
* Orrorin†
* Ardipithecus† (hominid status highly problematic)
* Kenyanthropus†

Most species listed seem to be different names for the same type. Obviously, the fossil record cannot be fully trusted, and is not a reliable indicator of when one species appeared and disappeared. (E.g., there was no gorilla fossil record until AFTER the discovery of gorillas.) Which leads to my questions:

Which species fit the designations of prototypes 1 and 2, with possible subdivisions (a, b, c, etc.)? (Were they Homo habilis and Homo erectus, respectively?)

How many years ago did each appear and when did they disappear?

How do we account for modern femurs and other fossils being found millions of years ago, as documented in Cremo's book?

Also, on the subject of modern humans, the C's mentioned prototyopes 4 C and D. What is the distinction? Is it racial or perhaps OP/non-OP?

What were/are human types 4 A and B?

 

[Juba]

Great question and if I may ad to it how much of Neanderthal genome is in both human variations (if any)???

 

[Roser]

I think human a and b were Aryans and Celts, c and d are European and Caucasian. I think the C's are guided by the root races.

This is what I found:

Q: (L) Who built Stonehenge?
A: Druids.
Q: (L) Who were the Druids?
A: Early Aryan group.


Q: (L) Can you determine my dominant genetic type?
A: Caucasian.
Q: (L) Is Caucasian different from Aryan or Celtic?
A: Aryan subgroup Caucasian.

Furthermore, Cremo's book is fascinating and I'd be interested to know how they relate eseos bones of millions of years ... my theory is that they are of the civilizations before the fall.

Prototypes 1 and 2 could well be these.

Greetings!

 

[darksai]

What were/are human types 4 A and B?[/b]

A good start I think would be to ask Laura to qualify exactly what she intended to refer to with her question "And what are we?", i.e. all humans on Earth at the time or just those sitting in the room. Being able to reject all or include some of living humanity would narrow down the search possibilities by quite a factor if it is discernible.

 

[Laura]

What were/are human types 4 A and B?[/b]

A good start I think would be to ask Laura to qualify exactly what she intended to refer to with her question "And what are we?", i.e. all humans on Earth at the time or just those sitting in the room. Being able to reject all or include some of living humanity would narrow down the search possibilities by quite a factor if it is discernible.

Those issues are best dealt with via research. I think we have way more serious problems to deal with right now. Frankly, I don't feel the least bit attracted to those questions because the answers are of little value to the pressing problems of humanity.

 

[darksai]

What were/are human types 4 A and B?[/b]

A good start I think would be to ask Laura to qualify exactly what she intended to refer to with her question "And what are we?", i.e. all humans on Earth at the time or just those sitting in the room. Being able to reject all or include some of living humanity would narrow down the search possibilities by quite a factor if it is discernible.

Those issues are best dealt with via research. I think we have way more serious problems to deal with right now. Frankly, I don't feel the least bit attracted to those questions because the answers are of little value to the pressing problems of humanity.

I strongly agree with that myself, and in hindsight think I should make efforts in not forgetting to consider it sooner in future.

 

[lilies]

little value to the pressing problems of humanity.

so this is just a technical corollary:

Who created the main human Prototypes 1 2 3 4 5? STO or STS beings?

Speculation:
Because I have a hunch that all root human prototypes - that are radically different (e.g. need seriously precise engineering) in internal functions and require totally original design from the ground up - were created by STO beings. It seems that every time a new model was needed it was a supreme task to first design:

1. new cellular biology that fits in the new universal environment and meet other needs of creator

2. make the new body-blueprint compatible with souls = able to house fine energies

I think radically different human prototypes - requiring true creative work - were created by STO designers with the intent to live in Paradise environments, when needs arose for these new types for any reasons (cataclysmic, etc). STS having seen these new toys saw them fit for their nefarious schemes. STS stole the new toys and modified them to significantly reduce super-abilities of the new bodies - originally designed for Paradise.

The corrupted bodies were reduced in function, were recolored/reshaped/maimed, were barely able to hold advanced souls = all types of genetic diseases broke out in the body when an advanced soul with a lot of reincarnations accepted it for housing, because the original Paradise-Super-Bodies fitting for these souls were no longer available as choice.

It would be interesting to find out if the goal of Alchemists were actually to use Soul-power to repair the bodies, reverse corrupting modifications made by STS and re-create the body to be able to function like the original STO design, fit for Paradise environment.

The C's mentioned current human average age not at all realistic and various super abilities - bi-location, teleportation, pure energy mastery were alluded be possible if certain requirements met and the human soul/mind/consciousness being super-powerful only we need to know how to become such.

It would be baffling if it turned out Alchemist were actually able to rebuild their bodies according original Human Prototype Number# blueprint [with male<-->female transfigurating abilities among others] - and with the limiting corruptions (done by STS) gone, they were able to teleport and change "dimensions" to live in veiled Paradise-like beautiful places outside of linear time as were described in the account of Eugene Canseliet having met Fulcanelli at a castle in the Pyrenees in 1954.
http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php?id=340

 

[scyth]

Human prototypes?

Approximately one-half years ago, an interesting event happened. I closed my eyes for a moment that I was getting into my room, and C 8 letters and digits from right to left in front of my eyes was the color of bright orange on a black background. Soon after, a random part of the 19 October 1994 hearing, I have read about people with prototypes.

"October 19, 1994 F*** and Laura
..........

Q: When Aryans came to India?
A: 8243 years ago.

Q: Who was there before?
C: Asian tribes and 3 prototypes.

Q: What is the number 3 prototype?
C: is known as Neanderthal Man.

Q: So what are we?
A: No. 4, c and d type. About translation. "

For a long time, because I was not sure about asking not to ask a personal question. However, I am very curious indeed. Can you tell me what it is C 8.


Mod's note: Changed personal name for privacy.

 

[Nienna]

Re: Human prototypes?

Your copy of the sessions seem to be a pirated copy and the original names of guests were used. If you use this copy again for quotes, please make sure that original names of those guests in attendance are not used. Thank you.

And on Laura's copy, this is session 941020 for those of you who may want to look it up.

 

[scyth]

Re: Human prototypes?

I did not know. I pay attention to that next time. Thank you.