Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?
- Thread starter MusicMan
- Start date
It was (kind of) hilarious to watch Andrew digging himself deeper into a hole with his totally absurd and contradictory explanations:
Andrew says it was "honourable" to end his friendship (with a convicted pedophile) in person instead of just calling on the phone, so he wanted to see Epstein "one last time" in 2010, yet after this he still stayed as a guest for several days in his place. And Andrew had just moment ago explaing how Epstein was not really a close friend at all!
Andrew explains how he was at home with his children during the time of the abuse. Amazingly he recalls how he was "going to pizza Express around 4-5 in the afternoon" during that totally normal day almost 20 years ago. What a memory!
Then he says how he had a "medical condition" that prevented him from sweating, thus "proving" that he couldn't have abused Virginia Roberts who had described Andrew sweating a lot during that night. What a strange detail to take as your defence. But apparently now he's healed from this "medical condition" and can sweat again - which i'm sure he's doing after this interview.
He can't directly accuse Roberts of lying, so instead Andrew goes on throughout the interview saying how he can't remember ever meeting her, which is bizarre, since there's the famous photograph that shows Andrew standing right next to Roberts, with his hand on her waist.
Apparently Andrew can remember what he ate for dinner 20 years ago on a totally random day, but can't remember whether he's ever met someone even after showing a picture of them together! Then Andrew explains cryptically how the photograph can't be proved to be fake or not because "it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph".
During the interview Andrew gives his "best explanation" for the photograph:
Andrew says it was "honourable" to end his friendship (with a convicted pedophile) in person instead of just calling on the phone, so he wanted to see Epstein "one last time" in 2010, yet after this he still stayed as a guest for several days in his place. And Andrew had just moment ago explaing how Epstein was not really a close friend at all!
Andrew explains how he was at home with his children during the time of the abuse. Amazingly he recalls how he was "going to pizza Express around 4-5 in the afternoon" during that totally normal day almost 20 years ago. What a memory!
Then he says how he had a "medical condition" that prevented him from sweating, thus "proving" that he couldn't have abused Virginia Roberts who had described Andrew sweating a lot during that night. What a strange detail to take as your defence. But apparently now he's healed from this "medical condition" and can sweat again - which i'm sure he's doing after this interview.
He can't directly accuse Roberts of lying, so instead Andrew goes on throughout the interview saying how he can't remember ever meeting her, which is bizarre, since there's the famous photograph that shows Andrew standing right next to Roberts, with his hand on her waist.
Apparently Andrew can remember what he ate for dinner 20 years ago on a totally random day, but can't remember whether he's ever met someone even after showing a picture of them together! Then Andrew explains cryptically how the photograph can't be proved to be fake or not because "it is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph".
During the interview Andrew gives his "best explanation" for the photograph:
With just that one car crash interview, Andrew has ruined whatever good they mustered from flooding the airwaves (in the UK anyway) with royal stories of late. They had even convinced Andrew's daughter to announce her wedding. 
My one reservation with the Amy Robach leak is that it's a little convenient the way she 'laid it all out' in front of a camera. Sure, she knew she wasn't 'on air', but she likely also knows that cameras can still be recording, especially when the cast and crew are all on set, between takes or ad-breaks or whatever. Why did she share this with her colleagues so... riskily and openly?
Robach specifically claimed "the palace" killed the story. Can Buckingham Palace reach into ABC News in the US to kill a story? I doubt it, though British security services might perhaps be able to do so on their behalf. And ABC's CEO is British...
Throughout the decade or so since Epstein was convicted, much of the focus has been on just one of his 'clients': Andrew. I wonder if some deflection games are afoot to steer fallout from this scandal from 'the tribe' to this hapless (though undoubtedly pathological) British royal.
My one reservation with the Amy Robach leak is that it's a little convenient the way she 'laid it all out' in front of a camera. Sure, she knew she wasn't 'on air', but she likely also knows that cameras can still be recording, especially when the cast and crew are all on set, between takes or ad-breaks or whatever. Why did she share this with her colleagues so... riskily and openly?
Robach specifically claimed "the palace" killed the story. Can Buckingham Palace reach into ABC News in the US to kill a story? I doubt it, though British security services might perhaps be able to do so on their behalf. And ABC's CEO is British...
Throughout the decade or so since Epstein was convicted, much of the focus has been on just one of his 'clients': Andrew. I wonder if some deflection games are afoot to steer fallout from this scandal from 'the tribe' to this hapless (though undoubtedly pathological) British royal.
Last edited:
SlipNet
The Living Force
I very much agree. Why has Ghislaine Maxwell not been at the forefront of all investigations? And at this point it is clear that her father Robert Maxwell was a Mossad asset. It could well be a tactical diversion going on here.
If you can stomach another victims testimonies video this one came up on YouTube after the Richie Allen analysis of the Prince Andrew interview. The first victim interviewed was Virginia Roberts. Numerous other victims tell their stories. However; the one other commenter (didn't catch his name) throws in a kind of damage control by saying he thinks Epstein's "suicide" is plausible.
1,878,732 views •Nov 10, 2019
Exposing Jeffrey Epstein's international sex trafficking ring | 60 Minutes Australia
Last edited:
I wondered about that when I heard her say it in the "leaked" video. Not only in regards to how much power the Palace has on media revelations in the US, but also, I don't think that any American holds the British royal family in such high-esteem as to choose to protect their reputation over sharing a news story.
For example, Alan Dershowitz alone holds way more power in the US than the entire Buckingham Palace. And he is one of the more visible ones of "the tribe".
Yeah. You gotta give the nobility/gentry types some credit for at least having some principles that some of them actually care about, as opposed to the rampant nihilism reigning elsewhere. The problem with these types is (and always has been) though that when it comes to it, they ALWAYS choose "protection of their kin/class" over morality. It's shameful.
Yes, the Royals (and aristocrats in general) have become a circus show for some and punching bags for others for some time now it seems. They are certainly not our worst problem, or the worst of the bunch, or even that powerful. The Mossad angle in the whole Epstein affair would be much more useful to explore I think.
Now that you mention it, we should point out that she did also drop Dershowitz's name.
I took the "palace" comment by Robach to be a euphemism for an American-based power center, not the royal family. But with Andrew's connection, it could be very on the nose. But if it was too on the nose, what's the purpose? To distract from another guilty party? Someone with an axe to grind?
I thought she meant that the Palace killed the story simply by threatening ABC with not granting any access (for interviews and so on) to Kate and William et al. US media may not recognize the authority of the British royals, but they do care about ratings.
D
Deleted member 4737
Guest
I thought this was interesting.
www.yahoo.com
Lady Colin Campbell defends Prince Andrew and claims ‘soliciting sex from minors is not paedophilia’
The socialite and TV personality caused anger with her controversial comments.
This could be the reason for Robach's ¨accidental¨ video, to shift the blame for blocking the item on Epstein to the Palace. The ¨and threatened us a million different ways¨ fits in with the famous ¨they have a million ways from sunday to get back at you¨, the CIA/Mossad. They also hindered the prosecutor in the original court case against Epstein
Last edited:
I'm still listening to the Richie Allen youtube reaction to the Prince Andrew interview the night before. Here's what appeared in my local paper in a section of around the world news highlights:
So the Prince was supposedly advised NOT to give the interview and it was a complete disaster as predicted. One has to wonder then, why did he do it? Has he been designated as the official patsy to direct attention away from the tribe > Ghislaine, Dershowitz, Les Wexner? Did the Queen think a rebuttal was essential for damage control in regards to the monarchy's image and that's why the interview took place? A picture's worth a 1000 words, and for Andrew to suggest that the one of him with his arm around Giuffre may have been faked is more than ludicrous! As pointed out in the previously posted Joe Rogan clip, the extreme blatancy of this entire episode is just so over-the-top! I guess at this point, the PTB feel certain that they can get away with anything and even rub our noses in it!
Tiffany FitzHenry with another good interview. This on one The Finders. It sure seems that the "network," as she calls it, operates among people in very high socioeconomic circles.
I thought this was interesting.
Lady Colin Campbell defends Prince Andrew and claims ‘soliciting sex from minors is not paedophilia’
The socialite and TV personality caused anger with her controversial comments.
@RevChristoph , what did you find interesting? Having Lady Colin Campbell say having underage 14 year olds sexually trafficked was not pedophilia was disgusting not interesting to me.