Lab-Grown Meat (cultured meat) - bad?

[ScioAgapeOmnis]

Stuff like this:
https://www.sott.net/article/302380-Mad-Science-Move-over-test-tube-burger-theres-a-lab-grown-chicken-breast-in-the-works

And with this not being unimportant:
https://www.sott.net/article/264775-Why-are-the-founders-of-Microsoft-Google-and-Paypal-investing-in-artificial-meat

Now, granted, lab-grown meat is basically a GMO franken-food that will probably do far more damage than anything good. But I'm curious if this is even possible in the future at all even in principle - can meat be grown without killing animals and be just as healthy for us, ever? I mean, if I could get all the benefits of meat without killing animals, I'm all for it. But given what the C's said before, doesn't food that comes from actual 2nd density beings carry some kind of energy that can only exist in living 2d beings, and is more than just the macro/micro nutrients? If so, does that mean that no one in the universe can ever really "fake" food, as long as they require food?

I mean there's a reason 4D STS use us as food. If their technology is ridiculously advanced and they still can't just engineer this energy technologically and require actual 3D beings, wouldn't this be true for us no matter how advanced we get - that we would require 2D beings? It probably has to do with consciousness - a certain level of consciousness must've existed in your food for it to be viable as food, and you can't "fake" it - only consciousness can create whatever it is another consciousness would consume, or so it seems.

So then what happens to all the people who switch over to lab-grown meat if it ever truly comes to market? Let's say it has the macro-nutrients and micro-nutrients (unlikely tho!), what is it missing? How will their mind, body, and "other" bodies react to it? Will it feed the physical body but somehow starve all non-physical "higher" parts of us, effectively turning us into Organic Portals by killing our higher centers and removing our ability to house a soul? And if that were to happen, wouldn't that also make us no longer viable as food for 4D STS because we're all just OP's and no longer truly 3d beings at all capable of higher-order energy and emotion that is necessary for them? Or would we still house a soul but just be severely stunted in other ways, kinda like what fluoride and GMO does now?

So the question I'd have - can food ever be consumed and be just as healthy as eating animals, but without killing animals as long as we are 3d STS?
And follow-up - if not, what does lab-grown meat do to those who switch to eating it - is my guess anywhere in the ballpark?

The C's did mention that a long time ago humans were able to get all their food from a "mother stone" - but I dunno if we were also different back then, and cosmic environment was different, and our needs were different somehow. But it does sound like there's a way to get food without killing - if the right things are different.

 

[Javi]

Perhaps the key is in the variety of DNA that we consume from different animals (even of the same species), as the carrier of a many information fields that helps our own DNA to repair. A synthetic meat would always have the same DNA. Worse still, would be so much easier to genetically alter the DNA, and the domination of mankind through the information fields expressing said fixed DNA.
The lack of direct expression of a soul 2D in a DNA field would be also an additional problem. In short, we would lose all control over what we eat, exposing us to the vulnerability.

 

[PerfectCircle]

Animals we eat mostly eat plants, which we alltogether consume when eating meat and that affects our quality of food. It is optimal for our energy levels and our body.
Synthetic meat, besides being nutritive different, doesn't have appropriate energy for us.

 

[Iosif]

Interesting questions SAO. The franken-meat will be here faster than I expected... I'll wait ten years to prove it: D

BREAKING: World’s first chicken and duck produced without the animal
http://www.memphismeats.com/blog/2017/3/15/breaking-worlds-first-chicken-produced-without-the-animal

Now they can say that fat is healthy with more reason :/

http://gizmodo.com/the-future-will-be-full-of-lab-grown-meat-1720874704
One of the big takeaways from the 2013 cultured burger demo was that meat just ain’t right without fat. So, Post’s lab is now culturing fatty tissue in addition to muscle fibers. Working out that process has taken some time. Until now, there hasn’t been a whole lot of scientific interest in culturing fat cells, and methods that did exist used chemicals we don’t really want to be eating.

“The original methodology to make fat cells from stem cells requires steroids, which are not wanted in food applications,” Post told me. “We had to redesign that and work with the biochemistry of the cell to figure out which stimuli we should use. We now have a bunch of natural components of fat that actually stimulate fat production.”

 

[theos]

Now, granted, lab-grown meat is basically a GMO franken-food that will probably do far more damage than anything good. But I'm curious if this is even possible in the future at all even in principle - can meat be grown without killing animals and be just as healthy for us, ever? I mean, if I could get all the benefits of meat without killing animals, I'm all for it. But given what the C's said before, doesn't food that comes from actual 2nd density beings carry some kind of energy that can only exist in living 2d beings, and is more than just the macro/micro nutrients? If so, does that mean that no one in the universe can ever really "fake" food, as long as they require food?

I don't think that it would be possible to live a normal, healthy lifespan without real meat from formerly living animals. Aside from all of the components that we know of that are in food there is certainly some undiscovered protein, vitamin, mineral, fatty acid etc. that we don't know about but is essential to human nutrition that fake meat can't capture. Also, there is the etheric or energetic 'information' or consciousness that living things possess that can't be replicated in a lab. Cloned animals certainly aren't a success (at least the ones we know of).

Sure, you could probably live off of frankenfood for a while, people certainly seem to be able to get by on a diet full of fast food but are they really fully-functioning human beings with any capability to reach optimal functioning?

 

[Galaxia2002]

I don't think that it would be possible to live a normal, healthy lifespan without real meat from formerly living animals. Aside from all of the components that we know of that are in food there is certainly some undiscovered protein, vitamin, mineral, fatty acid etc. that we don't know about but is essential to human nutrition that fake meat can't capture. Also, there is the etheric or energetic 'information' or consciousness that living things possess that can't be replicated in a lab. Cloned animals certainly aren't a success (at least the ones we know of).

Sure, you could probably live off of frankenfood for a while, people certainly seem to be able to get by on a diet full of fast food but are they really fully-functioning human beings with any capability to reach optimal functioning?

This is a question I have made some time ago, but I had reduced the problem to a single molecule, by simplification. Suppose you have a medicinal plant i.e Willow tree bark, which has a active molecule, the aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and you also have a 100% pure synthetic version of it. You take the willow tree bark and extract the acetylsalicylic acid by an hypothetical process which leaves no waste, 100% pure. Obviously both are chemically identical and indistinguishable from one another. Will they have the same exact effect in people?
My question will be: is the presence of a collective "soul" in that tree, imprint some information in another layer in that single molecule, that is not information contained in the structure?
Another way to put it: the presence of that etheric field and its consequences in the consumer comes to be expressed exclusively in the way of chemical structures, or there is real etheric eating ?. How did that etheric layer survive in a piece of meat in a refrigerator and then the heat? (Assuming the etheric layer is something that is associated with the physical body)

 

[Cyre2067]

Two friends of mine that were vegan were discussing this and I laughed right in their faces. Like some of y'all, I'd wager there's an energetic component that as yet remains unidentified in real animal meat. This is why I aim to get as close to family-raised as possible with my meat. We want to eat happy, healthy cows, pigs and chicks.

The point I made with them is that this is basically as GMO-ultra-processed as you get. Plus without 10 years of lab safety studies we have no way of knowing what the effects of eating this stuff may be. I expect that if it does get approved it will make its way into the food supply via chicken nuggets and chicken tenders - favorites of kids. Scary thought.