gwb1995 said:
I have confused my situation with Psychegram's....
I thought that might be the case. :)
gwb1995 said:
As for being with like minded people, I mean being with others involved in doing the work. I think this would be a very mutually beneficial situation.
Yes, I'm sure that it would be "beneficial" for those involved. Whether such an ideal situation would be likely, or even within the realm of possibility, for most of us on this forum who are endeavouring to pursue the Work, is another matter. But more importantly: While it is vital to be able to recognize and avoid people and situations that merely feed on and sap our energy and resources, I think this idea that only those who are formally pursuing the Work and/or are "just like us" would be appropriate people to be around when the you-know-what hits the fan, is something that needs to be re-examined.
There are so many variables to consider, which will of course be different from person to person. But, most importantly, aren't we all aiming towards an STO orientation? Is it STO to be concerned mainly with how others may serve OUR needs in such a situation? If we accept the C's definition of STO behaviour, shouldn't we be aiming to be of service to ALL who ASK, regardless of whether they fit our preconceived notions of spiritually advanced beings? After all, it may be our role to be teachers and guides to those who happen to be in our immediate environment at that time, to share our knowledge and expertise, regardless of their level of spiritual awareness. The C's have said "Where you are is not important. Who you are is and also what you see." I think one could also say "Who you're with is not important. Who you are is and also what you see."
I think there is a danger of getting caught up in a kind of "spiritual self-importance", to the point that that we forget about the issue of service. Obviously, we cannot be of service if we do not exercise enough self-preservation to actually survive and function, both physically and mentally. But is the aim really to congregate only amongst "ourselves", to be of service only to "ourselves", and dismiss the rest of humanity as somehow "unworthy"?
Remember, whether someone is formally pursuing "the Work", or has even heard of it, has nothing whatsoever to do with whether they are what the C's call an "STO candidate". "The Work" is only a tool for those who need it, not a kind of final-exam for STO candidacy. If we accept what the C's have to say on the matter, it is a person's Frequency Resonance Vibration (FRV) that is the best indicator of their orientation, and that has to do with their "emotional path", not their degree of knowledge or intellectual understanding. Perhaps it is only we "stunted" individuals who need "the Work", to bring us to the point of being able to recognize and become in tune with another's FRV, regardless of superficial appearances.
Things to think about....