I think, the issue is not whether time travel exist or not. When one is emotionally invested in some tree( conspiratoral time travel), they tend to forget about the forest and all the tree's in the forest are looked with the same lens. Cognitive science addresses this bias. That is what we are trying to say.It seems to be accepted on this forum that 4th Density STS can alter reality. OK, if reality is being changed, then the question moves on to how/why some people can notice the changes and others can't.
I discussed the topic of the Gettysburg address being changed with Claudia and how the revisionists were first noticed when they claimed Nelson Mandela was still alive (after everyone knew he died in prison) and as it turns out, Mexicans all know he died in prison long long ago and this hoax "Mandela effect" never happened in Mexico. It appears that it is all a stunt the tech left is pulling to re-write the history of Western civilization, even despite it all remaining intact in countries like Mexico. Claudia said they would never get away with it in Mexico because the old books are kept by everyone and not thrown away. I am not so sure this will work for them long term, but for now, the "Mandela effect" is not happening in Mexico, at least not as much.
FOLKS, THE SCAMMING TECH LEFT HAS CHANGED THE GETTYSBURG ADDRESS. It is now Four score and seven years ago our fathers! The tech left has replaced "forefathers" with "fathers" and have obviously employed supercomputers to comb every record everyone has and change it to fathers, including photos people have, even private personal photos. There is now NO QUESTION AT ALL that's what operating system updates are really doing, they are going into everyone's photos and documents and changing what is there to match the new narrative, whatever it happens to be. If this is hard for you to believe, go check the Gettysburg Address on all sites that claim to be for "history", even the photos, and see for yourself.
There's no other way this historic document could have been purged so well, and so completely, and the quality of the hoaxing of photos is so high there's now reason to believe Julian Assange is in fact dead and they are hoaxing even him.
It might be hard to believe you did not remember the Gettysburg Address wrong after bathing in 500 photos "proving" you remembered it wrong but I found proof you did not remember it wrong. As it turns out, Johnny Cash put it to music. Since the revisionist AI was not set to hunt out music and destroy even that, it stayed preserved via Johnny Cash.
Their revisionist AI made a fatal screw up and I found it there. It can be assumed that the AI will change that Johnny Cash tune as soon as the tech left figures out it was preserved there, but I checked again this morning and it was still legit and also saved it. It is evident now that saving it on a computer will not be good enough however, the AI will find it's way in and wipe it out. This is obviously what all those huge supercomputers are at least in part, really for.
If you still have those old encyclopedias, or there is a set you can go get, DO IT, AND GUARD IT WITH YOUR LIFE. Believe nothing, the tech left is clearly hell bent on destroying true history.
Yep, this one too sounds pretty far-fetched. It sounds like just another cognitive error to me. Given that the sentence starts with "four", and "forefathers" is appropriately old-sounding, it's not very hard to believe that people would unconsciously replace fathers with "four"-fathers.Really, AI changing the Gettysburg Address? When I read it, 'fathers' didn't sound off. But I may just not remember it. If anything, I would have said neither, and rather 'founding fathers'. Now, I do remember (or think I do) the Declaration of Independence, so if that gets changed, I think I'll know.
But for real? So just make some text documents with 'forefathers' and see if they get changed...
That reminds me of the move Edge of Tomorrow, which I'd recommend. And knowing that you're an Avatar reminds me of this quote:Then Deja vu in the Avatars who have experienced some change in the simulation.
Be that as it may, "the Avatar" continues to "play" oblivious to the actions of his "player" or the "administrators" of the game, except for those strange sensations of Deja vu.
I've read somewhere that you have to try to be a "conscious" player.
The Avatar who knows he is an Avatar inevitably changes the way he plays ...
“So live as if you were living already for the second time and as if you had acted the first time as wrongly as you are about to act now!”
― Viktor E. Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning
Yes. The encouragement given here to shore up one's knowledge of cognitive errors still stands, lest we misattribute all kinds of perceptions or experiences to causes strange and metaphysical. You know, your writing 'Art' - instead of Ark, is an example of a cognitive error, albeit a pretty minor one (even if Ark's name is printed out over a dozen times in the session transcript). But I got that one beat! I must have watched an actor's name on the show titles I was watching over three dozen times before a friend pointed out to me that his name wasn't Walter Goggins (as I used to refer to him), but Walton Goggins. And he was right! See what I mean?Anybody have any comments about the recent session and Art now having two hats?
Little errors but maybe not so little.Yes. The encouragement given here to shore up one's knowledge of cognitive errors still stands, lest we misattribute all kinds of perceptions or experiences to causes strange and metaphysical. You know, your writing 'Art' - instead of Ark, is an example of a cognitive error, albeit a pretty minor one (even if Ark's name is printed out over a dozen times in the session transcript). But I got that one beat! I must have watched an actor's name on the show titles I was watching over three dozen times before a friend pointed out to me that his name wasn't Walter Goggins (as I used to refer to him), but Walton Goggins. And he was right! See what I mean?
If we're not thinking about our own thinking, as much as possible, and if we don't use some of the tools to rule out many of the most basic possibilities, then we can get easily lost in the mire of 'mandela effects' and all kinds of things. So, again, starting from square one with the most basic of possibilities (which many folks don't even know exist) is, I think, a great place to work from; the suggested reading being here for a reason.