Newton's Apple Goes Transdimensional

[eeiiei]

I was watching several of maverick physicist Eric Dollard's videos a few weeks back. Many of his ideas seem to mesh pretty well with the cosmology put forward by the Cs. All celestial bodies have hollow cores. The sun is not a nuclear fusion device - it is a converter whose core is a gateway to another dimension.

Assuming this is the case, gravity waves themselves would be traveling through the Earth's core and into a different dimension. This infers the existance of a transdimensional circuit which in turn would necessitate the reappearance of an equal amount of energy at some point 'our' universe, continuing the process ad infinitum.

And here's where Gurdjieff's 'food for the moon' cosmology comes in: gravity would have to be a differentiated carrier depending on its destination - moon, planet or sun - what gets drawn into a celestial body depends entirely on its 'needs'. This would also mean that the dimensions the gateways lead to also vary depending on the type of celestial body.

Is Dollard getting close? Is the above a feasible working model?

Dollard:
http://youtu.be/asesblfb4zI

 

[eeiiei]

One of nature's little clues. Interesting that geode is greek for 'earthlike'.

 

[eeiiei]

And for those who may not entirely understand just how free energy for everyone got hijacked, this (part 1) is an excellent history of the heroes and villains of that story.

Parts 2 & 3 get into the mechanics as well as some pretty staggering possibilities for the future.

Enjoy!

http://youtu.be/NZZmFY9W4eg

 

[Buddy]

Hi eeiiei. Interesting thoughts.

The thing that bothers me about scientific theories is that 'multiplication of hypotheses' phenomenon. Hypotheses are formed as questions come up while testing another hypothesis. An answer is then proposed and a hypothesis is made to test that answer. During this time, more questions arise, more answers proposed and more hypotheses are created to test, then more questions, more answers and more hypotheses. And so many of these are just thought experiments whose background context is a poor understanding of quantum reality as the physicists themselves will admit.

Considering that there are so many theories and hypotheses available to explain just about anything, I find myself more interested in asking about the beginnings.

Assuming you're familiar with Eric Dollard's work, what can you say about how he began? What questions does he attempt to address and to maybe answer? If I get some time, I'll probably look at the videos, but I'm hoping you can at least address those two questions.

Thanks.

 

[eeiiei]

Hi eeiiei. Interesting thoughts.

The thing that bothers me about scientific theories is that 'multiplication of hypotheses' phenomenon. Hypotheses are formed as questions come up while testing another hypothesis. An answer is then proposed and a hypothesis is made to test that answer. During this time, more questions arise, more answers proposed and more hypotheses are created to test, then more questions, more answers and more hypotheses. And so many of these are just thought experiments whose background context is a poor understanding of quantum reality as the physicists themselves will admit.

Considering that there are so many theories and hypotheses available to explain just about anything, I find myself more interested in asking about the beginnings.

Assuming you're familiar with Eric Dollard's work, what can you say about how he began? What questions does he attempt to address and to maybe answer? If I get some time, I'll probably look at the videos, but I'm hoping you can at least address those two questions.

Thanks.

Hello Buddy -

Dollard talks extensively about his beginnings at the old RCA lab in Bolinas, as well as the issues regarding patents and deals struck between GE, Marconi, Westinghouse et al. Fascinating forgotten history by someone who was there.

He also explains how the work of Steinmetz, Tesla and others was squeezed out by the 'Einsteinians'. This resulted in the loss of so much of what (rightly) bothers you in your opening paragraphs - simple, streamlined and above all demonstrably operational electro-magnetic phenomena of a kind that was buried along with these people's careers.

Time and space, it appears, are no obstacles to electro-magnetism once we get our limiting perceptions out of the way. Can you think of a greater threat to the PTB than this?

Demonstration of a longitudinal wave traveling beyond the speed of light:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BnCUBKgnnc

E

 

[Buddy]

I understand the theory and the theoretical implications of longitudinal wave energy transfer. I also understand the psychological and metaphysical conceptual issues and paradoxes involved with 'time' and 'space.' What I'm not seeing is a scaled up example demonstration in 3 dimensional model form so I can put my hands on it, figuratively speaking.

With regard to the act of supplying energy to something, what would be required on a transmitter end? What would be required on a receiving end? How and why would it work in the physical world? How would the energy be constrained and controlled within whatever is being powered?

I watched a big chunk of your latest video which is a rip of an old vhs tape. It stimulates more questions than answers though, so maybe I'll check it out in depth a little later. I realize you're not addressing me specifically with this topic, but I thought I'd give you whatever feedback I had to offer. Thanks for posting it.

Can you think of a greater threat to the PTB than this?

I can't say what would be the greatest threat. I think they multi-task. Probably have many areas under their watch and control and can swap back and forth, creating some kind of crisis or allowing some kind of advancement depending on how they need to direct the public's attention.