Potential EMF Mitigation? Compensatory Magnetic Oscillator

Keyhole

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
I recently had some correspondence with a company who have designed a device which supposedly mitigates EMF to some extent.

At first, I thought "just another company trying to sell some product which claims to block EMF". However, I was intrigued to learn that this device does NOT claim to block EMF. In fact, the mechanism appears to approach this problem from an entirely different angle, and so seems to be quite unique.

In short - It claims to be acting via resonance to maintain the binding of calcium ions within the proteinacous cavity, thereby modulating the VGCC threshold and preventing calcium efflux caused by external EMFs.

It has support from some of the big names in water science, including Professor Marc Henry.

For those who are not familiar with Professor Martin Pall's work + here(HIGHLY recommended), he has published several papers on the mechanisms of EMF toxicity. External EMF sources seem to activate voltage gated calcium channels inside the cell, which cause excessive calcium flooding (which has numerous downstream effects including mitochondrial damage, apoptosis, excess nitric oxide synthesis etc). Likewise, it has been proposed that these EMFs are potentially altering the biophysical properties of the calcium ion via something called cyclotron resonance (if I understand correctly):
Paper
Six studies have supported the view that calcium cyclotron resonance, has a role in producing biological effects produced by certain specific frequencies which can interact with Ca2+ ions to produce a cyclotron-like resonance (Foletti et al., 2010; Gaetani et al., 2009; De Carlo et al., 2012; Lisi et al., 2008; Pazur and Rassadina, 2009; Pazur et al., 2006). In each case, the effects involved a very specific frequency which produces the calcium cyclotron resonance and in three studies, these frequencies were shown to produce increases in [Ca2+]i levels. In the De Carlo et al. (2012) study, the calcium channel blocker nifedipine was shown to greatly lower the apparent calcium cyclotron resonance effect. This finding strongly suggests that the calcium cyclotron resonance can feed Ca2+ ions into the VGCCs, thus increasing the flow of Ca2+ions through the VGCCs into the cell following EMF exposure. The frequencies studied here for cyclotron resonance, one was close to 7 Hz and the other was close to 50 Hz, are both in the extremely low frequency range and consequently are not relevant to microwave frequency effects. The finding that only very specific calcium cyclotron resonance frequencies produce these effects is the main evidence for this mechanism.

Interestingly, many of the biological effects of EMF can be mitigated via calcium channel blockers, which strongly implicates VGCC activation being one of the primary mechanisms of cellular stress. The CMO supposedly alters the threshold for VGCC acitivation, which is almost acting like a calcium-channel blocker but which is specific for external EMF.

Here is an excerpt from an article on the CMO systems website:

The ions in our body (calcium, magnesium, potassium ions, etc.), apart from their biochemical function, also have physical properties including oscillating and rotating movements.These movements generate characteristic electromagnetic microwave signals of certain frequencies that have been accurately identified. These are an ion's signature.

The problem is that the operating frequencies of our electronic devices correspond to the spectrum of signatures of these ions, in particular Ca2+. This overlap of frequencies creates resonance or interfering effects (well known in basic physics) at the cellular level.
lighter

The Ca2+ ions in their protein cavities have characteristic rotation and oscillation frequencies within the natural magnetic field in the body which gives an overall circular movement.
lighter

The circular movement of these ions is described as having a natural cyclotron radius which is characteristic for each type of ion.
lighter

The addition of more energy to this system as happens from EMFs causes excitation of the ion and increases the cyclotron radius of the ion.
lighter

Once the cyclotron radius has been altered and increased, the ion remains at the heightened energy state and the larger radius persists.

The calcium ion (Ca2+) is held within proteins embedded in the cell membrane by biophysical forces. When the cyclotron radius is enlarged as a result of external EMFs it changes the threshold at which the Ca2+ is released from the protein binding and alters the functioning of the Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) through which the Ca2+ enters the cell, allowing Ca2+ to flood into the cell.
lighter

lighter


When Ca2+ enters the cells it sets off an inflammatory cascade that is the basis for a whole array of non-specific stress responses that manifest as the symptoms people commonly experience when exposed to EM pollution. We know this mechanism is correct because Prof Martin Pall discovered that these same symptoms could be prevented by giving people pharmaceuticals that block VGCCs. Chronic exposure to EMFs therefore leads to chronic inflammation which is the basis for many diseases that have been steadily rising, including cancer.

29872
In the opposite way to how EMFs disturb the Ca2+ binding within their proteins, Compensating Magnetic Oscillators (CMO) use the phenomenon of resonance to reinforce this binding force which returns the threshold for the release of Ca2+ back to normal and corrects the regulatory function of the VGCCs. CMOs contain a crystalline solution that hold and emit the necessary resonant frequencies that were meticulously identified by the elite scientists in the Comosystems team.

I am in no way qualified to make any judgement on whether this mechanism is even possible. I have very little understanding of physics, and so cannot really have an opinion on it. I am interested to know if anyone else with a background in physics (@ark @Pierre, @Scottie or anyone else) could weigh in on this... because it seems 'too good to be true' - especially when you look at the research on biochemical parameters which I will post below
 
Research in support of this system:

Peer-reviewed Publications
1. Effects of mobile phone radiation on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster. Weisbrot D, Lin H, Ye L, Blank M . and Goodman R. Journal of cellular Biochemistry: J Cell Biochem. Vol. 89, Issue1, 2003, pages 48-55. An increase in synthesis of the stress protein HSP 70 is a sign of cellular stress (and also of the hyper- activation of the DNA's SRE sequence. It shows that a factor that is toxic for the body is present. The stress protein HSP 70 is considered to be a significant marker for evaluating environmental pollution. The test involves quantifying HSP 70 synthesis in the living systems studied which are exposed to electromagnetic radiation from a mobile telephone. The trial results provide objective data of a large cellular stress linked to exposure. The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) reduced HSP 70 by 73% compared to the increase seen in exposed subjects. The technology used in this protection was called TecnoAo which has been improved as the Easycall.

2. Yayoi Satou, Akiko Hara, Kouji Oono, Hiromi Kikuchi, Hiroe Matsuzaki, Tatsuto Namba and Mikio Miyata. Ocular functions loading by visual display terminal and the effect of TecnoAO. Japanese Review of Clinical Ophthalmology 11: 1634-1636 / 32-35.

3. Youbicier-Simo B.J, Messagier R., Fillion-Robin M. Review of studies validating the protective efficacy of a new technology (Tecno A.O. CMO) designed to compensate potential adverse bioeffects caused by VDU and GSM cell phone radiation. The Journal of the Portuguese Society for Radiation Protection (IRPA) , Vol I, N 8 and 9, pp 105-123, ISSN 874-7016. 2000-2001

Abstract: A total of 13 studies were initiated and coordinated by Technolab Research Center in 6 laboratories from 3 countries (France, UK, Japan). These studies were aimed at: 1) investigating potential adverse biological effects associated with exposure to non ionizing radiation emitted by two types of communication devices, video display units and cell phones; 2) assessing the efficacy of a compensation magnetic oscillating technology designed to protect from non ionizing radiation. Five types of biological systems including chicken embryos, young chickens, healthy mice, mice suffering from cancer and humans were used. A set of 10 biological parameters were assessed, including embryonic mortality, hormones, antibodies, haematological parameters, stress, mood, ocular damage, neurogenesis, micronuclei formation and intracellular calcium. Overall endpoints were affected by irradiation, in terms of increased embryonic mortality, immune depression, depletion of hormones crucial for the regulation of the immune system, changes in haematological parameters, increased stress, mood alteration, induction of ophthalmologic disorders, inhibition of the neurogenesis in brain areas associated with memory processes, induction of symptoms of cell dysfunction, apoptosis or cancer, and disruption of trans-membrane fluxes of calcium. On the other hand, the compensation magnetic oscillation technology tested allowed significant correction of altered physiological parameters, as well as improvement or disappearance of observed pathological symptoms.
4. Derek J.Clements-Croome, John Jukes. Computers and Health in the Workplace. Healthy Buildings 2000 "Exposure, Human Responses and Building Investigations”, Syr Indoor Air Vol. 1, 2000, pages 119-124
5. B. J. Youbicier-Simo, F. Boudard, C. Cabaner, and M. Bastide. Biological Effects of Continuous Exposure of Embryos and Young Chickens to Electromagnetic Fields Emitted by Video Display Units. Bioelectromagnetics: vol. 18, N° 7, 1997 pages 514-523
6. Santini R, Messagier R, Claustrat B, Fillion-Robin M, Youbicier-Simo BJ. Video screen exposure and 6-sulfatoxymelatonin urinary excretion in women. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2003 Apr;51(3):143-6.
7. M. Bastide, B. J. Youbicier-Simo, J.C.Lebecq, J.Giaimis. Toxicologic study of electromagnetic radiation emitted by television and video display screens and cellular telephones on chickens and mice. Indoor and Built Environment: vol. 10, N°5, 2001, pages 91-98
The following eminent scientists have presented various papers at different Conferences and Symposiums over recent years.
  1. Prof. Madeleine BASTIDE, Professor Emeritus in Immunology, Pharmacy Faculty – Immuniology, Parasitology Laboratory - Faculté de Pharmacie - Montpellier 1 University, France
  2. Dr. Benoît-Jules YOUBICIER-SIMO, Doctor in Neurosciences, Montpellier, France
  3. Dr. Jean-Luc MARANDE, Doctor of medicine, Specialist employment service doctor, Hospital doctor. Cochin-Tarnier Teaching Hospital Group, Paris, France
  4. Dr. Laurence BONHOMME-FAIVRE, Doctor in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hospital Pharmacist, Head of Pharmacy-Pharmacology Service - Paul Brousse teaching hospital, Paris, France, Associate professor, PARIS XI University, Paris, France

  5. Prof. Derek CLEMENTS-CROOME, University of Reading, UK

  6. Dr. Marie-Claire CAMMAERTS-TRICOT, Head of working group: Faculty of Sciences. Campus of Solbosch CP160/12, avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Bruxelles BELGIUM. Research Units / Biological Evolution and Evolutionary Biology and Ecology (EBE) Projects: Biology of Biology of Social Insects Laboratory of Evolutive Etho-Ecology, CP 160/12 DBO Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles 50, Av F. Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles. The following video summarises her study into the effects of EMFs on ants and the mitigating effects of CMO Harmony (in French)

  7. Dr. Vladimir N. BINHI, PhD. in Mathematics and Physics, Head of Electromagnetic Biophysics Laboratory, General Physics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. Quantum Physicist and Official WHO correspondent for Russia.

  8. Prof. Gerald J. HYLAND Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics. 1998-2001 - Senior Lecturer in Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Warwick University, Coventry, UK. 2001- Associate Fellow of Warwick University, Coventry, UK. 1997- Member of the Executive Board of the International Institute of Biophysics, Neuss-Holzheim, Germany. 1965- 91 - Work on biophysics with Prof. Herbert Fröhlich, F.R.S. 1985 "From Theoretical Physics to Biology : The Forward Path of Theory with Herbert Fröhlich". International biophysics expert on the interaction of exogenous non-ionising CEM (MW) with the endogenous activity of coherent microwaves in living systems. Government consultant on the potential risks of mobile telephones and their non-thermal health effects. Advisor to WHO.

  9. Prof. Marc HENRY. Teacher-researcher and Professor at the University of Strasbourg where he teaches chemistry, materials science and quantum physics.
Prof. Henry presented the following paper and analysis of CMO (in French).
Marc Henry talks about CMO : 1hr 21'52

The following summary was completely unsolicited

" Of all the protection systems that I have been able to study, only the "ComoSystems" device seems credible to me. Experiments have been made with ants, with the protection system, without the protection system, and we can see that the ants are returning to normal behavior. So these are systems that can protect your home and the people who live in it. Of course, we will have to do further studies to find out if there are no frequency bands where we could really have no effect, but in the meantime, there is enough evidence for worry about an ever increasing exposure to electromagnetic waves. The best is to protect yourself, especially if you are a pregnant woman or with children. I had the opportunity to test in the laboratory the effectiveness of CMO systems and we can see that there is an effect on water and living things. The operating principle is based on an autonomous oscillator (passive resonator) which emits an "ultra-weak" ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) magnetic field when subjected to a "pollutant" electromagnetic field. These hyper weak magnetic fields target the ion-protein complexes, which they help to maintain the integrity of by a resonance effect. The device was therefore designed with scientific knowledge published in various scientific journals and based on quantum field physics. We would like the many other companies that market EMF systems to do the same. ComoSystems is therefore a serious company that has a scientific approach to the problem and proposes original solutions, which motivates my interest and my support."
 
Biochemical Parameters showing significant improvement/normalisation:

Copied from the COMOSystems website here

Trials in man

Exhaled nitric oxide


TITLE : comments


The nitric oxide (NO) found in an individual's expired air is a marker for tissue inflammation, cell dam- age and biological stress.
This pilot study was conducted with subjects who had not used a mobile telephone prior to the trial. The trial recorded 40% greater exhaled nitric oxide levels in unprotected mobile telephone users com-
pared to the normal levels. This increase was observed after 15 days use of the mobile telephone and
is a clear sign that this equipment is incompatible with the human body.
When compensatory oscillation is used (CMO fixed to the mobile telephone) the exhaled nitric oxide levels return to normal. This demonstrates that the mobile telephone can be made biocompatible with the human body if it is fitted with a CM
.
title : graphic presentation



diagram showing nitrite oxyde reduction with cmo
text for photo

Stepanov E, 2001 - General Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia

title: summary


text illustrating results



Work performance: rapidity, vigilance, concentration

TITLE : comments


The Stroop Color Word Test is used internationally by major companies and armies. It quantifies the ability of an individual to resist the stresses caused by the interference between conflicting informa- tion. This ability requires rapidity, vigilance and concentration.

People working with CMO-equipped screens have a statistically significant 15% improvement in their stress resistance compared to when they were working with screens without CMO. This result shows that the computer screen's electromagnetic field generates a stress on the human body and reduces its work performance.

The presence of compensatory oscillation (CMO) therefore increases the work performance of each individual who has a CMO-equipped computer screen by compensating the stress effects of this elec- tromagnetic source.

title : graphic presentation


Stress resistance comparison

title: summary


summary averages


a) Electromagnetic stress symptoms caused by computer screens

TITLE : comments


The stress symptoms studied in this protocol (Building Sickness Syndrome) are usually related to er- gonomic and environmental factors and the general stress of working in company offices. It seems as if chronic exposure to the radiation from computer screens can cause the same type of neurophysical, functional and inflammatory symptoms.
This trial was conducted as a double blind (with a placebo*) crossover study (with or without CMO).
The difference between the CMO protected group and the unprotected group is that 35% of the stress symptoms observed in computer screen users have statistically disappeared when the users have compensatory oscillation (CMO). This demonstrates the presence of an electromagnetic stress in of- fices which is, on its own, responsible for 35% of the symptoms that are usually recorded and which are caused by regular exposure to radiation from computer screens.
* dummy: empty and inactive CMO

title : graphic presentation


graph enlarged



title: factor analysed


b) Electromagnetic stress symptoms caused by mobile telephones (GSM)

TITLE : comments


As in the previous trial, the stress symptoms studied in this protocol are usually related to ergonomic and environmental factors and the general stress of working in company offices. It seems as if chronic exposure to the radiation from GSM can cause the same type of neurophysical, functional and inflam- matory symptoms.
This trial was conducted as a double blind (with a placebo*) crossover study (with or without CMO). The difference between the CMO protected group and the unprotected group is that 51% of the stress symptoms observed in GSM users have statistically disappeared when the users have compensatory oscillation (CMO). This demonstrates the presence of an electromagnetic stress which is, on its own, responsible for 51% of the symptoms that are usually recorded and which are caused by regular ex- posure to radiation from GSM.
* dummy: empty and inactive CMO

title : graphic presentation


Graphic stress symptoms mobile phones


title: summary


summary of stress symptoms mobile phone
 

Attachments

  • 1555590166963.png
    1555590166963.png
    28 KB · Views: 4
More improvements:

Motivation and serenity

TITLE : comments


Low intensity electromagnetic fields (EM) emitted by viewing screens change their users' EM environ- ment, which can effect brain function and results in a changed psychological status. Professor Ca- navan, a neuropsychiatrist, evaluated the psychological and emotional status of 100 students at his university working with cathode ray computer screens using the "Mood Test".
Motivation and serenity levels* were increased by 48 (166%) and 46.8 (77%) points respectively in students protected by CMO compared to unprotected students (with a placebo**).
The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) therefore greatly improved the psychological status of people working with cathode ray computer screens by making the EM environment biocompatible.
* see the quantification methods under the graphic.
**dummy: empty and inactive CMO

title : graphic presentation


Motivation graphic


title: summary


summary motivation



title: factor analysed


Corneal trauma

TITLE : comments


Professor Miyata's (Japan) work in man and animals on the effects of electromagnetic fields on the eye and vision have shown that ocular problems in users of screens and certain pathologies are due in part to the screen's electromagnetic fields and not just the luminosity and contrast.
In practice, screen filters do not protect the eye or sight against electromagnetic radiations even though they may provide some visual comfort (flickering, brightness).
This trial showed that micro-ulcerations develop on the cornea after 4 hours of continuous video gam- ing on a television screen (subjects at 1.20 metres from the screen).
The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) reduced corneal ulcerations by 50%

Title: consequences


o Micro-ulcerations and corneal infection (keratitis)

title : graphic presentation



graphic: corneal injury


title: summary

graphic results corneal trauma

title: factor analysed


Eye's accommodation ability

TITLE : comments


Electromagnetic fields from viewing screens are partly responsible for ocular problems in people using this equipment.
In practice, screen filters do not protect the eye and sight against electromagnetic radiations because the filters do not make the viewing screens biocompatible for the user.
In this trial, using a compensatory oscillator (CMO) increased the accommodation ability of protected subjects by a factor of 10 whilst also reducing the observed ocular fatigue.

Title: consequences


o Ocular fatigue
o Poor accommodation ability

title : graphic presentation


graphic: eye accomodation ability

Miyata, 1999 – Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan

title: summary


graphic: eye accomodation summary
 
Animal research (which is particularly impressive) - showing normalisation in melatonin, stress hormones, reduction in intracellular calcium (:scared:):

Melatonin production

Melatonin is a hormone that regulates sleep and stimulates the immune system. It has anti-radical and anti-tumour properties. This hormone is known to be electromagnetic sensitive.
The virtual cessation of Melatonin production under the influence of an electromagnetic field shows the inability of exposed animals to manage their electromagnetic stress. The resulting oxidative stress is due to a reduced anti-oxidant activity or an increase in the number of free radicals. It can cause several types of damage to cells, including cell death.
The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) returned Melatonin levels to normal.

Title: consequences


o Sleeping problems
o Tiredness, depression
o Accelerated oxidative stress
o Premature ageing
o Increased epileptic crises
o Acceleration of pre-existing tumoral processes


Title: melatonin production

Bastide M, 1997 - Youbicier-Simo B-J, 2001 – Montpellier University, France


Title: melatonin production graphi


ACTH release from pituitary cells

ACTH (adreno-cortico-tropic hormone) is a stress hormone. It is secreted by the anterior hypophysis (anterior pituitary gland) in response to information received by the central nervous system. Its role is to stimulate the secretion of other hormones, especially cortisol (see later).
Abnormal variations in blood ACTH and glucocorticoid (Corticosterone, Cortisol) levels are sympto- matic of a state of stress (ACTH = stress marker).
A 400% increase in ACTH levels in animals in an electromagnetic field is an unequivocal observation of considerable stress provoked in the body by the radiation ("electromagnetic stress").
The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) returned levels to normal of this hormone which is an essential indicator of the hormono-immune system regulation.

Title: consequences


Nervous and muscular systems:
o Psychic instability, irritability
o Tendency for depression
o Muscle weakness, contractures

Immune system:
o Reduced defences against bacteria, virus, parasites, allergies
o Aggravation of inflammatory diseases

Title: production of ACTH


Title: summary ACTH


Cortisol production in the adrenal glands

Cortisol is an adrenal (above the kidneys) hormone that regulates the immune system. Its production is stimulated by the hypophysis (pituitary gland), a gland in the brain that is the control centre for hormones and immunity which are themselves interrelated.
Its production is controlled by ACTH and varies throughout the day. Its role is to regulate sugar, lipid, protein, ion and water metabolism to limit any sudden changes in the body's physiological balance. It is involved in stress management and inflammatory processes.
This trial showed a 57% reduction in Cortisol production in mice exposed to radiation from a cathode ray computer screen. The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) returned levels to almost normal (reduction limited to only 8%).

Title: consequences


o Metabolic changes (sugars, fats, proteins)
o Inflammations
o Changed ion metabolism

Title: cortisol production


Title: summary cortisol



Corticosterone production in the adrenal glands

Corticosterone is an adrenal (above the kidneys) hormone that regulates the immune system. Its pro- duction is stimulated by the hypophysis (pituitary gland), a gland in the brain that is the control centre for hormones and immunity which are themselves interrelated.
This trial showed a 50% reduction in Cortocosterone production in animals exposed to radiation from a cathode ray computer screen or a television.
The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) returned levels to normal


o Deregulation of the immune system, reduction in bacterial, viral, defences, etc.
o Deregulation of the nervous and muscular systems: psychic instability, cramps, etc.


Title: corticostérone production

Bastide M, 1997 - Youbicier-Simo B-J ,2001 – Montpellier University, France

Title: corticosterone summary



Calcium concentration in hypophyseal cells

Calcium (Ca++) plays an essential role in all cellular exchanges, especially in nervous tissue. It is an important mediator ("second messenger") in most cellular biochemical reactions. The hypophysis (brain gland) is a hormone control centre. Calcium and ACTH (see page 17) are essential components in the regulation of the hormono-immune systems.
Stress observed in subjects exposed to radiation from a mobile telephone provokes a strong perturba- tion of intracellular calcium that forces the body to use its re-balancing mechanisms. This provokes great cellular stress and results in the displacement of other ionic charges (Magnesium Mg++) that are critical for the metabolism. The presence of a compensatory oscillator (CMO) returned calcium levels to normal.

Title: consequences


o Changes to the activity of cellular enzymes activity (including transduction of signals)
o Displacement of ionic charges (cellular stress)
o Changed metabolism, spasmophilia
o Hormonal deregulations (thyroid, adrenal, ovaries...)

Title: calcium concentration intracellular


Title: calcium concentration summary

More of the supporting research can be found here
 
Thank you, Keyhole! This technology is looking very interesting. I wish I knew French to watch 2h video, but from other information available it seems that this company can really be sincere in its claims. No magic, just simple physics and application of water memory property (which unfortunately can't be verified using physics schoolbook, you need an expert here).
 
  • Like
Reactions: SMM
Thank you, Keyhole! This technology is looking very interesting. I wish I knew French to watch 2h video, but from other information available it seems that this company can really be sincere in its claims. No magic, just simple physics and application of water memory property (which unfortunately can't be verified using physics schoolbook, you need an expert here).
I have purchased a personal device and am going to track my heart rate variability to see if there are any changes. Who knows what the experiment will show...
 
All this info sounds incredible if it works as described to normalize VGCC sensitivity. I hope your trial is a successful one. :-)
Whether it will affect HRV or not is unknown, so it is not necessarily going to be "diagnostic". However, I do suspect it could have an effect due to EMF's impact on the autonomic system.

The information really does seem too good to be true, because those research studies show insanely good results. But then again, the guys who created this are all academics with good credentials in the realm of engineering and physics (from what I can see, anyway), and who are willing to be associated with the technology. Now I know that this does not automatically prove validity, but it seems that some of the experts vouch for the technology... so we will see.
 
FWIW: I receive a weekly letter from the EMG Guy (Nick Pineault) and in the last one, we could read:

In the last year alone, I’ve received emails from inventors, doctors, and people who just want to protect themselves against EMFs. Each one claimed that they had found a “magic” solution which nullifies the effects of EMFs on the human body.

Some of these solutions were “chips” or other gizmos that you stick to your phone.

Some others are pendants that you wear around the neck, and that are said to repel EMFs by strengthening the “human biofield”.

I’ve spent countless hours contacting these companies and having them share their research with me -- the “definitive proof” that their device is protecting the user against the harmful effects of EMFs.

And so far, I have chosen to endorse NONE of them. Out of a list of 40+.

Why? To make a long story short:

1) I have seen ZERO evidence that these “EMF-harmonizing” devices are protective against EMFs.

Don’t get me wrong. Several companies who contacted me did test their devices, and people feel better wearing them.

I can say without a shadow of a doubt that some of these devices help to reduce the symptoms (not the biological effects) related to EMF exposure.

But the question that’s always in the back of my mind is… are we merely reducing the symptoms, feeling better when talking on a cell phone or being exposed to a cell tower… while the damage is still happening on a cellular level?

So far, no company has been able to show me testing which would show a reduction of oxidative stress in cells, no loss of mitochondrial function, a reduction in antioxidant loss, a reduction in DNA damage… nothing of substance.

2) The claims made by a lot (if not most) companies are LUDICROUS.

I have seen it all…

  • “Reduces EMF radiation by 99%”
  • “Protects you against EMFs”
  • “Makes your cell phone safe again”

These statements are untrue, unscientific, and might prove to be downright dangerous (if not criminal) in the near future.

I find it extremely concerning that people feel “protected” by devices that might just be providing them a reduction in symptoms. It’s like relying on Tylenol to ease your pain and hide the fact that you need knee surgery. (Which people are doing all the time, but you get the point.)

*****Summary of what I’m saying here and my current opinion on EMF-harmonizing gizmos, to be perfectly clear*****

  • These EMF-harmonizing devices have been shown to reduce the SYMPTOMS of EMF exposure.
  • We do not know if these devices are really protective against EMFs.
  • You should never rely on these devices to protect yourself against EMFs, and call it a day. Eliminating sources of EMFs and creating distance is key.
  • Using these devices as a temporary tool to help you feel better when you’re exposed to inevitable sources of EMFs (in public places, at work, at school, while traveling) is probably a good idea, as long as you understand that it’s no magic bullet.

When it comes to your cell phone, make sure to reduce your overall use and keep it on Airplane Mode (or turned off) as often as you can. Mine is pretty much always on Airplane Mode.

Create distance from your cell phone if you use it -- staying 2 feet away from it at all times if you can help it. Use an “Airtube” headset or speakerphone if you’re not in a public place. (Be respectful of other people -- using speakerphone on the subway train is so annoying...)

And when you carry your phone, Airplane Mode is also the way to go.

If you NEED to use your phone while walking or keep it on because you need your boss/kids/other people to reach you 24/7, then also make sure that you keep your phone in a Safe Sleeve case.

You put your phone in there, and it shields a good part of the EMFs that would otherwise be blasted towards your body.

It’s 3rd-party tested. It works. If I need to take a call on my phone and put my phone in my back pocket, I’m way better off using this case VS not using any case.

Also -- these cases are very affordable compared to competitors, and look super sleek.

I wish there was a chip that could magically make your cell phone safe again. Still looking for it.
 
Thanks Keyhole!, if it is indeed something that works, it could be very useful, especially with the 5G stuff being implemented as we speak! I'll be very interested to see how you go with the personal device.
 
@Gandalf, this guy writes that he saw zero evidence of effectiveness of such devices, but CMO has a lot of evidence. Of course, we can't tell if this information wasn't forged, but they look credible enough to give it a try.
 
@Gandalf, this guy writes that he saw zero evidence of effectiveness of such devices, but CMO has a lot of evidence. Of course, we can't tell if this information wasn't forged, but they look credible enough to give it a try.

Indeed @aimarok and I have just send an email to the guy. By the way, this guy Nick Pineault and the founder of the other device Danielle Beauchamp both of them live in Montreal, Québec. So, there is a good probability they know each other and so far, after reading the book of Nick Pineault, as I related in another thread, I improved my quality of sleeping in using the ENV RD-10 device which allows to find the source of EMF and bad electricity.
 
FWIW: I receive a weekly letter from the EMG Guy (Nick Pineault) and in the last one, we could read:
Yep, this is exactly my thoughts on the whole 'EMF Protection' thing. Hence why I originally wrote this CMO thing off.

But if those studies are genuine, then this CMO thing is doing something objective. I am not concerned with how people feel, but rather a reduction in the objective biomarkers. Subjective feeling could be placebo, but it is less likely that 24hr melatonin is going to be increased via placebo effect in lab animals :lol:.

Likewise, there is peer-reviewed research in support of this one. And even though peer-review doesn't count for much these days, it seems to have more support than those other devices.

But it is also possible that Pinault is aware, and has declined to support this CMO for good reason.
 
Back
Top Bottom