I second this. It is a lot to parse through, but a general vibe from the C's about what it means might mean a lot.Rhythmik said:
There's no reason to believe this is an anonymous Trump insider. The internet is almost entirely comprised of subjective nonsense.Rhythmik said:
I'm trying to find the board Q is referring to but I can't seem to find it. Many of these FAQs and Wikis and such need to be updated. There's a research board here:Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/08/18 (Mon) 22:39:35 No.5
Future dumps here.
Interaction to continue on dedicated /research/ board.
Suggest new board created.
Current BO’s claiming private comms and self promoting.
Patriots point - we will follow.
Yes it is hard to tell without really looking closely, that's why some of us who've been watching it think it rises to the level of being worth asking the C's about. It seems to be inspiring people on the positive side at any rate, but it's also possible it could be leading them off toward a negative dead-end. I've been watching it for less than a month and I confess I have not read every single Q post going back to the beginning. I pledge to come back to this thread with more info when I have more time, but right now I'm going to listen to Behind the Headlines :D .Pashalis said:Is there any hard data we could check out that proofs the claim that „they predicted“ things only a insider could know? Just because many "respectable" people from the so called „truth movement“ think it is „the real deal“, doesn’t mean it is true. Scrolled a bit thorough Q latest posts and couldn’t see anything that any other ordinary person on the web couldn't write as well.