Thanks everybody for your kindness and interest.
In my case with that ex-GF it was not planned as usual, and nobody ever thought much of anything in the way of consequences also as usual. After the initial shock I liked the idea of having a child despite our material situation - she was from outside and had come to study the language at Uni, I was working part-time besides Uni. It was her decision based on her assessment of our situation, so despite my opposition she had the saner arguments and I ended paying a months income to solve our problem despite my doubts. It has been following me on and off for many years. I've never spoken about it with anybody - as a man one is expected to "suck it up" (in Americanese) and be happy to have solved a problem (and everything else is sissy talk).
lwu02eb said:
Having thought about this a little more it also seems to me that it would be much more useful to light a candle or spare a though for all the tens of millions, if not billions, of children worldwide who are either starving, mentally or physically diseased or disabled, traumatised or abused and degraded by their families and the world at large. I'm sure this process would include self-reflection for many on this forum. There are so many, and have been so many suffering children, that it defies comprehension and yet nothing changes. Humanity continues on with the same mechanic behaviour.
It strikes me as oddish that anybody would think about the usefulness of remembering ones dead or mourning them. For the record, back in 2003 when the shrub first attacked Iraq I placed a light before the Iraqi embassy because I suspected what would befall those people. It was never an issue of usefulness to me and in fact it was useless because it didn't help to save even one wounded, dead or displaced from what befell them. In case there might arise doubt I am in no way disqualifying your decision.
Laura]I have read in a few esoteric sources that the soul doesn't actually "seat" fully until between 6 and 9 years old.[/quote]
and
[quote author=Laura said:
Session October 28, 1994
...
Q: (L) Bill Baldwin says abortions lead to serious spiritual attachment situations. Is this true?
A: Semi-accurate.
...
Does what Gertrudes said have anything to do with ones first lucid memory? If so, I know somebody who stated that he remembered the marriage ceremony of his parents from inside his mothers womb what embarrassed them endlessly. In my case, I was about 3 years and it was Christmas - I have some blurry memories form before on that same day and there was a point where it was like turning on the TV and everything became crisp and bathed in the beautiful evening light. Next, supposing that I understand this even remotely, how are spiritual attachments supposed to arise out of abortion if the soul "seats" itself a while after conception/birth? How would I find out if I have such an attachment?
[quote author=Laura]Obviously,
abortion is not an optimal solution, a better one is to not get pregnant if you are not ready to and the conditions are not best for the incoming ...[/quote]
Certainly. Over the years I've heard of some cases around me, and from those few cases it looks like this happens lots in cases of first conception. When I went to that clinic with my then-GF most of the women waiting were actually teens, some of them really young. I've heard that first children are more vital than the ones following so this would mean that abortions are affecting the fitness of the species in the negative.
And now I'll speculate a bit. I've long time wondered about the native Americans producing almost no psychopathic offspring. Some time ago I read a piece (sorry, don't remember where) about an old shaman lamenting that when his people were few they (the shamans) knew them all and could take care about them, but when the people became more they eventually lost the view over some and then the people started becoming "corrupt" or something to that effect. Many animal species apparently know to identify and either kill or abandon their weaklings (or they fall prey to predators or the elements) so it is a wonder why humans don't know that (apparently). A relevant and important concept which comes from the general culture of American natives is the "Kunlangeta" (look it up) what hints to those Eskimos being aware enough of the phenomenon to give it a name, what is not really the case in general culture in western society. If we combine all these factoids it should be possible to suspect that the natives - either their shamans or councils of elder women - knew to identify the deviants and rigorously culled them before they became a problem, and that would explain why there are to this day few psychopaths coming from those people. This would have affected the fitness of the species (or group) in the positive. This kind of knowledge probably has been lost from other cultures, perhaps it survives among the few remaining natives.