Can you summarize and point to those doubts in the video? Started to watch it and wasn't impressed at all. On the contrary, I was pretty annoyed by the "reasoning" presented there as "proof" of the theory. Comes across to me as a big load of make believe and pattern recognition run amok, with no effort involved to cite actual sources or any kind of rational argument for the ideas presented there.With some parts of this video you have doubts even of The same Doubt.
That wasn't what I said nor what I thought and isn't the point I was making either. Having said that, yes, in official history as well as in unofficial history, there are rather well-established facts, which to ignore and substitute by wild fantasies is rather dangerous. I was merely trying to say that there are specific principles in science, critical thinking and investigation that should be applied to any and all informations, especially if they claim something so grand and "conspiratorial". When a source doesn't provide any coherent nor rational reasoning for the line of idea it is presenting, it is rather dangerous to start with the conviction that there is or might be something to it, rather than approaching it from the other side, namely a very critical outlook on it. When there is nothing even remotely concrete to go by, and worse, a lot of make believe statements that frankly seem to contradict reality/history, it might be a good idea to approach it for what it is, with the information at hand right now: not more than a fairy tale disguised as probable fact.So, you think that OFFICIAL HISTORY are pure truths that are on firm ground?.
---Not me, Pashalis.
That sentence in itself doesn't say anything unfortunately. The sentence is rather similar to new age word salad, that you can interpret it any way you want as long as there is no concrete reasoning and context behind it, that anyone can follow reasonably by investigation.1---"Aether, the water that connects everything electromagnetically.
The pseudoscience calls Aether as "dark energy" and "dark matter".
The question here is whether this is equivalent to what the Cs have said about the gravity that unites everything, or perhaps it is the same concept but with a different name.
Well, that is another grand statement, that is not backed up by any facts anywhere I could see in the video. The professor was mostly right as far as I can see, that doesn't mean however that for the region to be climatically optimal you need any kind of "Aether harnessed artificially by constructions".2---"All cities located at strategic points on earth along rivers, seas and oceans were star fortress and had electromagnetics energy extracted from the Aether".
This point reminded me of what the Economics teacher at the university told us about the location of the big cities and their progress; It was a subject that was taught among others obligatorily.
The professor said that for a city to begin its progress, it had to have an adequate climate, that is, a temperate climate, neither too hot nor too cold, or it had to be near a water source, be it a river or a seaport.
Maybe some do not agree with these conditions for progress.
Another rather bold statement backed up by nothing even remotely concrete that I could see there. So rather than approaching it from "it might be true" I would approach this from "this might be nonsense".3---"The energy was captured through towers and obeliscs and stored in the red and white stripped power station of the high civilization called Tartary. They always had a fountain with water near them".
I could doubt this but it may be true.
Well, the fact in itself that many cultures used similar building stiles for their buildings shouldn't neccecarly imply that there is a grand conspiracy or something hidden there. You would need to first make a thorough investigation into the history of every culture that did that and explore the reasons and times they lived in before even attempting to presume something like this.4---I had been in doubt if the construction of so many minarets in buildings, monuments and churches all over Asia and also in Europe are just ornaments or something else, now I understand that they could have another important function.
You are mixing apples with oranges here. As I understand, the idea in the video is that there was a more or less global "Tatar civilization that had an elaborate energy grid system" merely 100 -200 years ago. The hypothetical Atlantian civilization is supposed to have lived at least 11.600 years ago (and before that point in time) and was at that point maybe wiped of the face of the earth by a global cataclysm. Some might have survived however and transmitted some of the remaining knowledge to next generations. That some of the Atlantian knowledge might have survived in one form or the other till today or 100-200 years ago however (in some circles and probably distorted quite a bit) might not be such an unlikely scenario. But implying, that the Atlantic Civilization from back then survived globally till 100-200 years, right in the face of everyone (if that is the idea), in a coherent and big global way, is a rather silly idea, unless we can see any hard data on that.5---"And the knowledge and History of the tartar aryan civilization was burned out and erased of the memory of many".
This may refer to the Tartary region as part of the Atlantean civilization.
When I commented before I only watched a part and felt very uneasy with the narration during this part. your title "See, Read and Think" looks there is some thing to it and the picture ( big feet) of the video was attractive too. Now, I finally watched totally, it felt like a slog to watch this video. Video is full of picture of castles, building, structures temples/churches/mosques/towers with a dome and big poles. Watching around 10 attractive pictures per minute while catching up the written text ( As they claim, they took from WikiMedia) is little bit overwhelming. The impression this video gives are:Pashalis and Seek10:
I do not think that all the theory of The Great Tartary is correct, that would be a great ingenuity, I could not explain myself well, but any theory can be used to analyze its elements and clarify doubts, draw conclusions and it can be a challenge that teaches us something. which is what we are doing now.