Smallwood said:
To me this website looks like a bunch of pseudointellectuals trying to make a name for themselves in the conspiracy-theory world.
I like that they knew they had to post something on 9/11 to have any shred of hope of street-cred, and so they throw down this "9/11 Revisited" piece attempting to spin it away with completely lame disinformed reasonings. Sparing anybody the need to waste their time with the site, here's the nucleus of their dispelling any need to waste time investigating the implications of 9/11. (I think whoever wrote this stuff deserves some credit for interweaving logical operands with ad hominem counter-arguments to formulate something comprehensible, but it reads like Zionists blaming the stooge meanwhile propping up the old story line).
[quote author="_http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/911-Revisited(1871863).htm"]
9/11 - What Really Happened?
The "neocon" agenda of America and its support for Zionism is well known, but that doesn't mean that the American government was behind 9/11.
In fact the truth of 9/11 could not be simpler.
Osama bin Laden did it and Bush and company were hoping he would do something of that nature to give them a pretext to invade oil-rich Iraq, give regional support to Israel, and try to start converting Islamic countries to puppet capitalist democracies under America's control, thus extending the OWO's power to regions of the world not yet fully under its heel.
The key to the whole controversy is the collapse of the Twin Towers and Tower 7.
The conspiracy theorists say that the hijacked planes couldn't possibly have brought the towers down, therefore they must have been expertly demolished. Therefore it was an inside job and therefore the American government was responsible.
But the collapse of the towers is completely irrelevant. America would have relied on the fact that four airplanes were hijacked and used in suicide operations as sufficient pretext for their subsequent foreign policy (military) response.
Whether the twin towers fell down or not would not have made the slightest difference and therefore could not have been part of any conspiracy.
To repeat, if everything had happened exactly as it did, except the Twin Towers and Tower 7 did not come down, the American response would not have been one iota different. The hijacked planes slamming into highly symbolic American buildings and killing American citizens was the only excuse the American government needed to carry out its policy. In other words, the collapse of the Twin Towers and Tower 7 - the so-called smoking gun - is completely irrelevant in terms of the government's alleged conspiracy. Since the smoking gun is irrelevant, it's crazy to conclude that it furnishes certain proof of government involvement.
Why would the government be so dumb as to carry out needless and dangerous demolitions when it already had the excuse it needed for a war? Any American officials allegedly sitting in a room planning a false flag attack would never have said, "Right, it's not good enough simply to hijack planes and crash them into buildings, horrifically killing hundreds of people; we also need to demolish the Twin Towers, and, hey, why not demolish Tower 7 and Tower 5 while we're at it, even though nothing is actually going to hit them and it will look as suspicious as hell?"
It's INSANE.
The collapse of the Twin Towers and Tower 7 is the biggest red herring in history.
The buildings collapsed for reasons that are now quite well understood in engineering terms. No demolitions took place.
American policy would have to have been dependent on the collapse of the Twin Towers for a conspiracy theory to have any credibility i.e.
it is being asserted by the "Truth Movement" that America would not have responded as it did if the Towers did not fall. Clearly, this is entirely false - whether the Towers fell or not was neither here nor there in terms of providing a pretext for a war. Hence there was no government conspiracy.
American support for Israel is a disgrace, and the invasion of Iraq was a disgrace, but that doesn't mean that the American government committed 9/11. The fact that 9/11 suited their agenda doesn't make them guilty.
All thinking people should analyze the facts rationally. Any intelligent person should be able to detect a myriad of holes in the 9/11 conspiracy theory.
9/11 was, in truth, an unsophisticated, low-tech attack by 19 Muslim suicide bombers. Bin Laden wanted to strike back against America and he succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. Airplanes had never been used as suicide weapons before, so America was taken by surprise. What's so hard to grasp about that?
[/quote]
The article goes on trying to debunk 9/11 truthers with a "[...] debate between a member of the illuminati and an expert conspiracy theorist.", in which they wildly throw conjecture and avoid detailed facts now well exposed around the internet about 9/11 smoke and mirrors conflicting with science.
I think the site may be half worth visiting with its overt demonstration of compromising 9/11 facts, because they tackle some core themes of concealed truths, so with wide eyes open shards of truth may appear, but you have to look hard through a lot of smoke and mirrors to get at any bright reflections.
