Tritium clues

Pierrrr

The Force is Strong With This One
Deuterium and Tritium
including a close look
at proton-proton reaction

by Miles Mathis
First published September 11, 2013
_http://milesmathis.com/deut.pdf
 
Could you maybe give us a clue as to why you posted the above and share your thoughts on it? Maybe you could write a synopsis of the material and why you think folk should invest the time to go and read it?
 
Alada said:
Could you maybe give us a clue as to why you posted the above and share your thoughts on it? Maybe you could write a synopsis of the material and why you think folk should invest the time to go and read it?

I skimmed this one and looked at the titles of the other physics papers, and can't really say too much about how accurate they are, not delving much into that subject myself. I had a look through some of the author's updates / thought pieces and they're are quite good, with a range of topics, such as 911, and art: http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html

What I read was worth a look for me. The way Pierrrr introduced this guy was odd though.

I'd be interested to know more about him, why you posted this paper too and what's the relevance of giving this "clue", Pierrr?
 
alkhemst said:
Alada said:
Could you maybe give us a clue as to why you posted the above [..] and why you think folk should invest the time to go and read it?
[..] why you posted this paper too and what's the relevance of giving this "clue", Pierrr?

Ever feel as if you are dancing around in circles?

Tritium

But what does it emanate from?
Look for clue!
Pay attention to the words.
 
Pierrrr said:
alkhemst said:
Alada said:
Could you maybe give us a clue as to why you posted the above [..] and why you think folk should invest the time to go and read it?
[..] why you posted this paper too and what's the relevance of giving this "clue", Pierrr?

Ever feel as if you are dancing around in circles?

Tritium

But what does it emanate from?
Look for clue!
Pay attention to the words.

Why be so cryptic? Just say what it is you think is relevant about what you posted so others can decide if they want to put in the time to check it out. It's basic external consideration.
 
Pierrrr,
Playing the mysterious sage does not lead anywhere. Clarifying what you want to say will shows more respect for those who read you, and also some respect to yourself in that matter.
 
mkrnhr said:
Pierrrr,
Playing the mysterious sage does not lead anywhere. Clarifying what you want to say will shows more respect for those who read you, and also some respect to yourself in that matter.

If you review you learn. Knowledge protects.

Session November 26, 1998
 
As far as I know, Miles W. Mathis is the pet theorist/scientist of a SOTT reader/commenter going by the name pavlink.

Here's an example: http://www.sott.net/article/256065-Arizona-professor-challenges-popular-dark-energy-theory

So maybe Pierrrr is the same person under a different 'handl' so to speak?

My two cents. :P
 
Palinurus said:
under a different 'handl'

:D

Or here? http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,6215.msg42708.html#msg42708

Accidentally (or not) I was reminded of the Handl thread and the whole tritium business during the weekend
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,27406.90.html Post 107f.
I reread the 28. November 1998 session and there is quite a lot of good stuff in it - in a way the whole year of 98 is kind of loaded ...

This thread also ties into it esp. from Post 63
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31376.msg422406.html#msg422406

So, I 'm interested :cool2:
As to the paper, well: :umm:

M.T.
 
Pierrrr said:
If you review you learn. Knowledge protects.

Indeed, so it would behoove you to review ‘external consideration’ and ‘self-importance’.

An explanation for others as why they should invest any time and energy following the link provided is a simple courtesy, good manners and considerate of other forum users.

When we find that we cannot explain something simply to someone else, then it usually means that we have not properly understood it ourselves (or there is nothing there to understand). In trying to convey knowledge to others we can perhaps learn something new ourselves, both about the material at hand and ourselves, it’s an example of serving self through serving others.
 
Alada said:
Pierrrr said:
If you review you learn. Knowledge protects.

[..]
When we find that we cannot explain something simply to someone else, then it usually means that we have not properly understood it ourselves (or there is nothing there to understand). In trying to convey knowledge to others we can perhaps learn something new ourselves, both about the material at hand and ourselves, it’s an example of serving self through serving others.

As above, so below.

Pieces of the puzzle start clicking together.

Once you contemplate the triple star system we are living in.
The Sun, the Mother star and the little brother.

Much like the tritium atom.

The triplicative connecting clue profile.
 
Pierrrr said:
Alada said:
Pierrrr said:
If you review you learn. Knowledge protects.

[..]
When we find that we cannot explain something simply to someone else, then it usually means that we have not properly understood it ourselves (or there is nothing there to understand). In trying to convey knowledge to others we can perhaps learn something new ourselves, both about the material at hand and ourselves, it’s an example of serving self through serving others.

As above, so below.

Pieces of the puzzle start clicking together.

Once you contemplate the triple star system we are living in.
The Sun, the Mother star and the little brother.

Much like the tritium atom.

The triplicative connecting clue profile.

I think you mean noise.
 
Back
Top Bottom