Uk - Horrific Stabbing & other events

Meanwhile, a petition (with no legal teeth unfortunately) to have another election in the UK has reached 2.6 million signatures in about 2 days.
On that note, currently on X, tweets are doing round that basically say that if you sign the petition you can get arrested.
Apparently, Starmer is threatening that he will give a "respect order" to everyone who signs the petition. But I cannot back up the claims from the woman in the video, I can´t find anywhere where he said that. So FWIW....

Listen to this apparently we can get arrested for anti-social behaviour and if we keep signing a petition against labour
 
On that note, currently on X, tweets are doing round that basically say that if you sign the petition you can get arrested.
Apparently, Starmer is threatening that he will give a "respect order" to everyone who signs the petition. But I cannot back up the claims from the woman in the video, I can´t find anywhere where he said that. So FWIW....


They can't arrest everyone 🥴...
 
As a northerner I agree with this. Seems to me that the vast majority of Brits haven’t got a clue about anything. Most aren’t interested, and those who are follow the msm.

I kind of hoped things would be different up north where significantly more people voted in favour of Brexit than in London. I will say though that as a foreigner who's lived here for over 15 years I'm still quite stunned by the level of obedience towards any sort of authority and rules in the U.K.

This also made me think of the exchange in the recent session:

(PopHistorian) Aside from Trump's survival of the assassination attempt, were any other decisions made by the quorum that did have an important effect upon the balance on earth? Can you give us any clues?

A: We cannot reveal the decisions of the council in any detail other than to say that the suffering that leads to knowledge might be ameliorated somewhat.

Q: (L) Hmm... Well, I can't think of a follow up for that. Can anybody else?

(Joe) Why would it be ameliorated?

A: More are awakening.

Were the C's referring to ameliorated suffering in the U.S.? Or globally? If it cannot be said that more are awakening in the U.K., why would Brits, and many other Europeans for that matter, not have to go through the kind of suffering that would help facilitate their awakening?
 
Last edited:
As a northerner I agree with this. Seems to me that the vast majority of Brits haven’t got a clue about anything. Most aren’t interested, and those who are follow the msm.
Up north myself many don't really grok the situation but the rural folk do have a feeling for what's going on. The farmers have support but many in the UK still need to wake up and quickly at that. As they say it has to get way worse for others to wake up. I think things are speeding during due to two tiers leadership.
 

British lawmakers vote in favour of strict anti-smoking rules​

By Catarina Demony
November 27, 2024 8:42 AM GMT Updated 8 hours ago
  • Vote was 415-47
  • Vape advertising would be banned if bill becomes law
  • Vapes would not be sold in vending machines
LONDON, Nov 26 (Reuters) - British lawmakers voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday in favour of plans to introduce some of the world's strictest anti-smoking rules, giving the green light for the bill to progress to the next parliamentary stage.
The Tobacco and Vapes Bill aims to make vapes less appealing and would ensure anyone aged 15 this year, or younger would be banned from ever buying cigarettes.
After a lengthy debate in the parliament's House of Commons, a total of 415 lawmakers voted in favour of the bill while 47 voted against it.

It would ban vape advertising and the sale of vapes in vending machines, as well as restricting vape packaging and flavours that overtly appeal to children and young people, such as bubble gum and cotton candy.
"The number of children vaping is growing at an alarming rate and without urgent intervention, we're going to have a generation of children with long-term addiction," Labour health secretary Wes Streeting said.

The previous Conservative government announced similar measures to create the first smoke-free generation. However, those plans failed to become law before the general election in the summer.
"Whatever our views on this bill are, it is a bold legislation of good intention," Caroline Johnson, the Conservative shadow minister for health, told parliament ahead of the vote. "It's not clear whether it will work but we have to all hope that it does."

There was some criticism of the bill, including concerns around its impact on civil liberties.

Conservative lawmaker Robert Jenrick said on X that he voted against it, adding: "Educate more, ban less. Say no to the nanny state."
The bill will now go to the committee stage ahead of the third reading in the House of Commons. It will then move to the House of Lords before receiving the "Royal Assent" - a formality that does not involve further debate.

Subject to consultation, the new bill would give the government powers to extend the indoor smoking ban to specific outdoor spaces, such as children's playgrounds and outside schools and hospitals. Britain banned smoking in almost all enclosed public spaces, including bars and workplaces, in 2007.
The government previously abandoned plans for a ban on smoking outside pubs and cafes after concerns were raised about the impact on the hospitality industry.
The bill would introduce a licensing scheme for retailers to sell tobacco, vape and nicotine products, and fines of 200 pounds ($251.04) to retailers found to be selling these products to people underage.
Expanding the use of standardised packaging to all tobacco products will also be explored.
"Tobacco still causes around 160 cancer cases every day in the UK," [and the clot shot?] said Ian Walker, executive director of policy at Cancer Research UK. "But with strong political will and bold action, these staggering numbers can be turned around."
($1 = 0.7967 pounds)
 
Maybe it's a karmic lesson for its past deeds, but it appears the UK is destined to go down the drain, figuratively and literally, considering all the pockets of flooding that are happening more often. I doubt there will be some sort of 'Trump effect' effect here, and it will likely have to get much much worse before anything gives.

The way they baited the general population into protests over an illegal murdering native children, then switched to the (allegedly) fake story of said illegal being a Welsh citizen gave the brain-dead far left in this country a reason to unite and cheer on the agenda being played out now. It seemed like a 4D chess move and they don't want to give up an inch of control.

Anyways these are just my thoughts, and for others who are in less populated areas I'm sure it's better, but I am done with this wet cold and morbid island, and will start putting things in place to move somewhere warmer and less restrictive over the coming years.
 
This is just for farmers. So far they have been exempt from inheritance tax but Starmer wants to change that, effectively putting smaller family run farms out of business and putting the control over food supply in the hands of large farms.

This is only loosely related to the topic of this thread, but very much related to the quoted bit. I noticed that 'Lurpak' was trending in the UK on X, so I decided to check why. Turns out the producer, a Dutch diary manufacturer Arla, has announced they will be using an additive in cow feed to reduce methane emissions. The additive, Bovaer, contains such ingredients as silicon dioxide, or propylene glycol, and apparently is linked to Bill Gates, and the WEF.

X users hit the keyboards and have been calling for a boycott of Arla's products.

Trending tweets on X: x.com

The MSM has posted articles reassuring consumers that the additive is "completely safe" and the conspiracies are nonsense:


But it looks like buyers aren't as trusting as they were of similar "safe and effective" assurances back in 2020.

I guess this is a good example of what happens when big corporations get into the space of food production. And with the push to kill of smaller family owned farms soon there may not be too many alternatives left.


Despite the backlash, Arla remains committed to its sustainability goals, with a target to reduce CO2 emissions by 30% by 2030. The company argues that Bovaer could play a key role in helping meet these objectives. However, as public criticism intensifies, Arla may find its involvement in the trial undermining its reputation among environmentally-conscious consumers.

I guess this is where it gets tricky: that environmental agenda is at odds with adding chemicals to the food supply. Looks like environmentalists aren't as concerned about cow farts as they are about the food on their plate.
 
Although I agree the general population of the UK still rely too much on MSM for information, I do feel there’s an undercurrent of anger building towards the government. The hostility towards Starmer / government is rapidly growing and could become a real threat to the elite’s.
Maybe a false flag in UK to blame on Russia is the ticket to channel that anger at an external enemy is what these psycho's might do. When all else fails send them to war.
 
My brief take on the Keir Starmer "admission" that the UK has been running an "open-borders experiment." An explosive revelation? Nowhere near what it should be if the whole truth were told.

- This is a limited hangout (admitting 1 million people came 2022-2023), no admission of the false total population number.
- This is divisive politically (blames the Right for not fixing economy, doesn't address massive public-relations campaign to encourage acceptance of multiculturalism).
- Sounds possibly desperate to shore up declining support for the Left and save his own job.
- Immigration on this scale can't have been by design and been kept a secret because massive immigration of persons (not adequately skilled or educated for the UK economy) requires accommodation from gov't at all levels.
- He is effectively not admitting that Left and Right are both under sway of globalists. Blames Brexit.
- No admission that immigrants have received preferential treatment (even allowing into the country known terrorists).
- "Plan to reduce immigration" means, actually, that immigration will continue and immigrant population will continue to grow. Same deception as "we've slowed (or cut) the rate of inflation") means that inflation continues. He boasts about increased refusals and returns, which is the same deception - it does not that immigration is stopping or that national recovery is possible.
 
Last edited:
Muhammad replaced Noah as the most popular name for baby boys in England and Wales in 2023.


Muhammad has overtaken Noah as the top baby name for boys in 2023, new data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) have revealed.

Noah came in second with Oliver third. Muhammad was the second most popular boys’ name in 2022 and has been in the top 10 since 2016.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom