Ellipse said:
I put it their because this is on my mind and I need to know what you think about the idea.
Simply, I think a lot of people would be more STO if they only have concrete consciousness of the STO/STS duality. Putting the word STO on a behavior change all, you act with more consciousness, but to do that, you must first find the information about what is STO.
If we join our forces we can certainly create a buzz, a sort of communication campaign, and so a movement. Is it realistic ?
My thinking is that the purpose of these sites is not to convince and persuade others into becoming STO, but rather to nurture and educate those who are asking and actively seeking such a way. I have long already considered the network we have here to already be a great 'movement.'
Ellipse said:
But isnt' this forum doing exactly that? I think that this forum is presenting STO concept to quite a few people on the net. The facebook gives this forum a lot of exposure as well.
Yes but why do we not enlarge the channel ? The forum is the forum and facebook is facebook, this is a good start but this is only two tools among a lot we can use.
As far as I can see, the channel is expanding and increasing in size and method of distribution every day. This can be evidenced by the recent takeover of the Dot Connector magazine, and the new members that visit and join the various sites daily.
I believe we already have an STO fashion - it is the collective works, behaviors, attitudes, products, services, and work being done very openly and publicly by every contributing member here, each and every day for all to see.
Of course, there is nothing stopping an individual from expressing this fashion in their own unique way in life, preferably with external consideration and strategic enclosure in mind of course. There is the SOTT.net T-shirt in the store, and folks like Mechanimated making their own T-shirts, something anyone can do.
Ellipse said:
[quote author=Mechanimated]but I think the concept of "fashion" implies identification with the form more than the content.
Yes, what I wanted to say with the word "fashion" is something people can easily identify with.
Really, the main idea is to give a chance to people to put a word on what they already are or what they tend to naturally be (STO) but without having the full consciousness of it. And, in my mind, this acronym, STO, is a very powerful word witch worth to be spread.
[/quote]
Indeed fashion is something people can easily identify with. I think the issue is more "Do we really want people to walk around spouting off concepts, possibly quite inaccurately and without the requisite foundational knowledge, when they may only be interested in it due to a 'fashion' or 'fad,' as opposed to sincere interest and study?"