What is The Kalergi Plan?

I've just read an article on The Vineyard of the Saker, written by Jimmie Moglia. Actually I've read it twice.
He starts with the premise that historians make sense of history by the details known at any given time. With more knowledge coming through we change our views on that history. It's a very long article with the first part given over to expanding on that theme.

It was the second part that really caught my attention. He speaks about what is evolving now in Europe. He mentions a german writer RICHARD KALERGI who wrote a few books and one in particular , PRAKTISCHER IDEALISMUS. which was never translated into English. He says the book is important because KALERGI prophesied, promoted and predicted about the fate of Europe which is unfolding now. KALERGI envisioned a unified Europe, invaded by Africans, who would miscegenate with Europeans, creating a new negroid population. This was in the 1920's. His book came to the attention of the Jewish banker Schiff and also the American jewish banker Warburg. Both financed him to carry out his plan by promulgating and promoting his ideas. This was interrupted by WW11, but continued afterwards,. When all this comes to fruition Europe will be ruled by very clever Jews who will intermarry with European royalty.

I've tried to download the article but I'm not well practiced in this and don't even know if it can be done. After the C's comment to Joe in the last session about 4d's wish to dominate the male of the species this article fits in so well with that theme. Hope I've not overstepped in mentioning this article here and also for posting it where I have. So it's all wheels within wheels.
 
.If someone has the time would they be able to teach me how to download the above article please. Not computer savvy. I have tried with no success. Thank you.
 

Palinurus

The Living Force
Source: The Waves of Time | The Vineyard of the Saker

The Waves of Time

8609 Views January 19, 2019 74 Comments

by Jimmie Moglia for The Saker Blog

That all the world is a stage and all men and women merely players is a familiar and generally accepted proposition. But many, prompted by curiosity and helped by new information previously unknown or uneasily available, would like to know more about the play they are the unwitting players thereof.

Which transforms the frame of mind of the curious into that of a historian. In turn, this exposes him to the immediate problem of interpretation. Interpretation of the historical facts themselves, often accompanied by a likely change of his worldview, following the discovery of new facts. For historians themselves can modify their views, when forced by the train of circumstances.

Here is an example. Friedrich Meinecke was an eminent German historian, with an unusually long life span, during which a series of revolutionary and extraordinary changes affected the fortunes of Germany. His books reflect four different Meinecke(s), each the spokesman of different times, and each speaking through one of his major works.

In his first, “World Citizenship and the Nation State,” published in 1907, Meinecke sees the embodiment of German national ideals in Bismarck’s Reich. And like many 19th and 20th century thinkers, he identifies nationalism with the highest form of universalism.

Here is dramatic evidence of the revolution of the times. In the parlance of current Western European & American elites, nationalism, rather than a higher form of universalism, is labeled as ‘fascism’ or ‘racism’. And since the characterization is ludicrous, a new word has been coined, ‘populism’, to demean and disgrace the idea.

In his second book, “The Idea of the Raison d’Etat,” (published in 1925), Meinecke speaks with the divided and bewildered mind of an observer of the Weimar Republic – where the world of politics has become an arena of unresolved conflict between the reason-of-state and morality. Morality, of itself, seems external to politics, but in the last resort it affects the life and security of any state. For morality is written in the human heart, even of those who hold it in contempt.

To frame the issues in today’s terms, since the end, in the 1950s, of the “Legion of Decency” act in American Cinema,” Hollywood’s productions have set the standard, planted the roots and sowed the of seeds of shame and iniquity, in just about all domains of collective and personal behavior.

In the Weimar Republic, as we know, it was the state of universal degradation, promoted, inculcated and imposed upon Germany after her defeat in WW1, that prompted the birth and growth of National Socialism.

In his “Development of Historicism” (published in 1936), Meinecke laments the idea of a certain view of history, which seems to recognize that whatever is, is right.

In our days, examples of this ‘historicism’ are many, from the totally unbelievable official explanation of 9/11, to the physical destruction of the Middle East, the ongoing farce in Ukraine, the grotesque Russo-phobia, the idea that Western European and North-American states can exist without borders, and so on.

Finally, in 1946, after seeing his country defeated and leveled to the ground, he published “The German Catastrophe,” where he exposes the belief that history is at the mercy of blind and inexorable forces.

That the times we live-in weigh on our thoughts and judgment is as obvious as saying that a great cause of the night is lack of the sun. Nevertheless, our individual evolving point of view also influences the selection of the facts needed to produce an acceptable explanation of causes and effects, or of causes and defects as the case may be.

That is, the historian and the facts of history are necessary to one another. For a historian without his facts is futile; and facts without a historian are dead and meaningless.

Finally – and I hope the strenuous reader will forgive the long preamble, though I hope there is method in the meandering – not all facts are historical. History begins when the historian selects certain facts and declares them endowed with historical value.

But the distinction between historical and unhistorical facts is not rigid or constant. Any fact may become historical, once its relevance and significance is recognized. If so, that fact generates its own historical wave, whose effects may be felt after a long time and with enormous power, unimaginable when the fact occurred.

In nature an analogy is the tsunami, where, at the point of origin, the waves are only about 3 feet high. But traveling at incredible speed across incredible distances, they finally release their apocalyptic energy on touching land.

As someone ‘curious about history’ and not a professional historian, I experienced a change of outlook on historical events when the United States declared war on Iraq and destroyed it. For I knew the country well and I could personally attest that all that was said about Iraq by the organs of mass persuasion, was false. And while accepting the inherent murkiness of politics, I could not reconcile myself to the idea that the two Bushes, one of whom is dead, could be some of the lyingest knaves in Christendom.

As it is universally accepted, the US destroyed Iraq to satisfy Israel’s ambitions. And given that curiosity is the mother of explanation, I took up the doubtful challenge of locating the original historical fact, the trigger and the source of the wave-of-time, which eventually led to the Iraqi Armageddon and beyond.

In this and similar instances, opinion reigns supreme. Other ‘curious about history’ may choose another episode or fact, and with good reason. But sometimes, lesser-known events, singularly representative of the reality and culture of an era, can offer a perspective different from the conventional and usual narratives.

In the instance, I pinpoint the source of the topic wave-of-time in Napoleon’s emancipation of the Jews in France, following the French Revolution.

Actually, already in 1791, in the midst of the Revolution, the National Assembly had granted Jews full citizenship. It was hoped that, by so doing, Jews would stop acting like a separate nation within France. But soon there were complaints that the Jews were stuck in their old ways, particularly in Alsace and Lorraine, where their majority lived. Their ‘old ways’ referred to usury, or, as we would say today ‘financial engineering’, or ‘banking shenanigans’.

The situation remained fluid and uncertain till Napoleon, converted from a servant of the Republic into an Emperor, convened, in 1807, what he called the Great Sanhedrin, to resolve the controversial issues arisen from the emancipation. The Great Sanhedrin refers to the governing body of the Jewish community, notably during the Roman Empire.

To a council of 71 Jewish leaders and rabbis, Napoleon posed 12 questions about their laws and customs. Some questions were amusing – for example, were Jews allowed to have more than one wife? The main issue, however, was whether Jews born in France, and now treated by law as citizens, would regard France as their country. They answered that there was nothing inherent in their religion preventing the full integration of the Jewish community into French life. This was enough to confirm their full recognition and emancipation, along with an obligation to take up French names.

Perhaps Napoleon ignored that if a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, a Shylock, by any other name would still call for his pound of flesh.

In fact, there was immediate widespread opposition to the move, in French-ruled Europe and in France itself. Even one of Napoleon’s famous generals, Francois Christophe de Kellerman, whose name is inscribed in the Arc de Triomphe, recommended strongly that the Jews be prohibited from dealing in commerce.

With easy hindsight, Napoleon, like all who like to anticipate futurity and exalt possibility to certainty, might or should have avoided this adventure, so linked to chance. For, in this and other similar instances, disappointment must always be proportionate to the breath of the original hopes.

The pressure became so intense that soon Napoleon restricted the terms of emancipation, via the so-called “Infamous Decree” of 1808. The decree annulled, reduced or postponed all debts with Jews, and imposed a ten-year ban on any kind of Jewish money-lending activity.

As an aside, the official public face of a notable politician or ruler, often conflicts with his private persona, as seen in his diaries or confidential papers. In a letter to his brother Jérome Napoleon, dated 6 March 1808, Napoleon writes, “I have undertaken to reform the Jews, but I have not endeavored to draw more of them into my realm. Far from that, I have avoided doing anything which could show any esteem for the most despicable of mankind.”

“Give me ten thousand eyes, and I will fill them with prophetic tears” – said Cassandra predicting the fall of Troy. The most Cassandra-like admonition given to Napoleon came from his uncle, Cardinal Fesh, who told him, “Sire, by giving the Jews equality as Catholics, you wish for the end of the world to come.”

But the onrush of events, including Napoleon’s defeat at Waterloo, inaugurated a new era. When an atheistic ideology, molded in the Age of Enlightenment, and strengthened by the impact of the French Revolution, took hold and spread at large throughout Europe.

For the 19th century saw an upsurge of anti-clerical movements and ideologies in the Western world. This is not a wholesale defense of organized religion. Nevertheless, religion also acts as a bulwark of the moral law. And irrespective of specific customs or ceremonies, religion – without disrespect – is metaphysics for the people, an intelligible intimation of eternity, an unthreatening glimpse of the infinity, a psychological safeguard from the despair of mortality.

In this context, it is not accidental that the rebirth of Russia, earlier ravaged, debased and plundered by the dissolvers of the Soviet Union, has seen the resurgence of her religion, which was dormant but never died.

Compare this with America, with her enforced and compulsive secularization, the banning of religion in schools and the prohibition of public display of religious symbols.

But I digress. Let’s return to the subject at hand. After 1815, Jewish supremacy, especially in the banking field, asserted itself in Europe, spearheaded by the ubiquitous House of the Rothschilds. In the second part of the century, England even had a Jewish Prime Minister, Disraeli.

During that time, with a pronouncement that today seems impossible, the Vatican declared that any country that abolishes the Christian religion will be run by Jews.

It’s worth transcribing an extract from a 1890 issue of “Civilta’ Cattolica,” the key media organ of the Jesuits and the Vatican,

“The XIXth century will end, in Europe, leaving her in the throngs of a very sad issue, of which the XXth century will feel consequences so calamitous, as to induce her (Europe) to drastically deal with it. We refer to the improperly-called “Semitic Question,” that more accurately should be called “Judaic Question” – which is connected via an intimate link, to the economic, moral, political and religious conditions of Europe.

How fervid at present and how much this question perturbs the major nations, is manifest by the common cry against the invasion by Jews in all spheres of public and social life; by the leagues formed to slow its advance in France, Austria, Germany, Italy, Russia, Rumania and elsewhere. By the calls for action in various Parliaments – by the large number of newspaper articles, books and pamphlets that are constantly printed, all showing the need to stem the growth of this plague, and to combat it, showing evidence of its very pernicious consequences….

Naively, some try to show that the ”Judaic Question” is the result of a (Christian) hatred of the (Judaic) religion or sect. Mosaism (read ‘religion inspired by Moses) in itself could not be an argument for hatred…. for it was the antecedent of Christianity… But for centuries Judaism has turned its back on Mosaism, exchanging it with the Talmud, quintessence of that Pharisaism, many times blasted by Christ…. And although Talmudism is an integral element of the Jewish question, we cannot say that (Talmudism) is all that relevant to it (Judaic question). For in Talmudism the Christian nations detest not so much the theological part, almost reduced to insignificance, but the moral one, that contradicts the elementary principles of natural ethics…. “

Incidentally, and as another aside, it is customary to describe the roots of European culture as “Judeo-Christian.” Many contend that a better description would be the “Greek-Christian” tradition, as certain important tenets of Christianity are actually derived from Plato. For example, he suggested that a trinity of forces shapes the cosmos and he struggled with the idea of a Being, purely incorporeal, executing a perfect model of the universe and molding with his hand what was but a rude chaos of random forces.

As an explanation, or at least a theory, Plato considered the divine nature of the universe under three modifications. There was indeed a first cause, the Reason or Logos, the soul of the universe, along with three subdivisions.

Readers may recall the beginning of St. John’s Gospel, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” where ‘word’ is an imperfect and narrow translation of the Greek ‘logos.’ For one of the meanings of ‘logos’ is indeed ‘word’, but not with sense that we usually attribute to it. A better translation could possibly be, “In the beginning was the Reason of the Universe.”

Plato conceived of 3 original principles, incorporated in the Logos, different, but linked to each other by a mysterious generation.

The important point is that the mystical and mysterious concept of the Trinity is the Christian rendering of Plato’s idea. The Trinity may still remain mysterious, but at least the mind can understand a Father, a Son, and a Holy Spirit, better than Plato’s more symbolic rendering.

Back to the main subject. During the early XXth century three events, distinct but important affected the wave-of-time begun with Napoleon.

One was the establishment of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in 1913 – at first in America but now practically extended and enforced worldwide.

In fairness to its founders and all subsequent members, it should really have been called the ‘Jewish Anti Defamation League.’ Though by astutely avoiding the qualifying adjective, ‘ADL’ suggests impartiality, thus evading suspicion among the majority of the gentiles, who rarely or superficially follow the details of political events and institutions.

The actual purpose of the now ubiquitous and wealthy ADL was and is to aggressively prevent any criticism of Zionism and Israel, by crushing the critics, destroying their career, often depriving them of a livelihood and even removing them from the Congress or the Senate.

Observers may have noticed that when the Prime Minister of Israel addresses a US joint session of Senate and Congress, he routinely receives a record number of standing ovations. And, after an ovation, no one wants to be the first to sit down – presumably but also probably – for fear of being suspected of weaker Pro-Zionist sentiments.

Readers familiar with the Communist world will easily detect the stunning similarities between the new-speak of Communist Eastern Europe and ADL’s new-speak and thought-crime – in America but also in Europe and the English-speaking world at large.

As an example, in December 2018, the owner of a pleasant yet unostentatious house in the Italian provincial city of Aosta, installed a metal gate at the end of his driveway. The gate carried a decorative wrought-iron winged eagle, reminiscent of a National Socialist emblem, though without a swastika or other disturbing symbols.

But it was enough for a rabbi in Turin, 100 km away (and presumably a member of a local ADL chapter), to have a judge issue a search warrant and dispatch the Italian police to execute it against the shocked, bewildered and disbelieving house-dweller.

The police carried a thorough search of the premises, removed his computer, various personal effects and books from his library. In the end all the ‘incriminating’ evidence they found – besides the eagle on the gate – consisted of some books about the history of WW2.

Curiously, the event leading to the founding of the ADL had nothing to do with defamation and all to do with the sexual assault and murder of Mary Phagan, a 13-year old girl in Atlanta, Georgia. Mary worked for the National Pencil Company, and in May 1913 went to her place of work to collect her $1.20 earnings from the company superintendent Leo Frank. She was never seen again. Her body was later found in the basement of the company, mutilated, bruised and with her undergarments torn off. She had been strangled and Frank was the most likely suspect.

At the trial, Frank pleaded innocent and declared himself a victim of hate. But after a thorough investigation, Frank was found guilty. That is when Adolf Kraus, president of the Jewish-American order of B’nai B’rith founded the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. Its charter reads:

“The immediate object of the league is to stop, by appeals to reason and conscience and, if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people. Its ultimate purpose is to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike and to put an end forever to unjust and unfair discrimination and ridicule of any sect or body of citizens.”

Sometime later the outgoing governor of Georgia commuted the sentence from death by hanging to life imprisonment. But the leaders of the town were enraged by what they rated a corruption of justice. They dragged Frank from the courthouse and hanged him.

Ever since, Leo Frank is viewed by the ADL as a kind of patron saint; a man whose death serves as a reminder of the depths of depravity to which men can sink when in the grip of xenophobic hatred.

Today, as universally acknowledged, the ADL is the lay arm of the Zionist inquisition and a patently obvious instrument for censorship and the abolition of free speech.

The second momentous event I referred to was the publishing of the so-called Scofield Reference Bible. Which is a Bible annotated by Cyrus Scofield, a man of questionable background though an able manipulator of souls and money.

Scofield and his Bible are responsible for the birth and expansion of Christian Zionism. If there was ever a contradiction in terms, Christian Zionism is one. It created a class of unpaid and obedient political eunuchs at the service of the Zionist state.

Specific and central to Christian Zionist belief is Skofield’s comment on Genesis 12:3 (the words in Italics are the comment). ‘I will bless them that bless thee.’ In fulfillment closely related to the next clause, ‘And curse him that curseth thee.’ Wonderfully fulfilled in the history of the dispersion. It has invariably fared ill with the people who have persecuted the Jew—well with those who have protected him. The future will still more remarkably prove this principle.

Though a struggling born-again preacher, Scofield became a member of the exclusive New York ‘s Lotus Club, where he was befriended by the Wall Street lawyer Samuel Untermeyer. Untermeyer was instrumental in having Scofield’s annotated bible published.

In Scofield’s biography, written by Joseph Canfield, we read that Scofield’s theology was “most helpful in getting Fundamentalist Christians to back the international interest in one of Untermeyer’s projects—the Zionist Movement.”

Israel holds the Christian Zionists in utter contempt. The Talmud considers Christ a heretic boiling in excrement for eternity, and his mother a -jezebel-. Jehovah allows goys to exist so as to be like donkeys in the service of the chosen people.

But according to Fundamentalist preaching, at some unspecified time in the future, there will be what they call a ‘rapture,’ during which the Messiah will return to earth and all Jews will convert to Christianity.

If Fundamentalism were played on a stage it would be condemned as improbable fiction. Even Greek-Roman paganism contains more truth than Fundamentalism and its absurd ‘dispensations,’ as they define their ranting.

For the extravagance of the Grecian mythology proclaimed clearly that the inquirer, instead of being scandalized or satisfied with the literal sense, should diligently explore the occult wisdom, which had been disguised, by the prudence of antiquity, under the mask of myth and the display of follies practiced by the quizzical dynasty of the Olympian Gods.

The Fundamentalists are a large congregation. Israel supplies their leaders with money, endowments and private planes, while feeding and securing their lavish lifestyle.

The third event, whose momentousness and importance is gradually being recognized, was Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi’s launching of the plan for the creation of the European Union, with extraordinary, new and revolutionary characteristics.

He was the son of the Austrian Ambassador to Japan, Heinrich Coudenhove-Kalergi, who was also a great friend of Theodore Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism.

In the 1920s Heinrich’s son, Richard Kalergi, published a few books, the most important of which is “Praktischer Idealismus,” never, as far as I know, printed in English. The book is important because what Kalergi prophesied, promoted and predicted about the fate of Europe is occurring under our own eyes.

Kalergi envisioned a unified Europe, invaded by Africans, who would miscegenate with Europeans, creating a new negroid population, similar in appearance to the characters depicted on the inside walls of Egyptians pyramids and tombs. Ruling over them would be a class of “the best of the Jews” some of whom would intermarry with the best of the European nobility.

In his autobiography Kalergi states that when his book was printed, it came to the attention of the Jewish banker Schiff, who along with the American Jewish banker Warburg generously financed him to carry out his plan. From then on Kalergi would undertake a massive lobbying operation, which – temporarily halted during WW2 – was restarted immediately afterwards.

An Italian history professor, Matteo Simonetti, has published a very interesting book, titled “Kalergi, La Prossima Scomparsa Degli Europei” (Kalergi, The Forthcoming Disappearance of the Europeans) – available at Amazon. In his book, Prof. Simonetti included the most critical pages of Praktischer Idealismus translated from the German. What transpires is even worse than the disappearance of the Europeans.

I quote directly from the translation. At pages 21-22-23 of Praktischer Idealismus we find that “the future race, negroid-caucasian will be composed by people without character, without scruples, weak in their will, without respect (for one another) and untrustworthy. The new race will replace the multiplicity of people with a multiplicity of individuals.”

As for the ruling Jews, Kalergi describes them as “close in blood”, whose “strength of character and sharpness of spirit” predestines them to become “the race of (the new) Europe’s spiritual leaders,“ the “carriers of the nobility of spirit,”…. endowed of superior intelligence, a race of lords (Herrenrasse)… the chosen people (pages 28, 33, 49-51 in the original German book).

But it gets worse. The only free marital union will apply to “the most noble of men and women.” Inferior men and women will mate with their societal equivalent. The “erotic style” of the lower classes will be casual mating. Only the upper classes will enjoy the free formation of families.

The new cultivated nobility of the future will emerge from the divine laws of erotic eugenics. “It is here, in social eugenism, where the new nobility will achieve its historical mission of excellence” (pages 55-57).

The new miscegenated race of the lower classes will live in “factory-cities,” where the factory will be the new “cathedral of work”, the center and object of devotion of the new race of miscegenated goys (page 110).

As for the elimination of genders, Kalergi hints at the formation of a Brave-New-World society. “Today men of both sexes (sic) command political and economic power. The emancipation of woman is but the triumph of the feminine man over the real feminine woman. With the emancipation, the feminine sex is mobilized for a technical war and regimented into the army of labor.” (page 119)

As for democracy, Kalergi says it is an instrument to be discarded, as soon as the new Jewish nobility will be established and in charge. (page 36).

In summary, there we have it – the predicted apocalyptic end of the tsunami – helped and driven by the ADL (at work to criminalize free speech), the fundamentalists (a docile army of spiritual eunuchs in the service of Israel), and the Kalergi Plan (a Europe of Negroids ruled over by Jews).

As universally acknowledged, Jewish elites and politicians are at the forefront of the push for illegal immigration and the abolition of borders, worldwide.

And the Left, deprived of its reference class, the proletariat, has made of the migrants a sort of fig leaf to prove that they still side with the weak. Indeed, migrants are the new proletariat, because their identity (or consciousness thereof) is not here, but elsewhere. But the original inhabitants of the poorer districts of Europe and elsewhere have the right not to be uprooted from their customs by a culturally heterogeneous immigration. The migrants do not reside in London’s Chelsea, New York’s Upper East Side or the posh districts of other cities. Nor they steal the jobs of bank managers and corporate directors.

The chosen elites have decided that people are ugly, dirty, bad and xenophobic because they do not want to accept migrants by the millions. But it is the people who bear the weight of immigration and the loss of manual work.

During the latter years of neo-liberalism and turbo-capitalism, the cultural devaluation of labor has been possible thanks to the reserve army made up of migrants. It is logical that the chosen elites favor immigration. It frees them from relocating in the cesspits of despair, by bringing cesspits and despair to the ugly and xenophobic locals, along with the prospect of a Kalergi-type future.

We cannot know precisely how far the wave-of-time, traced back to Napoleon, has travelled towards its end. For the laws of probability, true in general, fail in the details. But given the essentially unchallenged progress of the wave, I doubt whether the collective consciousness of the European peoples will wake up and prompt them to react effectively in self-defense.

Until historically recently, the Catholic Church provided protection. It preached and prohibited violence against the chosen people, but expected them not to corrupt the culture of the host nation. And she gave them the option of conversion. By converting to Christianity, all true or pretended forms of discrimination would be instantly removed.

But the Catholic Church has lost power and unity. In recent Catholic pronouncements, it is even stated that Jews no longer need to convert to be “saved.” And in current religious ceremonies the brethren are invited to “pray for our elder brothers in the Abrahamic religion.”

Therefore, given that time comes stealing by night and day, I must reluctantly observe that the very shortness of time and the failure of hope will tinge with a deeper shade of brown the evening of our current historical times, and the last act of the play performed on the current historical stage.
 

Palinurus

The Living Force
Explanation of the process:

Above the text box where you type your texts, a row of icons is displayed. When you place your cursor on top of each of them it will show you its function: i.e. (from left to right) Remove formatting, Bold, Italic, Underline, Strike-through, Text color, Font family, Font size, Insert link, Insert image, Smilies, Insert (drop down choices: Media, Quote, Spoiler, Code, Inline code), Alignment, List, Undo, Drafts, and Toggle BB code.

To copy/paste an article you need at least two of these icons, notably Insert link (for a link to the source) and Insert quote.

On the source page you highlight the URL by right clicking the address bar and then choose copy in the pop-up menu.
In the text box over here you choose the Insert link icon, click on it (left click) and then paste the URL copy in the pop-up box, and click the Insert button.

On the source page again you highlight the article text (keep right click pressed down from top to bottom through the text, or at the side of it) and choose copy in the pop-up menu.
In the text box over here you choose the Insert icon, click on it (left) and choose Quote (left click), and then paste the copied text in between the following [ QUOTE ]...[ /QUOTE ] i.e. where the dots are.

Usually, the forum software copies most of the lay-out of the original article as well as the active links. For illustrations you need an image location URL (right click on the image and choose Copy image location), which can be copy/pasted here via the Insert image icon, or when applicable a video-URL via the Insert media icon.

After all this it's useful to read the text, first and foremost in the text box, preferably using a spell checker, and then again once more via the preview button -- just to make sure everything is displayed as it should be.
If needed you can manually rearrange the text, add/remove paragraphs or headers and the like, when this would improve readability without really altering the original..

Then hit the Post reply button and voilà: the result as displayed in the previous post above.

Hope this helps a bit. :-)
 
Explanation of the process:

Above the text box where you type your texts, a row of icons is displayed. When you place your cursor on top of each of them it will show you its function: i.e. (from left to right) Remove formatting, Bold, Italic, Underline, Strike-through, Text color, Font family, Font size, Insert link, Insert image, Smilies, Insert (drop down choices: Media, Quote, Spoiler, Code, Inline code), Alignment, List, Undo, Drafts, and Toggle BB code.

To copy/paste an article you need at least two of these icons, notably Insert link (for a link to the source) and Insert quote.

On the source page you highlight the URL by right clicking the address bar and then choose copy in the pop-up menu.
In the text box over here you choose the Insert link icon, click on it (left click) and then paste the URL copy in the pop-up box, and click the Insert button.

On the source page again you highlight the article text (keep right click pressed down from top to bottom through the text, or at the side of it) and choose copy in the pop-up menu.
In the text box over here you choose the Insert icon, click on it (left) and choose Quote (left click), and then paste the copied text in between the following [ QUOTE ]...[ /QUOTE ] i.e. where the dots are.

Usually, the forum software copies most of the lay-out of the original article as well as the active links. For illustrations you need an image location URL (right click on the image and choose Copy image location), which can be copy/pasted here via the Insert image icon, or when applicable a video-URL via the Insert media icon.

After all this it's useful to read the text, first and foremost in the text box, preferably using a spell checker, and then again once more via the preview button -- just to make sure everything is displayed as it should be.
If needed you can manually rearrange the text, add/remove paragraphs or headers and the like, when this would improve readability without really altering the original..

Then hit the Post reply button and voilà: the result as displayed in the previous post above.

Hope this helps a bit. :-)

Palinurus.

Thank you so much for the instructions and for downloading the article. I'll be busy for the rest of the evening studying your guidelines. Very grateful.
 

zak

Jedi Council Member
Thanks Tuatha de danaan to mention this Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, that i didn't know before.
So i took five minutes to make a search on him, and i found an article in french that show the other side of the coin of this kalergi's plan.
I do not have enough certainty, but if the following article is true, we are in the continuity of the programming that has ponerized noble values and ideas to distort them and deceive us.

November 24, 2015 Published by L'Imprécateur
THE SO-CALLED "KALERGI PLAN" FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF EUROPE

François Hollande declares that we are at war in the very heart of France (for a long time, but he had not yet noticed it). He decided to close the borders, announced relentless retaliation, and convened the Congress in Versailles to tell it that his relentless response consisted in a revision of the Constitution that all constitutional lawyers considered unnecessary and unrealistic (an idea of one of the enarques that advised the Elysée, no doubt).

We are told that he has finally understood that by opening the doors of immigration wide he has also opened France to Islamist terrorists, we are delighted to see him in general from the Armies. It was a misunderstanding. Just out of Congress, he announced that France would welcome 30,000 more "refugees" by the end of its five-year term! As General Dourakine said, "A two-footed donkey can become a general and remain a donkey".

It is wrong to believe that François Hollande's perseverance in making mistakes is free or the result of the self-adoration of his intelligence, which he believes is very great. In fact, it is only the hubbub of supranational institutions with little visibility, often partially drowned by Freemasonry, such as the New World Order, Trilateral, Bilderberg, FAF*, etc. In addition to controlling global finance, they have in common the implementation of the Kalergi Plan for Europe.

When we know this plan, the whole societal policy, miserable (deliberately bringing misery) and immigrationist of the two Dutch governments can be explained. The European press will not tell you about it, it is a secret of European-German-French states of which Angela Merkel is the project manager in Europe, with her secretaries the former President of the European Commission Van Rompuy and his successor Jean-Claude Juncker. In 2010, Mrs Merkel was awarded the first prize of the European Company Coudenhove-Kalergi, then in 2012 to Von Rompuy and in 2014 to Juncker.
A prize highly sought after by the globalized super-elite. What the hell is this about?


Count Richard Nikolaus Enjiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi is a half-breed of Austrian father and Japanese mother, born in Tokyo in 1894, who studied brilliantly and conceived the idea of a Europe of Nations in the 1920s. He is the true founding father of Europe, long before Jean Monnet, Robert Schumann and their successors. They took up almost in extenso the ideas he published in his books: the common market, the common agricultural policy, the single currency... promising but forgetting those that hindered them: common taxation, social harmonisation, the European Defence Community, among others, which they feared would make them lose part of their power over the peoples and hinder their personal enrichment.

Forgotten today, Coudenhove-Kalergi was once very famous and listened to by many Heads of State. He was even nominated several times for the Nobel Peace Prize. In 1939 he proposed a project for a Europe whose main lines are: a Europe where the peoples would be on an equal footing; a Europe where they would be sufficiently united to be able to stand up to the other three blocs, the USA, the USSR and China; going beyond simple economic and monetary union; with a strong common army that would have facilitated the cultural diversity of the white European peoples, Christians of Greco-Roman culture; guaranteeing the independence and integrity of all the associated States (Europe of the Nations); developing a European mystique based on: a) European classical culture, b) Christian faith, c) the conception of the honour of medieval knights. "Just as in every living being the body is shaped by the soul, so the body of Europe will only be born under the impulse of a European spirit".

And he insists: Europe must be a predominantly white, Christian Europe: a Christian social and humanitarian trend, a Christian faith supported by a heroic and chivalrous spirit, so that it can resume its role at the head of the planet (L'Europe de demain, Conference of 17 May 1939 at the Hotel Ambassadeur in Paris). This definition of a Europe of Nations, bringing together the white European peoples of Christian civilisation, excluding the communist and Muslim countries, has angered the European left-wing. They hated Coudenhove-Kalergi until they found a way to get his project back to make a plan that was totally diverted from the original, a frighteningly racist plan that is wrongly attributed to Kalergi. They even accused him of Nazism, even though he was married to a Jewish woman, hated by Hitler, and fled the Hitler regime in late 1939 by taking refuge in the United States until he returned to France at the end of 1945.

In 1966, at the 10th Pan-European Congress in Vienna, he expressed his disappointment at the direction taken by the emerging Europe, the functionalisation of the Council of Europe and the European Parliament, the need for a common foreign policy in order to stand up to the United States so that it could stop lagging behind the United States and NATO, whose restructuring he called for, and a strengthening of intra-European technological cooperation to make Europe the world's leading economic power. He died shortly after in 1972.

Let us remember that it was the era of the "Europe of the Six" to which the peoples were very much in favour in this version proposed by Coudenhove-Kalergi, which resulted in the unequalled prosperity of the Glorious Thirty (1946-1976) and peace, or the absence of wars, in this non-communist (no Eastern Europe) and non-Muslim (no Macedonia, Albania, Croatia, Kosovo) Europe. Moreover, Coudenhove-Kalergi admits to doubting the willingness of the leaders of the time to move towards a Europe of Nations.


As soon as Kalergi died (in 1972), the European Commission undertook, in 1973, to enlarge the Europe of the Six (which worked so well), by recruiting new countries, until it reached today's 28, and this Europe which works so badly that a majority of Europeans no longer want it.

It was not long after, in 1978, six years after Coudenhove-Kalergi's death, that the Kalergi Plan appeared, which some people tried to trace back to 1922, while Coudenhove-Kalergi's first book, Paneuropa, was published in 1923. He is attributed the Kalergi Plan. It bears his name, but it can be assumed that it is a forgery and that the authors have sought to use his fame to conceal their neo-Nazi project. Indeed, the drafters of the Plan rely mainly on his book Praktisher idealismus, but when you have read this book, you quickly realize that in the Kalergi Plan you will only find truncated quotations, taken out of context, without direct references and that it goes totally against the philosophy of the father of the Europe of Nations.

Indeed, according to the so-called Kalergi Plan, Europe would only be the first step towards a world government under American authority, exactly the opposite of what Kalergi wanted. To achieve this "New World Order", we need a super-elite and people-livestock submissive to poverty and disciplined by constraint (of the pure Orwell) still exactly the opposite of what Kalergi taught all his life, which promoted the Swiss democratic and economic model. And it is here, in this project of a new world order, that we find the European model that Angela Merkel wants to build with obstinacy, with the support of the European Commission chaired by Juncker, and the collaboration of Holland.

The latest drafts of the Kalergi Plan squarely make it the Plan of the New World Order, which wants the disappearance of races until the very word is erased (it is done, at least in Larousse!) to arrive at a single species, monochrome, mestizo and bastardised, dominated by the super elite, the latter being reduced to socialists and Jews who would alone have the nationality of the New World Republic, the people remaining stateless so that they forget the word "Fatherland" in time to come.

In the latest version of the Kalergi Plan, it would be necessary, in order to submit the European peoples, to have a German-French duo that would impose its will on other countries. The peoples of the Old Continent should be replaced by a kind of sub-humanity resulting from racial mixing by crossing the European peoples with Asians, Arabs and Blacks, to create a multi-ethnic herd without specific qualities and easy to dominate for the ruling elite. "The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasiato-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the multiplicity of peoples. And again: "abolish the right to self-determination of peoples and, successively, eliminate nations by using separatist ethnic movements and mass allogenic immigration <...> promote deviant sexuality, homosexuality (marriage for all) and paedophilia (via teachers), and destroy the traditional family (harm the Manifes Pour Tous) <...> take control and buy the docility of the press by purchasing the shares (Bergé, Niel, Pigasse, etc.)) and by subsidizing them <...> playing on the humanitarian fibre to raise taxes, ruin the conservative classes and justify restrictions on freedoms (Intelligence Act)", etc.

Today we could add "play on the green fibre to raise taxes"!

Do not look for any further explanations for the statements made by JC Juncker, the new President of the European Commission, who says he is "disappointed" that the peoples refuse to accept and finance the torrent of "refugees"...

"We must not let ourselves be blinded by populist thinking <...> It is our duty to welcome them" (Holland);
"We have the challenge of mixing and we will meet it" (Sarkozy);
"We can welcome 800,000 refugees this year" (Merkel);
"I am determined to find collective solutions to meet this immense challenge" (Valls);
"I have decided to welcome 30,000 more" (Holland);
"The real question is whether or not we are ready to continue our tradition of welcoming and in particular to the Muslim community. I, of course, answer yes to this question" (Juppé);
"What people need to develop everywhere is birth control AND mixed (interracial) marriages, with the aim of creating a single race in a single world and dependent on a central authority" (G. Brock Chisholm, former Director of the Islamic Organization for Medical Sciences, WHO).

Now, who had the idea of this Kalergi Plan, of which Covenhove-Kalergi is not the author and which he would have rejected with horror? At the beginning, there is Sigrid Hunke, a neo-Nazi activist, former mistress of Himmler and friend of the great Nazi mufti of Jerusalem. She married Walter Hallstein. Law professor W. Hallstein was a member of several Nazi organizations in the Reich, but not a member of the Nazi party, which allowed him to get away with it without much damage after the war. He became the first President of the European Commission in 1958. In 1960, Sigrid Hunke-Hallstein wrote a book The Sun of Allah Illuminates the West, which serves as a reference for all gogos like Jack Lang who argue that Europe owes a lot to the Arab-Muslim civilization. In this book, she suggests that as many Muslim Arabs as possible be reintroduced into Europe to mix European peoples.

It's not the Kalergi Plan yet, but it comes to that.

Sigrid and her husband made an intense promotion in European circles of the ideas that would later become the Kalergi Plan, which had already been outlined in the Hallstein Plan for a Federal Europe (1965), which Kalergi, a supporter of the Europe of the Christian Nations, denounced and which led Charles De Gaulle to jump. The European socialist politicians who were committed to the Plan waited until Kalergi died in 1972 to recruit among the European elite, drowning the European company Coudenhove-Kalergi and creating in 1978 the famous Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize that Raymond Barre was the first to receive, then people like Mitterrand's friend Helmut Kohl, Ronald Reagan, and finally Angel Merkel, van Rompuy and Jean-Claude Juncker. They used the drafting skills of several enarques to finalize the modalities of action.

François Hollande is a strong supporter of the Plan, as well as Valls and Macron who were instructed in Bilderberg to support it. If Sarkozy also supports him, it is because the Le Siècle club of which he is a member, as well as many people around him at UMP-LR, convinced him that it was in his interest.

It is said on many websites so similar to each other (even Dieudonné's!) that it seems that the copied and pasted have worked like a charm, that the Kalergi Plan for the decline of Europe through the replacement and mixing of its population, was prepared by think tanks based in the United States. This is completely false, a simple cover-up, it is a co-production of the Franco-Germanic elite seduced by the idea of keeping power hereditarily by the Muslim-style submission of the peoples of Europe, a mixed mass of workers**.

Rather, the American plan is to take advantage of the side effects of this plan, because it helps, through the massive migration of Arab populations to Europe, to destabilize the States of the Arab-Muslim world, a destabilization on which the United States relies to take direct or indirect control, via Iran and Saudi Arabia, of its energy wealth.

The Americans are not in favour of a forced mixing of the European peoples who, they believe, will weaken their productive capacity and economic exchanges, exchanges from which they hope to be the winners. Moreover, as they are not sure of the success of the Kalergi Plan carried by Merkel-Holland, which they feel is somewhat neo-Nazi and could provoke a revolt by the peoples, they prefer to let them bear the responsibility if it fails.
DeepL.
StackPath
 
Wow Zac.
A wonderful find. I did a quick search myself but couldn't find anything. Now we have two sides of the coin blended into one.
Now it becomes totally understandable why all European leaders are hell bent on opening their countries wide to as many immigrants as possible. All we can do is watch it all unfold and not get enmeshed in the drama.
What Laura has opened our eyes and minds to is beyond words. Thank you for finding the article.
 
In the latest version of the Kalergi Plan, it would be necessary, in order to submit the European peoples, to have a German-French duo that would impose its will on other countries. The peoples of the Old Continent should be replaced by a kind of sub-humanity resulting from racial mixing by crossing the European peoples with Asians, Arabs and Blacks, to create a multi-ethnic herd without specific qualities and easy to dominate for the ruling elite. "The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasiato-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the multiplicity of peoples. And again: "abolish the right to self-determination of peoples and, successively, eliminate nations by using separatist ethnic movements and mass allogenic immigration <...> promote deviant sexuality, homosexuality (marriage for all) and paedophilia (via teachers), and destroy the traditional family (harm the Manifes Pour Tous) <...> take control and buy the docility of the press by purchasing the shares (Bergé, Niel, Pigasse, etc.)) and by subsidizing them <...> playing on the humanitarian fibre to raise taxes, ruin the conservative classes and justify restrictions on freedoms (Intelligence Act)", etc.
Zak, thank you very much for clearing up these misunderstandings about Kalergi and the so-called "Kalergi Plan"!

I am truly stunned about your findings. :shock:

I still think that there are very old plans at work but they seem to change the narrative and their goals as they go along. Some very treacherous social engineering at work here.
The global compact for migration is one of the offshoots of this ongoing process.

One of the requirements certainly was the "all whites/all Europeans are racist campaign" which caused the majority of Europeans to bend over backwards just to prove that they are not in the least racist (Heaven forbid!).

Just mentioning "race" in a public conversation is raising eyebrows nowadays.

On December 1, 2010 the NEW STATESMAN wrote:

The Libyan ruler, Colonel Gaddafi, has used a summit in Tripoli to warn that Europe risks "turning black" unless Libya is given £4bn a year by the EU to keep out illegal immigrants from Africa.
"We should stop this illegal immigration. If we don't, Europe will become black, it will be overcome by people with different religions, it will change," he said.

He made the threat before in the summer, during a three-day visit to Italy. "We don't know what will happen, what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans," he said. "We don't know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions."

New Statesman article

Only one year later (2011) NATO/OTAN countries led by France intervened in the Libyan "civil war" and succeeded in bumping off Gaddafi. Maybe the aim of this operation was not merely to take over Libyan oil fields and picking up the gold of the country's national bank? It could have been the prospect of pulling out the stops for African mass migration to Europe.
 

Niall

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Coudenhove-Kalergi was an aristocrat who wrote about, and advocated for, a pan-European union or federation. His ideas weren't that novel as Europe had already temporarily unified a number of times in history (Holy Roman Empire, Napoleon, Zollverein or German Customs Union, etc.)

I don't understand how that got abbreviated into 'the Kalgeri Plan', which is being spread around the net as 'a 100-year-old plan to mix Europeans with Africans and have the new mixed race be led by Jews'.

It strikes me as reading history backwards to explain something going on today. That method always produces bad history. As a general rule, '100-year-old plans' don't exist. History may unfold according to patterns, but that doesn't mean a person living back then was the intelligent input.

It's like saying 'the flagellum of bacteria is intelligently engineered, therefore a man designed it'.
 

anka

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
i found an article in french that show the other side of the coin of this kalergi's plan.
I do not have enough certainty, but if the following article is true, we are in the continuity of the programming that has ponerized noble values and ideas to distort them and deceive us.

November 24, 2015 Published by L'Imprécateur
THE SO-CALLED "KALERGI PLAN" FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF EUROPE
Thank you very much for the find, zak. New information for me too. That piece, if true, sheds a very different light on the matter. After reading I am doubtful as to where to find the truth. Have not read Kalergi's books yet so it is hard for me to judge how much twisted his words might be in the so called Plan which, according to the article', is but a misinterpreted version of Kalergi's original ideas. I'd like to know, since the article is in French , where you got the English translation. I had no luck finding it on the internet. Have you translated it or do you have the source?
 

Niall

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Adam Garrie, in conversation here with George Galloway, credits Kalergi with 'the founding idea for the EU', but similarly dismisses the 'Kalergi Mass Miscegenation Plan'.


So yes, he was something of a 'founding father' - though more as political theorist than statesman - of what later become the EU.
 

anka

Dagobah Resident
FOTCM Member
That video does not go deep into the issue, Niall, although it's an interesting overview. I guess we could form a good opinion only after reading and discussing Kalergi's book 'Praktischer Idealismus: Adel - Technik - Pazifismus' which is the one that so many 'conspiracies' refer to in terms of his alleged design to eliminate original European nations and create a new mixed race. I could not find an English translation on Amazon, just the German original which I can't help with. If any of the German members could get hands on it and see whether there is some truth to it or not that might bring some light to the matter.

Found this snippet from the mentioned book in Czech from one of the alt-news websites (suppose it's not twisted) which I try to translate:

Man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and social classes will gradually disappear as a result of removal of space, time and prejudices. European-negroid race of the future, similar in its look to the Egyptians of antiquity, will replace contemporary diversity of nations and individuals. Instead of eliminating European judaism, Europe in fact (against its own will) improved and educated these Jewish people and led them to their future position as a chosen nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It is no surprise that people who escaped ghetto prisons have become a spiritual aristocracy of today's Europe. Compassionate care provided by Europe for Jews has created a new strain of aristocrats.
Weird, no? I would actually like to read that book because so far I can't wrap my head around of what the whole Kalergi thing is about.
 

Christine

Jedi Council Member

Conférence de presse «Egalité des chances et diversité » - Palaiseau, 17 décembre 2008.
« Quel est l'objectif ? Ca va faire parler.
Mais l'objectif, c'est de relever le défi du métissage. Défi du métissage que nous adresse le 21ème siècle. Ce n'est pas un choix, c'est une obligation, c'est un impératif. On ne peut pas faire autrement (...) Si ce volontarisme républicain ne fonctionnait pas, Il faudra que la république passe à des méthodes plus contraignantes encore. »
Nicolas Sarközy de Nagy-Bocsa --- Président de la République Française

Press conference "Equal opportunities and diversity" - Palaiseau, 17 December 2008.
"What is the objective? It'll make people talk.
But the objective is to take up the challenge of mixing. The challenge of the 21st century's cross-fertilization. It is not a choice, it is an obligation, it is an imperative. We cannot do otherwise (...) If this republican voluntarism did not work, the republic will have to switch to even more restrictive methods. "Nicolas Sarközy from Nagy-Bocsa --- President of the French Republic

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
 
Top Bottom