Wingmakers ?

Tigersoap

The Living Force
Hello,

I don't know if this website _http://www.wingmakers.com/ has been discussed about before ?

I was very impressed by it at the time (before I read anything from the C's) and I was wondering if anyone had some insights about it.

Thanks.
 
Tigersoap said:
Hello,

I don't know if this website _http://www.wingmakers.com/ has been discussed about before ?

I was very impressed by it at the time (before I read anything from the C's) and I was wondering if anyone had some insights about it.

Thanks.
You may like to read Splitting Reality (if you did not read it yet) where you will find some of our thoughts on this subject.
 
I could not found any informations on this forum about _www.wingmakers.com project.
I read complete material, have their music, but i am not sure how to classifie it: STO or STS.
anybody knows something?
 
Tigersoap said:
Hello Slobamos

You may read the following text Splitting realities

The Search function might help you as well ;)
And verify in the section "Channel Watch & New Age COINTELPRO" and more specifically for CHANNEL WATCH.

There are a lot of them and you may find something on that subject.
 
Here's a snippet from session 000923 regarding the Wingmakers.

............(L) Well, after reading it, I don't even think I want to ask a question about it. Let's move along here. We have a question about the Wingmaker's information that we pretty much went through and analyzed at an earlier time, but never really brought to the table here. Is the Wingmaker's thing a complete hoax as has been suggested by some analysts?

A: No.

Q: Is the Wingmaker's presentation a source of good clues if one can figure out how to decipher it?

A: Yes.

Q: Are the clues in the poetry, the pages of philosophy or the art?

A: All.

Q: Is the story about the Wingmaker's information true?

A: Some.

Q: Is the Wingmaker's material "left" from the future into the past for someone to find in the present?

A: Close.
 
Vulcan59 said:
Here's a snippet from session 000923 regarding the Wingmakers.
And, the context in which that snippet was presented - from http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/realitysplit1.htm
Laura said:
Well, that was curious enough, considering the fact that when I posted the excerpt from the session where we asked about the Wingmakers, I did not add any commentary which would have clarified the subject. The reader will notice that the C's said it was not a "complete hoax," which was then amplified by saying that there was only "some" of it that was true. "Some" - when the C's use the term - is a polite way of saying "very little." And this was what we had determined ourselves by analysis, which was discussed at the session, but which was lengthy and was not transcribed. This is one of the problems with people reading these sessions without knowing the background, or what the context of the questions is. When I asked the question about whether or not the Wingmaker's material was a source of good clues, the INTENT in the question, as we had been discussing, was that it was designed to lead AWAY from the truth, and that we could discern possible truths by looking at the OPPOSITE ideas presented! Nevertheless, I posted the excerpt, assuming that familiar readers would be able to chew on it and grok what the C's were saying in their terse responses.
 
Thanks Anart. I guess I should have also included the snippet from realitysplit1 for the proper context.
 
Vulcan59 said:
Thanks Anart. I guess I should have also included the snippet from realitysplit1 for the proper context.
Yeah, context always helps and keeping in mind the way Cs will answer things. If for example if asked "Is it possible that California will fall into the ocean in the near future" Cs might answer "yes", but if you asked "is it probable..." Cs might answer "no". Is possible to create a whole world of mis-reading from just using transcripts with no background reading.
 
I was sure there was something good in wingmakers. Not all, of course. It's quite commercial. But when I read some documents, I was astonished by the relevance by certain texts. "Very little", indeed, yes.

What I essentially remember of the WM is _http://www.wingmakers.com/downloads/lyricus5.pdf
= there is no necessity to isolate
 
Hi all

I'm new here. I was "directed" here, linked from the page http://www.cassiopaea.org
As I understand it, the mentionned page "belongs to the same group"; so hopefully I'm right here to discuss the following:

In the book "The High Strangeness: Of Dimensions, Densities, and the Process of Alien Abduction" you can read in the foreword, that the so-called "cassiopaeans" state, they are
"...you in the future."
[1] for ex.

The same statement was give from the source (or the builders) of the "Ancient Arrow Site", they call themselves the "wingmakers", a "future version of humanity"[2]. Ever heard of?

The winkmakers state also, that there are "time capsules" spread over the whole world, that were purposely "left" here (from the future?) in order that humanity will find" them (and get them to work?), when "the time is right".

Now - as the cassiopaeans statement reminded me of the wingmakers, I wanted to know, if there is anyone that sees here a relationship - as I do? What do you think about it. Does anyone know anything?

I would appreciate to read about your thoughts concernig this issue.

I hope my english is understanable enough. For critics regarding my english, please use the contact-form.

[1]
http://books.google.ch/books?id=gwM-bsYGKkMC&pg=PP1&ots=u23vfUNNtf&dq=%22The+High+Strangeness:+Of+Dimensions,+Densities,+and+the+Process+of+Alien+Abduction%22&sig=TbIwUxqmWxoZGt9eSCWu1CwL4gk#PPA7,M1
[2]
http://www.wingmakers.com/arrow/briefs/readfirst.html
[3]
http://www.wingmakers.com/arrow/acio/Sauthers.html
 
Hey taiki and wellcome.
Wingmakers topic was already mentioned on this forum before.
Here one of the links.
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=6330
Please first use search option for additional info or before posting a question.
 
Hi Keit

thanks for the wellcome!
I did search for "ancient arrow", but was to stupid to look for "wingmakers". Sorry.
 
The basic tenet with the wingmakers material is the idea of "don't do anything" except "immerse yourself in the music, poetry, art, and philosophy" and "let it work it's magic on you (changing dna blah blah blah). It's a commercial venture, with quite a following I might add.

I was part of a wm's study group a few years back. At one of our retreats, it dawned on me how clutish it is. And a lot of "it's true because James (the creator of wm's) says it is!!!" kind of circular logic.

It is a way to make money off of people who want answers.

kris
 
Back
Top Bottom