World population (Has a decrease begun?)
- Thread starter syldan
- Start date
s-kur
Jedi Council Member
I think the process of world population's decrease is already began. We observe such triggers as earth changes (at the moment it is all about animals mostly, but animal's kingdom is also "world population"), catastrophic and climatic events which distruct outer system, horrible PTB's acts against people, Ebola, hided shortage of the food, more and more toxic environment ...This triggers will increasing exponentially beacuse there is NOT ENOUGH conditions to stop it in the whole world. And this is why cosmic factors will enter the game.
Edit: grammar issues :)
Edit: grammar issues :)
crystalicdream
Padawan Learner
I also think that it has begun already. Especially with Ebola, the warning that animals populations are in heavy decline worldwide and the weather changes...
We have interesting times right ahead.
We have interesting times right ahead.
When checking quite a lot people go with wars but also with illnesses like Ebola or others. And this is on top of "the normal things" so to say. But when you check quite some people also go as victims of earth changes here a flood, there a storm, or a landslide or a volcano eruption. Some were taken by animals gone "mad". There may not too many connected with the single event but they sum up as there are so many earth change events. The same applies to the animal kingdom. A lot of them were dying lately. The reports are heaping on SOTT - so many of them. We are already living in interesting times IMO.
ealvizo2012
Padawan Learner
According to this page NO ... http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_noticias.htm
Increases as two people per second. But expect the response of the C's
Increases as two people per second. But expect the response of the C's
According to the 30th August 2014 session:
Maybe their actions have a chance of backfiring, due to their wishful thinking and inability to realize they can't control everything?
Maybe their actions have a chance of backfiring, due to their wishful thinking and inability to realize they can't control everything?
syldan
Dagobah Resident
Possible follow-up questions:
Can you give us a percentage pertaining to the number of 4d candidates, within the current population, at this present time?
Can you give us a percentage pertaining to the number of 'psychopaths', within the current population, at the present time?
syldan
Dagobah Resident
Q: During the same session when you gave us pretty precise numbers for world population, you also mentionned the population living under the surface, the inner earth dwellers, but never gave figures as to how many in total might be living under the surface. Could you give us some numbers pertaining to the inner earth population, as well as the surface dwellers.
Q: As far as populations living under thew surface, could you give us a rough breakdown of the 'various' groups (for example 3D, 4D, etc.) presently living under there, as well as the time frame period which they have been living underground? Are there groups that are form under ground that transit to surface and go back under during this preparation for 'the harvest'?
Q: Also can you give us a percentage of 'bio-cybernetic beings' having been introduced into the general populations on the surface? There was also at one point question of 'detrimental robots' spawned underground, are any of those on the surface at present? Do the PTB plan to introduce many more of these in the near future in the general population? Is there any distinctive signs, or behavioural patterns that could serve as clues in order so that we could somehow identify them for ourselves?
romochar said:
The first question would probably not be answered by the Cs (pretty sure it was asked before).
As for the second question, the last time they were asked about demography of psychopaths, the numbers indicated about 6% globally. I doubt that figure has changed much in the last few years.
romochar said:
Can you think of a real, practical reason why these questions should be answered? Are they vital for humanity at the moment? Or is it just curiosity?
syldan
Dagobah Resident
In rereading this thread, i began wondering how many of us, on this forum, would like the C's answers to these questions? Because although i wrote them as personnal questions, they somehow concern each one of us.
While hoping that this is not beginning to read as 'obsessive' because it is merely a series of questions that, in my view, could/would can/do HELP an individual position themself better, especially in regards to the fear factor. I say this because, in my experience, upon reading the Wave and the transcripts for the first time years ago, these questions really stuck to me, and it is only after several reads and internal change from work on myself, that i began to put this more into perspective along with other 'alarming' (to me) facts. This is taking into account that all the answers are in constant flux.
The number ONE question of the series closely linked in regards to the true demographics of our 'global situation', would become something along these lines:
Naturally, the answer to this first question, determines if it is even worthwhile to continue with this line of questionning. If the C's suggest that these issues are not important for us to know 'now', then we skip the next demographics questions and move on!
If on the other hand, the C's were to answer, (as i feel) that these answers would/could be helpful in order to alleviate the fear that these issues may generate, then the following questions of the series (rewritten of course) could be asked?
Am i alone in thinking that these things are important to know?
Thank you all for this wonderful forum and such an opportunity for networking and 'connecting our heart chakras as a tribal unit'.
While hoping that this is not beginning to read as 'obsessive' because it is merely a series of questions that, in my view, could/would can/do HELP an individual position themself better, especially in regards to the fear factor. I say this because, in my experience, upon reading the Wave and the transcripts for the first time years ago, these questions really stuck to me, and it is only after several reads and internal change from work on myself, that i began to put this more into perspective along with other 'alarming' (to me) facts. This is taking into account that all the answers are in constant flux.
The number ONE question of the series closely linked in regards to the true demographics of our 'global situation', would become something along these lines:
Naturally, the answer to this first question, determines if it is even worthwhile to continue with this line of questionning. If the C's suggest that these issues are not important for us to know 'now', then we skip the next demographics questions and move on!
If on the other hand, the C's were to answer, (as i feel) that these answers would/could be helpful in order to alleviate the fear that these issues may generate, then the following questions of the series (rewritten of course) could be asked?
Am i alone in thinking that these things are important to know?
Thank you all for this wonderful forum and such an opportunity for networking and 'connecting our heart chakras as a tribal unit'.
Courageous Inmate Sort
Jedi Master
romochar said:
Even though many of your questions touch on interesting subjects, in my opinion the one that could have a more practical implication is the title of the thread itself. That is, a decrease in global population would be a relevant marker for things to come if it signifies a trend for the near future.
However, considering the ~1.1% population growth rate for 2013 ( Link ), I don't think we have reached the point of a decrease in global population yet. The absolute number of deaths reported from Ebola so far is very small in relation to the global population. Even though it doesn't have the same panic factor, the slow-killing diseases of modern civilization (as well as all the fertility problems) are probably much more relevant in terms of reducing the population, so far.
Using the information on the link posted by ealvizo2012, 2014 saw 48 million deaths and 116 million births, that means that 68 million more deaths would be necessary just to begin a decrease in global population. This means a 240% increase in general mortality rate, which I'm inclined to think would be noticed and reported.
Courageous Inmate Sort
Jedi Master
Glad I could help, romochar.
