hello to the forum.
1. this is emotional message to the forum on the subject of the aether/ether.
2. please pardon me if i first dwell on some of my previous considerations which will explain the present message.
3. i was trained as a mechanical engineer, but always had an interest in the mysterious, the unexplained.
4. when i took my retirement in 1999, i wanted to get more informed on the mysterious phenomena which are reported wordwide, such as ufos, levitation, bilocation, synchronicity, death and life after death, parapsychology, joung, catholic religion, jesus, psychoanalysis, miracles, buddhism, shamanism, animal instincts, group soul, prophecy, etc, etc...
5. i was ready to read on such subjets without prejudice, but with a critical view and i was free to do so because i was no more constrained by official thinking models, and because i have really encountered phenomena which were outside of the spirit of my engineering education.
6. i discovered the cassiopaeans many years ago and i found their site intriguing, also because the channeling appeared to take place in realtime, without transmission delay. i have read several of the books by laura, and i liked her approach to find out the truth so that she does not have to tell wrong answers to the queries of her children.
7. also i found the answers provided by the cassiopaeans to be credible and pedagogic. i have read all transcripts and i have tried to condensee all answers in a single file, which i attach for your perusal.
8. since very long i was obsessed by the concept of the ether, because only the ether could explain the instantenous transmissions often observed, and which violate the need to rely on the speed of light for the transmission of information.
9. i was also intrigued by the book of houellebecq “les particules elementaires”, which built upon the experiments of alain aspect at orsay, france, and i was highly pleased that this work was rewarded by the physics nobel 2022. indeed, the intrication of particles irrespective of their separation demonstrates that the intricated particles remain a single entity even with a spatial distance between them. this outlines that space does not exist, and time does not exist, as claimed by the cass, by the bouddha when he had his illumination. when bouddah then returned to 3d, he found it impossible to describe his experience because any partial explanations required a further level of knowledge, and the number of explanation levels is infinite. hence, any vision available in 4d cannot be translated into 3d. the same for christ.
10. so, the concept of the aether was always in my mind, because aether must connect the whole universe instantaneously, therefore rendering the concepts of time and distance superfluous. i also assumed that the instantenous apparitions of ufos must be linked to the use of the aether.
11. to allow this instanteneous dissemination of information through the universe then also implies that the aether must be infinitely rigid, and the the whole universe must be embedded in the aether.
12. this would also explain how our thoughts, by impacting the aether, achieve their implementation, and the value of prayer. as this aether covers the whole universe, is unbiquitus, and reacts to thoughts, one could call the aether god, but this is less relevant.
13. during my retirement, i have constantly been reading and one day i fell on harold aspden. i did not seek to reproduce his reasonings, but i liked his invention of a modern form of aether, and i was scandalised that wiki did not have an entry on aspden.
14. since a long time, i also read “bibliotecapleyades” and i found may relevant articles in there. recently, i was fed up to always read bp at random, and i decided to read it consecutively from the beginning, which was june 2004. i arrived at novemer 2004, and saw the entry “why speak of an aether”, and there i discovered a site in which all of my initial wishes were satisfied:
- he spoke of tesla, who intrigued me for a long time, also because his papers were confiscated at his death,
- of reich and orgone, which i read a long time ago, and who met the same fate as tesla,
- of aspden, censured by wiki.
- on bearden
15. so, this site of aetherometry, and for the first time, included all the aether pioneers i knew, and the work of these pioneers appears to be extensively documented, including free energy applications.
16. therefore, this is why i recommend that interested persons study this site to assess its validity.
17. there is an almost infinite amount of literature provided by only 2 authors, paulo n correa and his wife alexandra n correa. i wonder how these 2 people could write this enormous amount of documentation.
18. i checked aetherometry in wiki: it is condemned as idiocy in rationalwiki, and in wiki. however, i would not take the wiki comments and appreciations at face value, but i suggest that the arguments of aetheronomy be read with an open mind and with goodwill.
19. i am sure that ark knows all this, and i would accept his assessment rather thant the vitriolic opinions of wiki.
20. i cannot imagine that the correa couple would have invested so much work in total nonsense as wiki suggests. surely, there must be at least a kernel of value in their theory.
21. they have also written a book on the co2 nonsense, which i scanned and which i believe worth reading with an open mind.
should i be wrong, it does not matter as i have nothing to loose.
should i be right, the better.
1. this is emotional message to the forum on the subject of the aether/ether.
2. please pardon me if i first dwell on some of my previous considerations which will explain the present message.
3. i was trained as a mechanical engineer, but always had an interest in the mysterious, the unexplained.
4. when i took my retirement in 1999, i wanted to get more informed on the mysterious phenomena which are reported wordwide, such as ufos, levitation, bilocation, synchronicity, death and life after death, parapsychology, joung, catholic religion, jesus, psychoanalysis, miracles, buddhism, shamanism, animal instincts, group soul, prophecy, etc, etc...
5. i was ready to read on such subjets without prejudice, but with a critical view and i was free to do so because i was no more constrained by official thinking models, and because i have really encountered phenomena which were outside of the spirit of my engineering education.
6. i discovered the cassiopaeans many years ago and i found their site intriguing, also because the channeling appeared to take place in realtime, without transmission delay. i have read several of the books by laura, and i liked her approach to find out the truth so that she does not have to tell wrong answers to the queries of her children.
7. also i found the answers provided by the cassiopaeans to be credible and pedagogic. i have read all transcripts and i have tried to condensee all answers in a single file, which i attach for your perusal.
8. since very long i was obsessed by the concept of the ether, because only the ether could explain the instantenous transmissions often observed, and which violate the need to rely on the speed of light for the transmission of information.
9. i was also intrigued by the book of houellebecq “les particules elementaires”, which built upon the experiments of alain aspect at orsay, france, and i was highly pleased that this work was rewarded by the physics nobel 2022. indeed, the intrication of particles irrespective of their separation demonstrates that the intricated particles remain a single entity even with a spatial distance between them. this outlines that space does not exist, and time does not exist, as claimed by the cass, by the bouddha when he had his illumination. when bouddah then returned to 3d, he found it impossible to describe his experience because any partial explanations required a further level of knowledge, and the number of explanation levels is infinite. hence, any vision available in 4d cannot be translated into 3d. the same for christ.
10. so, the concept of the aether was always in my mind, because aether must connect the whole universe instantaneously, therefore rendering the concepts of time and distance superfluous. i also assumed that the instantenous apparitions of ufos must be linked to the use of the aether.
11. to allow this instanteneous dissemination of information through the universe then also implies that the aether must be infinitely rigid, and the the whole universe must be embedded in the aether.
12. this would also explain how our thoughts, by impacting the aether, achieve their implementation, and the value of prayer. as this aether covers the whole universe, is unbiquitus, and reacts to thoughts, one could call the aether god, but this is less relevant.
13. during my retirement, i have constantly been reading and one day i fell on harold aspden. i did not seek to reproduce his reasonings, but i liked his invention of a modern form of aether, and i was scandalised that wiki did not have an entry on aspden.
14. since a long time, i also read “bibliotecapleyades” and i found may relevant articles in there. recently, i was fed up to always read bp at random, and i decided to read it consecutively from the beginning, which was june 2004. i arrived at novemer 2004, and saw the entry “why speak of an aether”, and there i discovered a site in which all of my initial wishes were satisfied:
- he spoke of tesla, who intrigued me for a long time, also because his papers were confiscated at his death,
- of reich and orgone, which i read a long time ago, and who met the same fate as tesla,
- of aspden, censured by wiki.
- on bearden
15. so, this site of aetherometry, and for the first time, included all the aether pioneers i knew, and the work of these pioneers appears to be extensively documented, including free energy applications.
16. therefore, this is why i recommend that interested persons study this site to assess its validity.
17. there is an almost infinite amount of literature provided by only 2 authors, paulo n correa and his wife alexandra n correa. i wonder how these 2 people could write this enormous amount of documentation.
18. i checked aetherometry in wiki: it is condemned as idiocy in rationalwiki, and in wiki. however, i would not take the wiki comments and appreciations at face value, but i suggest that the arguments of aetheronomy be read with an open mind and with goodwill.
19. i am sure that ark knows all this, and i would accept his assessment rather thant the vitriolic opinions of wiki.
20. i cannot imagine that the correa couple would have invested so much work in total nonsense as wiki suggests. surely, there must be at least a kernel of value in their theory.
21. they have also written a book on the co2 nonsense, which i scanned and which i believe worth reading with an open mind.
should i be wrong, it does not matter as i have nothing to loose.
should i be right, the better.
