Brazil Elections

I'm not sure of Bolsonaro's views on Israel? From the information I read on his run for presidency, there was a lot of opposition against him, including "the stabbing attack". Maybe, the only way Bolsonaro could have a chance at winning - was to pacify the Israeli crowd?
According to this article, "Netanyahu is the first Israeli prime minister to visit Brazil."


I've been following this thread from the beginning but passively, and I admit I wasn't proactively looking for news updates on Bolsonaro. My comment was based on other people's posts so I guess you caught me not corroborating the data. Oops :whistle:


He just LOVES the US (and Israel) and doesn't seem to want to hide it. He doesn’t like China (which might be one reason he gets along well with Bannon), and he’s completely against regional alliances such as the MERCOSUR (Common South Market, in South America) and abhors the Venezuelan government. Last week, Spanish SOTT published an article saying that his possible chancellor actually thinks a “humanitarian” military intervention could be a possibility. According to Sputnik, he said:

I can see him taking the country further away from BRICS, dismembering Petrobras, growing closer with the US, Argentina, Colombia, and the EU as well as israel (something he’s made clear he intends to do).

Now they need a puppet in a key BRICS player, but they don't have a big choice. So, he's there, ready to be the next lap dog of the US and Israel, to sew more discord in South America, and to hinder BRICS even if in small ways only. That's "good enough". Probably psychopathic enough, but also malleable for whoever wants to control him, give him a bunch of weapons to make him happy, or simply feed his ego to make him do their bidding. He doesn't strike me as a person who would think long-term, so creating tension, and messing up with BRICS may not be a big deal for him, and it plays to the advantage of the controllers.

I'll have a look around to see what's out there about his views on Israel and post them.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure of Bolsonaro's views on Israel? From the information I read on his run for presidency, there was a lot of opposition against him, including "the stabbing attack". Maybe, the only way Bolsonaro could have a chance at winning - was to pacify the Israeli crowd?

I really don't think that's the case. He's known for showing explicit support for Israel and the US, as we can see in some of the articles you posted. I don't think he's clever enough for doing it only to pacify the Israelis, yet, of course, we must still wait and see.

So far, his words are pretty clear, since he's totally in favour of moving the Brazilian embassy to Jerusalem, for example. He's now officially the president, so I guess we'll start seeing some of his actions soon.
 
I've been following this thread from the beginning but passively, and I admit I wasn't proactively looking for news updates on Bolsonaro. My comment was based on other people's posts so I guess you caught me not corroborating the data. Oops :whistle:

Ant 22, I think we're in the same boat? I really didn't take notice of Bolsonaro or his background - until the reported knife attack.
Basically, I've been collecting data that comes available and I really haven't put "any pieces together" including why Netanyahu is so interested in Bolsonaro? Maybe, there is a connection and the Son's are part of it?

I'm really curious, as to what Pompeo might be up too? There is a US Naval Support Detachment in Sao Paulo and Venezuela has been under heavy attack by the US. I'm wondering if Pompeo wants to use Brazil in some capacity and Israel is lining itself up to sell Military hardware, etc.?

Speaking to reporters in Brasilia, Pompeo said Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua were countries that do not share the democratic values that unite the United States and Brazil.

We have an opportunity to work alongside each other against authoritarian regimes,” he said at a news conference.

Here is a list of Military bases in Brazil. Brazil is NOT in NATO.
List of Brazilian military bases

There is an American military base in Brazil. The U.S. Naval Support Detachment, Sao Paulo is a U.S. Marine Detachment, based in Sao Paulo. The unit is under the command of the U.S. Navy's Fourth Fleet, which is responsible for the South Atlantic and Caribbean Ocean.

I really don't think that's the case. He's known for showing explicit support for Israel and the US, as we can see in some of the articles you posted. I don't think he's clever enough for doing it only to pacify the Israelis, yet, of course, we must still wait and see.

So far, his words are pretty clear, since he's totally in favour of moving the Brazilian embassy to Jerusalem, for example. He's now officially the president, so I guess we'll start seeing some of his actions soon.

Yas, I'm on the fence with you - as an observer. Like you, I think it's too early yet to see what Bolsonaro has in mind and where the US and Israel fit in?
 
Yas, I'm on the fence with you - as an observer. Like you, I think it's too early yet to see what Bolsonaro has in mind and where the US and Israel fit in?

Yes, we still have to see what he does, but I have an idea about where the US and Israel fit. It was mentioned here before:

- Now they need a puppet in a key BRICS player, but they don't have a big choice. So, he's there, ready to be the next lap dog of the US and Israel, to sew more discord in South America, and to hinder BRICS even if in small ways only. That's "good enough". Probably psychopathic enough, but also malleable for whoever wants to control him, give him a bunch of weapons to make him happy, or simply feed his ego to make him do their bidding. He doesn't strike me as a person who would think long-term, so creating tension, and messing up with BRICS may not be a big deal for him, and it plays to the advantage of the controllers.

-Latin America is, and has been for a long time the "back patio" of the US. In that sense, there isn't probably a lot of strategizing going on, other than making sure the whole continent is chaotic, and that they can have a foot on some countries and a constant flow of drugs for the CIA, plus a bunch of stolen ressources. Apart from the usual obedient countries like Paraguay, Argentina is obeying quite well now, so why not add Brazil to the mix as well? That's probably enough for whoever wants to prevent any good alliances with Russia and China, or any "independent" Latin America.

Each Latin American country has its own importance in terms of domination, I suppose, but recently I came across an article which explained how important Brazil was for the US, besides the fact that it is a BRICS country. First, think about the the amount of resources this huge country has, both natural and human resources. Another thing is that Brazil has always been a bit different from other Latin American countries, in terms of history, culture and how they developed themselves, even their language is different, and they have been an empire as well, so I guess that makes the country a player that they definitively want to have on their side because maybe it has the potential to influence much of what happens in the region. I don't know, that's just an idea.

The article I mention is in Spanish, but basically it speaks about a specific plan for Brazil. Here's one excerpt:

In 1973, US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger stated in Panama the purpose of replacing the US leadership on the continent with that of efficient and faithful allies such as Brazil. A policy of delegation of power: the old strategy of the British Canning. During the visit of dictator Emilio Garrastazú Medici to the United States, President Richard Nixon "officialized" Brazil as the North American model for the development of Latin America. He consecrated Brazil as the sub-Empire.

"We know that as Brazil progresses, so will the rest of the South American continent. The United States and Brazil, friends and allies in the past, are and will be strong and close friends. We will work together for a better future for their people, for our people, for the people of the rest of the continent," said Nixon, who advocated Brazil's development path as The Way for the rest of the hemisphere.

In recognition of the Brazilian military regime's brilliant performance in favor of US official and private interests on the continent, the US decided to reward Brazil with a new hierarchical ascent within the Washington-centered world power scheme. In 1976, during Kissinger's visit, the scheme was established.

"As if he were the Pope at the time of the discoveries, dividing the New World between Spain and Portugal, Metternich and Canning in post-restoration Europe, the megalomaniac Harvard professor decided to consecrate Brazil as a power and attribute to it a kind of tutelage, to be exercised in the name of Washington, over all Latin America," pointed out the brilliant Brazilian analyst Paulo Schilling, at the time.

In addition to attributing this "special mission" to the Brazilian military, Kissinger established a special "power to power" consultation system ( as it was proudly called in Brazil) with the government of Brasilia. Considering that Sashington had signed an equivalent commitment with Japan (which assured him a power status), there was widespread euphoria among the Brazilian military and technocrats.

A cold analysis of the consequences of what had been agreed in Brasilia concluded that the classic inter-American-multilateral (and apparently egalitarian) system was seriously affected. The maximum aspiration of General Golbery do Cauto e Silva and the Brazilian right-wing military was achieved: a new power scheme in the American continent that would assure Brazil a privileged role, that of the main US satellite.

The purpose was to establish that the shortest route to Washington, from any Latin American republic, would necessarily pass through Brasilia. Once the US-Brazil fundamental axis was established, the following secondary axes would be formed: Brazil-Argentina, Brazil-Paraguay, Brazil-Uruguay, Brazil-Chile, and so on.

Integration was attempted on the basis of bilateral schemes, led by Brazil, acting on behalf of the US and transnational corporations.

This last bit is also interesting because Bolsonaro has been saying that he might dissolve the MERCOSUR, which is common market space composed by many South American countries.

Regarding Bolsonaro's love for Israel, before everyone knew he was going to run for president, this man went to the Jordan river to have a special baptism. Now, that doesn't have much to do with Israel's politics maybe, since it is something that many hardcore Evangelists do, which, according to what I've read, is the group that allowed him to become president now. One thing is important though, many Evangelists LOVE Israel and generally accept it as the "chosen people", so if that's his base and his own believe, I wouldn't expect him to not act as if he really thinks that is the case.
 
The article I mention is in Spanish, but basically it speaks about a specific plan for Brazil. Here's one excerpt:

Very interesting piece of History, Yas! It also seems, Chu has a good handle on what might be developing - if Bolsonaro is placing himself in a position to be used as a puppet for the US/Israel?

This last bit is also interesting because Bolsonaro has been saying that he might dissolve the MERCOSUR, which is common market space composed by many South American countries.

There is a Trade War going on and the US/Trump is at the head of it, so I don't know how MERCOSUR fits into the picture? BRICS is also very important. I did see where Putin sent a Delegation to Bolsonaro's Inauguration.

December 31, 2018 - Duma speaker to lead Russian delegation to president's inauguration ceremony in Brazil
Duma speaker to lead Russian delegation to president's inauguration ceremony in Brazil

Jan. 2, 2019 - Lower house speaker conveys Putin’s greetings to Brazil’s new president
Lower house speaker conveys Putin’s greetings to Brazil’s new president

Jair Bolsonaro and Vyacheslav Volodin also spoke out in favor of further developing bilateral ties.

Speaker of Russia’s State Duma (lower house of parliament) Vyacheslav Volodin has conveyed greetings and congratulations from Russian President Vladimir Putin to Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro who took oath of office on Tuesday.

"During the new president’s meeting with the heads of the delegations, which arrived to take part in the inauguration ceremony, Bolsonaro had a conversation with State Duma Speaker Volodin, during which the State Duma Chairman conveyed congratulations and greetings from Russian President Vladimir Putin," the State Duma’s press service told reporters.

Bolsonaro responded by thanking Volodin and asked to convey his greetings to Putin.

Brazil’s president and State Duma Speaker also spoke out in favor of further developing bilateral ties.

Bolsonaro’s inauguration ceremony who won the runoff election on October 28, 2018, was held on Tuesday, January 1. The mandate of the politician representing the conservative Social Liberal Party will expire on December 31, 2022.

Volodin earlier met in Brasilia with speaker of the lower house of the Brazilian parliament Rodrigo Maia and speaker of the lower house of the Spanish parliament, Ana Maria Pastor Julian.
 
Back-dated November 30, 2018 - Brazil to host next BRICS summit in 2019
Brazil to host next BRICS summit in 2019

1209029.jpg

© AP Photo/Anupam Nath

BUENOS AIRES, November 30. /TASS/. The leaders of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) nations have agreed to hold their next summit in Brazil in 2019, according to the statement passed after their informal meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Twenty summit in Buenos Aires on Friday.

"We look forward to the 11th BRICS Summit to be hosted by Brazil in 2019 and extend our full support to Brazil as the incoming BRICS Chair," the statement says.

Russian President Vladimir Putin arrived in Buenos Aires earlier in the day to attend the Group of Twenty summit. Before that, he held an informal meeting with his BRICS counterparts.


January 2, 2019 - Bolsonaro Presidential Decree grants sweeping powers over NGOs in Brazil
Bolsonaro presidential decree grants sweeping powers over NGOs in Brazil | Reuters

r
FILE PHOTO: Brazil's new President Jair Bolsonaro gestures after receiving the presidential sash from outgoing President Michel Temer at the Planalto Palace, in Brasilia, Brazil January 1, 2019. REUTERS/Sergio Moraes/File Photo

Brazil’s new President Jair Bolsonaro has used an executive order to give his government secretary potentially far-reaching and restrictive powers over non-governmental organizations working in Brazil.

The temporary decree, which will expire unless it is ratified within 120 days by Congress, mandates that the office of the Government Secretary, Carlos Alberto Dos Santos Cruz, “supervise, coordinate, monitor and accompany the activities and actions of international organizations and non-governmental organizations in the national territory.”

The order, signed late on Tuesday, is part of a raft of measures the far-right Bolsonaro administration implemented on its first day in power.

Jose Miguel Vivanco, director of the Americas division of Human Rights Watch, said the decree on NGOs could be viewed in a positive light, but also expressed concerns.

“If the purpose of the measure were to facilitate a constructive relationship between international civil society groups and the government at its highest level, it would be a welcome step,” he said.

“However, what strikes me is the use of the terms ‘supervise’ and ‘monitor’, which suggest a fundamental lack of understanding of the independent role that these entities play in any open and democratic society.”

The decree did not give reasons for the change, but Bolsonaro said on Twitter that NGOs had “exploited and manipulated” the country’s indigenous population of about 900,000.

“Let us together integrate these citizens and value all Brazilians,” he wrote.

The president’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Bolsonaro is a former army captain and his cabinet is full of former high-ranking military officials - including Santos Cruz, a retired general.

Brazil’s military has long considered that the rich resources of the vast, sparsely-populated Amazon should be protected from any foreign interest.

Environmental and rights groups were already upset by the new government’s decision to give the agriculture ministry power over indigenous land rights decisions, and the latest move risks causing further tension with such groups.

A longtime member of Congress, Bolsonaro said at his inauguration on Tuesday that his election had freed the country from “socialism and political correctness.”
 
If Bolsonaro really wants to transform and secure Brazil's natural resources and stabilize the economy - he would be wise to take the needed steps - like President Rodrigo Duterte did in the Philippine's? Limit US involvement in it's affairs and minimize any foreign manipulation. Another situation Balsonaro might be dealing with is the power structure of the Catholic church. As can be noted in the US's meddling in Nicaragua, the Pope is in on the game of creating chaos. Philippine's Duterte has openly denounced the Church for it's corruption and interference into domestic affairs. Brazil has a high population of Catholics.

Catholic Church in Brazil - Wikipedia
The Catholic Church is the largest denomination in the country, where 130 million people, or 64.6% of the Brazilian population, are self-declared Catholics. These figures makes Brazil the single country with the largest Catholic community in the world.


January 2, 2019 - Pompeo, Brazil's new government target Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua
Pompeo, Brazil's new government target Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua | Reuters

Back-dated June 19, 2018 - US Gov. Meddling Machine Boasts of ‘Laying the Groundwork for Insurrection’ in Nicaragua
US Gov. Meddling Machine Boasts of 'Laying the Groundwork for Insurrection' in Nicaragua - Grayzone Project

As Nicaraguan student protest leaders meet with neoconservatives in Washington, DC, a publication funded by the US government’s regime change arm, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), boasts of spending millions of dollars “laying the groundwork for insurrection” against Daniel Ortega.

While some corporate media outlets have portrayed the violent protest movement gripping Nicaragua as a progressive grassroots upswell, the country’s own student leaders have suggested otherwise.

In early June, Nicaragua’s leading young activists went on a junket to Washington, DC, on the dime of the US government-funded right-wing advocacy group Freedom House. The Nicaraguan student leaders were there to beseech Donald Trump and other right-wing US government officials to help them in their fight against Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega.

On the excursion to the US capital, the young activists posed for photo-ops with some of the most notorious neoconservatives in the US Congress: Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. The Nicaraguan student leaders were also shepherded to meetings with top officials from the State Department and the US government soft power organization USAID. There, they were reassured that they would have Washington’s full-throated support.

A month before the student protesters’ meetings with ultra-conservative lawmakers in Washington, a publication funded by the US government’s regime change arm, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), bluntly asserted that organizations backed by the NED have spent years and millions of dollars “laying the groundwork for insurrection” in Nicaragua.

This article openly boasting of US meddling was published in the Latin America-focused news website Global Americans, and was authored by US academic Benjamin Waddell, the academic director of the School for International Training in Nicaragua. Following publication of this piece, Global Americans replaced the term “insurrection” with the more innocuous word “change.” The original headline can however still be seen in the article’s URL.

Despite the cosmetic alteration, Waddell’s article offers a remarkably candid assessment of the impact of the National Endowment for Democracy’s sustained investments in Nicaraguan civil society. The author’s conclusions inadvertently echoed those of Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega and his supporters, who have framed the protests as a carefully staged plot backed to the hilt by Washington.

“International press has depicted the rapid escalation of civil unrest in Nicaragua as a spontaneous explosion of collective discontent, triggered by the government’s changes to its insolvent social security system and rooted in more than a decade of authoritarian rule by the Ortega-Murillo family,” Waddell wrote. “And while the underlying causes of the turmoil are rooted in government mismanagement and corruption, it’s becoming more and more clear that the U.S. support has helped play a role in nurturing the current uprisings.”

In another striking passage, Waddell concluded, “the NED’s current involvement in nurturing civil society groups in Nicaragua sheds light on the power of transnational funding to influence political outcomes in the 21st century.” (Article continues.)


December 14, 2018 - Every Single Member of US Congress Approved Crushing Sanctions on Nicaragua
Every Single Member of US Congress Approved Crushing Sanctions on Nicaragua - Grayzone Project

After defeating a violent US-backed coup attempt, Nicaragua’s elected government faces the NICA Act. The bill aims to force the Sandinistas from power by ratcheting up economic despair.

Every single member in both chambers of the US Congress approved legislation that will impose sanctions and financial restrictions on Nicaragua in an explicit effort to weaken its government.

Known as the NICA Act, the bill is now on its way to the desk of President Donald Trump, who will almost certainly sign it into law. Its passage was spearheaded by neoconservative lawmakers centered around the Miami lobby of right-wing Latin American exiles dedicated to eradicating any iteration of socialism in the Western hemisphere.

The United States has spent decades trying to topple Nicaragua’s government, now led by the left-wing Sandinista movement. In April, US-backed opposition figures launched an unsuccessful and exceedingly violent coup attempt in the Central American country — one of the last bastions of leftist politics in an increasingly right-leaning Latin America.

The newly approved Nicaraguan Investment and Conditionality Act (NICA) will give the US president the authority to impose targeted sanctions on Nicaraguan government officials, former officials, or people purportedly “acting on behalf of” Managua.

The bill also seeks to prevent international financial institutions from providing “any loan or financial or technical assistance” to Nicaragua’s government.

The NICA Act enjoyed bipartisan support, but the campaign behind it was largely led by neoconservative Florida Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, with help from Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. Ros-Lehtinen and Cruz met for a Facebook live this December 13 to celebrate the bill’s passage.

In June, these three right-wing Cuban-American lawmakers gathered with young leaders of the Nicaraguan opposition in Washington, DC.

The NICA Act encourages the US government to increase assistance to anti-government “civil society in Nicaragua, including independent media, human rights, and anti-corruption organizations” and to “support the protection of human rights and anti-corruption advocates in Nicaragua.”

The legislation also suggests that political negotiations should be “mediated by the Catholic Church in Nicaragua,” which has for decades supported violent right-wing forces in the region.

This October, leaked audio revealed the Catholic Church’s auxiliary bishop of Managua, Silvio Baez, conspiring with the opposition to oust Nicaragua’s elected president, Daniel Ortega.

The unity that we need at this moment must include everyone opposed to the government, even if they are suspected of being opportunists, abortionists, homosexuals, [drug] traffickers…,” Baez declared, according to a translation of the leaked audio.
Baez urged the opposition to put up more of the tranque roadblocks that had plunged the country into violence and strangled its economy, describing them as “an extraordinary invention.”

In November, USAID Director Mark Green announced an infusion of $4 million to civil society and media groups opposed to the Sandinista front.

Neoconservative gloating
In September, the NICA Act was combined with a remarkably similar bill from Democratic New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez: the Nicaragua Human Rights and Anticorruption Act, which imposed additional sanctions on Nicaraguan government officials.

Menendez – a Cuban-American whose legal defense from corruption charges was bankrolled by the pro-Israel lobby – joined his neoconservative colleagues in referring to Nicaragua’s democratically elected president, Daniel Ortega, as a “dictator” who leads a “regime.”

Ortega — who voluntarily stepped down from power after losing an election to a US-backed right-wing oligarch in 1990 — won his third presidential term in 2011 with 62 percent of the vote, in what international observers recognized was a fair election. Even the staunchly anti-Sandinista New York Times admitted at the time that Ortega had widespread support.

Ros-Lehtinen declared that “the NICA Act that will help the Nicaraguan people break free of Ortega’s despotic rule.” She has previously insinuated that Nicaragua was a national security threat to the US, proclaiming, “We must also remain vigilant of efforts by Russia, Cuba, Venezuela, China and Iran that continue to help Ortega with military equipment, surveillance, and other technology support.”

For his part, Rubio boasted, “We are one step closer to expanding sanctions and other pressures against the oppressive Ortega regime.”

In lieu of a formal vote, the NICA Act was sent to the bipartisan House Committee on Foreign Affairs for amendments, and these changes were then agreed to by each chamber, without any objections.

On November 27, amendments for the combined legislation were approved with unanimous consent in the Senate. Then on December 11, the changes were unanimously approved in the House without objection. (Article continues.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yas
Yes, it's all quite strange actually, because in those declarations about Nicaragua, Venezuela and so on, you see that Bolsonaro's government is fully siding with the US' interventionists views. Yet, here is the new Foreign Minister promising to fight against "globalism":

Brazil's new foreign minister says country will abandon globalism | Reuters

Brazil’s new Foreign Minister Ernesto Araujo said on Wednesday that his country would revert to its former, less globalist policies and support those fighting against “tyranny” in Venezuela.

At the United Nations, Brazil would no longer serve the interests of international non-governmental organizations, he said, in a speech made after being sworn in.

Araujo’s thoughts on international relations mark an abrupt break from Brazil’s traditional conciliatory stances. Araujo said it was time for Brazilians to focus on patriotism and be less concerned with the global order.

Now, I don't understand how fighting against Venezuela is fighting against Globalism :huh:. What I kind of get from it, though, is that it seems that this government superficially took these "slogans" that are proving to be successful to push for their own agenda. Just as some politicians took the leftist ideas that were appealing to people only to push their agenda forward, this people can be using this new fashion of fighting against "globalism", "cultural Marxisms" and so on, because they know that's "catchy" nowadays. I do hope that I'm wrong in this though and still think that we must wait and see.

Here's some more about what this Chancellor said:
"For a long time Brazil spoke to please (...) it wanted to be a good student in the school of "globalism," but Brazil speaks again what it feels, to feel what it is," Araújo said in his first speech as chancellor, adding that "globalism," like socialism, is not irreversible, and that Brazil will "push" it to its starting point.

"Our foreign policy has become atrophied for fear of criticism; I am not afraid of suffering nor am I afraid of being criticized," added the minister, who made few concrete announcements and focused on the need to strengthen nation-states and put multilateralism aside.

In addition, he cited his "admiration" for the United States, whose citizens hoist the flag and respect their heroes, for those who fight against tyranny in Venezuela, the "new" Italy, Hungary and Poland; "those who affirm themselves and not those who refuse," he said.

Araújo said that the world's problem is not xenophobia, but rather hatred of one's own home and that in today's culture there is a "noisy theophobia," a hatred of God, which he seeks to combat.

Regarding the UN, he assured that he will defend "what is important for Brazilians, not what is important for NGOs", and especially the rights of Humanity, among them the one he defined as the most important, the right to be born.

That's quite interesting actually, and the reference to the right to be born is because there's been a huge debate in all Latin American countries lately about legalizing abortion.

Furthermore, we have his Israeli-fan-son twitting about how bad Globalism is:


Translation: "This crazy globalist wave hitchhiking in Gramscian thought and in an irresponsible sophistic pragmatism started to destroy one by one the cultural values on which our institutions are based: family, church, school, state and homeland".

Well, I'm confused... but that makes it all more interesting.

While I was searching a bit, I've found this article in English which is interesting, although I think that the author runs the risk of inferring too much from what we've seen so far. Just like some of us do sometimes with other people, like Trump. So, again, we have to wait and see how all these words translate into actions now.
 
Yes, it's all quite strange actually, because in those declarations about Nicaragua, Venezuela and so on, you see that Bolsonaro's government is fully siding with the US' interventionists views. Yet, here is the new Foreign Minister promising to fight against "globalism:

I would imagine - the new Foreign Minister would probably side with the Military - in not wanting a new US Military base?

January 5, 2019 - Brazil Military ineasy with Bolsonaro's openness to US base: source
Brazil military uneasy with Bolsonaro's openness to U.S. base: source | Reuters

Comments from Brazil’s new right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro that he would be open to the United States operating a military base on Brazilian soil have not been well received by the country’s armed forces, a senior army officer told Reuters on Saturday.

Bolsonaro, who took office on Jan. 1, said in a television interview on Thursday he might be willing to allow a U.S. base in Brazil as a way to counter Russian influence in Venezuela, a move that would mark a sharp shift in direction for Brazilian foreign policy.

Brazil’s military would be against a U.S. base in the country, the officer said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he has not been authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

He added that the possibility of ceding territory for a base took officers by surprise in the Brazilian military, which has traditionally been a zealous guardian of national sovereignty.

The Ministry of Defense said on Saturday it has not been informed of such a proposal by Bolsonaro, a former Army officer turned politician who has appointed retired generals to his cabinet.

The president has not discussed this with the defense minister,” said Major Sylvia Martins, a spokeswoman for the ministry.
 
January 5, 2019 - Brazil Military ineasy with Bolsonaro's openness to US base: source
Brazil military uneasy with Bolsonaro's openness to U.S. base: source | Reuters

That's interesting. I read somewhere that the military in Brazil is actually quite nationalist, in a true sense and not the phony nationalism attributed to Bolsonaro. What I read was that the military chose to support Bolsonaro also because they didn't have a better choice, yet, they aren't in full agreement with his views on economics and, as we see here, his love for the US.

This article is old, but it tells a little bit about the military's nationalism:
(Translation might not be very good, I'm doing it quickly in DeepL)

Odebrecht is the key to Brazil's military industrial complex

Brazil's big private companies were born under the wing of the state. These are family groups that began with medium-sized enterprises, as shown by the names of many of them: Gerdau steel mill, JBS (founded by Jose Batista Sobrinho, is the largest meat processor in the world) and the construction companies Camargo Correa, Andrade Gutierrez and Odebrecht, among the most important.

Things changed when in 2007 Lula signed the National Defense Strategy (END) that established pathways to enhance the military industrial complex in Sao José dos Campos (Sao Paulo state) and the tasks assigned to the Armed Forces. In 2008, a strategic agreement was signed with France for the construction of five submarines (four conventional and one nuclear), including technology transfer.

The National Submarine Development Program (PROSUB) contemplated in the defense strategy, aimed to acquire the necessary capabilities so that the Navy would be able to deny the use of the sea to any foreign country, with two central tasks: the protection of the Amazon, establishing a second naval base at the Amazon delta, and the defense of oil deposits in the maritime platform (pre-salt), the largest reserves found in the world in decades.
[...]

Odebrecht is not only in charge of building the submarines, but would also be the key company in the Navy's development, a weapon that plans to build 20 conventional submarines and six nuclear ones until 2047, in addition to other developments such as an aircraft carrier built entirely in Brazil. In 2011, Odebrecht bought Mectron, a Brazilian company that manufactures air-to-air missiles, anti-navigation and anti-tank missiles, and radars, thus positioning itself as the most important company in the area of defense.

Military specialists do not hesitate to suspect that behind Odebrecht's corruption allegations there is a geopolitical interest in preventing Brazil from developing its defense capabilities, as pointed out by defesaneet.com.br, one of the country's main military pages.
[...]

The nationalist militaries do not forget that their nuclear defense construction projects, from submarines to uranium enrichment, were systematically blocked by the Brazilian right allied with Western powers, and in particular the United States. The imprisonment of Admiral Othon, president of the state-run Electronuclear, is interpreted by these members of the military in a way similar to the accusations against Odebrecht: the weakening of strategic defense sectors.

Even without agreeing with this position of the nationalist military, it sounds suspicious that with dozens of companies involved in acts of corruption, it is Odebrecht that is at the centre of the storm, which was taken as a symbol of illegal acts throughout the South American region. Time and new leaks will tell who is pulling the strings of the Lava-Jato operation. For now, the unquestionable thing is that the strategic submarine program is suffering significant delays, since the first one should have been launched in 2015.

Then, during Bolsonaro's campaign, there was another instance in which the military was somewhat contrary to Bolsonaro's plans:

The military who support Bolsonaro clash with his candidate for Economy

Jair Bolsonaro's possible government began to exhibit fissures before coming to power because of the contradictions in the management of the economy between the military that surround the controversial candidate and his candidate for the Ministry of Finance.

Guedes has an ultraliberal profile and Bolsonaro promised him that he would be in charge of a "super ministry of economy" that would merge the areas of Treasury, Planning, Industry and General Secretariat.

The future minister, if Bolsonaro wins the ballotage, had generated euphoria in the market with bombastic proposals such as the sale of all state companies, to collect a trillion reais and pay off all of Brazil's debt, and a pension reform that Michel Temer could not carry out.
[...]

But the military began to question the nationalization of Petrobras, which represents 10 percent of Brazil's GDP, because they consider it strategic for the government. As LPO explained, the positions in the state-owned companies are the Brazilian Executive's currency to negotiate with the group of parties that populate Congress.

The sector's refusal to get involved with Petrobras was reflected on Thursday, when PSL president Gustavo Bebianno went out to minimize the oil company's privatization. "He cannot mess with Petrobras because it is a public commodity and should be treated as such," Bebianno said.

So it seems that there's surely more than meets the eye at a first glance and that there are many different sectors trying to push their agenda...
 
That's interesting. I read somewhere that the military in Brazil is actually quite nationalist, in a true sense and not the phony nationalism attributed to Bolsonaro. What I read was that the military chose to support Bolsonaro also because they didn't have a better choice, yet, they aren't in full agreement with his views on economics and, as we see here, his love for the US.

They say Bolsonaro is the 'Brazilian Trump'. Yeah, and that is a problem because, while Trump is a nationalist who loves the US, Bolsonaro is also a 'nationalist' who loves the US!!
 
Thank you all for sharing your insights on the political developments in Brazil.

With all his admiration for Trump (which may be superficial) - will he be pulling the B out of BRICS?

Sergei Lavrov held a press conference on the results of Russian diplomacy in 2018 - today, January 16th. In the "Question and Answer" format that followed after his Introductory speech, there was a question concerning BRICS:

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks and answers to media questions at a news conference on the results of Russian diplomacy in 2018 Moscow, January 16, 2019

DxCQuzXX0AAjc4m.jpg


Question: Jair Bolsonaro has taken office as the President of Brazil. He is dubbed the Trump of the Tropics. Are there any concerns that he could be a Trojan horse for BRICS?

Sergey Lavrov: President of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro contacted our representatives, including State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin, who represented our country at his inauguration. He confirmed his intention to ensure continuity in relations with the Russian Federation and to participate in the further development of BRICS, in which Brazil took over the presidency this year. Literally the other day, our Brazilian colleagues made us aware of their presidency plans, the schedule of ministerial meetings and the summit, and the program that they propose to other members of this group. I do not see any reason to assume that Brazil will play a destructive role in BRICS. On the contrary, the country affirms that the group is one of the priorities in Brazil’s foreign policy.


Streamed live 15 hours ago (2:24:58 min.)
 
One of the first leaders he talked to and then met face to face after being elected was the President of Chile.

Chile has played a many decades, low-key, intelligent game of not pissing off the Empire (thus preventing an Economic Hitman outcome) while being very open to China, Russia and other trading partners such that China has for a number of years surpassed the US as the main $$$ trading partner of Chile. Chile will also be the Southern Cone entry point for the maritime OBOR.

I'm hopeful the current center-right President of Chile informed him on how to play the game and come out ahead as the Empire declines.
 
Brazil’s new right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro will undergo surgery on Monday in Sao Paulo’s Albert Einstein hospital to remove a colostomy bag he has had since he was stabbed on the campaign trail last year, his spokesman said on Friday.

Friday Jan.25, 2019 - Brazil's Bolsonaro to undergo surgery on Monday, VP takes over
Brazil's Bolsonaro to undergo surgery on Monday, VP takes over | Reuters

Vice President Hamilton Mourao will assume the presidency for 48 hours while Bolsonaro is in surgery and during his initial recovery. Bolsonaro will have to stay in Sao Paulo for 10 days, spokesman Army General Otávio Santana do Rêgo Barros said.


Brazilian rescuers were searching for some 200 missing people after a tailings dam burst on Friday at an iron ore mine owned by Vale SA, with seven bodies recovered but the death toll expected to rise sharply.

Friday Jan.25, 2019 - Seven bodies found after Dam burst at Brazil mine, hundreds missing
Seven bodies found after dam burst at Brazil mine, hundreds missing | Reuters

Avimar de Melo Barcelos, the mayor of the town of Brumadinho where the dam burst in Brazil’s mining hub of Minas Gerais state, said seven bodies had been recovered by nightfall.

However, Vale Chief Executive Fabio Schvartsman said only one-third of the roughly 300 workers at the site of the disaster had been accounted for. He said a torrent of sludge tore through the mine’s offices, including a cafeteria during lunchtime.

U.S.-listed shares of Vale tumbled as much as 10 percent after the incident, the second major disaster at a Brazilian tailings dam involving Vale in just over three years.

Both hit Minas Gerais, which is still recovering from the collapse of a larger dam in November 2015 that killed 19 people. That dam, owned by a joint venture between Vale and BHP Billiton called Samarco Mineracao SA, buried a nearby village and devastated a major river with toxic waste in Brazil’s worst environmental disaster.

Operations at Samarco remain halted over legal disputes relating to damages even after the companies settled a $5.28 billion civil lawsuit last year.

Schvartsman said the dam that burst on Friday at the Feijao iron mine was being decommissioned and had a capacity of 12 million cubic meters – a fraction of the roughly 60 million cubic meters of toxic waste released by the Samarco dam break.

“The environmental impact should be much less, but the human tragedy is horrible,” he told journalists at Vale’s offices in Rio de Janeiro. He said equipment had shown the dam was stable on Jan. 10 and it was too soon to say why it collapsed.

Fire brigade spokesman Lieutenant Pedro Aihara said the torrent of mud stopped just short of the local Paraopeba river, a tributary of Brazil’s longest river, the Sao Francisco.

“Our main worry now is to quickly find out where the missing people are,” Aihara said on GloboNews cable television channel. Scores of people were trapped in nearby areas flooded by the river of sludge released by the dam failure.

Helicopters plucked people covered in mud from the disaster area, including a woman with a fractured hip who was among eight injured people taken to hospital, officials said.

The Feijao mine is one of four in Vale’s Paraoeba complex, which includes two processing plants and produced 26 million tonnes of iron ore in 2017, or about 7 percent of Vale’s total output, according to information on the company’s website.

Feijao alone produced 7.8 million tonnes of ore in 2017.

Slideshow (19 Images)
Seven bodies found after dam burst at Brazil mine, hundreds missing | Reuters
 
Back
Top Bottom