Vulcan59 said:Hi Rx,
More info on Buddy List - http://wiki.simplemachines.org/smf/Buddy_list :)
A Buddy List displays all of the members on the forum whom you have added as a “buddy”. This list will also show their online status and contact information if available. If your administrator has enabled the buddy list, you can work with your buddy list from your profile.
No need for a buddy system for that, if someone needs to talk about depression or traumatic events, there is the swamp section for that.Rx said:Actually, I've been thinking lately that a "buddy system" on the forum might be helpful for those members who are at risk of dropping out of the support network due to depression or other traumatic events. This just recently happened to me in fact and a polite inquiry or discreet show of support from a "buddy" might have helped me reconnect sooner. Is there a way that those of us who feel at risk could sign up to have a buddy check in if we go missing from the forum after a period of time? Could the 'buddy list' be used in this way?
Buddies/Ignore List
Inevitably, there will be times when members get along great and times when personalities clash. SMF provides a way to handle both instances. The buddy list allows members to keep track of users they enjoy talking to, while the ignore list hides users they do not want to see. - Source
Psalehesost said:In short, this feature came with the forum software, so it's there, even though it's not really so relevant to our needs.
Leòmhann said::) Rx hi, soon after joining the forum I added many forum members for whom I felt an affinity to my own buddy list ... as far as I can tell, what it offers is mainly an insight into your frame of mind / awareness at the time of adding the buddies to your list
mkrnhr said:No need for a buddy system for that, if someone needs to talk about depression or traumatic events, there is the swamp section for that.Rx said:Actually, I've been thinking lately that a "buddy system" on the forum might be helpful for those members who are at risk of dropping out of the support network due to depression or other traumatic events. This just recently happened to me in fact and a polite inquiry or discreet show of support from a "buddy" might have helped me reconnect sooner. Is there a way that those of us who feel at risk could sign up to have a buddy check in if we go missing from the forum after a period of time? Could the 'buddy list' be used in this way?
Rx said:Writing only came after the depression for me. In the midst of it, I was in pure self- soothing/dissasociative mode and had to work very hard on my own to get out of it since no one around me knew (I have just moved and no one knows me here yet) and this forum was the only community I belonged to at the time.
I still think my idea has potential for community building among its members. I would be happy to check in with a forum member or buddy who has put themselves on a "watch list" if they've gone awhile without posting.
Heimdallr said:Rx said:Writing only came after the depression for me. In the midst of it, I was in pure self- soothing/dissasociative mode and had to work very hard on my own to get out of it since no one around me knew (I have just moved and no one knows me here yet) and this forum was the only community I belonged to at the time.
I still think my idea has potential for community building among its members. I would be happy to check in with a forum member or buddy who has put themselves on a "watch list" if they've gone awhile without posting.
I think such a system is still a prime place where predation, abuse, negative feedback loops, etc. can be fostered. Checking in with an individual instead of a group always leaves the possibility for abuse. Why the desire to do that in place of the network?
Rx said:Absolutely true and I'm not sure how you could have that kind of protection when people are contacting each other personally. Hmmm....maybe it's an idea for those in the FOTCM then? Or maybe not one individual checks in but a team of members instead- that would add better protection for all involved.
Heimdallr said:Rx said:Absolutely true and I'm not sure how you could have that kind of protection when people are contacting each other personally. Hmmm....maybe it's an idea for those in the FOTCM then? Or maybe not one individual checks in but a team of members instead- that would add better protection for all involved.
I'm still confused why that would be done instead of checking in on the forum.