I think the same concept about Thruth fits on Free Will.
Truth is Relative.
Free Will is Relative.
.. I was persuaded that the past was determined and that it was enough of time so that the future finds itself in past and what it becomes definite.
This is Ok from karmic point of view, because the past have a bag full of (Experimented) experiences while about future (counter-part) the bag is empty, so the (quality and quantity of bag full) Past determine the complementary opposed (bag empty) to fix karma and become (balanced) dharma.
Worth to add that it's (very) rare a individual walk through this straight line, as he usually is unaware of the unexplored (empty) areas. Master direction is determined by polarizing accumulated karma, but the path to be followed is never wholly or exclusively a straight line, so
free will is relative.
That simply means that the amount of free will you have is determined by the amount of information you have and then your ability to apply it which turns it into knowledge.
The Bag Full == amount of information you have + ability to apply it.
This (Joe) quoted post was very nice. Individuals are micro-parts of Cosmic Macro-Mechanism so (being individuals), none of them have all the information about the Macro-Cosmos, because they are (specialized evolutionary) micro-parts (of Cosmos). So that, the individuals
Free Will is Relative (to individuals).
be aware of this individuality is the aim of each (soul) consciousness, so from the perspective of individuals, in itself they aim to be micro-cosmos aware of itself, to (everybody) fill the Macro-Cosmos (of itselves).
The Truth of Cosmos (or micro-cosmos) its Relative to (knowledge of) each one, so Free Will must be analog approach.
The tricky is (cosmos) Universe is always changing, so Its Relative.