And he's against the US position on Ukraine, and publicly so. So I guess its a hit and miss thing as with many many others.
War in Israel-Palestine - October 2023
- Thread starter Puma
- Start date
And he's against the US position on Ukraine, and publicly so. So I guess its a hit and miss thing as with many many others.
ZOG?
This session gives some food for thought. Apparently the Soul can actually become detached from the body.
April 4, 2015:
Another practical way of talking about frequency might be that the Soul only 'seats' with the activation of the higher centres. That means, of course, keeping excessive emotionality under control. This might get at the mysterious phrase 'geometry of thought' - namely, that there is a specific 'geometric' relationship between lower and higher centres. All centres can then become geometrically aligned with the truth, or the search for it at least.
Being aligned with the truth isn't a static thing, though. The world is ever-changing, and so constant adjustments need to be made in order to keep the geometry of thought in alignment with the truth of this or that particular situation.
And I think it might be the case that truths are not all created equally, in the sense that missing the truth of why apples turn brown when you cut them is not as significant as the truth of the horrific genocide in Gaza.
I'm no soul doctor, but the fact that this is even possible is kind of incredible. I can't say if Peterson and other conservatives are losing their souls. It sure feels that way, though. After all, some of them seem quite willing to accept that protestors and professors are being beaten for their views. Peterson liked to go on and on and on about Twitter troll demons and cancel culture, but this is next level - justifying genocide, and demonizing those who speak out against it, even if those speaking out against it are woke morons.
He's recently released a video discussing Bill C-63, Canada's censorship bill. It's government-enforced compelled speech, justified by 'protecting children from online predators'. I wonder if JP (or any of them) will get up in arms about the bill that just passed in the US, outlawing 'antisemitism'. In essence, it's the same logic as C-63, government-enforced compelled speech, except this time justified by protecting one ethnic minority from hurt feelings. I'm not holding my breath for him, or any other conservative culture-warriors, to recognize the depth of the hypocrisy here.
This is also an incredible statement. Does this mean it's not even a matter of a spirit attachment, or a walk-in, but literally one body hosting two souls? Not even two aspects of one fractal soul, but two distinct souls? It's hard to fathom.
At any rate, I think we can say that our soul is never in a stable state or a finished product, it's a constant process, or a dynamic equilibrium. The health (if that's the right term) of the soul seems to depend on the degree to which one is attuned to the truth, and also the development and maintenance of an unalterable conscience - a sense of what is right and what is wrong in a basic sense.
It follows that being called a 'great soul' at one point in time is no guarantor of anything. To me it looks like that applies to JP mostly in the recent past, where he definitely was great. But JP has absolutely and totally misunderstood two of the most important events of recent years, the SMO in Ukraine, and the ethnic cleansing in Palestine, and in so doing has sinned against his conscience. Maybe his soul detached a little bit thereby. Or a lot.
This is purely speculation, but this may be part of the reason why Peterson was targeted by 4D STS through the Zionists - his greatness was a threat. So in walks Ben Shapiro.
The US House passed a bill that expands the definition of anti-Semitism. It still needs to be passed in the Senate. The law would codify a definition of anti-Semitism created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA).
So there you have it. The definition itself is so vague that anything stated against anyone who happens to be a Jew - and apparently in some cases against anyone at all ("non-Jewish individuals") - may fall within it.
But it's even worse - it explicitly states that targeting the state of Israel "conceived as a Jewish collectivity" is anti-Semitic. Well, the state of Israel defines itself as 'for the Jewish people', so how can anyone criticize the state of Israel without being anti-Semitic, according to this law??
The Nazis put Jews and other groups in ghettos and exterminated a large number of them. Israel does similar things to Palestinians. But if the law passes, people won't be able to make this comparison because, by law, you'll be 'anti-Semitic'.
The Jewish people often claim that 'Jewishness' is inherited from the mother's side (even though it's also a religion and you have many different 'races' of Jewish people, and I don't think there is such a thing as a Jewish gene). And since the state of Israel defines itself as 'for the Jewish people', then one could make the case, based on the claims of the supporters of Israel themselves, that Israel is a 'racist endeavor'. That is, a project that is intended for one 'race' as opposed to all the others. But if the law goes through, that will make you anti-Semitic by law.
To think that this comes as a reaction to the world's disapproval of Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza.
ADDED:
I was wondering the same thing!
So there you have it. The definition itself is so vague that anything stated against anyone who happens to be a Jew - and apparently in some cases against anyone at all ("non-Jewish individuals") - may fall within it.
But it's even worse - it explicitly states that targeting the state of Israel "conceived as a Jewish collectivity" is anti-Semitic. Well, the state of Israel defines itself as 'for the Jewish people', so how can anyone criticize the state of Israel without being anti-Semitic, according to this law??
The Nazis put Jews and other groups in ghettos and exterminated a large number of them. Israel does similar things to Palestinians. But if the law passes, people won't be able to make this comparison because, by law, you'll be 'anti-Semitic'.
The Jewish people often claim that 'Jewishness' is inherited from the mother's side (even though it's also a religion and you have many different 'races' of Jewish people, and I don't think there is such a thing as a Jewish gene). And since the state of Israel defines itself as 'for the Jewish people', then one could make the case, based on the claims of the supporters of Israel themselves, that Israel is a 'racist endeavor'. That is, a project that is intended for one 'race' as opposed to all the others. But if the law goes through, that will make you anti-Semitic by law.
To think that this comes as a reaction to the world's disapproval of Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza.
ADDED:
I was wondering the same thing!
Last edited:
Ketone Cop
Jedi Master
And so, "ZOG" goes from conspiracy theory to conspiracy fact.
Zionist Occupation Government conspiracy theory - Wikipedia
And therefore suppress free speech, isn't that against 1st amendment?
What would happen if the bill passes the Senate and plataforms are ordered to enforce the law according to the examples below?
From the IHRA
If history is any guide, then the law will pass, someone will break the law and go to jail, the prisoner will appeal the law, and then many years later the Supreme Court will decide. The covid lockdown followed this model too.
It's a war against the human spirit that's being waged, against consciousness. As in Fahrenheit 451, where the regime prevented people from reading, in other words from thinking and reflecting, the same thing is happening now. They started with the plandemia. They put people in prison for that, those who criticised, and they even killed people for telling the truth and well, they're going to do the same thing now because they don't want people to have a conscience, a mind. It's the total decadence of the human being that we're seeing, but that's what totalitarianism is all about, thinking the way they want us to think, yes or yes. For them, there is no alternative.
But in Bradbury's futurist novel, a group of people refused to think the way the totalitarians demanded and this group memorised books, in other words, they refused to lose their minds and consciousness. And not just their own mind or conscience, but that of the whole of humanity.
It's not easy to memorise a book, just as it's not easy to keep a bright mind, not easy to keep our conscience, our spirit, but that's what it's all about. It's a way of fighting totalitarianism.
Well, you know all of this.
But in Bradbury's futurist novel, a group of people refused to think the way the totalitarians demanded and this group memorised books, in other words, they refused to lose their minds and consciousness. And not just their own mind or conscience, but that of the whole of humanity.
It's not easy to memorise a book, just as it's not easy to keep a bright mind, not easy to keep our conscience, our spirit, but that's what it's all about. It's a way of fighting totalitarianism.
Well, you know all of this.
Will that include the Swastikas and Nazi symbols worn and venerated by the Ukrainian army that the US is so ardently supporting?
Touché.Will that include the Swastikas and Nazi symbols worn and venerated by the Ukrainian army that the US is so ardently supporting?
JP's middle name is Bernt.
We know that words carry vibrations. If you pronounce Bernt in English, it will sound really close to Burnt. Could having a name that is so vibrationally close to a 'tarnished' counterpart mean that JP has a major vulnerability that, if not kept in check, could totally alter his character? When the war started, remember how he began wearing flashy dual-colored suits, giving the impression that his body was vertically split in half?
Symbolically, it seems like his inner 'strong bear' was burnt by the Zionists, and replaced by Jordan David Peterson, a shadow of himself.
Last edited:
This is not encouraging. Donald Trump jumps on the 'stop anti-Semitism on campus' band-wagon.
I'm aware that US politicians need to walk a narrow line when it comes to Israel, but surely there are ways of saying things that don't send the message of being Israel's unconditional vassal? How far does being strategic go? When does it turn into an actual betrayal of their own country and basic humanity and common sense?
I'm aware that US politicians need to walk a narrow line when it comes to Israel, but surely there are ways of saying things that don't send the message of being Israel's unconditional vassal? How far does being strategic go? When does it turn into an actual betrayal of their own country and basic humanity and common sense?
For the record, this is the sort of stuff that Jordan Peterson is posting 
:
Nothing to do with genocide. It was "resentful harpies longing for domination" all along!
I'm beginning to think that @iamthatis 's theory of JP literally having lost his soul has merit.
:Nothing to do with genocide. It was "resentful harpies longing for domination" all along!
I'm beginning to think that @iamthatis 's theory of JP literally having lost his soul has merit.
Esote
Dagobah Resident
It seems that most of the "famous" people, like JP, rather than loosing their soul, are just into the band wagon of the up to date politically correct
Maybe he is afraid to be assassinated by the Mossad. Or someone in his family.