As I write
the Adventures With Cassiopaea Series
and its supplements, readers are busy sending their feedback and the Quantum
Future School continues to assess and analyze our observations for deeper
insight. This last process has brought us many advances in the "heating
of the crucible" of our experiences which, as the C's pointed out,
is of great benefit:
Q: (A) A related question concerning our internet activities which have
been going on for some time, and we do it because we feel that it is
necessary, but we don't really know or understand what is the real purpose
of what we are doing. Some people are reading our pages and writing
letters, and then they disappear or they are discouraged, or they do
nothing on their own. We are expending a lot of time on this publishing
of information, but without clear understanding of what we are supposed
to accomplish by this. (L) At this point, it is not accomplishing a
whole lot except drawing down fire on our heads! (A) Right!
A: You should rejoice! From the fire comes light. Patience pays. You
are on the right track. Fear not, have we steered you wrong a lot lately?
fine and good and easy for the C's to say; they aren't the ones taking
the heat! As the well-informed reader might expect, as a result of the
two previous articles on Rene Schwaller
de Lubicz, there have been serious ripples in the Matrix.
for this may be exactly what we reported: because Schwaller and others
of his ilk are the "inspiration" for the current "New Egyptology"
and Occult Uniformitarian Synarchy which is the underlying philosophy
behind most New Age Vacuum Cleaner operations being
propagated on the unsuspecting public at the present time.
covered to some extent, the "teachings" of Schwaller, showing
their premise, and have compared this to the position of the Cassiopaeans
on similar subjects. We have further related these teachings to the problem
of Time Loops and the Atlantean Replay
Trap being set by hyperdimensional self-serving beings with what appear
to be plans to take over our planet and turn it into their own private
"energy farm," which does not include any beneficial plans for
humanity in general. Naturally, exposing these things inevitably leads
to either the appearance on the scene of new "agents" of the
Matrix, or the "reprogramming" and/or repositioning
of those agents already set up on the Game Board.
With Cassiopaea Series was begun as an effort to develop understanding
of the actions and motivations of the various "agents," because
it is only in the broader context that we can understand that there is
a "forest" and not just a couple of trees. It is also only in
this broader context that the full multi-millennial, hyperdimensional
nature of the "Game" can be seen.
the small potatoes "game pieces," such as Vincent Bridges, Jay
Weidner, and others of their ilk would swear to their dying day that they
are not "agents of the Matrix." And, as far as what they are
aware of, they are correct. They are pawns with no necessity - or even
capacity - to comprehend the significance of the game being played. They
are "reaction machines," with a "panel of buttons"
that get pushed or dials that get twisted via their environment or associations.
It would make as much sense to be angry at them as to be angry at a rabid
dog for having the disease and foaming at the mouth.
people are often very much like the protagonist in the movie "Arlington
Road," where, because of their nature as "reaction machines,"
they are subject to extreme manipulation by very clever puppet masters.
In the end, they only accomplish exactly what they think they are trying
to avoid - they take the bomb into the building. And in our reality, the
"terrorists" are hyperdimensional, and far more capable than
the gang of terrorists in Arlington Road. I highly recommend
this movie for insight into our problems in 3rd density.
As I was
finishing up the Schwaller de Lubicz articles, I received a "surprise"
package in the mail. A reader had sent me a little book entitled Darkness
Over Tibet. by a certain Theodore Illion. It was originally
published in English in 1937 and is about Illion's purported trip into
Tibet between 1934 and 1936. The name was an intriguing word clue since,
at one point in the past five years, I did a lot of studying on the subject
of Illion and Troy, including the related word studies.
I was curious
about the origins of this book and undertook to discover if it was just
another "Lobsang Rampa" type of thing. I could find no biographical
details about T. Illion, except for the fact that he used other pseudonyms
for other works, and that yes, the original book had been published in
German as Ratfelhaftes Tibet, in Hamburg, in 1936. I was
able to obtain a first edition from a bookseller in Amsterdam to establish
the provenance of the book, but I thought it was strange that I could
only find one listed with the many antiquarian book sellers I contacted.
The English Rider edition was brought out a year later. Establishing that
the book was published at this early date is one thing, discovering information
about the background of the author is another. There just doesn't seem
to be any.
I did read
several very unfavorable reviews of the book on amazon, most of
which were skeptical of the stories in the book itself. However, being
familiar with the most definitely verified travels and writings of Alexandra
David-Neel, I could see that these criticisms came from people who
were not very familiar with such work. Yet, I had to agree that the story
seemed to be somewhat "artificial," even if certain elements
of it struck me as being factual in that, if they had been made up, a
different and more satisfying resolution would have been given them.
I next checked
the chronology of events in terms of David-Neel's travels, and realized
that the Illion book was written precisely during the period when Alexandra
was ensconced in France, writing and lecturing widely. In fact, this book
came out immediately after she had returned from her long treks in Tibet
and had settled down for a period. That struck me as an interesting item.
I thought that it was possible that this T. Illion was a student of hers,
or even a nom de plume of either herself or her sidekick, Lama Yongden.
However, the fact that the book was written in German argues against it
being either David-Neel herself, or her companion. So, if there is any
connection, it would probably be a student or colleague. In any event,
there are several reasons for suspecting some sort of connection between
Illion and David-Neel.
One of T.
Illion's other pseudonyms is "Theodore Burang." The name "Burang"
seems to be a Tibetan "county." The name 'Theodor(e)' means
'lover of God'; 'Illion' is related to the ancient city "Ilium."
In 1863, Charles Maclaren wrote:
was for a considerable period to the Heathen world, what Jerusalem is
now to the Christian, a 'sacred' city which attracted pilgrims by the
fame of its wars and its woes, and by the shadow of ancient sanctity
reposing upon it. Without abusing language, we may say that a voice
speaking from this hill, three thousand years ago sent its utterances
over the whole ancient world, as its echoes still reverberate over the
modern. [The Plain of Troy Described]
Iliad, the Achaeans were fighting against Trojans, and we have already
discussed some speculative possibilities about the Time Loop factor, Atlantis
vs. The "Athenians," being the original "Trojan War"
to which later wars were assimilated in the mythicization process discussed
in our book The Secret History of The World, and how it may
relate to the present day struggle between the forces of Darkness and
As if to
point in this direction, in a third book by Ms. David-Neel co-authored
by her Tibetan lama/monk/companion, Lama Yongden, makes reference to yet
another book by her:
Vie surhumaine de Guesar de Ling (the Tibetan Iliad)".
The words in parentheses are hers." [The
Secret Oral Teachings in Tibetan Buddhist Sects. The quote
was from Note 7 at the bottom of page 114, City Lights, San Francisco,
interesting relation between the two books - David-Neel's and Illion's
- is the fact that both of them mention Padmasambhava as being the progenitor
of a "degenerate sect of Tantric Buddhism." David-Neel also writes about
the many Tibetan occultists, vulgar sorcerers, who only seek to acquire
magic powers - the primary subject of Darkness Over Tibet.
to the currently available edition of Darkness Over Tibet
tells us that it is in the form of "classic travel writings of the
1930's. It is believed that Illion's accounts of Tibet were instrumental
in persuading the Nazi government of Germany to send yearly expeditions
wrote in the preface to Darkness Over Tibet:
book In Secret Tibet I have given an outline of my recent
journey to Tibet [...] After witnessing various marvels [...] I reached
the final stage of the journey in the most inaccessible part of the
country where live the genuine Tibetan hermits, who can read people's
thoughts and possess the strange power to maintain themselves young
also writes about such, as well as those who achieve this state by the
"Dark method," telling us that this method seems to involve
the consumption of human flesh. She tells us:
exist, so [some anchorites belonging to the Dzogschen sect] said, certain
human beings who have attained such a height degree of spiritual perfection,
that the original material substance of their bodies has become transmuted
into a more subtle one which possesses special qualities. [...] A morsel
of their transformed flesh, when eaten, will produce a special kind
of ecstasy and bestow knowledge and supernormal powers upon the person
partaking of it.
describes for us the rituals of these "sacred feasts" in some
detail, and the feeling that one begins to get about the whole Tibetan
"spiritualism" is one of revulsion.
she confirms that there are mystics and hermits who are of the light,
though it seems that the vast majority of Tibetan mysticism is purely
and simply black magic and sorcery.
back to Illion, he writes about the rare, few and far between Wise men:
with these wise men, which are recorded in my earlier book, reflect
a certain degree of understanding of the vital problems of Life and
Death, spiritual crimes, Salvation and Eternity, and many of my readers
will have wondered how the author arrived at a degree of understanding
which made these spiritual contacts possible.
say, then, in this connection, that real understanding in spiritual
matters is the result of much bitter fighting, of suffering, spiritual
agony and soul passion. Life itself would have no meaning if there was
no fighting on all planes, if all was smooth and monotonous. Everything
fights in nature. Every plant fights to get more sunlight. Every animal
fights for food; the angels themselves fight. Constant struggle on all
planes to which it has access is the birthright of the creature. Woe
to him who wants to put himself on a level with the Creator and escape
travels I have met some of the highest spiritual entities incarnated
in the flesh, and not only those working for the Creator but also
those working against him.
fires of hell have their mission. They destroy man if he is weak, but
if he is strong they purify by burning the dross away. [...]
actually is a very stormy ocean. The currents of life are interwoven,
and Good and Evil, Light and Shadow, are within a hairbreadth from each
other. [Illion, Darkness Over Tibet, 1937, Rider &
Co, London, Reprinted by Adventures Unlimited Press, 1991]
was so struck by the perspective of T. Illion which so closely coincided
with many things the C's had said, I decided to ask the C's about this
book, if it was a report of a real 3rd density travel experience, or not.
Their response was most interesting:
A: It is a disguise for conveying truths of a spiritual nature as well
as a depiction of 4th density realities.
At the same
time that I was considering the problem of this book, several members
of the Quantum Future School had the following exchange:
mulling over the Adventures stuff about the plausible lie, and happening
to receive an email that turned out to be an "urban legend", I was struck
by something... Laura had mentioned that when we *believe* a lie, we
end up "feeding" the creator of the lie. There seems to be a veritable
plethora of these urban legends, hoaxes, etc. going around the Internet,
and it makes me wonder if the reason for their creation is that each
time someone reads and believes these "plausible lies", it feeds the
person who created it...
are a lot of movies that try to "yank" a person's emotions, and if one
gives into the emotional manipulation -- effectively "believing" the
lie -- I've noticed that one tends to feel drained afterwards... Is
this something similar? When one becomes involved in the "lie", one
is effectively "believing" it, and thus "feeds" the creator of the lie
(which doesn't have to be 3D)? Does this seem right?
good point, that believing in a lie feeds its creator. If true, then
here's another thought with frightening implications: one of the biggest
lies is linear time, and we know who created that for us...
had just finished reading Illion's book, and it was so a apropos, I wrote
Illion book addresses this subject in a certain way that really struck
me. In the following, Illion is having a conversation with a young brigand,
a temporary traveling companion:
that Tibet has a lot of monasteries and the interest in religion is very
intense there. Illion points out that there are festivals celebrated throughout
the year at the various monasteries, attracting many pilgrims. He mentions
occasions a gay and cheerful atmosphere reigns supreme, in strange contrast
to the teaching of the Buddhists, asserting that all life is inherently
bad and that escaping from the wheel of rebirths and all forms of material
existence is the supreme goal of the Buddhists.
that, not far from where he is studying various meditation exercises,
there is a monastery where a famous oracle was going to visit and do his
thing in public. Illion is very interested in witnessing this spectacle
and travels to this nearby monastery where the pilgrims are pouring in
for the big event. Additionally, a religious play was going to be presented
by the lamas of the monastery.
of the demons "riding the oracle" is pretty interesting, but
what is even more curious is that after his "event," he is handed
a big sword, about 25 pounds of substantial steel, that he grasps in his
bare hands and "folds" it as though it were made of soft wax.
Shades of Yuri Geller! (Keep in mind that this account was written in
in the monastery went into a sort of frenzy upon witnessing this miraculous
metal-bending event. Illion comments:
fuse into one "group soul," and then the individual no longer
behaves as he would behave individually. Crowds really are not the sum
total of all the individualities present. They seem to be a suddenly formed
new entity actuated by a kind of "group soul." It is man sinking
back temporarily into the "group consciousness" from which civilized
man is just about to emerge. I think only the greatest of the great
[are] fully and definitely individualized and beyond the possibility of
lapsing back temporarily into group consciousness.
We of course
wonder just what is going on when Yuri demonstrates his ability and people
all over the world are able to bend metal as well during such exercises.
lamas" came out to beat the crowd into line, and during the lamas'
crowd control activities, Illion meets a young girl with whom he has a
conversation. Because Illion comes across to her as so knowledgeable on
spiritual subjects, she inadvertently drops a hint about her own teacher
and the existence of a "Hidden City." Illion is very intrigued.
At this point, the conversation diverts to Illion's lack of fear evidenced
by the fact that he is traveling alone and sleeps in the open without
worrying about bandits or wild animals. The exchange that followed is
s is another fascinating tidbit:
you never attacked by animals?"
" I answered. "The animals which are on the rising branch
of life are very kind to me. I do not think even a lion would attack
me, although I never met one. I have had very pleasant experiences, though,
with bears and some other so-called wild animals."
heard a story about a bear," said Dolma. "I will tell it to
you. Perhaps you will be able to tell me whether such a thing can happen...
A man who often broke the law which prohibits hunting had obtained a white
man's death stick in the Lhasa district, and when he returned to his province
he went out bear-hunting. He had shot several bears, but one day, just
while he followed the track of an animal, a strong bear suddenly appeared
just behind his back... [...] The hunter was so afraid when he saw the
big bear just behind his back that he dropped his gun and stared aghast
at the animal, who could have crushed him in a couple of seconds. [...]
The bear looked at the frail creature who stood tremblingly before him,
his gun lying at his feet, and calmly walked away."
can believe that, " I said, "for bears have a soul, although
they are only at times individualized. By the way, it is easy to say whether
the hunter in the story had a soul or not."
the hunter had a soul, it was impossible for him to take up the gun to
shoot after the bear. If he was soulless, he would have done so at once."
there soulless animals too?"
yes. The animals on the descending branch of life are soulless. [...]
Ravens, rats, mice - vermin, for instance."
behave like a soulless man?"
these entities inhabit men before?"
many thousand years ago. When they lost their soul they began to move
is very strange. When I visited India I heard so much about progressive
evolution - that life always passed upward, that the souls in minerals
became souls in plants, then in animals, and after this in man, and that
man finally must become an angel and that all this is only a question
would have no meaning if there was no alternative between light and darkness,"
I said. "There are two currents of life. One is moving upward and
the other downward. The moment one loses one's soul one is precipitated
into the downward current."
can one lose one's soul?"
sinning against one's soul."
a sensual life?"
no, in most cases that is a sin against one's body. You may suffer for
it in this life or in some future incarnation."
treating other's badly, then?"
as a rule, even this is no sin against your soul. You will get your punishment
for treating others badly in this or some future incarnation, although
wanton cruelty to defenceless creatures, ratlike ingratitude, or an innate
tendency to spy on others already reveal a certain degree of soullessness
which may be due to sins committed against one's soul in former incarnations."
then, what is a sin against one's soul?"
spiritual things for selfish purposes. Dragging God down to earth. Trying
to put oneself on a level with the Creator."
many of us here sin like that!"
but also people in other countries."
brings this subject up a number of times and it certainly defines the
"bottom line" of the STS reality of "wishful thinking."
To tell lies and live in an illusion is, effectively, "using God
for selfish purposes." He says that each such act of this chips away
at one's free will, one's soul, etc. This sort of makes it important to
really do research and check things out. Our recent experiences with Vincent Bridges certainly suggest that there are people who have lied so much
and so long - maybe for many lifetimes - that they have very little, if
any, soul left.
discussion group member then wrote:
a wonderful story, and I agree. Psychopaths seem to fit the profile
of one whose soul is slowly shrinking into the abyss. A question popped
into my mind as I read the above story. If an STS oriented being continues
along the path of STS, resulting in its soul slowly fragmenting and
ultimately dissolving, at what general stage would that leave the souls
of 4D STS/Lizzies et. al.? I mean, if we see that some humans here,
still on 3D, have developed to the stage where they would appear to
be practically soulless (psychopaths, f.ex..), what amount of soul might
be left in a 4D Lizzie? I recall reading that Lizzies do have souls
(while greys do not, unless a Lizzie projects its own soul into it.
Correct?), but my guess is that those souls must be contracting. Frankly,
I'm surprised they still do possess souls at all.
psychopaths, the thought occurred to me that these folks seem to be
Lizzies in human clothing, so to speak. Is it possible that Lizzies
could be projecting their souls into these people, making them psychopaths?
That they are not truly human at all, simply Lizzies in human bodies?
(This, rather than the thought that they are truly human, with human
souls [albeit pure STS], but that the Lizzies have manipulated their
DNA to make them the way they are.) And that this is perhaps an experiment
for them to see what will happen when they project themselves into different
bodies? I believe I read that this soul projection scenario might be
part of the plan with regards to the "Master Race" that they are supposedly
creating, but maybe I'm wrong here.
story! All this stuff is starting to actually make sense... ;-) I guess
it sometimes seems we have to "experience" stuff ourselves to understand
things... Or at least use the understanding of the *possibility* of
something to try to find where something *has* occurred in our experiences...
This is where I really appreciate all your writings, Laura -- they help
in that search!
about the "disintegration" of the soul that might result from
believing lies led to even further speculations on the part of the QFS.
Another member wrote:
wrote something that always troubled me - that we are born without souls
and that each of us needs to do our 'work' to create one. I've rationalized
this to where I can think that there might not be *personal* soul, but
that each of us would, at the least, be part of 'species' soul, or even
part of the soul of organic life on earth. This thinking allows me a
little more comfort in a soul-less world. Maybe it's just a buffer and
I'm avoiding the real 'terror of the situation'.
of soul, and of spirit, has been lurking about in my life of late, and
I recently posted the following to another group. I'll put it out here
as well since it attempts to address the difference between soul and
a list-member about magnetic center because I had been under the impression
that it was at least partly essence and he had written that it is mechanical.
I read and re-read the section in Ouspensky's 'The Fourth Way' and,
to my consternation, found that O. did, indeed, say that it was mechanical.
*But* he did not say that it was strictly personality and this led me
into some interesting areas.
84, Ouspensky says: "And the faculty that helps man to understand and
discriminate is the magnetic center." On page 85: "If a man notices
them and studies them ('B' influences), they may accumulate in him.
The memory of these interests may begin to collect in him from a very
early age and form a certain group of 'I's' out of the many 'I's' in
him." Same page: "It is a combination of what we are born with and outside
circumstances that makes us what we are; it is all mechanical, all under
the law of accident."
line was the kicker for me; "..all under the law of accident."
of years ago, I realized that in the Ray of Creation both the descending
*and ascending* rays must be equally mechanical - the boomerang *must*
come back. But I hadn't realized that the same could be said for essence,
at least to a degree. Things like 'heavenly influences' could be taken
as mechanical, for example, and our genetic make-up, as well. This was
something of a shock for me - I'd been painting a picture of essence
that wasn't far from the 'inner child' sort of thing - as much as I
dislike that expression. So to discover that simply grasping on to the
essence was not in and of itself all that meaningful was a little surprising,
thread in the braid came from 'Meetings With Remarkable Men', in the
'Professor Skridlov' chapter (page 243, my edition). Gurdjieff writes:
"I shall place them (Father Giovanni's 'remarkable thoughts'), as relating
to the question of the soul, that is, the third independently formed
part of the common presence of a man, in the chapter entitled 'The divine
body of man, and its needs and possible manifestations according to
law', but only in the third series of my writings, as complementary
to two chapters of the same series which I have already decided and
promised to devote - one to the words of the venerable Persian dervish
concerning the body, that is, the first independently formed part in
the common presence of a man, and the other to the elucidations of the
old *ez-ezounavouran* concerning the second independently formed part
of a man, namely, his spirit."
the differentiation between spirit and soul - they are respectively
the second and third bodies of man.
me to ISOM ('Fragments') and the chart on page 41 that describes the
second body as: 'Natural' body; "Horse" (feelings, desires); Astral
body. In the MWRM quote, G seems to be saying that this second body,
the Astral body, is Spirit, and in ISOM connects it to emotional center.
I was at a Gurdjieff reading and somebody asked: "What's the difference
between 'Soul' and 'Spirit'?" I brought 'magnetic center' into it because
it seemed to apply, and the ensuing dialogue brought me to the thought
that 'Essence' and 'Spirit' are one and the same thing.
answers what for me has always been a troubling idea - that people are
born without souls, that Soul has to be developed.
becomes far more than the 'inner child', it becomes the animation of
the physical body, its elan vitale. This can still be very much mechanical
and still governed only by the soul of organic life on Earth or species
soul, but it can explain auras and Don Juan's 'luminous egg' as purely
mechanical manifestations possessed by everybody.
center, though mechanical, can utilize the power derived from the emotional
center (in this case, a yearning or desire for knowledge) to lead a
seeker towards something that is real. Gurdjieff and others have said
that the emotional center was the key to our understanding and our being,
so connecting essence, spirit and magnetic center to it seems to 'prove
the possibilities'. I somehow feel that I've rambled here and failed
to get across the momentum that this idea has for me (tonight), but
at least it's 'down on paper' now. Take it out for a couple of laps
and see what you think. [Al]
response to the comments about Gurdjieff, the following exchange took
place between two discussion group members:
wrote: Let's see. My understanding is that we humans were all part
of one large STO soul entity to begin with (The C's keep saying that
they are "us in the future", and the past, etc.
wrote: What if our connection to that unified soul entity or to
source is what Gurdjieff meant as "having a "soul"? There are connecting
threads from us to the "self serving" aspect as well as to
the "other serving" aspect [Thought centers] . Different densities
are just a designation of how developed the coat of awareness [of a]
being is, and how close [or "thick"] the connecting threads
comprising the coat are to source. Is it direct or do we connect to
another being which connect to another then to source? STO/STS designates
what aspect of the source we are connected to.
get higher up in density the thread connection is so much stronger and
"distance" is shorter. This is why we know more and in turn
require more energy for existence. Big Bang is when all the connecting
threads goes directly to source, or rather a big ball of energy thread
which begins to unravel. In a sense when Gurdjieff says we have no soul
it means we do not have a direct connection to source. Our connection
is only through beings at higher levels than us. [This is why it is
important as to which "thought" we align with.]
This discussion does now bring another question to my mind actually.
Namely, if we did, in fact, start out as rocks or minerals or whatever
on 1D, what happened between our existence in 1D and the time when we
were all part of this larger/higher soul that we then fragmented from
and left to go down to Eden? Or do I have my progression of events mixed
up in my mind here?
wrote: I imagine it like this: As we learn and master the essence
of what we are we gain spirit not soul. We have the essence or spirit
of rocks, plants etc. Hence we get closer to source by what Don Juan
called "growing a coat of awareness." Once we have a complete
coat in our level we move on to the next.
is connected via these threads to the plant the mineral doesn't own
a coat, through the thread it has a connection to, and is subject to
the influence of the plant. Basically the plant feeds on it. The mineral
is not too aware of the plant. It will continue to exist in mineral
until it learns the mechanical laws that govern mineralness, it grows
it's essence. The animal feeds on the plant and so there is an energy
thread connection also. It has more essence than the plant and mineral
or rather it has the entire mineral and plant essence and is in the
process of growing its coat of animal essence/awareness.
on the animal and so take in the essence of animal, plant and mineral.
Ours, animal and plant and mineral's existence is one of increasing
accident in the order stated. And while we are a less prone to accident
than the animal we have complete souls just thicker coats of awareness
because we in turn feed something else. We are subject to the whims
of that something else. Until we learn the lesson of what we are by
growing our coat of awareness, the essence of what we are, we will remain
soulless accident prone things.
I was actually also curious as to whether anyone had any thoughts about
4D STS souls. What are their souls like?
wrote: I imagine 4d souls as also incomplete souls because it doesn't
have the awareness of a unified soul group. It still feeds on something
else to exist. I imagine there is a point where if the soul continues
to take in essences and energy without giving, or only giving
so that it can get more energy (STS), it reaches a critical [negative]
mass at which point there is implosion and as the Cs say regeneration
as primal atoms. 4D has enough coats of awareness to be variably physical
because there is so much energy and less density. 6D which is so much
closer to source comprise so many coats of awareness it is a pure energy
state. It is unified but has to wait until all other beings gain the
same amount of awareness so they are all touching, all connected directly
and not through something else. This would form one complete something
I call source but some call god
Well, first of all, I have a hard time thinking that very much happens
by "accident" since there seems to be a purpose to absolutely everything
(lessons), even if that lesson is not immediately discernible to us.
wrote: It is accident because we do not understand the laws that
govern what happens to us in our 3D existence. It is based on the whim
of 4D critters. That is why we are in this density. It is less accidental
than say plant or animal it is still accidental and mechanical. I guess
to Gurdjieff, until we are directly connected to source we are soulless
at one point, questions relating to the idea of "evolving" through
the densities as opposed to "falling into" matter were asked:
Q: (L) [...] A reader writes: "Laura, I commend you on your vision,
fortitude, courage... I have read most of the material with great interest.
It feels right, but I have a couple of questions: I can't reconcile
the idea of our being trapped or lured (by sensuality) into a physical
state with the idea that we have progressed through the vegetative and
animal states." This is a good question. It seems that the energy of
creation has progressed through the vegetative and animal states, that
animals can graduate to third density and become human, just as humans
can graduate to 4th density. How do we reconcile this with the idea
that human souls were entrapped into third density bodies from 4th density,
by the Lizards? Are we talking about two different functions? Two different
A: Humans were not entrapped by the "Lizards."
Q: (B) We volunteered! (L) Well, they did say that the Lizards were
waiting for the right soul matrix to "step in." So, we were the right
soul matrix and we stepped into these engineered bodies that the Lizards
created. That's what you said. So, how do we reconcile us stepping into
these engineered third density bodies with soul evolution through the
vegetative and animal states?
A: If you look more closely at the material, it was not stated that
the consciousness levels currently represented by humans and many others
"stepped into" anything in particular but PHYSICALITY.
Q: (F) Perhaps individual consciousness units have stepped into different
physical forms. Some may have "stepped" in as humans right off the bat,
and some may have done otherwise.
can't get hung up on any kind of evolutionary system. It's just an ongoing
and concurrent thing..
is simply that WE chose to experience physicality in many forms, maybe
simultaneous rather than in a linear progression, but since we perceive
time the way we do, it seems that it is a progression. We could be all
kinds of things in other realities.
that relates back to the idea of "simultaneous disbursement?" Half of
The All chose to "fall asleep" as matter, and other "units" or groups
chose to interact with matter by "informing" it with life of all different
varieties, more or less simultaneously? So we can have souls that are
slow accretions out of matter over the long wave cycle, moving through
the densities over aeons, and souls that thought they would speed things
up a bit by a different method of entering directly into bodies and
changing them. Well, that seems like a sort of "right off the bat" violation
of the free will of the energies of such bodies and their emerging consciousnesses
in the long wave cycle. That right there is STS even if it was not realized
as such at the time. And such an act could have some tremendous implications
in terms of what you have called a "desire based imbalance." It takes
us back to the story of the Prodigal Son. So we have a very complex
idea of souls and their evolution in more than one mode.
Q: (L) And in the end, it is a timeless mass division and disbursement
that was, is and will be?
suggests to us that there is both a "rising branch of life,"
and a "descending branch of life," and any number of combinations
and variations thereof.
You are visitor number .