You can use auto translate to get subtitles for this video.
Sound of Freedom
- Thread starter mkrnhr
- Start date
Ketone Cop
Jedi Master
I personally haven't seen this movie, but I know people that have, and it made a difference for them. They "woke up". At least, to what was happening with human trafficking. But even so, now that this abomination has entered their minds, they do nothing to stop it other than recommending the movie to others. I guess I'm in the same boat, other than sharing knowledge where I can.
I wonder if what Kenlee shared above, his second paragraph, is the true goal of this "awakening". Could it truly be that this movie is bringing focus on this abomination NOW, when ALL things are currently being redefined, including what is "good' and what is "evil"? And that the true goal of those behind this movie is to normalize this evil? I'm sorry, but I have to ask this question, because I'm personally not seeing a single bit of this child-trafficking evil being ended at this current time.
Yeah, I read something about some local cops taking down a child trafficking "ring" lately, but: none of the kid's names were revealed, in order to "protect" them. Well, has anyone EVER asked if actually NOT "naming those names" has ever actually saved any of them? Because what happens when you DON'T? They just disappear forever, that's what, IMHO.
For my part: I am GLAD this movie got made. It can only wake people up...IF they are READY to be awakened. But that's the rub, isn't it.
BTW this article was what prompted me to post: Are aliens real? People don't seem to care either way -- Sott.net
Will this entire charade of children being raped and worse end, before Hunter Biden is filmed live on Fox news having sex with a six-year-old girl on the White House lawn while snorting cocaine? And afterwards, no one watching on the MSM says a single word? Because that's where I'm currently seeing this going, and if it does, then I'm totally OK if God decides to flood it again. But, that's just me.
-EEYORE
zak
The Living Force
After reading this thread (in zig-zag), and particularly the posts between aragorn and Heather, I can understand by following her links a little, the reasons for her persistence, because indeed if Tim Ballard is not only what he says, but what's more, if he's in the same boat as paedophiles, and he's praised as a hero, entitled to his own biopic, getting rich as never before on the backs of the children he claims to defend and protect, that's one hell of a case of reverse pathological engineering for the masses.
Before continuing, I'd like to make a brief aside about spies and infiltrators in various political, social, economic, cultural and criminal circles.
We have the image of Bond, James Bond, but in the field, it is advisable for the spy to have done some acting to interpret his role without being discovered, and for that the best weapon is not his handgun, or his other gadgets, but his empathy, or at least his profound ability to play on empathy to attract the trust and sympathy of others, in order to subtract information for the accomplishment of his mission, in The Wave III, there is this adequate passage:
"...The greatest dangers are those lures and traps designed to seduce him with kindness, sympathy, love and beauty!
It is only AFTER he has made the right choice that the illusion appears to him in its true form..."
And as Joe so aptly put it:
In the kitchen, we rarely peel all the layers of an onion, but rather cut it in half, which allows us to see the cross layers.
By putting each part of the onion and its different layers on a scale, we can ask ourselves the question of the pros and cons, but let's also admit that the accusations against T.B. are true, the type under cover of lies that have become reality in a fiction based on its orthogonality (as Laura would say), but which is nonetheless a factual reality - child trafficking does exist.
Am I prepared to pay for a cinema ticket to see this film with its onion cut in half?
If the film was shown here, I would have liked to see it with my family and friends, in a packed theatre, and have a more informed opinion on the film itself, and feel my reaction and those of the people in the theatre.
This film can bring about a mass awareness of child trafficking and its various tentacles, and at the same time more than just an emotion, to become aware in their own flesh of the suffering of others, and to be able to put themselves in the other person's shoes, and that once they know that, they can never ignore it again.
And that far outweighs all the riches that a true or false T.B. can pocket in terms of fame and money.
Let's keep it open and maybe we'll get an answer at a future session.
Before continuing, I'd like to make a brief aside about spies and infiltrators in various political, social, economic, cultural and criminal circles.
We have the image of Bond, James Bond, but in the field, it is advisable for the spy to have done some acting to interpret his role without being discovered, and for that the best weapon is not his handgun, or his other gadgets, but his empathy, or at least his profound ability to play on empathy to attract the trust and sympathy of others, in order to subtract information for the accomplishment of his mission, in The Wave III, there is this adequate passage:
"...The greatest dangers are those lures and traps designed to seduce him with kindness, sympathy, love and beauty!
It is only AFTER he has made the right choice that the illusion appears to him in its true form..."
And as Joe so aptly put it:
In the kitchen, we rarely peel all the layers of an onion, but rather cut it in half, which allows us to see the cross layers.
By putting each part of the onion and its different layers on a scale, we can ask ourselves the question of the pros and cons, but let's also admit that the accusations against T.B. are true, the type under cover of lies that have become reality in a fiction based on its orthogonality (as Laura would say), but which is nonetheless a factual reality - child trafficking does exist.
Am I prepared to pay for a cinema ticket to see this film with its onion cut in half?
If the film was shown here, I would have liked to see it with my family and friends, in a packed theatre, and have a more informed opinion on the film itself, and feel my reaction and those of the people in the theatre.
This film can bring about a mass awareness of child trafficking and its various tentacles, and at the same time more than just an emotion, to become aware in their own flesh of the suffering of others, and to be able to put themselves in the other person's shoes, and that once they know that, they can never ignore it again.
And that far outweighs all the riches that a true or false T.B. can pocket in terms of fame and money.
Let's keep it open and maybe we'll get an answer at a future session.
David's review seemed 'sound' - as he said, "It represents our world,"and it does, and has for a long time before people here were born - one does not even need to see the film to know this. Go to SOTT.net and enter search 'Trafficking' to see the breadth and depth of this business, and it is just a fraction.
My guess is that in time, any cloak and dagger stuff against the film or associated with the film, if can be made to make sense of, will come out. However, the film message that may include being granted artistic leeway, is part of our reality and can't be ignored. So, there needs to be care in handling both the message and messenger(s) least either, especially the former, become lost in muddy waters. The more that grasp this films sick mess the better (IMO), which may lead people who never knew or did not want to know, back to some of the front and side players, and those who would aim to profit and hide from their sickness while trying to avoid the light.
I wasn't going to comment any more in this thread, because I had seen that the exchange was getting a bit heated between users and when it's like that, it's better to get off the wagon. But I could not leave the news unattended.
Now, I quote what you say because I have just seen the following news, and then with the following observation.
'Sound of Freedom': uno de sus mayores inversionistas es arrestado por supuesto secuestro infantil
Uno de los principales inversionistas de 'Sound of Freedom' fue arrestado por supuesto secuestro infantil en Estados Unidos.
hipertextual.com
As for what you say in your post, which I quote here. It reminds me of a well-worn phrase: The thief judges others by his own condition. That is, it usually happens that those who most vehemently denounce and point out the crime of another person, usually the denouncer is also a perpetuator of a crime.
zak
The Living Force
As far as children are concerned, it's difficult to remain calm in the face of their predators, and in this case, shouldn't we wait until we have a better view, or is that not necessary, given the atmosphere surrounding this film?
Indeed, it's the forte of psychopathic beings to blame the victims for the crimes of which they are guilty.
The one leader actually addressing the problem.
Putin Introduces Forced Chemical Castration for ALL Pedophiles in Russia
Russian President Vladimir Putin has announced plans to chemically castrate all pedophiles in Russia and execute those found guilty of the most heinous forms of child abuse.
The new legislation is currently under review by the government, but is expected to be signed into law by Putin within a matter of weeks.
Putin Introduces Forced Chemical Castration for ALL Pedophiles in Russia
Russian President Vladimir Putin has announced plans to chemically castrate all pedophiles in Russia and execute those found guilty of the most heinous forms of child abuse.
The new legislation is currently under review by the government, but is expected to be signed into law by Putin within a matter of weeks.
Nice!!! He's literally Hitler that Putin... but like... inverted, he's protecting children instead of hurting them... still though!!! on a massive scale!!Well, JEEP, that's going to get a whole lot of "woke" folk's panties in a bunch.
More popcorn, please.
Well, the Spanish page claims that it was a 14 year old girl, and cited The Daily Mail as their source.. but The Daily Mail doesn't say it was a girl, or that it was 14 years of age.. all they say is that the St. Louis police department have not shared any further details.. so where did the Spanish folks get her age and gender?
I won't defend anyone, I will wait for the details to appear, and if he's to go to jail for 10 years for kidnapping a girl, then I hope he rots in there. But sometimes, things get publicized for the headline, because the message the headline leaves most people with is what you said above: "They claim to care about child trafficking but they are trafficking themselves, which means their entire message is discredited."
Look at the daily mail's ending to the article to understand what they were aiming at really, it wasn't getting rid of a potential child kidnapper, it was the following:
This is yet another good example of how people jump to conclusions too quickly. As always, this news bit has, at the very least, another version which can be found e.g., here:
PURE EVIL: Latest Media Attack Against "Sound of Freedom" Is Complete BS - Steve Bannon Responds, "It's Just a Bald-Faced Lie!" (Video) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
The mainstream media has done everything it can to push people away from the historic film “Sound of Freedom” by Angel Studios on the scourge of child sex trafficking in the world today.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Quote from the above:
Now, we can't of course say that this version above is 100% correct/true either but still, it provides a counter argument that should be considered. Another 'at the very least' thing is, if it's even close to true that this man donated 200$ to the film, which apparently was part of a crowd funding with over 6000 funders so....so what!? C'mon man, 200$, that's not in any way significant!
So, the question remains, why are some people so quickly accepting these 'news articles' to discredit the film? Is it an underlying/unidentified programming that produces this bias, or some weird 4D influence?
Well, I think we have to admit that when you are tired of so many lies you become quite susceptible to the comings and goings of information and disinformation. I just know that there are two things here that seem to me to be on equal strength and that makes it difficult to elucidate where the truth lies.
First, this would not be the first film to deal with these issues.
A list here: Películas sobre Pedofilia
Some of these films are even more crude and descriptive than SoF.
So, how is it that with all this filmography, SoF has managed to stay in the spotlight to the point of appearing to the public as an absolute revelation? It is not the first movie that takes real life facts and shows them on screen and it is not the first time that it generates in the public -such as (quote wikipedia)- that reaction.
Caso McMartin - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
I think we are again seeing an occurrence of the type in the public.
Now at the other extreme, what we also see is that there is a whole campaign against the film. The reason for that is quite obvious. What I find strange in all this, compared to what other films of the type may have generated in the public at the time of screening, is the extreme polarization between those who support the film and its detractors.
Qui bono?
BTW, when I saw that news item I just shared it and gave just that minuscule reflection. Just think for a moment that biases seem to have the ability to enhance each other, when it comes to opinions... perhaps that is the 4D programming and influence. Trigger unrecognized biases and make people fight.-
Nević Nenad
The Living Force
I would say, as already being said, patern recognition going amok. Once you starting to see paterns, you see it anywhere. Works almost as a drug. Plus, you are feeling smart and important. Needs lot of energy to pull yourself out of that.This is yet another good example of how people jump to conclusions too quickly. As always, this news bit has, at the very least, another version which can be found e.g., here:
PURE EVIL: Latest Media Attack Against "Sound of Freedom" Is Complete BS - Steve Bannon Responds, "It's Just a Bald-Faced Lie!" (Video) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
The mainstream media has done everything it can to push people away from the historic film “Sound of Freedom” by Angel Studios on the scourge of child sex trafficking in the world today.
Quote from the above:
Now, we can't of course say that this version above is 100% correct/true either but still, it provides a counter argument that should be considered. Another 'at the very least' thing is, if it's even close to true that this man donated 200$ to the film, which apparently was part of a crowd funding with over 6000 funders so....so what!? C'mon man, 200$, that's not in any way significant!
So, the question remains, why are some people so quickly accepting these 'news articles' to discredit the film? Is it an underlying/unidentified programming that produces this bias, or some weird 4D influence?
I hear you, but I think in those cases the best approach is to take time to digest the information and remind oneself to think critically, to realize that one is emotionally exhausted of the lies and that emotionality won't aid in approaching the truth, it will hinder that approach. That emotionality will cause one to jump to conclusions, to validate a notion that "everyone is evil".
So, my suggestion is to put some distance between you and the information and take your time to dissect it, realize that there's a difference between what you know and what you want to know to be true. I think scrutiny is the best response to distrust, but cold scrutiny with the goal of truth and not of confirmation of a preconceived notion.
If they went through such lengths over 200 bucks, they really have little on this film, I mean that is truly reaching and stretching a tiny news item over their desire to demonize this film.
Yeah, had someone from the EU jumping up and down over this guy (so it must percolating around FB or whatever else - Bots, don't know), except he suddenly morphed into the guy that 'made the film," so 200 bucks goes to becoming the maker of the movie and a child trafficker.