Ah, I see, Turchinov and gang paid Strelkov to save Russia. Got it.If it weren't for Strelkov, Russia would have lost everything.
Even the Kurils?Russia would have lost everything.
Sez who?Strelkov didn't "flee" he was yanked out by Moscow.
Ah, I see, Turchinov and gang paid Strelkov to save Russia. Got it.If it weren't for Strelkov, Russia would have lost everything.
Even the Kurils?Russia would have lost everything.
Sez who?Strelkov didn't "flee" he was yanked out by Moscow.
If you believe that say 600k Ukrainians are dead, as some seem to think, then the total ukie casualties are 2.4 million. Wow.If you think that only 100k Ukrainians (and associated mercenaries) are now permanently out of the fight I don't know what to say.
Soledar is barely even a town. A town. That is your proof of a grand Russian offensive. DELUSIONAL.You seem to have gone on holiday at the end of the summer and just got back. I will help. During this time, Wagner PMCs captured Soledar. By the way, Zelensky yelled that Soledar would never be taken. By the way, like Mariupol, Severodonetsk, Lysychansk...
History is full of examples of strategic retreat. You probably haven't heard anything about the events of 1812? Right, why study history? Strelkov knows best!Let me just say that this is one impressive k/d ratio that has never been replicated in any modern war. Brits against flint-tip spear-wielding abos, maybe.
I have a telescope to watch your ass fly to Jupiter.I see you have had to get creative. "CIA manual reader" and "Arestovich's student" are quite good. What else you got, sovok?

You could say why you think otherwise, for starters.
If you believe that say 600k Ukrainians are dead, as some seem to think, then the total ukie casualties are 2.4 million. Wow.
How many Russians are dead then? Do you believe the MoD's figures? Say 20k dead Russians?
Let me just say that this is one impressive k/d ratio that has never been replicated in any modern war. Brits against flint-tip spear-wielding abos, maybe.
My point is that if you think that the Ukrainian death count is very high, it should follow that realistically the Russian death count is also higher as well. Unless you believe that, contrary to what soldiers on the frontlines are saying, news agencies like WarGonzo and many many others on Telegram that this is a tough tough fight, that this is just a one-sided slaughter the likes of which has never been seen on the battlefield before, well then the burden of proof lies on you, friend, not me.
And yet, despite killing hundreds of thousands of ukies, the Russian army still can't advance! Weird!
So much information on the SMO. so I've totally missed where it was stated that Russia plans to capture Kiev. Could you point me to that piece of information please.?Russia is nowhere close to capturing Kiev
Now you are inventing figures that have not been mentioned in this forum, the 600,000 is a Chinese estimate and it is counting injuries.You could say why you think otherwise, for starters.
If you believe that say 600k Ukrainians are dead, as some seem to think, then the total ukie casualties are 2.4 million. Wow.
And yet, despite killing hundreds of thousands of ukies, the Russian army still can't advance! Weird!
I think that this proof that Mariupol is not a town, and Severodonetsk and Lysichansk are not towns either!Soledar is barely even a town. A town. That is your proof of a grand Russian offensive. DELUSIONAL.

BH I always appreciate your humor. But war sickens me. Our Earth is soaked in human blood from wartime sacrifices. I get an icy stab of pain in my stomach, when I think of it and rising bile chokes me to think of it coming to the USA.So I am wondering if the answers are somewhere embedded in the idea that the one world government which is fundamentally non-human is like the parent who lets the boys fight it out so long as no one gets mortally wounded. And perhaps a test of human nature and acceptance of the insanity of prolonged warfare.
Well...it seems that the 1990 -2000s inventories took a bit longer to deplete than anticipated. This year it looks like the theater of war uses the 2010s props.Wow. Quite the pizzing contest!…” And welcome back to the Rolo f1esk and youlik, show! (aka RfYou!) with todays special guest Possibility of Being”…(warm applause) (cut to commercial for Stolichnaya Salted Karamel vodka)
I’m looking for a unifying takeaway here. One is that there is a massive difference of opinion which points to the fact that either someone is way off base or basically nobody can be certain of anything. (The other aspect is a fascinating educational look at a certain cultural mode of relating)
I personally have been wondering - why are they fundamentally fighting WW1 type of warfare? Where are the sonic weapons, the microwave weapons? Yes those are hideously inhumane but how uplifting is trench warfare? It seems fishy to me, no matter who is “winning”. What real difference has air superiority made If they are still mucking around on the ground? Where are the catapults heaving boulders? Oh, they’re called tanks now.
So I am wondering if the answers are somewhere embedded in the idea that the one world government which is fundamentally non-human is like the parent who lets the boys fight it out so long as no one gets mortally wounded. And perhaps a test of human nature and acceptance of the insanity of prolonged warfare.
There’s a primitive part of me saying “for God’s sake just blow the holy crap out of the other guys and get it over with.” Why the Chinese water torture?
But I suppose there are larger issues playing out such as an economic counter-attack on the West on many levels. Russia seems to be good at dilly-dallying while the opponent becomes antsy and impatient. Yes? I will defer to the Red Triad for the answer!
I congratulate you, dear BHelmet, on the enchanting entry into the ensemble (aka RfYouBH) (stormy and prolonged applause).And welcome back to the Rolo f1esk and youlik, show! (aka RfYou!) with todays special guest Possibility of Being”…(warm applause)