Hegseth says the helicopter was on a "continuity of government" annual retraining mission...
Black Hawk military helicopter collides into American Airlines flight landing at Reagan Airport in Washington, DC
- Thread starter Vulcan59
- Start date
Which speaks to the likely scenario that this is a direct message to Trump that "they" can get to him. If they feel like it, they can take control of, and crash, one of the most security sensitive aircrafts, AND they are willing to kill innocent Americans in the process. The question is if Trump truly understands that, or if he actually believes that it was human error due to DEI-related incompetence.
Interesting in light of Tulsi Gabbard being grilled today for the job as director of the DNI (Director of National Intelligence) which is a position that works with the DIA (Defence Intelligence Agency). The below is just an example of the connection between the two agencies.
If messages are being sent as Joe mentioned, by the CIA and their overlords, is it also directed at some of the other intel agencies?
Bastian
The Living Force
This article gives a few details on the 'copter crew :
www.military.com
Here are some extracts :
3 Army Soldiers Killed in Tragic Collision with Passenger Plane Near DC Airport
Three unidentified Army soldiers died after their Black Hawk helicopter collided with a passenger flight over Washington, D.C., on Wednesday night during an annual training exercise.
Here are some extracts :
So for this "Black Hawk", 2 deadly crashes in 2023 and now this one. And they keep them flying ?!?
They've now reported that the Black Hawk helicopter had taken off from Davison Army Airfield at Fort Belvoir in Virginia. So, while it did not 'come from Langley', the published graphic of its flight path showing it coming around Langley before following the Potomac's course means that its flight path probably looked something like this:
Still bugs me that it swung around Langley (marked red above), but maybe that's "routine" for a "routine, continuity-of-government" training mission.
Still bugs me that it swung around Langley (marked red above), but maybe that's "routine" for a "routine, continuity-of-government" training mission.
The media's noting that this crash is the deadliest US airplane crash since American Airlines Flight 587 crashed in Queens, NYC, on 12 November 2001.
What they don't know is that that 'crash' was a deliberate attack, according to the Cs:
The official story was that the pilot "overused rudder controls," causing the vertical stabilizer to "fall off," and then the two engines followed suit.
More likely, it was remote-hijacked, just as the planes on 9/11 were, and deliberately flown into the Rockaway Peninsula.
What they don't know is that that 'crash' was a deliberate attack, according to the Cs:
The official story was that the pilot "overused rudder controls," causing the vertical stabilizer to "fall off," and then the two engines followed suit.
More likely, it was remote-hijacked, just as the planes on 9/11 were, and deliberately flown into the Rockaway Peninsula.
Last edited:
Two black boxes recovered from crashed jet, to be sent to NTSB for analysis
x.com
x.com
Audio recording of the deadly crash on the Potomac River.
Looks like a similar collision almost took place the day before:
That’s my bet too: It was a message/warning towards Trump and/or his team that this can happen to them too if they don’t “behave“.
Ina
The Living Force
How about hacking of the traffic control software? A 2 or 3 second delay at 120 knots speed combined with a changed altitude parameter during night time especially if the plane does not have the landing gear out and landing lights on CAN be done remotely and does not leave traces. I don't think ALL radar information is digitally cached or recorded 24 out of 24. Also I don't think radar installation access points keep track of all 'maintenance / access logs'.
Ina
The Living Force
What AI Labs has to say.
Air traffic control (ATC) systems have been the target of cyberattacks multiple times, including in 1997, 2006, 2008, 2011, and more recently. These attacks have included phishing, false signals, and manipulation of satellite navigation signals.
Not only that, but the following Springer article, gives a comprehensive breakdown in aviation hacking.
The types of hackers and cyberattacks in the aviation industry - Journal of Transportation Security
The main goal of this study is to analyse the types of hackers and cyberattacks in the aviation industry, to enhance cybersecurity in the air sector. This manuscript has identified 12 different typologies of hackers in the aviation context. First, those hackers who exercise responsibility in...
link.springer.com
Ina
The Living Force
Also from AI Labs
Yes, a radar system can be hacked, especially if it has digital components and network connectivity, allowing attackers to potentially manipulate radar data, disrupt operations, or even completely disable the system, posing significant security risks depending on the application area like air traffic control or military defense;.
Key points about radar hacking:
Vulnerability in digital interfaces: Modern radar systems often have digital interfaces which can be exploited by hackers to inject malicious code or alter data;.
Network access: If a radar system is connected to a network, it can become vulnerable to cyberattacks targeting the network infrastructure;
Data manipulation: Hackers can intercept and modify radar data, leading to false readings or misleading information about detected objects;
System disruption: Cyberattacks can cause radar systems to malfunction or completely shut down, impacting operations;
Examples of potential radar hacking scenarios:
Creating false targets: A hacker could make a radar system detect phantom aircraft or vehicles, potentially causing confusion or dangerous situations in air traffic control;
Hiding real targets: Conversely, a hacker might manipulate radar data to make real aircraft or ships appear invisible;
Disrupting weather monitoring:
In weather radar systems, hacking could lead to inaccurate weather forecasts by manipulating data;
Mitigating radar hacking risks:
Strong cybersecurity practices: Implementing robust network security measures, including firewalls and intrusion detection systems
Regular security updates: Keeping radar system software up-to-date with security patches
Data encryption: Encrypting sensitive radar data to protect it from unauthorized access
Access control: Limiting access to radar systems to authorized personnel
Trending content
-
-
-
Thread 'Nick Fuentes, from troll king to... leader of a true 'America First' movement?'- mugacoffee
Replies: 96
