Brigitte Macron is a man?

A little comic relief
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2313.jpeg
    IMG_2313.jpeg
    136.4 KB · Views: 56
The question that I would like to ask the C's is to know, even if this phenomenon is distilled in a majority of countries in the world, why, France is according to my point of view, a kind of "Mecca" for the transgenderism and pedophiles? A kind of showcase as an example of these vices for the world.

Just guessing here: I think it could be explained by something akin to morphogenetic fields, a collective memory, pathological and normalized. In France there has been more overt sexual depravity or simply lots of sex, orgies, etc., throughout the centuries, more normalizing of it. You can read about the French having been the most sexualized of European countries back in the 1600s, then the 1800s, etc. And look at all the defenders of pederasty in the 70s and 80s! Maybe it's therefore a karmic thing? I keep waiting that at some point, people will really be revolted by it all.

Judging by the bad press that the Prime Minister is getting right now because of the Bétharram affair, I wonder if we may not see the same with the Macrons: people can tolerate the hardship, the fact that a minority party is ruling. But when they find out about pedophilia, MANY seem to draw the line and want those politicians gone. Now they want Bayrou gone. Maybe it's the time to really say NO? I don't know, but one can hope.:-(

At the same time, I think it's not just France, but Northern France, Luxembourg and Belgium. Again, something akin to morphogenetic fields in the evil camp?
 
Perhaps Candace Owens should read Georgia Le Carre's The Billionaire Banker series? Apologies if someone has mentioned this already, but I am watching episode 5 where a cousin of De Rothschild talks about keeping it in the family:
"Vice is nice, but incest is best, because it stays in the family. We are simply raised to be silent, so that nothing comes out. We are brought up with this weight to make sure and it works, that we never speak out".
:barf::evil:
Didn't the Cs say that The Billionaire Series were an accurate description of what is happening in these circles where children are raped in order to make sure they will never tell on their family members. (I can't even fathom this.)
At the same time, I think it's not just France, but Northern France, Luxembourg and Belgium. Again, something akin to morphogenetic fields in the evil camp?
I would also think the Netherlands, because back in the late nineties (after Dutroux in Belgium) it became clear that they are an important distributor and producer of child porn.
 
Just guessing here: I think it could be explained by something akin to morphogenetic fields, a collective memory, pathological and normalized. In France there has been more overt sexual depravity or simply lots of sex, orgies, etc., throughout the centuries, more normalizing of it. You can read about the French having been the most sexualized of European countries back in the 1600s, then the 1800s, etc. And look at all the defenders of pederasty in the 70s and 80s! Maybe it's therefore a karmic thing? I keep waiting that at some point, people will really be revolted by it all.

Judging by the bad press that the Prime Minister is getting right now because of the Bétharram affair, I wonder if we may not see the same with the Macrons: people can tolerate the hardship, the fact that a minority party is ruling. But when they find out about pedophilia, MANY seem to draw the line and want those politicians gone. Now they want Bayrou gone. Maybe it's the time to really say NO? I don't know, but one can hope.:-(

At the same time, I think it's not just France, but Northern France, Luxembourg and Belgium. Again, something akin to morphogenetic fields in the evil camp?
Yes, I also thought of this long past of depravity and karmic debt. And to say no and refuse this fact even only in his mind, that's exactly it. I talked about friends who said "anyway, I can't do anything" I told them that if they thought that they gave them approval, their free will to do what they wanted, but I don't think my friends have understood.
 
But hearing "Véronique" cleared all doubts: even if Véronique isn't "Brigitte", it's clear that some of these trans "women" have a somewhat feminine voice. Whether it's just a natural quirk or a consequence of hormones etc. I don't know, but there it is.

Agree, had caught that piece. That interview was also back in what, 1977 or close? Véronique was shadowed-out for viewers, and yet might it not be reasonable that the producer, host and production people, if still alive later, would have had this recognition connection (hey, remember that Véronique person we interviewed way back when, well maudit, if that is not Brigitte Macron or what?).

Providing people who feel more male than female or more female than male, depending on who they are at birth, with official papers enabling them to have their sex legally changed on their papers, which doesn't necessarily mean that they change sex via surgeries.

Yes, perhaps so. Give the time (if 1977), probably those types of surgeries were not very well advanced, although I don't know.
 
A fascinating and disturbing series from Candace, and kudos to her for having the courage and persistence to produce it. And just looking at some pictures of this Brigitte, IT looks like a female farce. And what she scratches on with the Macrons is most likely just the tip of the iceberg.
The real issue may be less of Brigitte and more regarding Macron. Who is he? A pedophelic manchurian candidate? Maybe.
 
Yes, perhaps so. Give the time (if 1977), probably those types of surgeries were not very well advanced, although I don't know.
Surgery has been as advanced as today, i.e. not so advanced. Anyways, there's no need for surgery to get a juvenile/ feminine voice: puberty blockers around 9, 10, 11 yo avoids the voice becoming hoarse after puberty. It was the case for Michael Jackson, who kept his wonderfull voice by this means. And if the male client is yet an adult and wants his voice becoming feminine, there is the surgical option not of sexual organs but of the vocal organ itself (=laryngoplasty). Just to quote wikipedia:

Feminization laryngoplasty - Wikipedia

Feminization laryngoplasty (also known as FL or FemLar/Femlar) is a reconstructive surgery surgical procedure that results in the increase of the pitch of a patient, making the voice sound higher and more feminine. It is a form of Open Laryngoplasty and effectively reaches its goals via a Partial Laryngectomy of the anterior portion of the larynx, thereby diminishing the size of the larynx to cisgender female proportions. It also changes the vocal weight or resonance quality of the voice by diminishing the size of the larynx. It is a type of voice feminization surgery (VFS) and an alternative to vocal therapy. Feminization laryngoplasty is performed as a treatment for both transgender women and non-binary people as part of their gender transition, and women with androphonia. The surgery can be categorized into two main steps: Incision and vocal fold modification followed by thyrohyoid elevation. Risks and complications include granuloma, dysphonia and tracheostomy. Patients are recommended to follow perioperative management such as voice rest to hasten recovery.

Typically, the surgical procedure could shift the lower limit of the patients' vocal range upward, with little to no effect on the higher end of the vocal range, and reduce the patient's vocal weight and resonance by reducing the size of the larynx. Studies have shown a very high long-term satisfaction rate with the pitch change from this surgery, and the measured pitch change outcome is known to be typically greater than Wendler Glottoplasty, a current, separate procedure that also attempts to increase pitch by shortening the vibrating length of the vocal cords via an alternative, and less destructive, endoscopic approach. A recent study notes that the measured changes average 6 semitones for the patients' comfortable speaking pitch (20-80hz). However, there have been a few outlying cases where the pitch change was too high/effective for the patient, with a maximum reported increase of 320hz in one particular case, albeit it may be possible to mitigate this by carefully choosing how much vocal cord to remove in the operating room for an individual patient.

Other than pitch change, the operation could also diminish the masculine neck profile caused by "Adam's apple" after the removal of anterior cartilage, thus achieving a more feminine neck appearance. This effect is more pronounced than the reduction that can be typically achieved with a tracheal shave as it explicitly goes further than a tracheal shave and removes tissue that should be avoided by the surgeon during a tracheal shave in order to feminize the voice. Thus, if a patient opts for this procedure, they will typically not need a tracheal shave.
 
Last edited:
The real issue may be less of Brigitte and more regarding Macron. Who is he? A pedophelic manchurian candidate? Maybe.
Possible. There was also a complotist theory in France some years ago saying that he's been artificially created/ biologically created / hybrid, something like that, I don't remember exactly, and where they were getting such info/belief? Maybe from remote viewers? if it's true, it would explain why he refused beeing tested for covid when he went visiting Putin

France's Macron refused a COVID test when he met Putin so Russia couldn't steal his DNA: report​


1739616900415.webp


1739616857509.webp

 
Last edited:
Didn't the Cs say that The Billionaire Series were an accurate description of what is happening in these circles where children are raped in order to make sure they will never tell on their family members. (I can't even fathom this.)

I would also think the Netherlands, because back in the late nineties (after Dutroux in Belgium) it became clear that they are an important distributor and producer of child porn.

Apologies that this is outside this thread, but just to attach to this, it also started in the Ukraine, at least by 2001, with a major producer hiding under a modelling agency front named 'Alex-Model'.

The agency's operations spanned several cities in Ukraine. They would regularly advertise on TV, in local newspapers, and on the radio, calling for children with a "model appearance." Parents, believing in opportunities for their children, brought in their kids, and the agency's workers would create explicit content.[3]

It is believed the agency lured approximately 1,500 girls between 8 and 16 years of age. The agency had many branches located throughout Ukraine, in particular in Kyiv, Kharkiv, and Simferopol. The images of minors were then disseminated predominantly on foreign internet websites to consumers in the United States, Canada, and Australia, among others.[4][5][6][7]

A section from the Russian Kommersant newspaper shows a disturbing result from an 'economic' standpoint.

Deputy Head of the Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs for Combating Crimes Related to Human Trafficking, Daniil Klykelnikov, told the Kommersant correspondent that the parents were a contract in which the wording “light erotic in the nude style” was used. As a result, they received fees in the amount of 50 to 250 hryvnia per session, depending on the duration and nature of the shooting. Mr. Klyuchnikov stressed that the parents knew exactly what the children were doing. “I was unpleasantly surprised by the reaction of the parents to our intervention. Some accused us of depriving them of their earnings,” he said.

The director of the 'modelling agency', Alexander Chursin, was supposed to receive between 3-7 years in prison (that's all?), according to Ukrainian law. But the article says the court's decision was never made citing Judge Oleg Prudnik saying a large number of materials needed to be read.

It's mentioned from this wiki that:

There is a consistent trend of human trafficking from Ukraine, especially women and children. International Organization for Migration reports that Ukraine became one of the major sources of minors and females for their forced sexual exploitation; as a rule they are sold to Balkans, Central Europe and Middle East. An average price of Ukrainian girl is around $2,000 — $10,000 depending on her destination. In Israel a Ukrainian youngster may earn up to $50,000 — $100,000 annually for her pimp and have nothing left for herself. [11] According to the available statistics the number of Ukrainian children involved in prostitution is growing both domestically and abroad.
 
While I haven’t watched Candace expose yet I can’t say that I‘m surprised. In fact, I thought it likely that that and similar or worse things are happening quite frequently in powerful circles, especially in the west. I think it is likely that Macron and/or “Brigitte“ and others like them (and plenty of potential similar cases, especially in the west) are examples of people who get groomed by various nefarious forces to do their bidding. Puppets basically.

It might be worthwhile to read what this Ex German Elite Billionaire revealed to maybe get a better understanding how things like that might be happening/working (at least in some cases). I would bet that Macron might be an example of a guy that was groomed by forces in the background to their bidding early on and he himself might be somewhat distantly related to those forces/families/clans/interests (or not). While the real forces behind Macron stay safely in the background through several layers of smoke screens.
 
Yeah... Listen to this other one, also helped by Macron's mother (Candace mentioned "her" in part 1 or 2):

I think that even back then, they knww how to "feminize" men quite well, via surgeries and hormones.
This is Alexandra Brazzainville (pseudonyme), the full interview is here:
link

Notes from the interview:

She has XXY chromosomes
Her diagnostic at the time was: Primary congenital pseudo-hermaphroditism.

She was borned in march 1964

Her defect was probably caused by her mother taking Distilbenz (powerful castrator, discovered later).

She has/had no testosterone at all.

Distilbenz is still recommended for transitions.

What they would do at the time was to wait for puberty.


At 17 years and 8 months she had:
brain scan / chromosome study / cariotype = XXY / DNA study / hormonal samples from surenal and tyroid glands / internal-external genital ecography

She said “What we call transgender is the opposite of what I am”.

She had 15 years of psychotherapic care / She never took hormones because she was totally devoided of testosterone / She had a little estrogen / She was hairless (she probably means no beard and that sort of thing)

She took hormones only recently at age 60 for osteoporosis.

She wanted to have the micro-penis removed, which she found monstrous, but didn't want a neo-vagina. The doctor told her that the law imposed it.

At the time, you didn't want to be part of the LGBT movement, otherwise you'd be refused transformation. It was a bit extreme the other way around.

When she went for the operation she knew she had a 1.2 in 3 chance of dying.

She was almost 28

She had 2 breast operations / nose operation and fat injection in the face / 2 vagino-plasties / She had a lot less operations than most.
 
When searching for Xavier Proussad's book on Amazon France, this is what the algorithm showed me:

View attachment 105925
You've beaten me to the punch Niall, I wanted to post the following image, which suggests that the link between the two book covers is largely intentional, the message, which says it without saying it, being that with Michelle Obama too, something is “not quite right”.

Pretty clever, if you ask me.

20250214_195043.jpg
 
The real issue may be less of Brigitte and more regarding Macron. Who is he? A pedophelic manchurian candidate? Maybe.
I do think that in the end, despite the central role played by "Chibritte" in this series of videos by Candace Owens, who draws on the investigative work of Xavier Poussard, who draws on the earlier work of Natacha Rey, the key to the whole story is Emmanuel Macron, President of the French Republic. I am convinced that “Chibritte” is a means, not an end.

Because, ultimately, right now, what do we know about Emmanuel Macron? Apparently, it's not even certain that he was born in Amiens, Somme. Several documents from the Rothschild bank (in episode 5 of Candace's series) indicate that he was born in Paris, in 1977, the same year that the “Véronique” video was broadcast. So where is the truth? Hidden somewhere we're not supposed to find it? As in Georgia Le Carre's novels? I find, too, as mentionned here by @Gwenllian, that there are many similarities between what she describes in all her novels, and not only in The Billionaire Series, and the case at hand.

In his book Révolution, E. Macron mentions that he grew up with his grandmother, nicknamed “Manette”, meaning “joy-stick” in French, a choice that may not be anodyne if E. Macron has been manipulated since early childhood. Also in his book, he indicates that he spent this period with “Manette” in the Pyrénées, in Bagnères-de-Bigorre to be precise. It seems to me that there's a secret base a few kilometers away, and I seem to remember it is at Monte Perdido, although I can't find the Cs session that confirms its existence. A secret base. Coincidence? Maybe.

Another question which, in my opinion for at least 3 years, deserves to be answered, one way or the other:
Is E. Macron related to the Rothschilds?
Even just “half-blood”? Or even just an “unexpected incident” between two unmarried people? Maybe between a young Jean-Michel Trogneux (1976?) and a Rothschild girl/woman, who knows. That would be the kind of secret families like those are careful not to reveal, but which they will use as and when it suits them. And let's not forget to mention what they do with their bastards in Georgia Le Carre's novels.

These are just guesses, and I expect to discover some completely delirious nuggets of the mores of “these people” in the next few episodes, that prove they're “really not like us”, that they're insane (and for a very, very long time). I haven't read Poussard's book, but frankly, I'm considering it!
 
Wandered across a John Helmer article today which was not related to this story, per se, except for this brief comment related to Brigitte:

Russian Russians will never forget German tanks with crosses on Russian fields and another Napoleon [Emmanuel Macron] with an elderly Josephine [Brigitte Macron/Jean-Michel Trogneux], who sent French legionnaires and French weapons to kill Russians on Russian soil.

Seems many are clued in on Becoming Brigitte (Xavier Proussad), and if John is talking about it, he is likely the type to make connections of it's political orbits equally well. If he is talking about it, the story is probably also strong in Russia. Leaders like Putin must shake his head in sitting across the table from Macron, how could he not.

So, the grand French scandal, one wonders how long they can possibly try to hedge it off when it is only gathering steam.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom