Trump Elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

iamthatis said:
Super weird, are you really downplaying the relationship between the USA and Israel? That's pretty bizarre to me. As you say, there's more going on than just US-Israel, but US-Israel is definitely not a psyop and it's definitely not an exaggerated problem. For proof, read Reed's book Controversy of Zion, MacDonald's book Culture of Critique (and his other two in the series), Joe and Laura's book on 9/11, or even just listen to mainstream analysts like Jeffrey Sachs. There's evidence in the C's sessions, too.
Click to expand...
No, I'm absolutely not down playing that long standing relationship. I was commenting on the statements in that one post only and disagreeing on Axj interpretation. You didn't understand what I was trying to say there. Trump is new on the scene and its not clear how he will deal with Israel over the long term. Your speaking of history here not current events. It was more about black and white thinking. Don't read to much into it.

By the way, be careful about what you see on X covering the Yemen bombings. I just saw this which happened in 7/2024 by Israel.. Interesting how Sarah won't allow you to leave a comment.


www.middleeasteye.net

Israel confirms air strikes targeting Yemen's Hodeidah port

Strikes on the port, a vital lifeline for millions of Yemenis, sparked massive fires and killed at least three people and injured scores more
www.middleeasteye.net www.middleeasteye.net
 
Last edited:
Meg said:
I don't know if you are on Twitter/X, but I think it's worth checking out TrackAIPAC. They track what US politicians receive money from AIPAC and it's A LOT of them and A LOT of money.

Here's a blurb from AIPAC's Wiki entry:



You can read more here: AIPAC - Wikipedia
Click to expand...
Thank you Meg. Yes, I'm aware of all this money going to the US politicians already. My post was clearly misunderstood, thats what I get for writing late at night. I was being to cryptic maybe. I'm well aware of the problem that is Israel and its hooks in the US and I would very much like to see that end.
 
The government of Colorado has gone beyond insane. I can't comprehend, its to crazy. Oh, and there are cats dying of bird flu! AND they've passed new, restricted gun laws.

 
Last edited:
SummerLite said:
No, I'm absolutely not down playing that long standing relationship. I was commenting on the statements in that one post only and disagreeing on Axj interpretation. You didn't understand what I was trying to say there. Trump is new on the scene and its not clear how he will deal with Israel over the long term. Your speaking of history here not current events. It was more about black and white thinking. Don't read to much into it.
Click to expand...
I think you may have read too much into what I said as well. We do not know if Trump is indeed as pro-Zionist as he portrays himself publicly or if he is doing that to have support from the Zionists/Mossad on various issues.

Trump is not really new on the scene, it is his second term and close to a decade since he first took office. If we judge him and other politicians by their actions, then so far he seems to be doing a lot of what the Zionists want with hardly any disagreements.

Considering that almost no politician in the US dares to disagree with the Zionists or criticize Israel (even as a genocide is committed), it seems fair to say that this amount of power and control is close to a Zionist tyranny in the US.

If the zionists and globalists are indeed opposed to each other ("Soros vs Netanyahu"), then it is more of a power split in the US between these two factions, along with the apparently weaker nationalist faction.
 
axj said:
If the zionists and globalists are indeed opposed to each other ("Soros vs Netanyahu"), then it is more of a power split in the US between these two factions, along with the apparently weaker nationalist faction
Click to expand...
It's a convoluted, tangled web working in the shadows which we try to unravel. Soros was created by Britain and Israel by the Rothchild's which implies they work together. Time will tell us more but If defunding USAID succeeds it will remove the money financing global conquest. Maybe some of the big money people realize that if the globalists succeed they will loose everything and their children will live in a very ugly world if they survive so they throw in with Trump, like Musk. Then they can continue to do stuff. Maybe this is the other faction? A thought thats crossed my mind.

www.lewrockwell.com

How the British Invented George Soros - LewRockwell

IN 1993, many in Europe felt betrayed. Some grumbled about an “Anglo-Saxon plot.” Britain had rejected monetary union with Europe, saying she would stick with the British pound. Tempers flared. Tongues loosened. Rhetoric was starting to get downright racial. “There is a kind of plot,” said...
www.lewrockwell.com www.lewrockwell.com

Soros was allowed to grab this money in order to finance his color revolutions and he's been buying positions of officialdom in the US for awhile. Funds to him where uncovered in USAID.

Designated Villain

When British operatives engage in covert interventions such as destabilizing regimes or undermining currencies, George Soros always seems to pop up like a jack-in-the-box, mugging for the cameras, making provocative statements, and generally doing everything he can to draw attention to himself.

He is what intelligence professionals call a “noisy” operation.

Soros is the designated villain, the scapegoat.

He deliberately takes the blame for things, even when he is not to blame.

It’s a strange way to make a living. But it seems to pay well.

“The Man Who Broke the Bank of England”

Until 1992, most people had never heard of Soros.

Then the British media named him “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England.” Soros became an overnight celebrity.
Click to expand...

The Man Who Created George Soros

The man chiefly responsible for promoting Soros during this period was Lord William Rees-Mogg, a prominent journalist and member of the House of Lords.

The Financial Times called him “one of the grandest names in British journalism.”

Lord Rees-Mogg died in 2012.

He was editor of The Times for 14 years (1967-1981), then vice chairman of the BBC.

He was a friend and confidant of the Royal Family, a close friend and business associate of Lord Jacob Rothschild, and the father of British politician Jacob Rees-Mogg.

More than anyone else, Lord Rees-Mogg was responsible for weaponizing George Soros.
Click to expand...

Soros and the “Atlanticists”

In a series of articles in Revolver News, Darren Beattie exposed a cabal of U.S. national security operatives who specialize in toppling regimes through “color revolutions.”

They operate through a network of government-sponsored NGOs, among them The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its two daughter groups, the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute (NDI).

Beattie accuses these “pro-democracy” groups of staging a mutiny against President Trump.
Click to expand...
www.sott.net

Trump suspends funding to the National Endowment for Democracy

The Trump administration has frozen funding to the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a US-funded organization that meddles in elections and pushes regime change around the world in the name of "promoting democracy." According to The Free...
www.sott.net www.sott.net

Then we have the Khazarian Mafia story that claims to give the origins of these world controllers that traces their lineage to the Canaanites, descendants of Cain and worshippers of Baal and maybe ET connections. Thats an interesting one. Soros and Netanyahu, Khazarian Mafia?
 
Last edited:
Michael G. Waltz, the Zionist warmonger (mole) in Trump's cabinet

Screenshot 2025-04-03 at 19-58-17 (1) Mike Waltz on X https __t.co_R2SEDdzfNE _ X.png

From the CIA

Screenshot 2025-03-31 at 19-50-16 White House in Arabic البيت الأبيض بالعربية on X @hhtbzayed ...png
🇺🇸🇦🇪 Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed @hhtbzayed Deputy Ruler of Abu Dhabi, wrote following his meeting in Washington with Michael Waltz @MichaelGWaltz, National Security Advisor, and the evaluation of the partnership between the United States and #الإمارات_العربية_المتحدة:"We discussed our partnership in various sectors, particularly advanced technology, artificial intelligence, energy, infrastructure, and joint investment cooperation. We also discussed ongoing efforts to strengthen the foundations of regional and global security and stability."He continued, "The UAE and the United States are working together to address current challenges and unlock opportunities for further development and prosperity."Michael Waltz reposted on his official account what his Emirati guest wrote and said:"He is a strong and decisive partner!" 👊🇺🇸🇦🇪
SummerLite said:
No Tariffs on Russia I've heard.
Click to expand...

“Trump has roughly bent the global trading system over the table by imposing duties on nearly the entire world. The consequences will be global. Counter-tariffs will be imposed on goods from the United States. Old supply chains will be broken, but new ones will form. And what about us?

Russia barely does any business with America anyway, or with the EU, for that matter: nearly all trade has been sanctioned. But we are still developing and at a decent pace: for the first quarter of 2025, growth stands at about 3%. So, no need for knee-jerk reactions.

According to Lao Tzu's immortal advice, we should take a seat on the shore and wait for the enemy's corpse to float by. In this case, the decaying corpse of the EU economy.”



Related:
 
Not sure if one of the 9/11 threads is a better place for this.

For some reason I never heard this TV phone interview with Trump right on 9/11. He gave another shorter one in person a couple days later, but this one shows clearly that he did not believe the "airplanes destroyed the WTC" narrative at all and even the interviewers on Fox News did not seem to buy it:


Transcript of the relevant section (starting at 5:12):

Q: Donald, you're you're probably the best known builder, particularly of great buildings in the city. There's a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect or possibly bombs or aftershocks. Do you have any thoughts on that?

Trump: Well, it wasn't an architectural defect. You know the World Trade Center was always known as a very, very strong building. Don't forget that it took a big bomb in the basement. The basement is the most vulnerable place because that's your foundation and it withstood that. I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour, because he did the building. And I said I can't believe it, the building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out.

I mean so this was an unbelievably powerful building. If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows you had the steel on the outside. So you had the steel on the outside of the building. That's why when I first looked and you had big heavy I-beams, when I first looked at it I couldn't believe it because there was a hole in the steel. And this is steel that was, you remember the width of the windows in the World Trade Center. Folks, I think you know if you are up there, they were quite narrow. And in between was this heavy steel.

I said how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this steel. I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steel on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside which is the strongest structure you can have and it was almost just like a can of soup.

Q: You know Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two. And when you see it approach the the far side and then all of a sudden within a matter a millisecond the explosion pops out the other side.

Trump: Right. I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think obviously there were very big planes, they were going very rapidly. Because I was also watching where the planes seem to be not only going fast, they seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction it's even more than a big plane. Because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building. I mean these buildings were rock solid.
Click to expand...
 
4/5 Saturday day of protest, speaking of George Soros (British agent). Warning: this video is from MSNBC if you have the stomach to watch.
I wonder if they hired some of the actors from rent a protest. Last I checked that company was located in LA I believe
 
On April 1 the Houthis claimed to have launched 18 missiles and a drone against the "aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman and accompanying warships" in the Red Sea, in response Trump bombed them and childishly mocked them, as is his style adding "They will never sink our ships again!"

The only US ship to be sunk "recently" was the USS America (2005) and that was by the US itself in a war exercise or simulation. The Houthis have never sunk an American ship, unless Trump knows something we don't.

The responses to Trump's X were like missiles that the MAGA apologists could not overcome. Now war is good.​

Boom

:phaser:


Screenshot_20250405-005136_X.jpg
 
Puma said:
On April 1 the Houthis claimed to have launched 18 missiles and a drone against the "aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman and accompanying warships" in the Red Sea, in response Trump bombed them and childishly mocked them, as is his style adding "They will never sink our ships again!"

The only US ship to be sunk "recently" was the USS America (2005) and that was by the US itself in a war exercise or simulation. The Houthis have never sunk an American ship, unless Trump knows something we don't.

The responses to Trump's X were like missiles that the MAGA apologists could not overcome. Now war is good.​

Boom

:phaser:


View attachment 107483
Click to expand...
Shades of 1984.
the woman putting her arms round him and comforting him although she was blue with fright herself, all the time covering him up as much as possible as if she thought her arms could keep the bullets off him. then the helicopter planted a 20 kilo bomb in among them terrific flash and the boat went all to matchwood. then there was a wonderful shot of a child's arm going up up up right up into the air a helicopter with a camera in its nose must have followed it up and there was a lot of applause from the party seats but a woman down in the prole part of the house suddenly started kicking up a fuss and shouting they didnt oughter of showed it not in front of kids they didnt it aint right not in front of kids it aint until the police turned her turned her out i dont suppose anything happened to her nobody cares what the proles say
Click to expand...

George Orwell - 1984 - Part 1, Chapter 1

The complete works of george orwell, searchable format. Also contains a biography and quotes by George Orwell
www.george-orwell.org
 
JEEP said:
It would appear that our Constitutional Republic is still very much in danger.
Click to expand...
The Supreme Court dissolved Boasberg's temporary restraining order and overruled the DC Circuit.
Supreme Court Sides With Trump Over Venezuelan Deportations, But Requires Due Process For Each Case
by Tyler Durden
Monday, Apr 07, 2025 - 05:05 PM

The Supreme Court on Monday sided with the Trump administration's request to halt lower court judge James Boasberg's order stopping Trump from deporting suspected members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA).

"We grant the application and vacate the [temporary restraining orders]," the court said in its unsigned 5-4 opinion.

And while this may be a win for Trump, its impact was muted by the fact that detainees must be given due process before they are deported.

"AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the court wrote in its majority opinion.

Predictably penning the dissent was Justice Sonia Sotomayor - who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett partially joined Sotomayor’s dissent.

The decision came after the Trump administration and plaintiffs in the initial case filed competing briefs to the justices.

According to Acting US Solicitor General Sarah Harris, the "case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country—the President, through Article II, or the Judiciary, through [temporary restraining orders]."

The Trump administration launched their appeal to the Supreme Court after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with Boasberg.

The plaintiffs, which included a group of Venezuelan nationals, told the court on April 1 that the lower court's block on deportations "ensures that, based on an unprecedented peacetime invocation of the AEA, additional individuals are not hurried off to a brutal foreign prison, potentially for the rest of their lives, without judicial process."

The Supreme Court on Monday sided with the Trump administration's request to halt lower court judge James Boasberg's order stopping Trump from deporting suspected members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA).

"We grant the application and vacate the [temporary restraining orders]," the court said in its unsigned 5-4 opinion.

And while this may be a win for Trump, its impact was muted by the fact that detainees must be given due process before they are deported.

"AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the court wrote in its majority opinion.

Predictably penning the dissent was Justice Sonia Sotomayor - who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett partially joined Sotomayor’s dissent.

The decision came after the Trump administration and plaintiffs in the initial case filed competing briefs to the justices.

According to Acting US Solicitor General Sarah Harris, the "case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country—the President, through Article II, or the Judiciary, through [temporary restraining orders]."

The Trump administration launched their appeal to the Supreme Court after the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with Boasberg.

The plaintiffs, which included a group of Venezuelan nationals, told the court on April 1 that the lower court's block on deportations "ensures that, based on an unprecedented peacetime invocation of the AEA, additional individuals are not hurried off to a brutal foreign prison, potentially for the rest of their lives, without judicial process."
Click to expand...

Supreme Court Sides With Trump Over Venezuelan Deportations, But Requires Due Process For Each Case | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom