Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

[JEEP]

More developments:

Elon Musk Turns on Starlink for Iranian Public After Islamic Regime Cuts Off Internet Service

Is Washington Preparing for War? U.S. Air Force Reportedly Sends Out Two Mysterious Encrypted Nuclear Emergency Codes

And this doozy:

On Sunday, June 15, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the explosive claim on Fox News’ Special Report with Bret Baier that Iran was behind the two assassination attempts on President Trump.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1934284175676514659

Was the stage set last year?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1814104725954207850

The FBI’s analysis of Crooks’ electronic devices revealed that he used these encrypted platforms primarily to purchase firearm components, chemicals, and other explosive materials.

While some details from Crooks’ devices have been disclosed, such as search histories and certain communications, comprehensive information about the contents of the second phone and the full extent of his communications on encrypted platforms has not been fully released to the public.

So the same FBI that still hasn't coughed up the Epstein files or even all the JFK files, can be totally trusted to tell us the truth about an Iran connection to Trump's assassination attempts? The Gateway Pundit isn't buying it:

Not So Fast, Netanyahu: Trump Assassination Plots Trace Back to Ukraine—Not Iran—While FBI Stonewalls on Crooks’ Encrypted Messages | The Gateway Pundit | by Jason Sullivan

Source: Unleashed.news On Sunday, June 15, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the explosive claim on Fox News’ Special Report with Bret Baier that Iran was behind the two assassination attempts on President Trump.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[WhiteMountain]

I think Musk may have had the most influence on Trump among the technocrats. Even Thiel does not seem to be working as closely with Trump as Musk did. Some even claimed that Musk is the "real president".

How big of a difference the Trump-Musk breakup has on the influence of technocrats we don't know. Both Palantir's spread in US agencies and the Stargate AI plan seem to continue as before.

However, why else would Trump go from snubbing the Israelis publicly for weeks to agreeing to their attack on Iran? Is it a coincidence that Trump's sudden change of heart regarding the Israelis happened right after the Trump-Musk fight?

I think it was all part of the plan. The whole "Path to Persia" document. It outlines there needs to be an apparent split between the US and Israel so that Israel could "go rogue" and initiate the war, with the US coming in to back them later. The fight gave it credibility. Who knows maybe some of it was genuine because Trump is so fickle and seems to just listen to the last person he spoke with. But I think this was always the plan. Again Putin said it, "You don't even know the names of those who control your country." Trump is just the PR front man that is put up for the Empire. He does as he is told ultimately, just like he did in bombing Syria twice and stealing their oil fields during his first term (despite his tweets at Obama when Obama was faced with a similar choice and decided NOT to take the bait; so Trump knew better about the chemical weapons bullshit).

 

[axj]

Iran-Contra could have had components of nuclear technology transference that was covered up.

What reason would the US or its deep state have had to secretly transfer nuclear weapons technology to an openly hostile country? There is zero indication of anything like that and I think that Iran obtained nuclear weapons probably much later than the early 1980s.

Steve Ben Nun is reporting his sources in the US military have told him that the US will enter the war in the next 48 hours. They will be using tactical nukes and "rods from God"

A channel called "Israeli News Live" making such insane claims is almost certainly lying, maybe to trick the Iranians into a preemptive attack on the US.

Trump is just the PR front man that is put up for the Empire. He does as he is told ultimately,

If you read the Trump thread, after much research and discussion there the overall consensus about Trump is quite different.

There is no need for some false flag attack on the US to get US into the war with Iran on Israel's side. The war between the US and Iran is already happening. Israel cant have their planes armed and above Iran without the US logistical help.

Logistical help is far from an actual direct war with the US. See Ukraine.

The US is already under total Israel's control, and its not relevant what people of the US thinks or wants, thus no need for false flag action.

I think that is not really true and too much black and white thinking.

Iran can count on help only from China and Pakistan. Forget Arabs, they are ever turncoats, Turkey the same, or Russia, which is empire (somewhat autistic to be honest), and only do whats in their direct interests.

Most countries do only what is in their direct interests, some don't even do that (eg. Germany). And I don't know what "autistic empire" is supposed to mean.

 

[mabar]

Oh! ...another "we" moment. This interview Tucker Carlson-Ted Cruz will be enlightening. And this with one was delated?

 

[WhiteMountain]

What reason would the US or its deep state have had to secretly transfer nuclear weapons technology to an openly hostile country? There is zero indication of anything like that and I think that Iran obtained nuclear weapons probably much later than the early 1980s.


A channel called "Israeli News Live" making such insane claims is almost certainly lying, maybe to trick the Iranians into a preemptive attack on the US.


If you read the Trump thread, after much research and discussion there the overall consensus about Trump is quite different.


Logistical help is far from an actual direct war with the US. See Ukraine.


I think that is not really true and too much black and white thinking.


Most countries do only what is in their direct interests, some don't even do that (eg. Germany). And I don't know what "autistic empire" is supposed to mean.

What exactly was the insane claim? That the US is going to war? Most of the evidence would certainly point in that directly. If I were a betting man without that report I would be giving that 70% or better odds. That we would use nuclear weapons? As Scott Ritter and others have noted, we CANNOT take out their facilities with conventional weapons. This was already on the table given they started this war. The rods from god are weapons people have been talking about for over a decade including speculation about their use on several chinese factories back in 2015 when the US was upset over their currency policy. Then it was stealth, but the idea those plants all just happened to explode in the same timeframe was absurd and the rods of god made the most sense. Even the C's said Iran wanted Suleimani killed and what they said was the only good explanation I heard as to why that might be. Hodos book people can read themselves. I don't think any of this is unreasonable, and it is certainly more reasonable than anything coming out of Trump's mouth right now. And I have been listening to Ben Nun for years because he does have some really good sources (as well as some HORRIBLE ones like his FEMA source who was predicting planet X bs coming in back in 2021 LMAO :)). But he has been one of the most critical ones of Israeli policies which is not exactly in line with the Empire's interests.

 

[Jtucker]

What reason would the US or its deep state have had to secretly transfer nuclear weapons technology to an openly hostile country? There is zero indication of anything like that and I think that Iran obtained nuclear weapons probably much later than the early 1980s.


A channel called "Israeli News Live" making such insane claims is almost certainly lying, maybe to trick the Iranians into a preemptive attack on the US.


If you read the Trump thread, after much research and discussion there the overall consensus about Trump is quite different.


Logistical help is far from an actual direct war with the US. See Ukraine.


I think that is not really true and too much black and white thinking.


Most countries do only what is in their direct interests, some don't even do that (eg. Germany). And I don't know what "autistic empire" is supposed to mean.

I don't think there's "zero" indication that Iran-Contra was a big problem of illegally transferring weapons to Iran. Much of what went on was never released. It was the biggest U.S. security threat of that era. It may not have been nuclear warheads that changed hands, but it may have been the basic building materials to finish them a decade later. From what I understand, it is the "lens" or the "fuse" technology that is extremely precise in order to detonate a thermonuclear warhead. That technology is the key. Enriched Uranium may be expensive, but I believe it is a chemical process that isn't very hard to do if you have the money. Multi-millisecond micro explosions from extreme high voltage creating critical mass on a plutonium or similar core to create critical mass is the issue.

I don't think much of this "Spy vs Spy" world that the C's have mentioned was geopolitical from an executive branch of the U.S. perspective. It's hard to understand for us normal human beings that successfully brokering arms to anyone who wants to pay can get you a 5 million dollar place on Chesapeake Bay in the 80's and a new Ferrari - and that is worth untold deaths and possible treason to these psychos. The MIC is huge.

And once again, I'm not putting it forth as a well-researched element of this war, or geopolitics in general, it's just something I felt when reading that session and growing up in that era, it clicked with me. If you were to write a great 1980's/90's spy thriller - that's a great twist ending.

 

[iamthatis]

What reason would the US or its deep state have had to secretly transfer nuclear weapons technology to an openly hostile country? There is zero indication of anything like that and I think that Iran obtained nuclear weapons probably much later than the early 1980s.

Well, the PTB at the very top level are non-national and have an interest in building up the power and capacities of 'opposing' nations. Then they set the opposing nations against each other in war and feed on the profits, blood, and suffering - demonstrated in books like Conjuring Hitler, or Prouty's books, and others. That would be the reason for transferring sensitive tech.

About technical nuclear transfers to foreign or 'enemy' nations, there is also a possible precedent for that in particular, when elements within the US allegedly sent nuclear secrets to the USSR. From Yahweh to Zion:

Thus the Second World War was completed with the determined aim of laying the foundations of a new conflict in Europe. The Atlantic Charter ofAugust 14, 1941, had declared that the United States and Great Britain “wish to see sovereign rights and self government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them,” and “hope to see established a peace which will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety within their own boundaries.” This referred first of all to Poland, whose joint invasion by the Nazis and the Soviets had justified the Allies’ entry into the war. Yet the result of the Second World War was not to liberate Poland and the other EasternEuropean peoples, but to hand them over to the Soviet dictatorship. This situation did not result from any failure by the United States, but on the contrary from the secret will of the powers that controlled the White House.

Many other proofs exist of the secret complicity of the United States in the capture of Central Europe by the Soviets. During 1942, large quantities of uranium, cadmium, and heavy water thorium, aluminum tubes, and copper wiring (all materials required for the creation of a nuclear reactor) were sent to the Soviet government from an air base in Great Falls, Montana, established specifically for this purpose. This incredible high-tech military smuggling, organized from the White House, is known through the publication of notes taken by Captain George Racey Jordan, who participated in the delivery of these cargoes, which included many other kinds of industrial equipment (From Major Jordan’s Diaries, 1952).

This secret assistance to the Soviets was supervised by Harry Hopkins, who had been placed in the White House by Bernard Baruch. Also delivered to Moscow were duplicates of United States Treasury plates, together with tons of paper and gallons of the appropriate ink for printing unlimited quantities of dollar bills. The transfers were supervised by Harry Dexter White, a protégé of Henry Morgenthau Jr. and a liaison officer between the Treasury and the StateDepartment, who was also the principal US official at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944 and closely associated with the founding of theInternational Monetary Fund. Born Weit Magilewski of Lithuanian Jewish parents, White was charged with espionage on behalf of the Soviets, alongside Alger Hiss, following the denunciation of another repentant spy, Whittaker Chambers.

So in principle, psychopathic elements in the US could have sent nuclear secrets to Iran. I would be surprised if that were true, though. It's either them or elements in the USSR IMO. Maybe the Iranians are just really smart, though, and developed it on their own.

 

[Nević Nenad]

What reason would the US or its deep state have had to secretly transfer nuclear weapons technology to an openly hostile country? There is zero indication of anything like that and I think that Iran obtained nuclear weapons probably much later than the early 1980s.


A channel called "Israeli News Live" making such insane claims is almost certainly lying, maybe to trick the Iranians into a preemptive attack on the US.


If you read the Trump thread, after much research and discussion there the overall consensus about Trump is quite different.


Logistical help is far from an actual direct war with the US. See Ukraine.


I think that is not really true and too much black and white thinking.


Most countries do only what is in their direct interests, some don't even do that (eg. Germany). And I don't know what "autistic empire" is supposed to mean.

Autistic empire would be close to autistic person. Doesn't really know what they are and how to fend for themselves. I do believe that the black and white thinking is prevalent in the world now, so people of the US is not relevant. No one is going to ask them if they want to die for Israel's death cult or not. No false flag needed. If masters of the US wants them to die for Israel they will. All the chances now is that we will see that in the next couple of days.

 

[Alejo]

Things continue to escalate, I do find it curious that Macron has expressed direct opposition against any regime change in Iran via military force. I do not buy what he's saying one bit, but then why now? it seems as though he's simply preemptively positioning against Trump because he knows that Trump will have no choice but to get involved, so as to have a premade higher moral ground.

In the US, the congress and senate have a few elements, including republicans, who oppose any direct involvement.

And amongst the developments, maybe this is a symbolic way in which the universe says that this will backfire? has anyone else seen that the iron dome missiles have been failing and falling on Tel Aviv? lol. Another thing to note is how many people are cheering on the Iranians, and counting on Israel to fall.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1935097955029041158

https://twitter.com/x/status/1935101137918501208

 

[WhiteMountain]

Things continue to escalate, I do find it curious that Macron has expressed direct opposition against any regime change in Iran via military force. I do not buy what he's saying one bit, but then why now? it seems as though he's simply preemptively positioning against Trump because he knows that Trump will have no choice but to get involved, so as to have a premade higher moral ground.

In the US, the congress and senate have a few elements, including republicans, who oppose any direct involvement.

And amongst the developments, maybe this is a symbolic way in which the universe says that this will backfire? has anyone else seen that the iron dome missiles have been failing and falling on Tel Aviv? lol. Another thing to note is how many people are cheering on the Iranians, and counting on Israel to fall.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1935097955029041158

https://twitter.com/x/status/1935101137918501208

Macron knows France has let a lot of Muslims into the country. He does not want Paris to burn. The Yellow Vest stuff was bad enough, imagine if he directly supported this travesty of a war against Iran.

 

[JEEP]

More related stories:

Tucker Carlson warns that Fox News 'liars' influencing Trump could END his presidency over nuclear war

I wonder if the Carlson-Trump rift will top the Musk-Trump one.

Israels War with Iran Isnt Americas Fight And Voters Know It

When Israel launched a surprise military strike on Iran last week, it did more than risk igniting a catastrophic regional war. It also exposed long-simmering tensions in Washington—between entrenched bipartisan, pro-Israel hawks and a growing current of lawmakers (and voters) unwilling to be dragged into another Middle East disaster.

“This is not our war,” declared Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), one of the House’s most consistent antiwar voices. “Israel doesn’t need U.S. taxpayers’ money for defense if it already has enough to start offensive wars. I vote not to fund this war of aggression.” On social media, he polled followers on whether the U.S. should give Israel weapons to attack Iran. After 126,000 votes (and 2.5 million views), the answer was unequivocal: 85% said no.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1933939584808751327

Rep. Summer Lee (D-PA) was even more blunt. “The war criminal Netanyahu wants to ignite an endless regional war & drag the U.S. into it. Any politician who tries to help him betrays us all.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1933606565921403254

Adding to this diverse chorus of opposition are some Republicans from the party’s non-interventionist wing. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) declared, “War with Iran is not in America’s interest. It would destabilize the region, cost countless lives, and drain our resources for generations.” Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH) lamented that “some members of Congress and U.S. Senators seem giddy about the prospects of a bigger war.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1933542330188931424

[...]

But these crude pro-war responses, once guaranteed to go unchallenged, are now being met with resistance–and not just from activists. With public opinion shifting sharply–especially among younger voters, progressives, and “America First-ers” – the political calculus on unconditional support for Israel is changing. In the wake of Israel’s disastrous war in Gaza and its widening regional provocations, members of Congress are being forced to choose: follow the AIPAC money and the old playbook–or listen to their constituents.

If the American people continue to raise their voices, the tide in Washington could turn away from support for a war with Iran that could plunge the region into deeper chaos while offering no relief for the suffering people of Gaza. We could finally see an end to decades of disastrous unconditional support for Israel and knee-jerk support for catastrophic wars.

If only . . .

 

[Weontv]

More related stories:

Just to see some contrast. Incredible how many politicians are boot lickers to Isreal. Really shows you how our hierarchy works.

The west needs to stay out of this. I am sick of these privileged sycophants sending young men to die.

 

[JEEP]

Incredible how many politicians are boot lickers to Isreal.

Yep - the Israel Firsters. Candice Owens summed it up last year:

 

[JEEP]

A voice worth hearing:

Colonel Douglas Macgregor reveals a hidden conspiracy involving Trump’s misleading actions and secret U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. As tensions rise, both Putin and Iran issue serious nuclear warnings, pushing the world closer to a dangerous tipping point. This critical analysis exposes the real motives behind global power plays and the threat of nuclear escalation.

[40:55]

Doing more than just warning?
Chinas Covert Cargo Flight to Iran Sparks Global Crisis: Transponder Blackout Ignites Fears of World War

A dramatic global turn has intensified the volatile standoff between Israel and Iran. Explosive intelligence now suggests that China may have stealthily entered the fray, dispatching a cargo aircraft to Tehran with its transponder deliberately disabled — a move widely seen as a bold and risky provocation against both the United States and Israel.

Possible confirmation?
Mohammad Marandi LEAKS: Trump's Secret Nuclear Talks with Israel! China & Russia Land Nukes to Iran!

Meanwhile, China and Russia are reportedly delivering nuclear capabilities to Iran, marking a dangerous shift in global power dynamics. This revelation signals a critical turning point in the race toward nuclear escalation.

[34:19]

 

[mabar]

And amongst the developments, maybe this is a symbolic way in which the universe says that this will backfire? has anyone else seen that the iron dome missiles have been failing and falling on Tel Aviv? lol. Another thing to note is how many people are cheering on the Iranians, and counting on Israel to fall.

I had seen a couple of more times since June 13-14 ... did not work well and/or Iranian strategy does to shot the other way around or to itself.

Just to see some contrast. Incredible how many politicians are boot lickers to Isreal. Really shows you how our hierarchy works.

Incoming more people to favor Israel/Trump on "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon never forever"

https://twitter.com/x/status/1935163808559030744

Add, interesting take here:

Yesterday, I wrote in a tweet: "Given an estimated stockpile of 3000 air-to-ground missiles and 3000 interceptors (both generous estimates), Israel may run out of suitable munitions in 10 days. With the Brits and French sending in everything they can spare, and the US resupplying Israel to the best of its ability, I would give Israel no more than 5-10 additional days tops with current use patterns." Today the WSJ is quoting American and Israeli security experts who are giving virtually identical estimates. What Iran has been doing is bleeding Israel dry of interceptors with mostly older missiles. In a little while, Iran and other enemies of Israel will be able to strike anywhere without interruption. This shortage of interceptors may be the reason the US is threatening to join the war. Only it will not solve this problem: the US will run out of interceptors itself after 2-3 weeks of war. The Iranians are preparing for years of this

https://twitter.com/x/status/1935182117199298730