If you think he's a fraud, how do you explain that Jackowski has solved seven hundred criminal cases, as evidenced by written thanks from police in Poland? He didn't even count small cases like finding lost objects, animals, and the like, because there are countless of them.for me this jackowski is a grifter . nothing that we cant predict alone based on knowledge.
Is this correct, I know nothing about him pr provide a link so I can look at his background.If you think he's a fraud, how do you explain that Jackowski has solved seven hundred criminal cases, as evidenced by written thanks from police in Poland? He didn't even count small cases like finding lost objects, animals, and the like, because there are countless of them.
for me this jackowski is a grifter . nothing that we cant predict alone based on knowledge.
The purpose of this discourse is not to advocate for a particular viewpoint, but rather to articulate an individual perspective on the subject at hand.If you think he's a fraud, how do you explain that Jackowski has solved seven hundred criminal cases, as evidenced by written thanks from police in Poland? He didn't even count small cases like finding lost objects, animals, and the like, because there are countless of them.
What is space?
Space is the illusion of a vast expanse. It is an illusion. Space makes sense up to a certain point; the further we go into space, the more meaning is lost. The vastness of space is an illusion. Space is a mathematical distribution of possibilities. If there is an observer in space, only one part of space is activated; the rest is an illusion. Our imagination adds a continuation to this illusion, and space is a spherical point that makes sense up to a certain distance from the observer, after which it disappears, which is why it appears to us as infinite. Space only has meaning when there is an observer; space disappears the moment the observer disappears. It is as if the observer sustains reality. It is as if the space were dead and only comes to life when the observer appears. It comes to life up to a certain distance, and the rest is an illusion. Jackowski was reminded of Immanuel Kant (a characteristic element of his doctrine was transcendentality – the view that the subject is the cognitive condition of the object).
Should I invest in Chinese currency?
Investing in Chinese currency is not a good business.
After the great crash, investment funds for countries will be created on the newly resurgent stock market. Whoever invests at the very beginning will gain the most.
Hi.If you think he's a fraud, how do you explain that Jackowski has solved seven hundred criminal cases, as evidenced by written thanks from police in Poland? He didn't even count small cases like finding lost objects, animals, and the like, because there are countless of them.
Would you care to give us a link or some info about the Volga Group?Hi.
Thanks for posting short info from Jackowski all the time. Hope ill meet him some day to say thanks too.
Appreciate your work also .Please,continue.
I am watching him too. And many other sources through many years.
He is a real deal. He is gifted. His info is very in line with work of best remote viewers. and QHHT etc.
(Dont react to negative comments. Many here still live in own bubble, stuck in one source and never investigate whats happening around. Its not worth time even explaining how toxic things are here lol. They still believe russia is fighting holy war etc. Out of touch with reality. Channelings of the Volga Group did also so much valuable work. Predicted clearly Putin in power and this maddness and destruction in 90s)) 1000x more precise than all these years of Ouija board. Its my personal opinion through years reading this. And RV guys saved many lives describing exactly things before they come in reality. )
Would you care to give us a link or some info about the Volga Group?
Hi, Arwenn. I know about that introduction for newbies and i just ignore that for many years. Its just i prefer to observe. But I will share something.Hi @A.M.Ghost, I see that you joined us a few years back. We ask all new members to post an introduction over in the Newbies section- nothing too personal just a bit about yourself and how you found the forum.
I’m glad you decided to join us andaboard!
Laura's Cassiopaea and the Volga Group are essentially the same source. This similarity is obvious, since I have studied both of these groups. The difference is that the Volga Group is dead, and Laura's contact continues to this day (more than 30 years). Laura has done a fantastic INDEPENDENT work over the years to search, systematize knowledge and transfer this knowledge to the community of like-minded people (and any other people around who are able to perceive this information).Out of touch with reality. Channelings of the Volga Group did also so much valuable work. Predicted clearly Putin in power and this maddness and destruction in 90s)) 1000x more precise than all these years of Ouija board.
Gena is still alive and doing work with young people. So you are wrong here. Thats what im talking about - protecting the bubble.Laura's Cassiopaea and the Volga Group are essentially the same source. This similarity is obvious, since I have studied both of these groups. The difference is that the Volga Group is dead, and Laura's contact continues to this day (more than 30 years). Laura has done a fantastic INDEPENDENT work over the years to search, systematize knowledge and transfer this knowledge to the community of like-minded people (and any other people around who are able to perceive this information).
What did the fools from the Volga Group do? They opened their mouths every time in the hope that someone would feed them grapes. But did they try to grow their own grapes and feed other people? Never.
P.s. In order not to pollute this topic. Guys who write that Jackowski is a fraud, why do you do this all the time?
This already reminds me of a joke: I chased you for three kilometers to tell you how much I hate you.![]()
Kadam is questioning Jackowski's abilities to predict, to which you answer:for me this jackowski is a grifter . nothing that we cant predict alone based on knowledge.
You answered this yourself a year ago when you wrote:If you think he's a fraud, how do you explain that Jackowski has solved seven hundred criminal cases, as evidenced by written thanks from police in Poland?
That Jackowski may have had success in solving crimes which happened in the past does not make him good at predictions of the future. As mentioned previously:At the same time, I make everyone aware that the future cannot be predicted, as the Cassiopaeans have repeatedly mentioned. The fact that Krzysztof Jackowski solved over 700 criminal cases does not prove anything, because it was discovering events that had already happened, i.e. the past.ss
20 pages have been added to this thread since this was discussed a year ago, so perhaps it bears repeating though many other forum members have been saying the same thing:Having revisited this thread, I am wondering about if there is anything special about this guy and what he says. What he says above sounds more like speculation than anything else and is so vague that it will fit most of what occur. Saying for example that a retaliation will involve not only missiles but also planes that will bomb something is not a mindblowing revelation. Missiles and planes are normal instruments of war and they pretty much always hit something.
A better read of the situation would come from listening to Newsreal or follow the threads on the forum here.
As @Joe said already on page 2 of this thread which now is 71 pages long:So I am just wondering whether it really is necessary to post everything this guy says. Google translate does exist. Perhaps it is time to take stock of what he has said so far and see if his track record holds up. Would people listen to him if he just came out and said that he was a political commentator or does the label "clairvoyant" help?
It is also important to keep in mind what the C's say, that we live in an open universe and thus not to get hooked on fixed futures.
After a brief look at his predictions, that's exactly what I thought "I could do that!"![]()
Since you know about the introduction part, perhaps you can muster the courage to introduce yourself formally to all forum members instead of only in this thread which is not for introductions. Most other forum members would not see this thread, which may be what you wish if your preference is to observe, yet a little impolite if a representative of the host of the forum invites you to do so.Hi, Arwenn. I know about that introduction for newbies and i just ignore that for many years. Its just i prefer to observe. But I will share something.