Nick Fuentes, from troll king to... leader of a true 'America First' movement?

mugacoffee

Jedi Master
Nick is blowing up online right now. He's polarising, provocative with a very edgy sense of humour. The system really did everything he could to cancel him. He makes a lot of good arguments and is very articulate, very smart and knowledgeable. But there is a question mark about him being an FBI informant as he didnt get arrested or go to jail on J6 even though he was on speaker telling people to "keep moving toward the Capitol" and "break down the barriers," etc. There are some who think he did a deal with the feds to turn over information on all his donors and subscribers, Tucker has suggested he's fed, and I like Tucker but is Tucker being petty or does he know something?

So I'd like to ask the C's if Nick Fuentes did a deal with the FBI.
 
I agree with a lot that he says, but loathe him personally. At least in this case I agree with JBP that he's a psychopathic weasel. (Milo and Chris Brunet also see through his act.) A huge proportion of his followers are pedos, and he himself has said that his own sexual interests are "too esoteric" for normal people.
 
I agree with a lot that he says, but loathe him personally.

Yeah. I really think you ought to be the guy with millions of followers, rubbing elbows with Candice Owens and being talked about by Tucker and Peterson. Ponerology is getting there 🤞

A huge proportion of his followers are pedos, and he himself has said that his own sexual interests are "too esoteric" for normal people.

Reminds me of Sam Smith coming out as Xenosexual 🙄 In a more enlightened era everyone using their sexual orientation for attention would all just mark down Histrionic on that section of their passport applications and leave the rest of the normal gays and straights alone.
 
A huge proportion of his followers are pedos, and he himself has said that his own sexual interests are "too esoteric" for normal people.

They are indeed. I ended in this rabbit hole for longer than I cared for: https://www.chrisbrunet.com/p/top-50-nick-fuentes-pedophile-scandals

And the associations here are dark. Something sinister seems to be developing here, and the potential for him to gain some real traction I think is there, despite those associations.
 
Nick Fuentes seems to draw some attention in part due to being very critical of Israel and Zionists, at least for a conservative voice with his message closer to those more commonly seen amongst left wing influencers.
Even with voices like Tucker and Candance Owens growing more confrontational with Israel’s agenda and activities they still tread with relative caution on the subject matter. Not without good reason mind you.

As a potential tool of the system Nick Fuentes with his strong opposition to Zionism combined with his conservative presentation, is well positioned to influence large numbers of conservatively minded people when eventually the ball drops and Israel is completely exposed. Primed for an “I told you so” moment in which he can be framed as ‘trustworthy’. This already seems to be happening to some extent.
Given his previous involvement in agitating things it would seem appropriate to be wary of him.

I have linked Nick Fuentes rumble channel and one of his videos on the History of Israel below if anyone is not familiar with him.
 
Candace Owens interview with N. Fuentes is somewhat revealing (imo) , he/ it may not be a fed , but his apparent personality is unhinged , and i'd add, at least bordering on psychopathic . ( link of interview @ Rumble )

I watched about an hour of that interview you linked, and then gave up. Fuentes is insufferable, I knew little of him before watching, and TBH I just came away thinking he was a wrong-un. Yeah, he's on the pathological scale, for sure.
 
Candace Owens recently addressed him in response to criticism:
@DrLoupis__
Friendly towards a known sex offender but hostile towards 26yo @NickJFuentes who has had his entire life destroyed since the age of 18 for discussing politics. We've lost all respect for you.

R: @RealCandaceO
I am so bored with the narrative that the world owes Nick Fuentes for what others did to him.
People give him a chance and he spits on them.
It’s now a character issue.
He’s not 18 anymore—he’s closer to 30. So what happened to him almost a decade ago when he was a teenager is not an excuse for his antisocial behavior.
Acting like Nick was attacked because I asked him to explain why he routinely attacks people that give him a chance (like Dave Smith) is just dumb.
If your belief is that Nick is allowed to routinely attack people but should never be asked to explain why he does it because “he was victimized by somebody else 10 years ago” then LOL.

Continue...
@RealCandaceO
I’ve interviewed everyone from Piers Morgan, Andrew and Tristan Tate, to Harvey Weinstein and everyone in between.

Nick is the first person I can say I have zero interest in ever having on the show again. And it wasn’t because of the interview. When he left I was totally game to have him on again. When he left my house he said “Okay well I’m glad we can be friends now”.

Then two weeks later, we release the interview and he does a complete 180 for no reason publicly.

I’m sorry but that is not how a “real man” behaves.

Nick, for his part, has been attacking her and calling her a possible foreign agent; perhaps from Russia, given her "obsession" with Macron.
 
Nick always gave me Ben Shapiro vibes, annoying and the high pitch voice. But I think that Tucker and Candace kind of described his utility during their conversation, they plant someone who can be associated with you to then discredit an entire current of thought.
 
Fuentes and his people are good example of ponerology in action and the ways political movements get manipulated by the Deep State. He says the right words but at the same time his nasty persona and shady followers with cult mentality are equally visible.

This serves to either distance unaware listeners from their political views (i.e to throw the baby out with the bathwater) or radicalize them to embrace this tribalistic woke-era black-and-white mindset.

The darker aspects of their movement may also be used at some point to discredit the idea that there's pedophile networks in political structures, or to associate people who make these claims (conservatives or "conspiracy minded") with Fuentes and his followers.

Maybe it's not even that far fetched that someone like Fuentes could be eventually made into modern Charles Manson type scarecrow, when considering that some of his followers are (claiming to be ironically) pledging to "rape, kill and die" for him.
 
As a potential tool of the system Nick Fuentes with his strong opposition to Zionism combined with his conservative presentation, is well positioned to influence large numbers of conservatively minded people when eventually the ball drops and Israel is completely exposed. Primed for an “I told you so” moment in which he can be framed as ‘trustworthy’. This already seems to be happening to some extent.
Given his previous involvement in agitating things it would seem appropriate to be wary of him.

Nick always gave me Ben Shapiro vibes, annoying and the high pitch voice. But I think that Tucker and Candace kind of described his utility during their conversation, they plant someone who can be associated with you to then discredit an entire current of thought.

Agreed. At absolute best a useful idiot that’s being propped up by the establishment, but more likely a groomed construct/tar baby.
He says all the right things and has ‘energy and charisma’ but because of his ‘tastes’ he can be used later for guilt by association.
If he was anti-establishment he’d have been arrested for those ‘tastes’ long ago.

So he looks like a trap, encouraged and/or engineered.
 
Back
Top Bottom