Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

[Moine]

This was obviously a well-planned operation and will it be possible to expose it in a way that launches a real investigation. One can imagine just how deep this probably goes.

If it turns out that there was nothing extraordinary about the affair, people still forget what law enforcement actually is. It is an extremely hierarchical power structure, wherein basically everyone involved usually has: 1) a career, 2) a family, 3) children that need to be supported, and of course the usual 4) debts, loans and planned purchases.

Even if 99.99% of an involved agency is noticing all of the funny details of the affair, and are conducting copious amounts of conspiracy gossip, not a single one of them will even think of attempting to usurp the procedural momentum that is put into motion once a mug-shot is released to the media, and the meeting with the attorneys is scheduled.

You might have a Fox Mulder down in the basement who actually is connecting all the dots, but they're usually ignored and ostracized, since the organisation's priorities are more-in-line with: 1) maintaining a inter-organizational authority, 2) telling the public what's up, and 3) quickly putting the case through the courts. It's basically not their job to scrutinize the details of any serious crime. However, it is their job to quickly put together what can be shoved down a jury's throat, so that ultimately their boss(es) looks good, and no one gets side-lined permanently, you know -- down in the basement.

That's what I think is even a worse scenario than a complete conspiracy --- no one knows anything, and everyone's got incentives to get the case over with.

 

[MichaelM]

Haven't seen it posted here before (though someone has posted a link to this substack before)

A post exploring the idea that Erika Kirk could be much more sinister than just the publicly known persona as Charlie Kirk's "trad wife"

🔥 amERIKA - THE ERIKA KIRK FILES 🔥

🔥Hopium Slayer🔥 is a reader-supported publication.

sirescanor.substack.com

Not that I believe it at face value but the connections being made gives me something to think about and note for the future as the "turning point" of the USA (or even the world) develops.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Having said the above, I haven’t examined the kill shot nor looked at that footage so far (and do not plan to do so) and thus can’t check if the location would be possible. It just kind of occurred to me from all the other things I have seen/read as a probable location.

Looking at the angle in Google Maps, it doesn't look like that location would have a clear view of the tent - it's blocked by the roof of the building in between.

 

[Benjamin]

If the .30-06 is too powerful and would have easily blown right through Charlie's neck, then why is the Mauser even there? If a completely different weapon was used, who thought it would be a good idea to make the Mauser the 'scapegun' if it would be found out that it was too powerful for the injury? It just becomes obvious that there is a cover-up. Even if the FBI is in the clear, would they not realise that the Mauser couldn't be the gun used?

And why Mauser? Why not an American sounding name for dear ol' grandpa? Trying to invoke WWII memories?

 

[Cosmos]

Looking at the angle in Google Maps, it doesn't look like that location would have a clear view of the tent - it's blocked by the roof of the building in between.

Likely so, although I'm not 100 percent sure. It seems to be rather hard to say for sure because it could be close between possible and impossible. I haven't looked deeply into it, though. Here are a couple of pictures and videos where it seems like it might be possible, but more likely not IMO.

What follows is more or less the area where Tyler is claimed to have shot from, notice though that officially (as shown in the New York Times picture) where exactly he was is not known as of yet:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1N1EXqXEAA8vr-?format=jpg&name=small

If you take the last picture above and then imagine the building behind him which is higher and slightly to the right, IMO there might have been a line of sight.

Here is the building from the other side, and you see how much it is above Tyler's level:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G1fPpraXMAA9bnX?format=jpg&name=medium

Here is the video that apparently shows Tyler on the roof. It was filmed not far away from the tent, but higher:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1968567545532739735

The tent is further to the right and quite a bit lower, so yes, it seems like it would be impossible to shoot from there, although I'm not 100 percent certain because the edge of the roof could end almost somewhere where a line of sight might be possible. It would be nice to have some better perspectives from the tent/shot area towards that area or the other way around, to be sure. But I would say yes, from that data so far, it is impossible to shoot from there.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Good discussion between Gary/Paramount Tactical and Marcus J. Allen. At the beginning they go through Steven Crowder's video and comment on each of his points:

 

[Approaching Infinity]

The tent is further to the right and quite a bit lower, so yes, it seems like it would be impossible to shoot from there, although I'm not 100 percent certain because the edge of the roof could end almost somewhere where a line of sight might be possible. It would be nice to have some better perspectives from the tent/shot area towards that area or the other way around, to be sure. But I would say yes, from that data so far, it is impossible to shoot from there.

Here's the view from Google Earth. You can just barely see a few of the terraced levels on the left of the amphitheater/bowl:

The tent would have been just to the left of that tree-top, and below the level of the roof.

 

[Cosmos]

Here's the view from Google Earth. You can just barely see a few of the terraced levels on the left of the auditorium/bowl:
View attachment 112229
The tent would have been just to the left of that tree-top, and below the level of the roof.

That view makes it pretty clear it is impossible to shoot from there, indeed. Thank you.

 

[bianca etezete]

Here is the latest episode from Candace. she was able to trace the person who did the video of the shooter in black on the top of the building and talked to him. What this guy was saying makes sense. In short it is not Tyler ( some foreign looking in complete black dress , professional using a short sized gun), gun is not AR-15, bullet is not 30-06 etc.

View attachment 112206

I just watched it. I said it once before here on the forum, in concern of Candace, that I think you need to be a shark to survive in a shark pool for that long time... Something here is very off, feels very off. I cannot exactly tell what it is yet, there simply is this odd feeling about it. Am I alone with it or does anybody else here have this slightly off feeling concerning her?

 

[JEEP]

A post exploring the idea that Erika Kirk could be much more sinister than just the publicly known persona as Charlie Kirk's "trad wife"

As much as I don't want to buy into the possibility that Erika is a key part of this conspiracy to take out Charlie, one must not close one's eyes to the possibility of what might actually be true. I believe Yoko Ono was pegged as John Lennon's handler, so maybe not a stretch the same scenario is playing out here.

Even the branding repeats:

• “Tate’s Angels” the cam-girl/trafficking ring.

• “Romanian Angels” Erika’s orphan project accused of trafficking.

• “Angels” as cover for export pipelines of flesh. On the younger side..

Don’t forget Epstein’s financier Lex Wexner’s Victoria’s Secret Angels. Epstein had power of attorney over Wexner’s estate.

I'm struck by the whole angel symbology, and when you think about it, isn't that just another way for the satanists to mock God? And even before reading the above, I thought of Wexner's Victoria Secret's models sporting angel wings - exceptionally beautiful women all but naked in super teensy underwear strutting down the runway wearing giant angel wings. Again, an in your face mocking of religion too subtle to be detected except by those in the know.

That view makes it pretty clear it is impossible to shoot from there, indeed.

Well, the two eyewitnesses attest they saw a figure prone atop the building shoot a rifle (not the Mauser) and then run away. No video evidence has been released of Tyler (or person posing as him) being prone on the roof either with or without a rifle. So, one more contradiction to add to the mix.

 

[Benjamin]

Here's the view from Google Earth. You can just barely see a few of the terraced levels on the left of the auditorium/bowl:
View attachment 112229

It looks like a pyramid on top of a mastaba. Just sayin'.

 

[Adobe]

Dubious—Concerning—and worth keeping an eye on:

"We will do it in Charlie's name" Deputy Chief of Staff for Trump—Steve Miller

“It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name,” Miller told Vance during a special edition of The Charlie Kirk Show, hosted by the vice president.


Under Donald Trump's leadership we will....

We will find you!

We will take away your money!

We will take away your power!

We will take away your freedom!

We will exile you!

Who is "you"? "Domestic Terrorists" (what scale, what law, and what definition will be used?)

What law? "I don't care how!"

For a just and right cause we are going to focus our anger.

We are going to channel all the anger that we have to...

2 minute video with JD & Miller, and the first 4 minutes of the following video show Miller's statements before the memorial. (From 14 minutes of The Young Turks video)

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967630252697587912

From 0 - till minute 4:

 

[Niall]

That view makes it pretty clear it is impossible to shoot from there, indeed. Thank you.

Anyway, the guy Owens got testimony from is the guy who filmed this footage of someone on the roof [right video]:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1965892989701730683

...and he said it's him, it's the shooter, but that he was "wearing black tactical gear."

 

[seek10]

I just watched it. I said it once before here on the forum, in concern of Candace, that I think you need to be a shark to survive in a shark pool for that long time... Something here is very off, feels very off. I cannot exactly tell what it is yet, there simply is this odd feeling about it. Am I alone with it or does anybody else here have this slightly off feeling concerning her?

I too had that feeling given the hoop's Candace has to go through to trace the person ( call 'A') who took the video. I get the feeling of 'William Rookwood' from 'V for Vendetta' moment. Given that FBI's narration went south immediately, they have to spin it to different direction and if they chose to spin it different direction, that is the right opportunity. What if this 'A' is fake and by discrediting 'A', they can discredit the entire narration.

But rewatching candace's latest video made me wonder the person who made the video ('A') may be genuine.

• Initially she reached out based on the video X posting and that went into Chicago numbers with no result
• Then she worked with UVU student, who led him to Erin guy. Whatever the role Erin guy doing (during the event) seems to have to led to this 'A' guy.

I get a feeling that deep state is not that smart enough to trace and control every body in a short time, particularly with the people who don't have incentive to lie. It is good that Candace was also skeptical about it and she mentioned that they will continue to cross check what this person 'A' says. She mentioned that she will cross check metadata of the video as a reference. Can somebody change metadata by changing the clock of the machine? Probably, I don't know.

 

[Niall]

Likely so, although I'm not 100 percent sure. It seems to be rather hard to say for sure because it could be close between possible and impossible. I haven't looked deeply into it, though.

All you had to do was check on Google Earth. No line-of-sight!