Charlie Kirk is dead... A sad day in history

In short, Phil Lyman looks like is the 'director' of the post assassination script. Probably, he played too many roles and overplayed. No need to say what he gets from this. The whole operation sounds like most "embarrassing" false flag with few "local" actors.
Based on the latest episodes by Candace it's obvious that just like with 9/11, 'eye witnesses' who often have, surprise surprise, a military background/connection, have diligently appeared on various shows and interviews giving their all too scripted sounding accounts of what happened on the day CK was 'shot'. Misleading and inserting false leads and facts. The whole thing is scripted like a (bad) movie.
 
his nephew
I got the impression from what Candace said, that the nephew or one of his friends may have been the stand in for that pic of "Tyler" going up the steps. If so, makes sense communication with Candance came to a halt. The home owners where "Tyler" was seen walking is all very suspicious. I guess I thought people can be tracked by their cell phone, so it can be determined exactly where Tyler really was that day. But I suppose, that would blow the carefully constructed scam being perpetrated upon the wider public.

And, what just happened in the UK
That was in reference to Starmer announcing that a digital ID will be mandatory to work in the UK. And surprise, Switzerland has also come on board with digital IDs, too.

Swiss voters narrowly approve plan for electronic ID cards

Interesting timing, don't you think?
 
I got the impression from what Candace said, that the nephew or one of his friends may have been the stand in for that pic of "Tyler" going up the steps. If so, makes sense communication with Candance came to a halt. The home owners where "Tyler" was seen walking is all very suspicious. I guess I thought people can be tracked by their cell phone, so it can be determined exactly where Tyler really was that day. But I suppose, that would blow the carefully constructed scam being perpetrated upon the wider public.


That was in reference to Starmer announcing that a digital ID will be mandatory to work in the UK. And surprise, Switzerland has also come on board with digital IDs, too.

Swiss voters narrowly approve plan for electronic ID cards

Interesting timing, don't you think?
I never wanted a chocolate watch anyway.
 
Based on the latest episodes by Candace it's obvious that just like with 9/11, 'eye witnesses' who often have, surprise surprise, a military background/connection, have diligently appeared on various shows and interviews giving their all too scripted sounding accounts of what happened on the day CK was 'shot'. Misleading and inserting false leads and facts. The whole thing is scripted like a (bad) movie.
True. In this case, the victim is President's right hand man (so he is not in loop) and his loyal FBI director is not in the loop. So they always can't count of their cooperation before the event. After the event, they can always threaten and silence, but always suspicious of them. In this case, Main stream media lost its credibility(due to Trump's actions) and people are looking to alternative media where Candace filling in due to her proximity to Charlie and some good luck.
 
The Shaffer security company said they stopped working with Charlie in 2022:

“Dan Flood headed up security for Turning Point USA, and Brian Harpole is his best friend. Brian worked for me for seven years, and then Brian started his own company and then shorted me on the contract for Turning Point USA,” Shaffer said. “That’s how they got the contract.”

When asked whether he had a falling out with Flood and Harpole, Shaffer said with a chuckle: “No, just got stabbed in the back by some friends.” Shaffer declined to comment further, other than to say he’s “100% confident that was the group that provided security [for Kirk] that day.”

Here is video of Dan Flood rushing over to Charlie just after he was hit and knock him over off his chair. My first thought when I saw it, was that Flood wanted to get him on the ground to either to administer first aid or perhaps get him out of the line of fire.

But now, after everything that has come out, it occurred to me that he wanted Charlie out of sight and below the table in order to remove any incriminating evidence left behind from the exploding microphone.

 
This is kind of tangential (not to mention gruesome) but it's been on my mind.

Given the PTB's love of symbolism, has anyone made the connection between Kirk's manner of death, and the way kosher meat is slaughtered? I looked up the process, and it's virtually the same scenario. Any rabbi connected to kosher certification would recognize it. It's supposed to make the animal holy and acceptable for the faithful. In their twisted way, Charlie was killed in the way a sacrifice would have been when there was still a Temple in Jerusalem. Maybe they even thought it was an honor of sorts, the same way Maxwell was offed when he became too much of a liability, but then was given a state funeral by Israel?
 
Charlie was killed in the way a sacrifice would have been
I did wonder if this was a ritual sacrifice, but not in the way you've brought up. And ugh - inquiring minds want to know:

The kosher slaughter process, or shechita, involves a trained individual called a shochet making a swift, deep cut to the animal's throat with a perfectly sharp knife to sever the trachea and esophagus, causing immediate unconsciousness and rapid blood loss. The animal must be healthy and conscious at the time of slaughter, and the process requires the absence of pre-stunning.

This whole thing is so sick that I wouldn't be shocked if this was one aspect of this assassination. And, a Redacted interview guest today, Colonel Roxane Watkins, a retired U.S. Airforce officer, speaks of the intelligence apparatus (CIA/MOSSAD/MI6) as the likely perps as it has their MO (a strategy of tension); this is an apparatus that functions outside of official government and has managed to acquire and utilize its own funding.
 
Mea culpa?

Laurent Guynot: "I Was Wrong on 'Weird' Charlie Kirk Theories"
Laurent Guyénot, author of From Yahweh to Zion, has quickly backed away from “weird” theories about Charlie Kirk faking his own death or being killed by an exploding microphone. Upon further reflection, and in light of Chris Martenson’s strong forensic analysis, Guyénot says he recognizes that seemingly odd aspects of the shooting can be better explained in more prosaic fashion. What can’t be easily explained away, however, is the long list of anomalies showing that the official story is impossible and that a wide-ranging coverup has been ordered. And Guyénot’s suspicions about Israel being behind the assassination have only grown stronger as the logistical picture gets clearer.
 
Interesting bit from Candace's show last night:


She heard from a guy who claimed he had been providing Charlie with bulletproof vests, and TPUSA stopped working with him a year or so ago, saying Charlie was going to start using an "army" vest instead. The implication is that Charlie consistently wore such vests on his tours, which matches with what others have been told by TPUSA sources. But in her NYT interview, Erika Kirk implied that it was only recently that she started suggesting to Charlie to wear vests, and he would not. So something is not right here.
During dinner, Erika begged her husband to start wearing a bulletproof vest and, when he refused, the friend suggested he speak from behind bulletproof glass.

“Not yet,” Erika recalled Kirk replying, before he added that he felt confident in his security team and that there would be additional security at the Utah Valley University event.
 
Back
Top Bottom