Probably not everywhere, especially in local elections of "insignificant" counties and towns. Plus, the rigging seems to have its limits since it was apparently not enough a year ago when Trump was elected.They are rigging elections everywhere.
Probably not everywhere, especially in local elections of "insignificant" counties and towns. Plus, the rigging seems to have its limits since it was apparently not enough a year ago when Trump was elected.They are rigging elections everywhere.
In the case of Trump last year, since there was presumably a "program change" in action even before the elections, maybe it was deemed unnecessary to go 'all in' in an attempt to keep him out of the WH for one more term? He has since then surely stirred up things globally and locally quite a bit, mostly in favor of chaos, instability, disorder and divisions among the population.Probably not everywhere, especially in local elections of "insignificant" counties and towns. Plus, the rigging seems to have its limits since it was apparently not enough a year ago when Trump was elected.
According to the C's the real numbers were 75% for Trump and 25% for Kamala. So the rigging almost doubled her numbers, which is tens of millions of fake votes. Who knows, maybe in this case the rigging was done just to make sure that it does not look like a landslide victory for Trump. And maybe he was allowed to win for similar free will reasons as the prevented assassination attempt.In the case of Trump last year, since there was presumably a "program change" in action even before the elections, maybe it was deemed unnecessary to go 'all in' in an attempt to keep him out of the WH for one more term?
November 23rd 2024
A: The imbalance was so severe that the STS side risked a severe violation of free will at a level that would have resulted in necessary degaussing from natural factors of balance.
At this early stage I would caution against throwing the baby out with the bathwater in regards to Mamdani and give the guy the benefit of a doubt. It could very well be that he is the same old and/or an agent of some sorts but it could also be that it isn’t that black and white.
Elizabeth D. Simons, chair of the Heising-Simons Foundation (a private philanthropy she co-founded with her husband, Mark Heising, focusing on science, education, human rights, and climate), shares indirect but notable ties to George Soros primarily through aligned philanthropic efforts and political donations in progressive causes. There are no documented personal, familial, or direct financial relationships (e.g., grants flowing between their entities), but their foundations collaborate on specific initiatives and co-support overlapping reform agendas.
I have to wonder how much Mamdani will be used as a tool of destruction by the PTB. He is already seen as a 'Champion of the Downtrodden', at least that's the subtext in the media, and what is being screamed on Twitter. Some on the left seem to fully expect a righteous judgment to finally fall on Trump... which it may. But there are no leaders on the left, only predators. Many on the left are in a bubble, and it's disarming to see the level of hatred (on X). All this is probably being fueled by the PTB with their new AI toys.I watched Mamdani's victory speech because I'd heard that the warm persona gave way to a harsher, more strident one. The speech certainly moved in that direction as it went along. Basically, he sounded like every politician entering office, believing he'll have more power than he has (NYC has 300,000 employees, its own deep state).
I imagine that NYC will spiral down into horrible chaos. Already the people with money, the target of Mamdani's taxes, are planning to leave the city. Relators in Florida are flooded with calls and the price of homes are rising. A tariff on all who come from NY is being discussed, Texas is the same.Non-Zionist leanings notwithstanding, I think Mamdani's been shunted into office to help usher in more chaos and control, London and LA style.
We've seen the media spin on behalf of those people, their policies, and outcomes, as with countless politicians before. As I began the thread, if Mamdani is what the PTB, in general, wants, he and his policies and outcomes will be defended by the media so that he may serve his purpose (as with those countless others). Failures, beyond limited hangouts, are typically obscured, covered up, or others are scapegoated. George W. Bush and many surrounding him are great examples.So even if he isn't quite such an incompetent numskull as say, Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, or London Mayor Sadiq Khan, I do think and fear he appears to be on that continuum, or easily maneuvered to be for all intents and purposes. Though I'd love to be proven wrong.
Not a chance will New York suffer the same fate as Detroit, Gary or Baltimore. Not in our lifetimes anyway. It doesn't matter who the mayor is, or how shabby the city looks around the edges, New York City has waaaay too much established long-term corporate power invested in it and built into it for that to happen any time soon. Its a HUGE economic powerhouse, it would have to take a direct cometary hit or mega-tsunami to bring it down to its knees.Tucker weighs in on the election of Mamdani, and the future of New York:
The New York Stock Exchange could relocate in a heartbeat. Business is now all virtual and done by computer. Only the early ones will get the best deal for disposing of their real estate.Not a chance will New York suffer the same fate as Detroit, Gary or Baltimore. Not in our lifetimes anyway. It doesn't matter who the mayor is, or how shabby the city looks around the edges, New York City has waaaay too much established long-term corporate power invested in it and built into it for that to happen any time soon. It’s a HUGE economic powerhouse, it would have to take a direct cometary hit or mega-tsunami to bring it down to its knees.