Candace Owens: From TPUSA Conservative Activist to Powerful Voice for Truth

[Cosmos]

Makin' a list - checking it twice -

• Matt Taibi
• Alex Jones
• Kash Patel
• Tim Pool
• Steven Crowder
• Ryan Dawson
• Matt Walsh

- gonna find out who's naughty or nice!

I think at this point in time the reactions Candace is causing/provoking in people in general and in specific amongst high profile public, secret powerful and also “alternative“ people could represent another crucial “separating the wheat from the chaff“ moment. And/or the exposure of “false prophets“. In similar ways Covid did so and the Ukraine/Russia thing.

There are those comparatively few who are knowingly deliberate false prophets that get exposed now while there are also many people that reveal their true colors now, not necessarily because they are deliberately evil, but thanks to this or that psychological issue (or thinking errors if you will) and/or programming that guides them because they really believe they are doing something good and fighting something “evil“.

The list of “false prophets“ is currently getting longer by the day (keeping in mind though that some might be able to correct course). There are a lot more I could name there.

In contrast to that here is a short list of high profile people that have so far shown an outstanding track record in this latest litmus test:

- Candace Owens
- Tucker Carlson
- Ian Carroll
- Jimmy Dore and company
- Tim Dillon
- Milo Yiannopoulos

And here are two candidates who haven’t shown quite as outstanding qualities as the people listed above, but at least some significant resistance:

- Megyn Kelly
- David Chappelle

 

[Voyageur]

Makin' a list - checking it twice -

• Matt Taibi

(Taibbi)

Had surprised me, yet perhaps not, as all kinds go to ground when faced with the question, when murder is really not a question at all.

This writer below sums Taibbi up - states what he wrote 25-years ago, and how he deflects today because, he says, its complex and he does not know anything about it.

Well there you go.

As Lionel of Lionel Nation states, many simply have no spine.

Why Doesn't Matt Taibbi Want to Talk About Gaza?

A real head-scratcher

leightonwoodhouse.substack.com

Matt, give your head a shake, because unless you have been sleeping under a rock, and you have not been, then no, murder is not complicated at all.

Edit: Matt is an international journalist, and he has done good work. So, he may have taken this stance as form of strategic enclosure - that ends up looking like he is sitting on a fence waiting to see which way the wind is blowing, but to come out with what he later said is very weak. Heck, a 10-years old's can tell you what's going on.

 

[JEEP]

Makin' a list - checking it twice -

• Matt Taibi
• Alex Jones
• Kash Patel
• Tim Pool
• Steven Crowder
• Ryan Dawson
• Matt Walsh

- gonna find out who's naughty or nice!

@JEEP Would it be worth you making a new thread for this topic?

I think at this point in time the reactions Candace is causing/provoking in people in general and in specific amongst high profile public, secret powerful and also “alternative“ people could represent another crucial “separating the wheat from the chaff“ moment. And/or the exposure of “false prophets“. In similar ways Covid did so and the Ukraine/Russia thing and what is happening in Gaza.

There are those comparatively few who are knowingly deliberate false prophets that get exposed now while there are also many people that reveal their true colors now, not necessarily because they are deliberately evil, but thanks to this or that psychological issue (or thinking errors if you will) and/or programming that guides them because they really believe they are doing something good and fighting something “evil“.

As the names cited have come under scrutiny not only in this thread, but at least one also in the Charlie Kirk thread, I pondered saying something about them being ready for the dumpster. The last entry, Matt Taibi, somehow triggered the very seasonally apropos naughty or nice response. @gottathink , I don't know that a separate thread about them is necessary as the comments so far are making good points as they relate to Candace and the search for real truth regarding Charlie's assassination. Of all listed, Tim Pool stunned me the most with his over-the-top profane rant/meltdown about Candace.

As @Ricardo posted in the Charlie Kirk thread, an X by Stew Peters, these people "aren't like us" i.e. normal/have a conscious/non-liars. Erika is certainly outdoing herself with her bold-faced lies that are so easily contradicted by actual well-documented events all over the internet! And these listed names do seem to be exposing either their true colors or very severe thinking errors - um, Matt Walsh (seriously?!!).

I guess now as even more diabolical info is rising to the surface, it's the non-influencer names that aren't known that are beginning to cause a stir. So maybe not waste any more energy on these presumed "false prophets."

Otherwise, I hope you are all having a very Merry Christmas and that 2026 will be the year for truth exposure!

 

[Phill4]

Valhalla vft put his expose video on Mitch Snow, he presented evidence of the domestic abuse accusations, around 8 women with accusations of abuse and phisical violence.

His stream is pretty long , the first hour is enougg to get the gist, skip 10 mins then 2x speed it. But ill try to sumarize it

Valhalla presented court documents, restraining orders(from several women abt 8 or so), text messages and even threats of shooting a judge.
Took out 7 credit card on his wife and maxed them out.
Lost custody of his son
He was in jail. He changed his name to snow recently not because he was running from the cartels as Mitch claims.
Nate presented great evidence to support his stance

He considers him a con artist who played Candace.

Nate says that his credibility is zero when he always seems to be the problem ( despite 8 women acusing him) in every situation, and that his story sounds fantastical

Nate doesnt think he is a fed just a con artist

Nare is in a group chat with paramount tactical (the green berrete that was in the interview with TPUSA when Candace met Erika: a snake who plays as the expert on behalf of the official narrative, they ARE friends) and another guy Jesse OnFire who have all made content on the situation.

As others pointed out to Nate, it is not so much the evidence but his ultimatums to Candace and his rush to kill the story, (probably influenced by paramount tactical) That makes him suspicious.


Baron Coleman holds the stance that a person's history has no bearing on what a person witnesses so he is willing to wait it out. Nate says it does because he thinks he is a con artist ( eventhough Mitch WAS actually a green berret for a year, and he spent a livestream of 3 hours saying it was stolen valor)

Paramounttactical will have Mitch's son tomorrow on his stream to describe the abuses at the hands of Mitch

Nate shared all that information and court records with Candace

Candace has not responded to Nate or to Mitch's personal life allegations

My thought:
Nate shot a few porkchops and now we have to follow his comands is a problem with me, his evidence is very well presented, i just don't think Candace trusts Nate off of the fact that he was deep in the millitary, and i share that sentiment. Specially when he is friends with paramounttactical who has constantily acted like the expert on behalf of the official narrative.
As far as Mitch and the evidence, it is very compelling and a POS as a person and i tend to believe he is all those things.

If Candace has something more then she just doesn't trust Nate and doesn't want to distract the direction of her investigation on yet another investigation

If Candace doesnt have anything else other than the metadata, she may be believing this guy Mitch too much. And i agree shouldn't help his " divepirates " donations, because that's tied to his unverified claims of persecution. Which haven't been yet proved or disproven.

I think she set up the donations which gives her the power to cancel it and refund the money.

And on that theory, going full tinfoil hat, i think it is possible "they"(PTB) "heard her prayer" and beamed her to check her tipbox at that moment in time when Mitch sent her that message, which would make him ,not necessarily a fed, but probably a MKultra puppet that can be remote controlled.
A person so disturbed (who is a pathological liar and abuser)but at the same time be "activated" for a mission.


I don't think Candace has nefarious motives and think she is under alot of pressure but taking a stance because valhalla tells me to, is just not how it is for me, im still on standby listening to the story.



We'll see what comes out of the interview with Mitch's son tomorrow




(BTW some girl on Nate's chat said he dated her mom and he did in fact get the shoulder injury during service while Nate showed that his injury was unrelated to service)
So it seems a very nevulous situation with Mitch.
Seem Candace is fully aware and has doubled down that something did in fact happen at Fort Huachuca


I Spent the whole day with my headphones on so you don't have to :)

 

[seek10]

Valhalla vft put his expose video on Mitch Snow, he presented evidence of the domestic abuse accusations, around 8 women with accusations of abuse and phisical violence.

It was a war zone on X on the topic. There are video's proving that this Valhalla vft guy's wife is a stripper and prostitute. Before there were videos of Piers Morgan's wife is sleeping with others and posting on social media.

Though Candace didn't have a her own episode for a week, the zionist 'damage control' couldn't do much other than damage their own narrative. The Idhao video below the candace and AJ's video is unrelated. But, I couldn't figure out how to disable that from X embed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2004795006150730098

 

[palestine]

And on that theory, going full tinfoil hat, i think it is possible "they"(PTB) "heard her prayer" and beamed her to check her tipbox at that moment in time when Mitch sent her that message, which would make him ,not necessarily a fed, but probably a MKultra puppet that can be remote controlled.

Thanks for your investigation and the relay of the information!

I was on the verge of going 100% trust in regard of the "meeting at the military base" - what a cold shower right now!

Honestly, in the past, here on the forum, I think that I saw this model... Like a template... New incriminating data... Amounts to the feeling of "there is no free lunch". Let's see how this goes, and best not let our guard down.

EDITED: better than "no free lunch", feeling is "no short cut" : the assassination is complex, so the way to untangle it must be, too. Candace may want to pursue on her complex leads.

 

[Beau]

Valhalla vft put his expose video on Mitch Snow, he presented evidence of the domestic abuse accusations, around 8 women with accusations of abuse and phisical violence.

Looks like character assassination 101 ripped straight from the intel handbook. Can't attack Mitch's content, so go after his character.

 

[Phill4]

Looks like character assassination 101 ripped straight from the intel handbook. Can't attack Mitch's content, so go after his character.

Valhalla is presenting this evidence to support his theory that the cartel story is a lie and that there are many inconsistwncies with Mitch's accounts and therefore he is not to be believed and makes him even less entitled to the donations. Givesendgo - search Mitch snow is at 140k with a goal of 250k as of now

Candance responded that all these influencers (without naming names) have backpeddal their accusations namely that they were pushing this idea that Mitch was never a green Barrete which then they quietly took back (true):

https://twitter.com/x/status/2004996870666682668

To be fair the donations are not for domestic abuse support but rather court fees for his millitary cartel story (so people asking for donations for one thing aren't nessesarily saints in every other area of their lives) im not sure but i think they have to provide evidence that the money is going to what it says is going but i don't know how donations work exactly. I could be wrong



Then today paramounttactical had one of the exwives of Mitch on along with a friend and his son on to discuss their experiences with Mitch (which hasn't conclusively answered if the cartel story is correct , just amounting evidence to the contrary):

In summary this interview is the ex and son and friend expnding on the alleged abuses , liar , con artist, manipulator and in bad terms with friends and family , yet very personable , spends times playing videogames, not fully disable with the ability to work but doesn't work, typical domestic abuse mess and details of those accounts.
(The first half is enough if you want to sit through it, but sufice to say and expansion on the domestic allegations against Mitch. Not much to do with CK directly)

(He said at one point that candace was trying to mess with the midterms which was the narrative Timpool and Alex Jones were rolling with, and that is just not reading the room at all, as that is probably the dumbest accusation even strategically speaking to bring Candace down)


MY thoughs
I think it is possible the guy is derranged but i just don't see it as much of an argument when ALL these public figures have skeletons in their closets, (Crowder is a wife abuser, Fuentes is probably gay, Timpool has meetings with Nethanyahu, Peterson and his daughter consume an absurd amount of medications and on and on and on, these influencers have a narcissistic, high impulsivity nature)
As an individual he probably is a pos, and deffinetly makes him less credible

On the other hand this idea that people need to be convinced to donate or otherwise as a moral angle, to me is ridiculous, people donating are adults who are capable of deciding whatever to do or not do with their money, but i understand the idea of Candace endorsing someone is a problem because autoritarian follower are in constant desperate need to be told what to think and not think.

As far as TPUSA they continue to look very suspicious in their lack of transparency, ryan matta pointed out that these are the very questions TPUSA should be asking and i agree it's almost like they want to be done with it so they can move the organization forward in a MIGA direction.
They just hide everything partly because of legal gag orders and NDA's and partly because CK was shot and everyone is afraid and clearly because they have something to hide and Erika's performances just gives it away


The MIGA side of the conservative party live in a bubble similar to the bubble we all felt between the left and right, two separate realities, and some of these actors are just in it for the grift , money and favors from powerful people.

One of the games influencers play is they select specific comments from their audiences to build up on a specific narrative, i saw valhalla and alex jones do this, only highlighting certain commentary to make it about their angle, not so much the rest, FYI


Conclusion
All that noise aside, this is where the conversation is at: "where was EK and BH on 9/8, 9/9 and 9/10 exactly?"
Unambiguous answers have not yet been provided.

Candace is still shooting for the Fort Huachuca angle.

 

[Beau]

All that noise aside, this is where the conversation is at: "where was EK and BH on 9/8, 9/9 and 9/10 exactly?"
Unambiguous answers have not yet been provided.

Exactly. Mitch's personal life may be a mess, but we know that:

He was a Green Beret. He was stationed at Ft Huachuca while enlisted. He was there on Sept 8-9. He was detained on the morning of the 9th for many hours, and that there is a Cpt. Neff who is of relation to Blake Neff. Everything in Mitch's story checks out except the identities of who he saw. That's literally the only thing still open for debate.

 

[Beau]

He was detained on the morning of the 9th for many hour

Mitch's own son confirmed this when Gary Melton (ParamountTactical) had him on his livestream and the son told Gary that he received a call the morning of Mitch's detainment at Ft. Huachuca. The military called him because he was listed as Mitch's emergency contact. Just a total self-own by that fool Gary.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2005251425261990098

 

[Ruth]

I think at a gut level, even if all these revelations about Erika had come out, the one thing that makes me discuss her is her willingness to seemingly toe the line with ALACRITY for the people who I think EVERYONE KNOWS killed her husband. I mean she better than anyone had to KNOW what was going on behind the scenes with Israel. No doubt she and Charlie had conversations about it. How couldn't they? And if Charlie was saying "they are going to kill me" - obviously the Israelis - he had to have had that conversation with Erika. There are two ways someone honest and above board generally handles that.

Yes it seems that everyone is expected to whore for Israel? Everyone in the media, everyone who's a podcaster, everyone who's a politician. In fact everyone who's American! Erika is seemingly "playing the part" of the grieving widow. She's definitely not up to the task of being a CEO, especially of a company that turns out to be infiltrated and engaged in fraudulent activities.

 

[Ruth]

The list of “false prophets“ is currently getting longer by the day (keeping in mind though that some might be able to correct course). There are a lot more I could name there.

In contrast to that here is a short list of high profile people that have so far shown an outstanding track record in this latest litmus test:

- Candace Owens
- Tucker Carlson
- Ian Carroll
- Jimmy Dore and company
- Tim Dillon
- Milo Yiannopoulos

And here are two candidates who haven’t shown quite as outstanding qualities as the people listed above, but at least some significant resistance:

- Megyn Kelly
- David Chappelle

I'd like to add to the good track record list of creators on Youtube:
Baron Coleman (trained lawyer, all round chatterbox and wriggler and ex radio show host), Zach De Gregorio (WolvesAndFinance) and James Li (investigative journalist). They all have their natural abilities to investigate and network, both amongst themselves, but also with the public. The public is sick and tired of the lies being told by those in charge, so are quite happy to give 'tips' to these people if they show an inclination towards truth.

 

[Phill4]

I'd like to add to the good track record list of creators on Youtube:
Baron Coleman (trained lawyer, all round chatterbox and wriggler and ex radio show host), Zach De Gregorio (WolvesAndFinance) and James Li (investigative journalist). They all have their natural abilities to investigate and network, both amongst themselves, but also with the public. The public is sick and tired of the lies being told by those in charge, so are quite happy to give 'tips' to these people if they show an inclination towards truth.

It may be a good idea to track these people, more so for readers who don't have the time to dig through eternal hours of podcasts,
Someone who has done a great job so far covering the situation (light biases, his regular content is freemasons, numerology etc) is:
DDgotapodcast

He platformed the Forensic auditor on TPUSA, very interesting listen, here is that vid:

This video is from a month ago, candace responded to the allegations in the comments.

 

[Cosmos]

I watched large portions of what the “Valhalla vft“ guy had to say about Mitch.

A number of things I noticed:

- Besides the documentation he showed he said a number of things over and over again like “I‘m not attacking Candace“ and other things that should proof his sincerity and integrity. Or “guys calm down“.

- That is the first time I really noticed that: People with a possible nefarious agenda seem to be in the habit to repeat the same “sincere“ things over and over again, to the point that you really have to wonder. Would somebody sincere be so concerned about saying over and over again that they have good intensions and how sincere they are?

- I was thinking that maybe that extreme repetition is a deliberate thing insincere (or paid disinformation) people use? Like in Goebbels credo: repeat a lie over and over again and people start to believe lies?

- Another thing I noted is that he sometimes said “we“ when talking about something he got or knows what will happen next.

- Another point I noted is that he claimed he talked to ALL of the Ex woman of Mitch personally and ALL of them gave him then a written “testimony“ which he read out loud “about the character and truth of Mitch“.

- What are the chances that a random YouTube podcaster can so quickly find and get a testimony of all the ex wife’s of Mitch? Does that suggest he or they used means to contact and get those people to “testify“ that ordinary people don’t have?

- Another thing I found interesting was that he said something like “we have a testimony of Mitch son that will come out tomorrow“. Who is “we“? Just the other strange podcaster he knew privately and that he will air it on the next day? Or “we“ in the sense of “the CIA?“.

- I also took note that he repeatedly wanted to make sure to say that Mitch is a monster and in at least 2 occasions tried to associate skeptical people in the comments with such evilness.

 

[Niall]

Owens with the current state-of-play (as of Dec 28th) on Fort Huachuca alibis for the whereabouts of E. Kirk, B. Harpole, C. Phillips, and Congressman Amodei on September 8th/9th:

While I was never fully committing myself to rely on Mitch’s memory— the frankly bizarre misinformation campaign which now includes his ex-girlfriends, estranged sons, and periodic emotional breakdowns from Alex Jones leads me to believe we now need solid information on the whereabouts of all mentioned so we can move on. Here is where we are at:

Brian Harpole: ignored my texts. But submitted his irrelevant flights through Andrew Kolvet to a YouTuber. Mitch felt VERY certain he saw Brian Harpole exiting the top brass meeting around 7:30am.

Erika Kirk: For no reason at all, she submitted her irrelevant metadata via Andrew Kolvet to a YouTuber as proof of her whereabouts on the 9th which was never a topic of discussion. Mitch felt VERY certain he saw her on the 8th at a hotel on the base. Important to note: this sighting was NOT at the top brass meeting on the 9th. Could be entirely unrelated to the meeting.

Mark Amodei: shared an actually relevant link to his house committee stream on 9/9. He indeed misses the first two rolls calls and does not vote until 3pm BUT many people believe they see him on camera (BEFORE the roll calls begin) at 58 minute mark in the video. This appearance would make it impossible for him to have attended the meeting earlier in Arizona.

Cabot Philips: No response. Missing from his show from 9/4-9/10 but he very well may have just been on vacation somewhere that week and is choosing not to respond for his own reasons.