Silver goes ballistic and shakes the financial system

It's claimed the CME was hacked, their system is locked down and/or their gold was stolen. Is this a false flag to cover their loses or a authentic hack on the infrastructure of the US? We see on Monday maybe. It's a concern if true. I'm back to wondering on the motives of Asian Guy.

 
… as long as you are aware that in the short to medium term the price still may go down some more, maybe even substantially so. Long-term the narrative for me hasn’t changed, so I am not inclined to sell anything at the moment.

One other thing … we always talk about “gold is worth such and such amount of dollars”, or “gold went up/ down”. This is the wrong way around. Gold is gold, and silver is silver. What goes up or down (mostly down), is the purchasing power of the currency. If for instance you look at the ratio between the S&P 500 (SPY) and gold (XAUUSD), you will see that the curve is mostly flat, while in nominal terms the SPY has gone substantially higher (in fact to record highs). This means that this massive increase in the SPY is only due to devaluation of the currency, strictly there were no gains. You were just compensating for the loss of purchasing power - as opposed to around 2000 where the SPY was truly outperforming PMs:

View attachment 115692

What that means is that PMs are mostly a wealth-preservation vehicle, not something “to make money” (except in certain circumstances, as maybe now, with leveraged position and not with physical gold/ silver).




The mining sector is a very difficult environment for any investor, and you need a ton of knowledge about geology, PM markets, production risk, geographical risk etc. You can’t just go online and pick some stocks. You need the guidance of someone who knows the space intimately. There are analysts in the space who are dependable and have been in this game for decades (Rick Rule, Brian Lundin, Jeff Clark) - but their newsletters are not free.

Generally it can be said that miners usually outperform the metal in a bull market, but they are high-risk. You also need to invest in a basket of these, as you will perforce have some that will go bellyup - from every 10 mining companies that I am invested in, 2 are down 90% (worthless), 2 are 25-50% down, and the rest is up between 10 and 500%. This is a typical picture of a mining portfolio - if you did your homework well.

And it needs to be repeated that you only want to invest small amounts into each company.

Aside from that, a better alternative might be to invest into a mining ETF - like GDX (majors) or GDXJ (juniors) for gold, and SIL/ SILJ for silver.

And again, this is not an investment advice, especially now that we are in uncharted territory - given that what we experienced is a 10-sigma event which statistically should only happen once in around 180’000 trillion years, unless it is artificially produced (which everything in the market is). And everyone’s situation is different.

Anything could happen from here on forwards!
Hi, you seem to know your stuff. What about crypto? Any investment advice? I have a small portfolio of XRP/Stellar/Cardano, but the prices have been steadily falling these past few weeks, and the Polish fortune teller's "prophecies" have me perplexed. I'm hesitant to buy more...
 
The mining sector is a very difficult environment for any investor, and you need a ton of knowledge about geology, PM markets, production risk, geographical risk etc. You can’t just go online and pick some stocks. You need the guidance of someone who knows the space intimately. There are analysts in the space who are dependable and have been in this game for decades (Rick Rule, Brian Lundin, Jeff Clark) - but their newsletters are not free.

Generally it can be said that miners usually outperform the metal in a bull market, but they are high-risk. You also need to invest in a basket of these, as you will perforce have some that will go bellyup - from every 10 mining companies that I am invested in, 2 are down 90% (worthless), 2 are 25-50% down, and the rest is up between 10 and 500%. This is a typical picture of a mining portfolio - if you did your homework well.

And it needs to be repeated that you only want to invest small amounts into each company.

Aside from that, a better alternative might be to invest into a mining ETF - like GDX (majors) or GDXJ (juniors) for gold, and SIL/ SILJ for silver.

And again, this is not an investment advice, especially now that we are in uncharted territory - given that what we experienced is a 10-sigma event which statistically should only happen once in around 180’000 trillion years, unless it is artificially produced (which everything in the market is). And everyone’s situation is different.

Anything could happen from here on forwards!

Thanks for the advise everyone, this was very helpful in particular. It doesn't sound like the stock options is a good one for me.

It's claimed the CME was hacked, their system is locked down and/or their gold was stolen. Is this a false flag to cover their loses or a authentic hack on the infrastructure of the US? We see on Monday maybe. It's a concern if true. I'm back to wondering on the motives of Asian Guy.
The comments on youtube are interesting for this video, 1,298 so far and 159,718 views. The common consensus is the CME did this. Asian Guy did have helpful and reassuring advise at the end, not to get caught up in it all, so maybe he's ok, I'm back and forth on my opinion with him.
 
Hi, you seem to know your stuff. What about crypto? Any investment advice? I have a small portfolio of XRP/Stellar/Cardano, but the prices have been steadily falling these past few weeks, and the Polish fortune teller's "prophecies" have me perplexed. I'm hesitant to buy more...

You may be interested in the discussion in this thread:

 
What about crypto?

I am totally out of crypto, and for the foreseeable future I don’t intend to get back in. I was early with BTC and did very well with that, flipped some - and at the end got scammed out of the rest!
🤪
That’s not to say that crypto hasn’t any value at all, but for me it’s tangible assets that I’m interested in. There are certainly specific situations where I would consider buying some crypto, but generally, I’m out.

To me the “story” behind cryptos doesn’t make any sense, but that’s a personal opinion, while my gut feeling screams “trap”.
 
I am totally out of crypto, and for the foreseeable future I don’t intend to get back in. I was early with BTC and did very well with that, flipped some - and at the end got scammed out of the rest!
🤪
That’s not to say that crypto hasn’t any value at all, but for me it’s tangible assets that I’m interested in. There are certainly specific situations where I would consider buying some crypto, but generally, I’m out.

To me the “story” behind cryptos doesn’t make any sense, but that’s a personal opinion, while my gut feeling screams “trap”.
OK, thanks for your feedback. I don't have much of it, so the risk for me is low, but I saw it as a moderate investment option. The problem is that there are bound to be one or more cryptocurrencies that will inevitably be used sooner or later by institutions, though which ones, of course...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Groundhog day perspective from Clive Thompson

Silver price and miner stocks reset to what they were two weeks ago
JP Morgan (or their clients) took February 3 physical delivery on about 3.1 million ounces, nothing indicated about short positions.
"Did I lose any money? I can tell you this, I counted my silver coins and I seem to have just as many as before the crash"
Miners report of profits lags behind, year end report won't be out until probably March. When that happens 4th Qtr will likely be higher and therefore drive a higher share price.

 
Here's an interesting look at Asian Guy. Although I've mentioned him several times here I only view that on occasion but I'm a bit curious. The algorithm for youtube is being exploited for money, it follows a pattern of heightened emotion leading to a addictive state for viewers, claims secretive insider moves, "mistakes" in the numbers. It's manipulative for a psychological response so I'm back to considering it a psy-op of sorts.

Monday came and went without the silver blow up and no word of the CME being shut down he claimed.

 
Here's an interesting look at Asian Guy. Although I've mentioned him several times here I only view that on occasion but I'm a bit curious. The algorithm for youtube is being exploited for money, it follows a pattern of heightened emotion leading to a addictive state for viewers, claims secretive insider moves, "mistakes" in the numbers. It's manipulative for a psychological response so I'm back to considering it a psy-op of sorts.

Monday came and went without the silver blow up and no word of the CME being shut down he claimed.

Just a heads up. Most of the videos of the Asian guy are imposters ripping off clicks from OG John AG. OG John AG is the legit information source. I know as I've listened to them all, use to, but be aware if the name doesn't say ( exactly ) OG John AG they are imposters.
 
The link below describes what happened in Weimar Republic from 1919 to 1923. There was a period of deflation that began in early 1920, the Mark strengthened, then price inflation began going up from the April 1921 level of 6% and began its climb into eventual hyperinflation in 1923.

see the data from: Weimar: First DEFLATION Then INFLATION | You Should Buy Gold

Interestingly enough, and maybe not related at all, there was a large Coronal Mass Ejection at the inflection point where deflation started to reverse.

Apologies for using Wikipedia

The three-day May 1921 geomagnetic storm, also known as the New York Railroad Storm, was caused by the impact of an extraordinarily powerful coronal mass ejection on Earth's magnetosphere. It occurred on 13–15 May as part of solar cycle 15, and was the most intense geomagnetic storm of the 20th century.
...
A paper in 2019 estimated that the May 1921 geomagnetic storm had a peak Dst of −907±132 nT.
For comparison, the Carrington Event of 1859 had a peak Dst estimated to be between −800 nT and −1750 nT.
The March 1989 geomagnetic storm had a peak Dst index of −589 nT.


There was a panic in 1857 prior to the September 1859 Carrington event. The 1844 Bank Charter act gave the Bank of England exclusivity (monopoly) in issuance of paper banknotes to the detriment of other domestic banks which were prohibited from doing so. It was inflationary in that bank credit was issued and the PM reserve requirement was sometimes waived. In the US the gold rush of 1849 had begun to peter out and the diminished gold flow was inadequate to supply growing demand for capital, largely to build railroads and telegraphs (the high tech of its day) under a PM reserve requirement. The breakout of war delighted the bankers who were given a green light to provide credit and fiat to fund the conflict.

The world economy was more interconnected by the 1850s, which made the Panic of 1857 the first worldwide economic crisis. In Britain, the Palmerston government circumvented the requirements of the Bank Charter Act 1844, which required gold and silver reserves to back up the amount of money in circulation. Surfacing news of this circumvention set off the Panic in Britain.
...
Beginning in September 1857, the financial downturn did not last long, but a proper recovery was delayed until the onset of the American Civil War in 1861. The sinking of SS Central America in September 1857 contributed to the panic, because New York City banks were waiting on its much-needed shipment of gold. After the failure of Ohio Life Insurance and Trust Company, the financial panic quickly spread with businesses beginning to fail, the railroad industry experiencing financial declines, and hundreds of thousands of workers being laid off.

In March 1989 there was another significant solar storm and subsequent to that a recession condition in the US from 1990 to 1993. The Federal Reserve Fed Funds rate was at a peak of 9.85% in March of 89 and began a decline that hit a trough in November of 1992 of 3.09%. It has remained at around 5% or lower since then. The correlation, if any, solar storm coincides with easing of interest rates which increases lending which increases fiat money supply.

The March 1989 geomagnetic storm occurred as part of severe to extreme solar storms during early to middle March 1989, the most notable being a geomagnetic storm that struck Earth on March 13. This geomagnetic storm caused a nine-hour outage of Hydro-Québec's electricity transmission system. The onset time was exceptionally rapid. Other historically significant solar storms occurred later in 1989, during a very active period of solar cycle 22.

Throughout 1989 and 1990, the economy was weakening as a result of restrictive monetary policy enacted by the Federal Reserve. At the time, the stated policy of the Fed was to reduce inflation, a process which limited economic expansion. The immediate cause of the recession was a loss of consumer and business confidence as a result of the 1990 oil price shock, coupled with an already weak economy.
 
Back
Top Bottom