Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

Diligent Denizen raised the Zorro Ranch property with Rep. Thomas Massie ( while live in an X space ) , and got a response of (paraphrasing) " refusing to comment / threat of getting his access cut off", so... , not all is as it seems with T. Massie. ( youtube Link of D. Denizen stream , relevant part @ ~1:14:00 but its discussed as well further on , 3:36:09 long )

 
Chinese comment on Epstein saga 'Accountability, Western Style'
Given C´s comments on the artist that got sacrificed Yu MengLong , objectively the same network is active in China , just not exposed as much, so far.

Session 6 December 2025 :

(...)

A: The sacrificial energy was active at the time. Think of "Eyes Wide Shut" type of activities.

Q: (L) So what is that? I never saw that. I didn't want to see it.

(Joe) It's a movie about the classic kind of secret society, masks, masonic kind of ritual sacrifice. Was Yu MengLong in some way involved in that or was he abducted by those people before that sacrifice?

A: He was the chosen sacrifice.

Q: (Niall) Is this like a Chinese elite version of their Western counterparts?

A: Yes

Q: (Niall) Chinese Freemasonry.

(Chu) Are the responsible people part of the government or just private individuals?

A: Above the government.

(...)
 
Steve Bannon tells his side (excerpts):

WarRoom host and former Trump White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon is pushing back after newly released Jeffrey Epstein chat logs revealed extensive text exchanges between him and the disgraced financier in the months leading up to Epstein’s 2019 arrest and death.

Bannon addressed the controversy directly, insisting his communications with Epstein were strictly related to a documentary project years in the making, and nothing more.

Bannon confirmed that his communications with Jeffrey Epstein were conducted strictly in the capacity of a documentary filmmaker seeking extensive on-the-record interviews with a notoriously reclusive and controversial subject.

“I am a filmmaker and TV host with decades of experience interviewing controversial figures,” Bannon told The New York Times.

“That’s the only lens through which these private communications should be viewed, a documentary filmmaker working, over a period of time, to secure 50 hours of interviews from a reclusive subject.”

Bannon’s team confirmed that while Epstein tried to ply Bannon with offers of private jets and concierge doctors, the America First stalwart never took the bait.

A spokesman confirmed Bannon never flew on the “Lolita Express,” never saw Epstein’s doctors, and never stayed overnight at Epstein’s residences, despite Epstein’s repeated attempts to buy influence.

Compare this to the actual friends of Epstein in the Democrat party and the establishment GOP who spent vacations on his island.

Mr. Epstein first tried to meet with Mr. Bannon in November 2016, after Mr. Trump won the presidency, the documents suggest. But Mr. Bannon, a top campaign strategist for Mr. Trump and later a senior White House official, agreed only after the president had fired him in August 2017.

Mr. Bannon’s spokesman said he conducted about 12 hours of interviews with Mr. Epstein for the documentary. But for reasons that remain unclear, the newly released files contain only two hours of interviews.

Later, Mr. Epstein wanted a legal agreement, known as a Kovel, apparently designed to extend attorney-client privilege to his communications with Mr. Bannon, who is not a lawyer. Mr. Bannon wrote back: “we need a deal for the entire ‘training.’”

Mr. Bannon’s spokesman said Mr. Bannon never signed the agreement and voluntarily shared his footage with federal prosecutors after Mr. Epstein’s death in a jail cell, ruled to be a suicide.

According to Bannon, the forthcoming film is slated for release later in 2026 and aims to dismantle what he described as the “myths” Epstein carefully constructed during his lifetime to obscure the scope and nature of his crimes.

“We’re gonna release the film, the five-part series, next year, early next year,” Bannon said earlier this month, according to The National Pulse.

“And by the way, the entire thing is how the elites and the intelligence services are inextricably linked… You’re gonna have to name names and you’re gonna have to understand how the elites in the world, but also the intelligence services, are inextricably linked in Epstein’s story,” he said, adding, “That’s the key.”

 
C's mentioned Psychopaths as "Failed OP's". Failed in what sense? If I remember C's said all OP's are easily manipulatable without abduction by 4D STS. Did psychopaths are failed in imitating the souled beings the way other OP's does?

There can be souled beings who are highly polarized towards STS and those can be psychopaths too. But in this case, I am not talking about them here.
:grad:
Those are questions that keep coming back and much has been said and written about it. I still cannot formulate precise answers, because some of those elements pertain to the big cosmology, so it requires to deal with 4D principles. I sometimes wish to have precise answers to what you explain, and I feel that this is something that couldbe achieved (unless it is my mind-who-wants-to-define-all that pushes this idea - it can be :-[)

Ultimately, I am sticking with the principle that psychopaths = DNA-based difference (or tweak, alteration; too, discrepancy from normal, sane, human beings). This helps for a basic understanding, going by "specific DNA deficiencies" (essential, schizoïd, others), and the word psychopathy is of help here. So, step-by-step, I build an understanding based on those basic principles.

But this seems applicable to 3D world. For example, if we want to have a gross view on the many people around: there are normal humans, free of native deficiencies - and there are other people, born with DNA specificities that amkes them different than the "basic human" model.

But what to do with all the UFO races?! Are those forcibly "psychopaths", because they are not of the "normal human" fabric? Well, psycho pathology indicates a pathology of the psycho, and in the work of A. Lobaczewski, it is about discrepancies in regard of "the basic human". Would a Venusian, who has no psychopathies, become automatically psycho pathological? I don't think so.

That's a bit where I am stucked right now. The OP's: who are they? I don't think that an OP is born with a "psychopathy" but that he has indeed a specific DNA, different than normal humans. It seems to me that OP's are initially designed to function in the Universe (I am not sure), so they are like a different tribe.

And then, "an OP becoming a psychopath" :knitting:

It becomes difficult for me to understand it according to the above, because for me "a psychopath" refers to being born with a DNA-based psychopathy.

Given C´s comments on the artist that got sacrificed Yu MengLong , objectively the same network is active in China , just not exposed as much, so far.

This makes me think that we are currently over-gluing those activities with the USA, while it's about a supranational structure. Even more, it's about a structure which has ties to 4D.

In addition, Joe reminded us, not that long ago, of a C quote: "The US happens to be the center".

This brings the USA back, countradicting the idea that we need not to focus on the USA (...).

I see a sort of relay, in 3D, or better put, that we need to first address the matter in terms of "supranational structure", and only THEN, to get back at the US. Dunno if this makes any sense :-[

So instead of focusing on the USA in the first place; it would be a matter of appropriatedly approaching a matter, and that it requires to be spot on in the first place. Because if we focus on 3D USA in teh first place, we miss the 4D-transnational-one-world govt aspect.

Or perhaps it's best to start up with the 3D aspect, and follow the thread up to who-knows-where... But I see many stumbling blocks with this approach. The 3D leads are all messy, the files seem partly true and partly designed to fool. I appreciate to start up with the 4D aspect because it allows to preserve the "view"; but it remains very general, it does not help to solve precise issues.
 
Given C´s comments on the artist that got sacrificed Yu MengLong , objectively the same network is active in China , just not exposed as much, so far.
True, Chinese comment (who normally likes to be silent) is geopolitical and more of rebuke to previous western preachings.

Whether it is same network or not (with whatever label they come up with), it doesn't matter as it ultimately serve the same upstairs guys. Also, agenda of the ultimate planners matter and so does quantitative and qualitative of effect of these groups on the common man of their society. We know very little about China.

As long as the Humans has pain points (or lessons), they look for something beyond and that brings in upstairs guys into picture (STS or STO with their rules and ideologies of engagement). These so called "black magic" groups are nothing new, they exist all over the world, even in the jungles ( but with different scope of influence). What is different in the western world, it tooks its own form and this evil's outreach is TOO BIG at this point in time and space.

What way it is different w.r.t common man between East and West? When ever I think about this, I remember some little conversation I read before.

In the Late 70's, an American astronaut met a Russian astronaut and exchanging their views. American astronaut remarked about how dictatorial soviet system is. Russian astronaut laughed and said "It is true ours is oppressive and we know it. Only thing is your system is also oppressive and you guys don't know about it".

After a century of freedoms, prosperity, education and so-called civilized progress, how did happen in the West? Answer is simple. Every body has their own programs and programs keep "magically" changing to keep people sleepy or helpless (if they some idea of what is happening).
 
Steve Bannon tells his side
It's worth noting that Liz Crokin - one of the original investigators of Epstein/Pizzagate - has been defending Bannon on X:


Since so many people are asking me about Steve Bannon or trying to bait and pressure me into trashing him, I will give you my honest opinion. My instinct for years now with Steve Bannon in terms of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is that he was running a white hat counter op on him. The claims he was trying to do an interview and documentary with Epstein to help him restore his image I have never bought especially now after actually taking the time to watch the footage. For those of you who didn’t watch the footage, Bannon literally told Epstein coldly to his face that he’s “fucked up” and then asked him in a serious tone if he’s the devil. Now it should not have to be said that if you’re trying to get someone’s image rehabbed, you don’t have them talk about how fucked up and twisted they are and that they’re Satan, LMFAO! Bannon has done a lot to expose the Deep State, he’s paid a big price for it and he was talking about pizza being a pedophile code word three years ago when almost all the conservative or MAGA influencers and media stayed silent or flat out lied about Pizzagate to cover it up. Plus, the Boss pardoned him and he never misses. Another big tell is that Bannon is the ONLY person Hillary Clinton singled out and attacked when asked about Epstein today at her event in Munich so…now I could go on but do I really need to say more? Not everything is black and white — learn to expand your thinking!
Another person who she has defended is, strangely enough, George W. Bush. I'm not sure what to make of that.
 
People in the past were haunting and burning witches. We all know that witches do not exist. The same way today people are screaming about a non existent pedophilia ring which I'm very happy that they do because it brought to light the Epstein files. These are once in a generation opportunity to have a glimpse for how the elites really work. If you want an important information here it is: "
Robert Maxwell "threatened Mossad.
"Ei= told them that unless they gave him E400million to save his crumblin= empire, he would expose all he had done for
them.
"In that time, he had free access to Margaret Thatcher's Downing Street, t= Ronald Reagan's White House, to the
Kremlin and to the corridors of power throughout Europe.
"Maxwell passed on all the secrets he learned to Mossad in Tel Aviv. In turn, they tolerated his excesses, vanities and
insatiable appetite for a luxurious lifestyle and women.
"He told his controllers who they should target and how they should do it. He appointed himself as Israel's unofficial
ambassador to the Soviet Bloc"
Mossad probably recruited him. He was treated like a hero in Israel after his death. "They", wouldn't 'kill their golden goose', but the British would, especially if they were annoyed with him switching loyalties, selling out to Israel, and committing fraud. My money would be on the Brits assassinating him.
 
I'm more inclined to believe he's just clumsily trying to contain all of this as much as possible because, in his view, he needs to maintain influence on his side to carry out his agenda, which doesn't prevent him from falling further and further into disrepute. He's helping to cover up for pedophiles! There's only one way the public will interpret that.
I think he made a really grave error when Trump thought he could cover up Israel's infestation and control of the United States. At all levels and industries, but particulary in politics because they need US support and money for their "Greater Israel Project".

He "handled" the Epstein files very badly. It's like a dam that's broken and it's entire contents cannot be stopped. His base now actively despises him (unless they are diehard Zionists and they realise they control him, so he's "good").
 
Back
Top Bottom