Session 21 March 2026

The advice given in this session seems to be that we should invest ourselves more in theories. It's almost like an invitation to play the 3D game - 'for keeps', and not hold back. If one is observing reality, and doesn't 'invest' and just sits around and waits for the answers or stays suspended in the inherent fallibility of 'we can never know for sure' - there is no risk.
It seems that the main thing the C's are inviting us to do is more research and networking, instead of just expecting answers from them.

Assigning probabilities on what is most likely the truth (based on our own research and networking) does not necessarily mean that we should not acknowledge that some things we cannot know for sure.

But that does not mean giving up or not even trying to get closer to the truth through our own efforts and networking.

As to "playing the 3D game for keeps", maybe in a certain sense. Though there is also this to consider:

A: When you see the futility of the limitations of 3rd density life, it means you are ready to graduate. Notice those who wallow in it.

Q:
(L) Some people obviously wallow in extreme materiality. And there seems to be another kind that is more subtle, which has to do with saying that you want to grow and become enlightened, and yet such a person is unable to pierce the veil of their own illusions about how to become enlightened, and this illusion is the wallowing...

A: Wallowing takes many forms.

Q: (L) Among the things I have noticed is the type of person who says: "This is my LAST life! Swami So-and-so told me!" And they are wallowing in the enjoyment of the adulation they receive from their followers who believe that sort of thing can be known.

A: Sometimes, but avoid stereotyping, because sometimes they are correct!!!

Q: (L) Okay. I am not trying to stereotype.

A: More often, the sign is someone who does not feel alienated by the obvious traps and limitations of 3rd density.
 
The sessions can often be never easy, especially as objective reality is hitting harder - so thanks for all you do while adding in a dash of humor here and there.

C's:
We are aware of the questions prepared for tonight. You might want to do research and review and network.

Well dang, you gotta love these guys.

C's cont...
Then you must assign probabilities and make a commitment to a probable conclusion.

If one thinks of certain threads there has been some excellent examples of this even if there is diving right and left at first, where probable conclusions were made that stand the test. There are so many things that none can know, or the answers are nuanced and not just one thing. It is even symbolic and often interconnected. These are all parts of separating the wheat from the chaulf, and a network does it best (osit).

C's:
Do not clamor for the answers to everything that piques your curiosity. Sometimes you must wait for confirmation only after you have committed to a conclusion. Also, sometimes this is part of the reality shaping process. Do you understand?

This whole opening by the C's was a good reminder.

Laura said this of the reality shaping process referencing the Romance thread title:

Q: (L) Is it as we were saying earlier in our discussion that dealing with karmic and simple understandings is the key? I wrote a post about it on the romance novel thread today [New title: Romantic Fiction, Reality Shaping and The Work] Is this one of the ways that can really help with that? It can take you through multiple processes by engaging in this reading project, thinking about it, and sharing with others what you are experiencing and learning?

A: Yes. True for nearly everyone.

Thanks ladies and gents, ever grateful!
 
Skipping ahead from halfway through page 5. Really good discussion by everyone regarding the new session that I thank Laura and all participants for contributing and sharing with all of us. Some of my own observations and thoughts:

I suppose the issue isn’t simply black‑and‑white; it more closely mirrors Catherine Austin‑Fitts’s Red Button story:

Out of 100 people, only one would push the button. I said to the other 99, “Why would you not push the button?”

They said, “We don’t want our mutual funds and our IRAs to go down in price, we don’t want our government checks to stop, and we don’t want our taxes to go up.”
I had similar thoughts years ago (way before the current crazed state of both parties), that low/mid income people kept going against their own best interests by voting for the big money party/the Republicans, because they believed that someday, they might have money, too, and wanted to be sure that they would have the same benefits as the rich. Individual wealth has always been the priority.

I guess we can see who both parties represent now. :evil:

Propaganda machine will run very strong against him, mental health issues, impeachment, things that the deep state has from him will be released etc. like Epstein connection etc, a huge machinery to discredit him will be disposed. So much that could make his credibility to fall even from some of Trump core supporters. His own team will come out to be against him too, his entire business can be fully affected too, things like that.
There are many potential reasons why he doesn't just play that last card and come clean. For starters, it would just be dismissed in all the media mind control as the ravings of a senile man, blaming everyone but himself. But ultimately such things are just not done in this reality.
Many great inputs regarding Trump, but I think @luc summed it up the best. There simply wasn't any real way Trump could have thwarted the warhawks - they had him completely ensnared with no chance to blow the whistle with either him or his family allowed to keep breathing at the very least. He was overwhelmed by powerful, negative influences and possibly 3D/4D mind control. As this session pointed out, they can drive a person mad! I'm just really disappointed that having believed God saved him, he was unable to use that belief and faith to get to a better outcome. Just the same, anger, outrage, betrayal, frustration, and confusion - all rolled up into one - as we react/respond to the reality creators' latest orchestration to inflict horrific death, destruction, and economic collapse worldwide - with no doubt a new pandemic level disease thrown in as well.

Perhaps it's destiny to get to an ultimate resolution that simply couldn't happen without Trump's role in all this. Well, we were warned things were going to get strange - and he's given new meaning to strange.

None of them with a big stature ever break rank and spill the beans like that
An exception in my book, President Andrew Jackson:
  • the only president in U.S. history to have completely paid off the national debt
  • the first President to be a target of a "lone gunman" assassination attempt
Jackson fired Secretary of the Treasury William J. Duane and removed federal deposits from the Second Bank of the United States.

Andrew Jackson referred to supporters of the Second Bank of the United States as "a den of vipers and thieves." This phrase was directed particularly at the bankers who were advocating for the re-charter of the bank.

“Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out!”

Andrew Jackson was never formally impeached by the House of Representatives, but he was censured by the Senate in 1834. The censure charged him with assuming "authority and power not conferred by the Constitution and laws" during his actions against the Second Bank of the United States.

On January 30, 1835, Andrew Jackson became the first U.S. president targeted by an assassin, surviving when both pistols fired by Richard Lawrence misfired outside the U.S. Capitol. Lawrence, an unemployed painter, fired at point-blank range, but damp, misty weather likely caused the powder failure. Jackson, 67, famously attacked Lawrence with his cane before being restrained.
This fact has to be sadly noted as well:
  • his presidency (1829–1837) is centrally defined by his policy of Indian Removal, which many modern historians, scholars, and Native American activists classify as an early example of state-sanctioned ethnic cleansing or genocide
A horrible, ruthless policy marked by the "Trail of Tears." But he did sock it to the bankers and saved the country for at least a while.

Only the white ones count, because this little effort is racist in my opinion.

Probably the same reason that the only 'acknowledged casualties' are white (they need the 'support' of white people to continue this 'war').
Sorry, but not only whites are being counted. Among the three Ohio National Guardsman who were recently killed:

All three airmen, as well as three other servicemembers, died on March 12 when their KC-135 tanker crashed in western Iraq in support of Operation Epic Fury in Iran.
1774498561830.png

1774499200286.png


I'll have to catch up the rest of the thread tomorrow.
 
Thanks for this new session.

(Niall) What are the odds of some kind of energy lockdowns in the near future, where there is effectively a ban or limitation on public consumer use of oil, gas, and home heating and car usage?

A: High!

Q: (Niall) Is a global economic crisis likely to result from this war?

A: Yes!

I've been posted this clip on telegram, I searched and found it on X, here it is :


I copy the summary text of this short 2m clip :
Lockdown 2.0 - The International Energy Agency released a 10-point plan telling governments to restrict driving, ground flights, force remote work, and ban gas cooking. They called it "Sheltering from Oil Shocks."


My bet about is that it's similar than what they did with covid, which was to mimic what the Chinese did + add some extra features. Remember the session of 21 March 2020, when the C's gave one of their longest answer (or maybe the longest one), I highlighted what look like a resonance to me :

A: The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created".

I also remember that the C's confirmed that they constantly adapt their plan, and also, that they fight between each other. Just to say that they do not have a full hand on all of this, but for sure they'll try to take it and benefit of it , the "Never miss a good opportunity" expression.

I think, and i would prefer to miss, that we are entering a new period similar to the covid one ... if the occidental elites/politics follow what they are told, but on the other hand, the population is quite more awake and upset than 6y before.
Time to train to calm down one's emotions, buy popcorns and enjoy the show. More seriously : I wonder if it's not the right time – or even the last chance (at least for a while) – to quickly buy certain things? Would they go so far as to shut down or severely disrupt online shopping and deliveries? Note that this mainly (or only) concerns people living in all the occidental countries, ie the US and their lackeys.
 
(Joe) Is Trump inclined to want to find an exit from this conflict in the near future?

A: Trump is terrified.

Q: (Joe) He's terrified of the implications of the conflict?

A: For his family.

Q: (Joe) So he's terrified of the Israelis, of the deep staters.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So what chances would they give of him being able to extricate himself from this, despite those people?

A: Almost 0 at present.

Thank you very much for this interesting and fantastic section!

Regarding what’s described above, I’m not sure if it was on this forum or somewhere else online, but I read months ago that Italian President G. Meloni was in a situation almost identical to that of D. Trump.

This was the best article I found on this case:

From Milan to Mossad – The Israeli Link in Italy’s Spy Scandal​

November 1, 2024 News
Meloni-Netanyahu-Rome-678x455.png
Italian PM Giorgia Meloni (L) with her Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu. (Photo: via Italian Government Presidency of the Council of Ministers)

Italy is engulfed in a major espionage scandal following allegations that a private investigation firm, led by former and current high-ranking security officials, unlawfully accessed personal information about prominent figures, including Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, for purposes of extortion.

Reports indicate that Israel’s spy intelligence agency Mossad was involved in deals with the Milan-based firm Equalize.
----.-----

The Israeli Connection

Italian media portray the scandal as a high-level conspiracy involving members of the mafia, intelligence operatives, and foreign agencies, including Mossad.

---- . -----

According to the Italian newspaper Corriere Della Sera, investigators tracked a visit to the firm by two unidentified Israelis described as intelligence operatives.

These individuals allegedly sought information about Iranian gas that could interest ENI, Italy’s state-run energy company, and inquired about gas trade with Iran.

----- . -----

Calamucci reportedly said, “They offered me a million-euro job!” and added, “Half of the data was given to the Vatican; the other half is needed to fight Wagner!” He also remarked, “They have all the original documents from the Qatar Gate.”

A: Kotloiaea of Cassiopaea here with you tonight. Now, we should remind you that we are not here to underwrite your reality and understanding. That is not helpful to your growth and state of being. We are aware of the questions prepared for tonight. You might want to do research and review and network. Then you must assign probabilities and make a commitment to a probable conclusion. This is like exercising a muscle and makes you stronger. Do not clamor for the answers to everything that piques your curiosity. Sometimes you must wait for confirmation only after you have committed to a conclusion. Also, sometimes this is part of the reality shaping process. Do you understand?

Q: (Andromeda) That was a lot!

(Joe) Yes. Basically, do your own research, come up with your own conclusions, and then commit to them. Have them form part of your awareness or whatever. And then see what happens.

I also share this idea. Personally, when I have the time and need to solve some personal problems that aren’t easy for me to resolve or understand given my current knowledge base, I turn to AI for help, and from there I delve deeper into what I want to clarify.
Reading books also broadens your horizons; sometimes you can stumble upon a REAL GEM regarding a question you’ve been unable to resolve for years, and that happened to me years ago during a personal search. That’s why, when I’m not satisfied with the direction of my search, I tell myself, “Let’s set it aside for now and see if I can somehow resolve this question in the future.”

Thank you very much for this thread and article:


 
It seems that committing to a conclusion should be seen in the context of assessing what is more probable of being the truth. So the conclusion is only regarding what we see as the highest probability, while still staying open to other possibilities.
That is also how I see it and adjusting ones view as things progress. One could say that the C's work similarly such as when they say that the 4D STS forces will lose in the end. Many things are still open, but the C's are so skilled at infering this that they have committed themselves to a conclusion. The exact details in between are still "open" but the overall direction is clear. Like Luc said:
I even suspect that at the higher densities/levels of being, it is not so much that we will "see all the hidden facts laid out directly in front of us", but rather that our power of inference/discernment has become so great that we "see" the hidden structures and machinations in such a clear light that there can be no doubt about it.
Well put. Many things are still "open" as the C's like to say but the overall picture is clear as to the end result, even if there are twists and turns along the way.

As for the a statement like "Iran will win", which by the way the C's didn't say (the question wasn't asked either), then the question is how do we qualify that? What does it look like? Not bowing down to the empire can certainly be seen as a "win", but it doesn't mean that Iran will not suffer greatly or that everybody will agree it to be a "win". It brings to mind that the C's in a past session didn't say that Russia would "win" in Ukraine and also that neither would the West. Again it depends on how one qualifies the word "win".
 
Oil is organic. 'Abiotic' means non-living.
Thank you all for the session.

Found it interesting the C’s used the term ‘Abiotic’ to describe oil.

Does that imply it’s not organic in origin ?

Sometimes the name used for this theory is abiotic oil, sometimes 'abiogenic' (materials or processes not derived from living organisms, originating instead from non-biological, inorganic, or geological sources). I think that's what the C's were referring to and suggests that oil is inorganic.

There's a thread about it here:

 
A: Kotloiaea of Cassiopaea here with you tonight. Now, we should remind you that we are not here to underwrite your reality and understanding. That is not helpful to your growth and state of being. We are aware of the questions prepared for tonight. You might want to do research and review and network. Then you must assign probabilities and make a commitment to a probable conclusion. This is like exercising a muscle and makes you stronger. Do not clamor for the answers to everything that piques your curiosity. Sometimes you must wait for confirmation only after you have committed to a conclusion. Also, sometimes this is part of the reality shaping process. Do you understand?

Q: (Andromeda) That was a lot!

(Joe) Yes. Basically, do your own research, come up with your own conclusions, and then commit to them. Have them form part of your awareness or whatever. And then see what happens.



very pertinent !!! I know my inclination at times so get overly entrenched in speculation and certain rabbitholes -whether it be current news or intersting theories and possibilties to whom why what and where . sometimes it can be a useful distraction like watching a good movie if im feeling unwell but more often than not knowing my tendencies it can become quite the habit !

Im working at staying much more present and grounded and focusing energies (networking)toward service and local community!
practicing qigong first thing in the morrning with a group of fellow qigongers has been most beneficial for me-its a 2 hour session
seems better than looking at the news on the internet first thing in the morning!

as my root qigong teacher says ' where the attention is the qi follows to that point !'

ive certainly wasted/leaked alot of energies that in hindsight could have been more appropriately utilised !

thanks for the reminder !

feeding the hungary ghosts come to mind in relation to this ! try not to feed them !!

🙏
 
It seems that the main thing the C's are inviting us to do is more research and networking, instead of just expecting answers from them.

Assigning probabilities on what is most likely the truth (based on our own research and networking) does not necessarily mean that we should not acknowledge that some things we cannot know for sure.

But that does not mean giving up or not even trying to get closer to the truth through our own efforts and networking.

As to "playing the 3D game for keeps", maybe in a certain sense. Though there is also this to consider:
I spent years back in the day studying and practising, meditatively, the Buddhist Theravada stages of insight. I kind of abandoned that (shortly after finding the Work here, as a matter of fact) but there are some useful ideas there. Insight stages 5-10 are known collectively as the Dukka Nanas, which we might loosely translate as the 'Dark Night.' The specific stage that corresponds most closely with the above quote from the Cs is Stage 8 'Knowledge of Disillusionment', in relation to material formations, and purportedly due to direct insight, via meditation, into the truth of the Three Characteristics of material reality of impermanence, suffering and no-self (the last of those three being a dangerous idea which ultimately drove me away from that path). But that stage is followed, at Stage 11, by 'Knowledge of Equanimity toward Formations', so Stage 8 is not conceived of as a permanent or, indeed, desirable state. And I'd liken that idea, 'Knowledge of Equanimity toward Formations', to the C's postulate that 'All there is is lessons'.

FWIW i think its possible to be deeply disillusioned by material reality at times, but also fully committed to experiencing the human life to its fullest potential.

Edit: sentence structure and spelling
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom