Brace Yourselves For War Between Iran and Israel

Brace yourselves for Trump to do something stupid after the "markets" close for the weekend.

It's that time of week and God only knows what news we'll wake up to Saturday morning.

It's an interesting this one because pretty much most ppl in the world (excluding the likes of his character worshippers) are coming to the conclusion that Trump is a character disturbed individual with a high degree of lack of empathy. It's all about his ego and others submitting to his will.
 
Brace yourselves for Trump to do something stupid after the "markets" close for the weekend.

It's that time of week and God only knows what news we'll wake up to Saturday morning.

It's an interesting this one because pretty much most ppl in the world (excluding the likes of his character worshippers) are coming to the conclusion that Trump is a character disturbed individual with a high degree of lack of empathy. It's all about his ego and others submitting to his will.

Yeah. Reminds me of the Bill Hicks bit about how the Americans sold weapons to Iraq. “As soon as the cheque clears, we’re going in!”

This time around it’s, “As soon as the markets close, we’re going in!”
 
This happened to the last person to successfully invade Iran
Iran was actually successfully invaded in 1941 by the USSR and the British Empire together. They attacked literally from all sides and won relatively quickly - their objective was the capture of the new Iranian railway system to bring in supplies from British territories to the USSR during WW2.


 
Iran was actually successfully invaded in 1941 by the USSR and the British Empire together. They attacked literally from all sides and won relatively quickly - their objective was the capture of the new Iranian railway system to bring in supplies from British territories to the USSR during WW2.


The invasion was driven by the need to secure oil fields

and protect supply lines (the Persian Corridor) for Lend-Lease aid to the USSR, and expel German influence from the country. Despite Iran's declaration of neutrality, the Iranian army was technologically outmatched, lacking sufficient training, air power, and modern tanks to resist the coordinated assault.


also other factors ----such as the "Great Game" refers to the 19th and early 20th-century geopolitical rivalry between the British and Russian Empires for influence and control in Central Asia, particularly in Persia (modern-day Iran) and Afghanistan. Iran was a key battleground, with both powers seeking to dominate its politics, economy, and military to protect their own interests—Britain to safeguard India, and Russia to expand southward
 
Yes, Alexander was definitely a man with a mission. He harboured a deep seated grudge against the Persians for their two invasions of Greece in 490 BC, where the Persian forces were decisively defeated at the Battle of Marathon, and 480-479 BC when the Persian forces led by their Emperor Xerxes I were roundly defeated at the naval battle of Salamis, having been heroically held up by the Spartans under King Leonidas at the Battle of Thermopylae. Alexander set out to smash the Persian empire in a campaign of revenge and to underscore Greek superiority.

From a western perspective, the successful Greek defence against the mighty Persian Empire not only preserved Greek independence but also laid the groundwork for the rise of the classical Greek civilisation, influencing art, philosophy, and governance (democracy) in the centuries to follow. The Persian invasions of Greece were thus critical events that shaped the trajectory of ancient history, highlighting the resilience and strategic capabilities of the Greek city-states in the face of overwhelming odds.

The Greek-Persian Wars also stand as one of history’s greatest underdog stories, proving that determination, strategy, and unity can overcome even the mightiest empires.

Hmmm... will the Iranians (Persians), in this day and age now playing the part of the underdog, reverse the result by seeing off the US superpower, the modern-day heir of Greek civilisation, proving once again that determination, strategy, and unity can overcome even the mightiest empires?

I do actually think all these events are connected across time since the rise of western civilisation through the Sumerians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans and the European powers, culminating in the present dominance of the USA, has been a project steered by 4D STS with a view to creating a modern-day Atlantean civilisation that will enable them to achieve their plan to rule over mankind at the transition from 3D to 4D. Not for nothing did the C's say that the old Empire of Atlantis was similar to NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) today and our current age is a replay of Atlantis's fate:



And of course the STS undergrounders are themselves Aryans who may soon reveal themselves to the surface world as "Martians":




So, we can now see why 4D STS manipulated Alexander the Great, since the Greek Empire he founded would lay the underpinnings of modern-day western civilisation. It was not for nothing that I chose in my previous post other events that I suspect 4D STS may have manipulated in order to arrive at where we are today.

BTW: Egypt's ancient name was "Kemet", meaning "black land" due to the rich, dark soil along the Nile River. The modern name of "Egypt" derives from "Aigyptos", the ancient Greek name for the land of Egypt, which in turn derived from the Egyptian word "Hwt-ka-Ptah" meaning "the house of the ka of Ptah".
The 'Greek empire' Alexander founded, was founded on the Achaemenid Empire. Did Alexander's conquest Hellenize Persia, or did Persia absorb and modify 'Hellenization'?

What if the Greeks didn't bring great learnings to the East, but rather learned great things from the East?

Dugin's been contemplating this a lot lately:



 
Fertilizer plants are closing in India because they lack LNG.

photo_2026-03-27_11-53-30.jpg
 
The dire consequences that may be in store for the U.S. (and unfortunately for the rest of the world by association?) is in my opinion largely due to the sense of U.S. "exceptionalism" (as Putin has often pointed out). I have recently found a person who seems to me to be a source of concise opinions on the fate of the U.S. at this point in time and Israel's (STS?)"wishful" thinking.

I find Col. Douglas MacGregor to be unusually aware and possibly even aligned with many of our views of these events.

Here is a recent video of his analysis of where he sees this war with Iran may be going:


A strange recent attack on Palmachim in Israel is reported by a source that I do not have much background or information (Oval Direct). Normally I would have not even watched it so "buyer beware". It uses Rachcel Maddows (she is Jewish so maybe I missed something?) image and voice (ugh) but the information may be useful.

 
I’ve not listened to Douglas MacGregor or Scott Ritter in a long while because I found their covering of world events in general (and the Ukraine conflict in particular) lacking quite a bit in nuances and understanding. Maybe that has changed since then, but that would actually surprise me.
 
A few interesting bits on how Iran is using USDT.
The mechanisms used by Iranian front companies in Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) operate as a sophisticated, parallel "shadow banking" system designed to bypass international sanctions. Here is how the mechanism functions:
  • Front Companies and Fictitious Invoices: Iran establishes a network of shell companies, often located in free-trade zones in the UAE and Hong Kong. When an international entity (such as an oil refinery or a shipping operator paying a transit toll) needs to remit funds, they pay these front companies instead of dealing directly with Iran. These payments are justified using falsified cargo documents, forged vessel registries, and fictitious invoices to make the transactions appear legitimate to compliance teams.
  • Layered Clearing and Exchange Houses: Once the front companies receive the funds (in dollars, euros, yuan, or cryptocurrencies like USDT), the money is cleared through a network of Iran-based exchange houses. These exchange houses utilize non-resident accounts and layered transfers to completely sever the transaction history before funneling the revenue to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
Regarding Tether, while the company has the technical capability to freeze USDT by adding specific wallet addresses to an on-chain blacklist via its smart contracts, issuing a blanket ban on an entire exchange like Nobitex is practically impossible due to several technical and legal hurdles:
  • Address-Level Targeting: Tether’s freezing mechanism works strictly at the individual address level, rather than at the entity level. An exchange like Nobitex does not use a single wallet; it utilizes a multi-layered architecture generating countless temporary user deposit addresses, hot wallets, and cold storage vaults. Tether cannot ban "Nobitex" as a concept; it must identify and freeze each individual address.
  • Advanced Obfuscation Tactics: Nobitex actively employs privacy engineering to evade surveillance, including stealth address generation, transaction batching, and real-time endpoint switching to defeat blockchain tracing. Furthermore, Iranian actors systematically use cross-chain bridges to move funds between different blockchains (e.g., from TRON to Ethereum), which breaks the transaction history and blinds compliance tracking systems.
  • Legal and Investigative Constraints: Tether's policy typically requires an external, official legal requirement—such as a subpoena, production order, or warrant from law enforcement—to freeze assets. Additionally, law enforcement agencies sometimes specifically instruct Tether not to immediately freeze certain known illicit addresses so that authorities can continue to monitor the flow of funds and map out the broader criminal network.
 
Joe Kent on the Shawn Ryan podcast explains how Trump closed ranks after the first Iran attack and surrounded himself with war hawk neocons.


“I was very frustrated that we had kind of backed ourselves into a corner artificially. I was, and remain to be, a big supporter of President Trump’s overall thesis of peace through strength and stopping us from getting involved in costly wars, in particular with Iran. But what I watched over the course of the last year was the red line being moved from no nuclear weapons to no enrichment, which is fundamentally not true. Through government officials and the media echo chamber, they basically got the U.S. talking point to change, and that put us on a collision course toward conflict. After Midnight Hammer, the president’s decision-making circle was very, very tight, and it was filled with pro-Israel hawks in his ear, and that’s how we ended up where we are.”
 
Finally some interesting information among the onslaught of BS out there:

Putin has just made a speech that I haven’t read completely yet.

From what I read so far, five things stand out:

- What is currently happening is quite unpredictable and that includes the parties directly involved (even if the US might wishfully think that that is not so). He seems to say that it is unpredictable how this exactly will end and what it will lead to, including for them.

- He alludes to the Covid “Pandemic“ seemingly saying that there are similarities some are seeing/suggesting, also in terms of the global extent.

- He seems to speak of some form of new world order that might be at the end of current shifts.

- He makes it clear again that sovereignty remains the most crucial thing Russia needs to strengthen and expand.

- He advices against any rash decisions to for example profit from the current crisis and instead to think and act strategically/conservatively into the future. Plan and think ahead and do not try to put your power into profiting from disaster.

From what Putin is saying and what I’m seeing it might very well turn out to be the next big thing after Covid, globally. But it still seems to be fairly unpredictable what, if anything, will actually happen or not.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom