Yellowstone Volcano

Jacques

Jacques

SuperModerator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
In that session, the C's answered Laura's question about the Yellowstone supervolcano:

Laura said:
Session Date: July 6th 2010

[...]

Q: (Andromeda) Can I ask about Yellowstone? Is any of this "movement" is going to wake it up and cause a major eruption soon? Or is that too predictiony?

A: That is more likely than a cataclysmic ocean floor explosion of methane.

Q: (L) Okay, so in the next 5 years, what is the percentage of probability of the supervolcano at Yellowstone going off?

A: 58%

Q: (L) 58, is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) 58 percent. Well, that's more than half, but still kind of 50/50 in the next five years.
Click to expand...

Since the 5 years are passed and since it seems that there are quite a lot of activities right now in the Yellowstone Park, do you think that it could be a good question to ask the C's a refresh of that previous answer for the next 5 years(or less). Something like the original question of 2010:

Okay, so in the next 5 years, what is the percentage of probability of the supervolcano at Yellowstone going off?
 
And if the question is asked and if the C's say that the probability is higher than last time in 2010, could it be possible to add another question like:

How much magma will be ejected if there is an eruption?

See below a graph showing a comparison of eruption volumes:

supervolcano-eruptions-usgs-550.jpg
 
Just for the record, an article has been published on SOTT recently about that volcano

https://www.sott.net/article/377323-Yellowstone-super-volcano-under-strain-from-magma-chamber-pressure
 
Yeah, I would say why not asking the question? We are always assuming about comets, earthquakes and ice age many times, but we sometimes forget that supervolcanos alone like Yellowstone are also good enough to end or affect big way a civilization of an entire region, or event the planet, if they go off!
 
Jacques said:
And the prophet, preacher or whatever name you call him (the one who said that Trump will be hit at one ear) said something about that recently.
Click to expand...
The point about Yellowstone is mentioned in the transcript at 11:25 and 17:30. If you begin at minute 9 you get the whole Earth Changes section and the reason - from his perspective. There is much more to it than Yellowstone; some land in the northwest sinking causing a massive tsunami in the Pacific, as well as fires in Southern Alaska.
 
Saw that and was thinking 🤔 - "when we can't create without, we create within" - paraphrasing the C's. And since the masses of people that don't support the Deep State and their machinations, such as the Trump assassination attempt, and are against it all in US, even if they realize how bad it is or not, but more will be as things move along... or at least the suffering will increase, don't have much say in anything maybe mother earth will be kicking into gear more and more in the US and around the world...
 
irjO said:
Yeah, I would say why not asking the question? We are always assuming about comets, earthquakes and ice age many times, but we sometimes forget that supervolcanos alone like Yellowstone are also good enough to end or affect big way a civilization of an entire region, or event the planet, if they go off!
Click to expand...
From July 2010 Session:
Q: (Andromeda) Can I ask about Yellowstone? Is any of this "movement" is going to wake it up and cause a major eruption soon? Or is that too predictiony?

A: That is more likely than a cataclysmic ocean floor explosion of methane.

Q: (L) Okay, so in the next 5 years, what is the percentage of probability of the supervolcano at Yellowstone going off?

A: 58%

Q: (L) 58, is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) 58 percent. Well, that's more than half, but still kind of 50/50 in the next five years. (Ailén) There was a question we talked about today about what would happen in the southern hemisphere... (L) Yes. So, if there was a global superstorm like in the movie we watched today [The Day After Tomorrow], what goes on in the southern hemisphere during such an event? The movie only showed storms in the Northern Hemisphere.

A: Less violent storms but storms nonetheless.

Q: (L) What about an ice age?

A: Ice ages grip the south somewhat, but the greatest damage is via drought, floods, and earthquakes
Click to expand...

Couldn't hurt to ask for an update. I figure the chances of Yellowstone erupting is also probably a good measure of how the collective USA is doing in terms of, "If we cannot create without, we create within".

Side note: we did see several massive ocean floor explosions of gas. Impact? Massive wave anomaly in the South Atlantic moving North

and April 2024
(Joe) It was on the Ventusky weather maps. You see the border, you can pick different things. You can pick waves and show the wave heights around the world. And for a period of time there was this big area off the southwest coast of Africa. Big area probably, about the size of South Africa. And it was at 14 meters in the color of the highest wave height, like 80 feet. But if you went forward in the prediction, it went north, but then they said no, no, it was nothing, that it was just a glitch in the software. It didn't happen according to them. So we were thinking it might have been some sea floor subsidence that had outgassing or something like that. Dunno. Whatever happened to our Africa... Last year, they said: Watch Africa! Some kind of a sea floor subsidence or something. Maybe it happened and we didn't notice.

(L) Is that what happened with these waves and they covered it up?

(Joe) We can ask if it was real or if it was just a glitch. Do you want to ask?

(L) Were the big waves real?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Why did they cover it up?

A: Why do they cover up so much? People would get agitated more than they are.

Q: (Joe) So was it outgassing from the seabed in that area?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And it didn't create a tsunami that was going to move out. The different ways to detect wave heights, the buoys and stuff, they read it as high waves. But was that the gas that was being expelled?

A: Yes
Click to expand...

Jacques said:
And the prophet, preacher or whatever name you call him (the one who said that Trump will be hit at one ear) said something about that recently.

Click to expand...
What I found curious about his really specific vision was the total focus on the Yellowstone eruption triggering huge earthquakes on the West coast and the subsequent effects. Assuming he has the same level of accuracy as his Trump prediction, it just seemed odd that he didn't see or mention any effects of the eruption in the immediate area. Perhaps Yellowstone "exploding" is really more of an inward collapse and that the seismic effects are the true danger?
 
Windmill knight said:
Yellowstone:

Biscuit Basin closed in Yellowstone National Park after massive explosion​


That doesn't seem normal to me! Is it waking up? :shock:
Click to expand...
In my opinion this is nothing unusual for Yellowstone.

In 1989 Porkchop Geyser in Norris Geyser Basin exploded as a result of hydrothermal activity and threw huge rocks high in the air.

An area in the Lower Geyser Basin known as Pocket Basin is a thermal area consisting of small hot springs, pools, and mud pots. This thermal area about 1/2 mile squared was created by a hydrothermal explosion. I do not recall the date.

There is a large pond/small lake in 100 Springs Plain, part of the Norris Geyser Basin, that was created by a hydrothermal explosion. Strangely enough the water in this pond is cool enough for ducks to swim in.

In April of this year a very small hydrothermal explosion occurred in Porcelain Basin, also a part of Norris Geyser Basin. For a few days it created a small perpetual geyser which has since died.

The Biscuit Basin explosion was relatively small and to call it a "massive explosion" is very misleading.

There have been numerous hydrothermal explosions over the thousands of years since Yellowstone's last major caldera eruption, and none have been related to magma eruptions or signaled an upcoming major magma eruption. Many of these past explosions have left behind large debris areas, newly formed hills, etc. Mary Bay, part of Yellowstone Lake, is believed to have been created by a hydrothermal explosion. Mary Bay is a mile and a half wide.

I would not lose any sleep thinking this small hydrothermal explosion is in any way related to a possible magma caldera creating eruption.
 
bltay said:
There have been numerous hydrothermal explosions over the thousands of years since Yellowstone's last major caldera eruption, and none have been related to magma eruptions or signaled an upcoming major magma eruption. Many of these past explosions have left behind large debris areas, newly formed hills, etc. Mary Bay, part of Yellowstone Lake, is believed to have been created by a hydrothermal explosion. Mary Bay is a mile and a half wide.
Click to expand...
Thanks, I was hoping someone would clarify how significant that really was. I'm glad you did!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom