Session Date: June 13th 2015
Q: (L) Alright, I have a series of questions here from forum members. Apparently, there was a conference with Barbara Marciniak where she was doing some trance channeling. Several of the forum people had a look at it and condensed the major points of the event. Out of what was said in that particular channeling, some questions arose... Not particularly about the channeling, but about some of the issues that were covered. Of course, everybody knows how I feel about trance channeling and that sort of thing. But anyhow, one of the questions that came up was:
Can the internet be seen as a "window of opportunity"/"an experiment in human consciousnesses"?
(L) I don't exactly know what the person means... I guess it would be one or the other. Is it a window of opportunity, or is it an experiment in human consciousness?
A: We once told you that your computers would overpower you. Thus neither question is precisely to the point. Internet was initially manifested for practical purposes, then other applications were developed. It could be said that the "experiment" in consciousness appeared in reaction to more positive uses. At present the internet is more a source of confusion and propaganda than anything else. Thus the opening statement is fulfilled.
Q: (L) In other words, the overpowering of people by their computers would be the use of the internet for confusion and propaganda. Is that what we're getting at here?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So, people being taken over in their minds by disinformation, propaganda, lies and so forth on the computer are literally being taken over by their computers?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay, the next part of that question is:
Is the internet likely to end soon?
A: If you consider the ramifications of the previous answer, not likely until the power grid goes down.
Q: (L) In other words, why would they shut down something that so easily enables them to control the masses?
A: Exactly.
Q: (L) Next question:
Is the warning about not sharing too much electronically sound, or is it more a distraction that keeps us from "leaving the [frequency] fence"?
A: Again, we believe that we have addressed this in the past: "Walls have ears".
Q: (L) In other words, there really is no way to keep anything private from those powers that want or need it. If you're worried about privacy, you're only keeping things private from other individuals or from people hacking your password and getting into your bank account. But those are things that should normally be protected anyway. Warning people to get off the grid, to not share, and to not network with each other in order to keep the PTB in the dark seems to me to be offering a false sense of security and is otherwise counterproductive, all things considered.
(Perceval) The opportunity is there to use what the PTB are using - for nefarious purposes - to instead do some good via networking.
(L) Okay, next questions:
Are we going to see machines integrated in the body and a divide between people refusing and people wanting this integration?
(Galatea) Like cyborgs?
(L) I guess so.
(Pierre) Transhumanism.
A: This is already being done to some extent.
Q: (L) What about a divide between people refusing and people wanting this integration?
A: That suggests a state of advancement that will never be achieved.
Q: (L) Why will it never be achieved?
A: We refer you to previous information.
Q: (L) It won't be achieved because humanity is, in a certain sense, going to possibly become extinct. Is that approaching it?
A: Cleansing.
Q: (L) Does that refer to the session when you once said, "Nothing lasts forever, thank goodness"?
A: Yes!
