Trump Re-elected: The True MAGA Era Begins, Now What?

Is MAGA still a thing nowadays? Or are we now back to business as usual?
Some things that are not quite business as usual:

- The US not participating in the CO2 scam
- RFK jr doing some good work regarding vaccine safety and mass poisoning through food
- Illegal immigration is being reduced
- No CBDC in the US, though the dollar stablecoins can potentially be used in the same way for increased control
- Trump is pushing for peace in Ukraine instead of more confrontation with Russia
- The tariffs (instead of globalist 'free trade') may bring more manufacturing and good jobs to the US

Though all this may be outweighed by supporting the Zionist genocidal actions. Trump's economic policies like the tariffs may also backfire to create a major economic crisis.
 
Is MAGA still a thing nowadays? Or are we now back to business as usual?

Internally and for MAGA's interests, things are apparently improving. Geopolitically, Latin America is facing a new phase of the Monroe Doctrine with a Trumpian corollary

"After years of neglect, the United States will reaffirm and apply the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere," says the new document, which calls this approach the "Trump corollary to the Monroe Doctrine."

So, business as usual.
 
An interesting thing about this is Chevron is one of the investors in TAE. So, does this mean Big Oil will no longer be sabotaging alternative energy sources? Oil won't be going away anytime soon but its good to see this new tech. This follows along with the idea that new technologies would be emerging under Trump. Maybe we'll see other suppressed discoveries coming out and in the area of healthcare, which are genuinely beneficial, would be excellent.

Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (TMTG) is an American media and technology company headquartered in Sarasota, Florida, that operates the Truth Social social-media platform and is majority-owned by the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust. Founded in February 2021 by Andy Litinsky and Wes Moss, TMTG went public on March 26, 2024, after merging with Digital World Acquisition Corp. (DWAC), a special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC).

On December 18, 2025, TMTG announced a merger with TAE Technologies, a nuclear fusion company backed by Google and Chevron, in an all-stock deal valued at more than $6 billion. The merger aims to combine TMTG’s social media and cryptocurrency ventures with TAE’s fusion energy technology to address the growing energy demands of artificial intelligence data centers. If completed, the merger would create one of the world’s first publicly traded nuclear fusion companies, with plans to begin construction on the “world’s first utility-scale fusion power plant” in the following year.

Devin Nunes, CEO of TMTG, and Michl Binderbauer, CEO of TAE Technologies, are set to become co-CEOs of the combined entity, while Donald Trump Jr. will remain on the board. Shareholders of both companies would each own approximately 50% of the merged company. TMTG also plans to provide up to $300 million to support TAE’s fusion initiatives.

The announcement led to a significant surge in TMTG’s stock, with shares jumping over 20% in pre-market trading on December 18, 2025. This move follows TMTG’s earlier pivot into cryptocurrency, including a May 2025 announcement to establish a $2.5 billion bitcoin treasury.

Despite its high-profile ventures, TMTG has faced persistent financial challenges. In 2024, the company reported a net loss of $400.9 million on $3.6 million in revenue, with Truth Social struggling to attract advertisers and gain market share beyond its core user base. The company has only 29 employees as of 2024.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
 
Trump going against ISIS:

US bombs Syria in retaliation for American deaths

The US has launched airstrikes against alleged Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) targets in Syria in what President Donald Trump described as "very serious retaliation" for the killing of American personnel earlier this month.

This will never be considered by anti-MAGA people as it is - but a first degree reading says what it says.

Who, apart from Putin, did ever go against those guys?
 
I've been wondering if it even is ISIS that they're bombing - and not the remnants of Assad's Syrian Arab Army - which might've still been holding on to hope of overthrowing the Jolani regime at some point.
This matter passed through my mind unconsciously... Thank you for mentioning it.

This deserves some research I believe. I will have a look at it and see if anything can be found.

I would like to express my firm opposition to all this Jolani thing: it happened too quickly. My first take is that it was opportunism. Israel, or else. But rapidity, or "hit & run" wouldn't stand the long-term resolution of accountability. I don't see how they can escape this.

And then, that Jolani guy, after the coup, spoke about some pro-LGBT policy. This is so distorted that I feel the need to pause, and even approach the matter from a different angle. The gender theory intertwined with "the tanks in the desert" (Saddam Hussein, Koweit, Iraq, "weapons of mass destruction). It's like Colin Powell in a girl's dress!

Then, Jolani in a suit, walking in the US, on a red carpet.

Those people seem to be into some "Let's not look at the past". Seems the background features something so pathological that we would need to pause, at all costs.
 
Article dated Dec 19, 2025:

The US military launched a rare wave of airstrikes against dozens of sites believed to be associated with remnants of the Islamic State group
in retaliation for an ambush in Palmyra last week that killed two US soldiers and an American interpreter.
The Islamic State has not claimed direct credit for the ambush

December 2025 Palmyra attack - Wikipedia
The December 2025 Palmyra attack was an ambush carried out on 13 December 2025 against Syrian and US troops stationed near the Syrian city of Palmyra. The attack was conducted by a lone Syrian security officer, allegedly affiliated with the Islamic State.

This guy was perhaps an Assad loyalist? So, @Ennio may be on the right track: they would be fighting the Syrian Arab army, scapegoated as "ISIS fighters".

My! One article mentions "Daesh" again:

US military launches strikes in Syria against Daesh fighters after American deaths
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration launched military strikes Friday in Syria to “eliminate” Daesh group fighters and weapons sites in retaliation for an ambush attack that killed two US troops and an American interpreter almost a week ago.



It becomes hard for the mind than to research those things. There is a lot of pathology, simply put. I really feel borderline emotional when I read the following things, to the extent that it becomes hard to research those things within the usual framework:

Trump says US has launched large-scale attacks on ISIL in Syria
Trump separately wrote on his Truth Social platform that Syria’s government, which was formed after the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime in late 2024, was “fully in support” of the US military operation.
Syria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also repeated its commitment to combatting ISIL and said it “invites the United States and member states of the international coalition to support these efforts”.

Assad Has Fallen. Who Is Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, the Syrian Militant Who Led The Rebel Offensive That Toppled Him? | FRONTLINE | PBS | Official Site | Documentary Series
He had risen through the ranks of the group then known as the Islamic State of Iraq, or ISI, and then with help from ISI’s successor, ISIS, Jolani founded an Al Qaeda affiliate in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/19/politics/us-strikes-isis-targets-syria
“The Government of Syria, led by a man who is working very hard to bring Greatness back to Syria, and is fully in support,” he added.

This is absurd. Trump cannot have lost all of his references points like that. At worse, he is made to bend.



Here are two articles depicting a process:

LeBron’s Immunity
The Stable Inversion

In a previous essay, I described the mechanics of stable falsehood. A lie tilted slightly from truth requires constant energy to maintain—struts, supports, continuous adjustment against the pull of reality. But a lie fully inverted finds its own equilibrium. It doesn’t argue with reality; it replaces it.

The Mechanics of Stable Falsehood
Consider a pole balanced perfectly vertical. This pole represents truth in stable equilibrium. It requires no energy to maintain. Gravity holds it in place. Now tilt the pole twenty degrees. Enormous energy must flow into the base to prevent collapse. Struts, supports, constant adjustment—the structure becomes a project, an ongoing effort against the pull of reality. The Leaning Tower of Pisa has required eight centuries of engineering intervention to prevent its collapse—counterweights, soil extraction, cable anchors, structural reinforcement. A partial deviation from vertical demands perpetual maintenance.
This is how falsehood should work. A deviation from truth requiring continuous subsidy. Reality reasserting itself the moment support falters.
There is another equilibrium point.
Invert the pole completely. One hundred eighty degrees. What was north is now south; what was up is now down. The fully inverted pole also balances. Not because it has escaped gravity, but because the inversion is complete enough to create its own coherent structure. The weight distribution that held the upright pole in equilibrium now holds the inverted pole in equilibrium. The internal logic is consistent, even though every element points in the wrong direction.
A partial lie—the pole at twenty degrees—requires constant energy because it participates in both systems. It must account for the truth it partially acknowledges while supporting the falsehood it partially asserts. The contradiction is unstable.
A complete inversion has no such problem. It does not argue with reality; it replaces it. The internal coherence becomes its own stability. Once trillions of dollars of infrastructure are built around that inverted pole—careers, institutions, industries, identities—the structure can stand for generations.
You are standing beneath poles that feel stable. You now know stability proves nothing.

Does this apply?
 
Back
Top Bottom