I don't really know. Both Russia and China went through their own cycles of hell not so long ago. We know that hard times make strong men, so it's reasonable to say that they're in the upswing of somewhat objective hysteroidal cycle.
In Russia's case, this suffering probably forged the Souls necessary to take out some certain significant amount of the PTB power structure there.
In China's case, it also has appeared that way to me, with what looks to be crackdowns on financial parasites, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty, education, safe streets, technological development, care for nature, etc.
Commentators like Escobar can barely contain their glee about the ascendancy of multipolarity and the powers of creative reason being unleashed, the end of the rules-based order and all that. I admit that trade, development, and sovereignty sure looks to be a much better approach than Team America World Police.
We might say that even if multipolarity does look better objectively, though, the PTB/STS forces have a history of intentionally allowing countries to follow the trajectory of this objective hysteroidal cycle - they allow 'strong men' to appear. They may directly support them and provide resources to build up the country in question. The main example I have in mind is the case of Germany's transformation between WW1 and WW2, funded by international bankers.
At the same time, we might also say that the PTB are not as omnipotent as we tend to think, and that higher STO forces can also give to those who ask, perhaps inspiring other 'strong men' at the same time.
Maybe it can look simple from the outside - a country rising into greatness - but the added layer of hyperdimensional complexity suggests that both STS and STO forces vie for influence over the outcome of the objective process of the hysteroidal cycle and what the 'strong men' do. Or which group of 'strong men' succeeds amongst all the factions. In other words, it's a spiritual battle, pretty much like everything here.
My general sense is that the build-up of China has a purpose - to set the stage for the next conflict, which is exactly what we're seeing. We could say that capitalism and communism were set against each other, in order to provide the overarching structure of the global lesson plan, in which individual lessons are learned. Same thing now, but with unipolarity/multipolarity.
Specifically about Chinese satanists - in farming, you get the animals to grow to weight before you harvest. This could mean that Satanists or psychopaths in China are not given free rein like in the US, because the time ain't right. Maybe they're being strategically kept down, or going unsupported by higher STS forces, so that the more STO 'strong men' of China can get the country to 'grow to weight' through reasonable policies? Or are the dark forces already in charge somewhat, and actively stimulating China's growth, while giving China a 'Mask of Sanity'? There's really no way to tell aside from asking the C's for clarification.
Commentators like Webb and Davies would say that the unipolar/multipolar distinction is unimportant (not sure wwhere Fitts or Corbett stand on the issue) It's a cover for a more insidious process of the global transition to a dehumanizing Technocratic control system, displacing capitalism in the same way capitalism displaced agrarian economies before. In other words, mass transformation of every facet of life - even more than we're already seeing. If we take this idea seriously, it would be a possible explanation for the PTB allowing China's rise - to generate the conflict necessary for harvest while the proposed digital gulag rolls out.