2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

An interview with Michael Anton who wrote the article "The Coming Coup" in the American Mind recently. I posted this here and it was also on SOTT. The Coming Coup?

The first 27 min. Dan covers the Pence/Harris debate and the interview starts at 27.20. Dan just had surgery to remove a large tumor on his neck but he looks good and he's not letting that stop him he says.

Very informative. Towards the end he lays out what he sees the Dems doing if they win. One plan is to do away with the suburbs. No more single family homes but also a long list of other onerous dictates. Speaks of the degeneration of California and NYC both places where he's lived. He worked in Mayor Giuliani administration for 2 years and the difference between then an now. Also explains the Coup plot, his article went viral and he's received some threats. Has a book in the top 10 on Amazon called "The Stakes".

The threat by the Dems is, this will become a street fight and not a legal one if Trump refuses to leave.. Massive protests/riots in the streets after the election are foreseen. Soros is brought into the picture.

This interview I found to be somewhat reassuring although he didn't make this his intention. The plan for the Dems to win the popular vote then call for the abolishment of the Electoral College doesn't seem likely if the Republicans have a majority on the Supreme Court.
But the plans are likely much more intricate then we can tell.

 
Trumpwise, thought this seemed coincidental this morning;




Nemesis is more often personified, and hence capitalized, than até. She’s a goddess of retribution, and she can follow acts of hubris with the certainty of a law of gravity – except that there may be a considerable time lag, as if one dropped a plate and it took a generation for it to break. That concept likewise appears in the Bible’s book of Ezekiel, which says “The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the teeth of the children shall be set on edge.”

Até is a more unpredictable figure, not necessarily personified – classics scholar E.R. Dodds in “The Greeks and the Irrational” tentatively defines até as “a sort of guilty rashness.”

On the other hand, até can be unforgettably personified, as when Mark Antony addresses the body of Caesar and predicts civil war in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar:”

“And Caesar’s spirit ranging for revenge, With Até by his side, come hot from hell, Shall in these confines, with a monarch’s voice, Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war…”
 

Kamala Harris Lied About Abraham Lincoln and the Supreme Court

Harris was correct that when Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney died on October 12, 1864, President Lincoln did not nominate his successor, Salmon P. Chase, until after the election. This had nothing to do with letting “the next president” choose the nominee, however.

As National Review‘s Dan McLaughlin explained, Lincoln delayed because the Senate was not in session when Taney died. In fact, the Senate session ended on July 4, 1864, and did not convene again until December 5, 1864. “It was once common for the Senate to be out of session for much of the summer and fall,” McLaughlin wrote. The Senate session calendar confirms this.
Make no mistake: Kamala Harris twisted history on Lincoln and the Supreme Court — and she did so in order to dodge a far more pertinent question: whether she and Joe Biden support packing the Court, fundamentally changing the rules of the game to support the very “living Constitution” judicial activism that politicized the Court in the first place.
 
An interview with Michael Anton who wrote the article "The Coming Coup" in the American Mind recently. I posted this here and it was also on SOTT. The Coming Coup?

The first 27 min. Dan covers the Pence/Harris debate and the interview starts at 27.20. Dan just had surgery to remove a large tumor on his neck but he looks good and he's not letting that stop him he says.

Very informative. Towards the end he lays out what he sees the Dems doing if they win. One plan is to do away with the suburbs. No more single family homes but also a long list of other onerous dictates. Speaks of the degeneration of California and NYC both places where he's lived. He worked in Mayor Giuliani administration for 2 years and the difference between then an now. Also explains the Coup plot, his article went viral and he's received some threats. Has a book in the top 10 on Amazon called "The Stakes".

The threat by the Dems is, this will become a street fight and not a legal one if Trump refuses to leave.. Massive protests/riots in the streets after the election are foreseen. Soros is brought into the picture.

This interview I found to be somewhat reassuring although he didn't make this his intention. The plan for the Dems to win the popular vote then call for the abolishment of the Electoral College doesn't seem likely if the Republicans have a majority on the Supreme Court.
But the plans are likely much more intricate then we can tell.


Just a quick observation here; before Dan Bongino begins the interview, he says "Information is power. Ignorance is not bliss." It sounds an awful lot like "Knowledge protects. Ignorance endangers" (osit).
 
SURPRISE!

Rigged: The Chairman of the Presidential Debate Commission is Co-Founder of “Color Revolution” Org Linked to Steele Dossier and More

From the failed Chris Wallace-Biden tag-team attempt against Trump, to biased moderator Susan Page’s shrill interruptions of Vice President Pence, to the Presidential Debate Commission’s ridiculous and politically motivated effort to force a “virtual debate” on Biden’s behalf, patriotic Americans have caught on to the fact that there is something deeply unfair about the presidential debates.

This clear bias has justifiably led many observers to wonder what is wrong with the Presidential Debate Commission. Just yesterday, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany called out the Commission directly:
Kayleigh’s characterization of the Commission is of course correct. However, its corruption and bias goes beyond the simple fact that it’s in the tank for Joe Biden. The nominally Republican Chairman of Presidential Debate Commission, Frank Fahrenkopf, is both a co-founder and current board member of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a top “Color Revolution” propaganda outfit. The IRI was run by Never Trump neoconservative John McCain for decades. It is closely linked to the thoroughly discredited Steele Dossier at the center of the Russia Hoax.

READ MORE
 
WSJ OPINION

Who Needs Debate Moderators?

Or, for that matter, who elected the Commission on Presidential Debates?

Thursday morning the Commission on Presidential Debates made headlines when it announced that the next presidential debate scheduled for Oct. 15 would be virtual. Minutes later, Donald Trump made more headlines when he told Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business that if it’s going to be virtual, he’ll skip it.

The commission “didn’t even tell us about the debate,” Mr. Trump said. “They called up two minutes ago and it was announced.” If it’s true that the debate structure was imposed rather than decided by the campaigns, that’s a problem in itself.

Since the insult-fest that was the first Trump-Biden showdown, the commission has been considering changes—such as giving moderators even more control over the candidates. But maybe the real solution is to get rid of the commission, as well as the moderators who are making themselves too much a part of the proceedings.

In the Pence-Harris debate, moderator Susan Page of USA Today asserted as fact that the “rapid and robust recovery” predicted by the Trump administration is “not happening.” But Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell noted Tuesday that “the recovery has progressed more quickly than generally expected.” The economy has regained half of the 22 million jobs it lost during the March and April lockdowns.

Mr. Pence was right to make his own points rather than debate Ms. Page’s economic misinformation, but when a moderator drops a loaded question or bases a question on a false premise, it stacks the debate. Who cares what a moderator thinks in any case?

That’s one reason we favor doing away with moderators and having microphones that give each candidate, say, two minutes to speak at a time. The candidates can use their time as they see fit before the microphone goes dead when the time runs out. The questions would come from the candidates and their campaigns, not some outside party who may have her own agenda. Surely the candidates know the best questions to put to their rivals.

The Commission on Presidential Debates doesn’t control these events as a birthright. It’s a nonprofit, supposedly nonpartisan outfit run by Washington grandees and first sponsored debates in 1988. Its debate sponsorship has since become a tradition, but its judgment on moderators and timing is suspect. By the time of this year’s first debate on Sept. 29, millions of people had already voted. Its unilateral decision Thursday for a virtual debate is another example of its high-handedness.

The candidates and parties ought to take back control over these debates, and let the candidates go at it mano a mano without some Beltway referee.

 
Article goes on to indicate Biden is ahead of Trump in polls.

More Voters Say They're Better off under Trump than When Obama, Bush Sought Re-election: Gallup Poll​

More American voters believe they are better off after four years under President Donald Trump than they did at the end of the first terms of former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, new polling data has revealed.

The latest survey from Gallup found that a clear majority of registered voters (56 percent) believed they were better off now compared to four years ago.

But when they were asked whether they were better or worse off toward the end of Obama's first term in the White House, only 45 percent told pollsters their situation had improved over the four years between 2008 and December 2012.

A slightly higher 47 percent of voters said their lives had gotten better at the end of Bush 43's first four years in office, putting him nine points above his father George Bush Snr. in October 1992.

READ MORE
 
afb100920dAPR20201009064504.jpg

Joe Biden: "You’ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over"​

 
HOLY SH*T!!! You're NOT going to believe THIS! From the Gateway Pundit:

EXCLUSIVE UPDATE: Video of Joe Biden Calling for a Muslim Jihad Was Created, Translated, Promoted and Endorsed By the US Government

Yesterday The Gateway Pundit reported that most Americans didn’t realize it or see it but Democrat Joe Biden in a recent ad called for Muslim Voters to wage jihad.

The former Obama Vice President called for Muslim voters to wage Jihad while attacking the police.
Some readers asked for more information on this Biden video and we have an update.

On July 21, 2020, Democrat Joe Biden met with a group of Muslims on a Zoom call. The call was with Emgage which is a front for CAIR and others. It is an Islamic organization which wants to generate one million votes for Biden for President.

It appears that Biden made it up from his basement and did the call from his backyard. During the call, Biden quoted the Prophet Mohammad and said this:

The prophet Mohammad, said, whoever among you sees evil, let him change it with his hand. If he is unable to do so, then with his tongue. If he is unable to do so, then with his heart.
This a call for Jihad in the Muslim faith.

The next day Emgage created a video calling for one million Muslims to vote for Joe Biden. (The video can be seen here at the Illustrated Primer – it is too large to upload.)

Shortly after that, four Voice of America (VOA) employees (i.e. US government officials) took the Biden statement on the Zoom call and spliced it with the Engage video and added Urdu text.

Urdu is the language spoken in Pakistan.

biden-voa-emgage-2-600x413.jpg

VOA and Emgage are watermarked on the video as seen in the above photo.

Voice of America (VOA) is a US government sponsored entity.
[Click to see video - also embedded in the article]

This video was distributed throughout Facebook, Twitter and also on the official VOA Urdu web page. Here is a picture of the VOA Urdu site from today:

VOA-Urdu-Site-600x265.jpg


This video which was created by VOA was a free endorsement for the Biden campaign.

It was created using government time and likely funding by using its facilities as well. It was then promoted on Facebook and Twitter. It included the VOA watermark. It was anti-Trump, pro Biden. It also included Democrat Joe Biden calling for a Jihad while suggesting police are abusive.

It not only aired on VOA on the Urdu website, it also was aired and promoted on PBS.

The four VOA individuals who created the video were reportedly identified but they were able to hold onto their jobs because the authorities who reviewed the case agreed it was their first time offense and so they were allowed to remain employed.

Here is a composite of the videos released by VOA and Emgage provided by Yaacov Apelbaum:


Biden-call-for-Jihad-in-the-US-2.jpg

The US government created a video endorsing Joe Biden who calls for Jihad. It was translated to Urdu and aired on US sponsored sites and paid for by the American tax payer to promote Jihad and the Biden campaign.

What is our government doing?


:jawdrop:What indeed?!!! :osama:
 
Yesterday The Gateway Pundit reported that most Americans didn’t realize it or see it but Democrat Joe Biden in a recent ad called for Muslim Voters to wage jihad.
Now it makes a lot more sense:

American Muslims praise Biden after he says 'inshallah' during Trump tax discussion

American Muslims took to Twitter to praise Democratic nominee Joe Biden after he used the Arabic word “inshallah" during a discussion on President Trump’s tax returns during the first presidential debate Tuesday night.

The remark came after the debate moderator, Fox News’s Chris Wallace, asked Trump to comment on recent New York Times reporting that the president paid only $750 in federal income taxes per year in 2016 and 2017.

“I’ve paid millions of dollars, and you’ll get to see it,” Trump said, implying that his tax returns would eventually be made available to the public.

“When?” Biden asked.

The former vice president then added, as his campaign later confirmed to NPR, “inshallah,” an Arabic word that translates to “God willing" or “if God wills it.”
American Muslims and others praised Biden on social media, pointing out that the vice president used it in its widely known sarcastic meaning as a way for someone to not fully commit to something they may be hesitant to do.

READ MORE
 
Bombard's has done an analysis on the vice presidential debate. She's basically saying, without explicitly using the word, that Harris is a psychopath. I'd agree that it's a high likelihood that she is. The smugness, laughing off and 'emotional speak' (while smiling) is hard to stomach.

 
More SHTF maneuvers:

NYT Calls For UN ‘Election Intervention’, Says Biden Must Follow Belarus Protesters And ‘Appeal To The World For Help’

THE NEW YORK TIMES CALLED FOR “INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION” IN THE FORTHCOMING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, INSISTING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY INVITE THE UNITED NATIONS AND A HOST OF GEORGE SOROS-LINKED GROUPS TO INTERFERE WITH THE ELECTION OUTCOME.

The opinion editorial, entitled “America May Need International Intervention” was penned by Peter Beinart, also is a contributor at The Atlantic and Political Commentator for CNN.

In over 1,000 words, Beinart makes the case for foreign election interference under the auspices of the notoriously globalist, anti-Trump United Nations, specifically the body’s Human Rights Council. The United Nations Human Rights Council, however, hosts egregious human rights abusers such as China, Somalia, Sudan, Venezuela, and Qatar.

Despite this, Beinart tees up his piece insisting “even Democrats may find it hard to imagine, but the “leader of the free world” would benefit from United Nations oversight.”

Screen-Shot-2020-10-07-at-12.48.34-PM-800x505.png

Beinart insists that Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden “should follow Sviatlana Tikhanovskaya’s example and appeal to the world for help.” He described Tikhanovskaya’s actions as “imploring the United Nations to act.”

In a contested election in Belarus, Tikhanovskaya represents the globalist pick who lost to the duly-elected populist Alexander Lukashenko, a candidate that establishment forces have been attempting to undermine.

Beinart continues, attempting to normalize America “requesting foreign intervention” in elections:

“For many Americans — raised to see the United States as the natural leader of the “free world” — it may be hard to imagine requesting foreign intervention against tyranny in our own land. But as historians like Gerald Horne and Carol Anderson have detailed, there’s a long history of Black Americans doing exactly that.”

He implores Democrats to bolster the actions of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), an international election advisory board which concluded American elections “contravene O.S.C.E. commitments and international standards with regard to universal and equal suffrage” in 2018.

In addition to partnering with paragons of globalism – the United Nations, the European Union, the Council of Europe, and the World Bank – OSCE also has links to progressive megadonor George Soros.

Soros was a keynote speaker at the opening session of an OSCE special meeting in 2003 and individuals from his foundation, the Open Society Institute, have advised the body.

For example, George Sharvashidze, a former Director at the Open Society Institute spoke at an OSCE Economic Forum to promote collaboration with the institute’s academic fellowship program.

And in 2012, the Open Society Institute advised the group on its “Human Dimension Implementation Meeting,” providing a comprehensive, nine-page brief on the issue.

Beinart continues, insisting “Democrats should use the OSCE’s report as evidence in an appeal to the same body where Tikhanovskaya made hers: the U.N. Human Rights Council.”

In other words, Beinart wants to cede America’s control over its own elections and give it to a body in which the Chinese Communist Party – identified as seeking a Biden victory – wields unparalleled power. Who’s to say the Chinese Communist Party wouldn’t manipulate the council the same way it did the World Health Organization, forcing a delay of life-saving information and continuing to withhold information about COVID-19.

Beinart also pushes Democrats to “lodge a complaint with the Organization of American States, a regional organization that has pledged “to respond rapidly and collectively in defense of democracy.”

China similarly sits on the group’s observer board, and the group itself was formed in Colombia. The Organization of American States also retains links to George Soros, as he lectured the group in 2006.

The calls for foreign election interference emanating from the New York Times represent a complete reversal of the paper’s years-long crusade to tie President Trump to foreign collusion with Russia.

UNBELIEVABLE! And here's more:

TRUMP: “BARR IS PATHETIC” ‘Where are all of the arrests?’ Asks why BARR blocks all FOIA’s from Judicial Watch into Obama

Trump twice amplified supporters’ criticisms of Attorney General William Barr, including one featuring a meme calling on him to “arrest somebody!” He wondered aloud why his rivals, like President Barack Obama, Democratic nominee Joe Biden and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton hadn’t been imprisoned for launching a “coup” against his administration.

“Where are all of the arrests?” Trump said, after several dozen tweets on the subject over the past 24 hours. “Can you imagine if the roles were reversed? Long term sentences would have started two years ago. Shameful!”
Trump retweeted this
Bill Barr is going to be fired!

During a live phone-in on Fox Business, Donald Trump complained again that not enough of his political enemies have been arrested – and said attorney general Bill Barr could find himself in “a sad situation” if he doesn’t start rounding them up.

The blunt warning comes after Mr Trump left Walter Reed Medical Centre and returned to Twitter with a blizzard of angry tweets and retweets, many of them calling for the indictment of Obama administration figures.

The president’s rambling and ill-tempered interview with Maria Bartiromo on Thursday saw him run through a long list of his usual grievances, but he was particularly rancorous on the subject of supposed Obama-era “crimes” against him for which he wants to see his predecessor indicted, along with Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and many others.

Our Republic is in BIG TROUBLE! And you just know if Barr gets fired, the media will go crazy with shades of Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre!
 
Funny that this will be making its debut Oct. 20th - same date as the Saturday Night Massacre in 1973.

OBAMAGATE The Movie Official Trailer | Starring Dean Cain & Kristy Swanson | ObamaGateMovie.com​


ObamaGate the Movie exposes the Deep State plot to undermine the Trump candidacy and presidency and it reveals the lies behind the fake Russia Collusion narrative. Don't miss this film starring Dean Cain and Kristy Swanson! It will premiere on YouTube October 20th at 9PM EST!

They failed the first time, but what about the sequel?
 
The ball is really rolling now!

Pope Francis says New World Order needs to happen now with United Nations in charge

(Natural News) In his latest Fratelli Tutti (Brothers All) encyclical letter, Pope Francis issues a plea for the nations of the world to hand their reins of power over to the United Nations, which Francis says will lead us all into the New World Order.

Since globalism has already succeeded at weakening the power of individual nation states through the trans-nationalization of their respective economic and financial sectors, the time is ripe to cement into place a system of global governance that can never be undone, Francis contends.

“Given this situation, it is essential to devise stronger and more efficiently organized international institutions, with functionaries who are appointed fairly by agreement among national governments, and empowered to impose sanctions,” he writes.

In calling for “some form of world authority regulated by law,” Francis explains that such an authority “ought at least to promote more effective world organizations, equipped with the power to provide for the global common good, the elimination of hunger and poverty and the sure defense of fundamental human rights.”

The best and most suitable candidate, Francis insists, is the United Nations Organization, to which Francis is a known ally. His support for global warming, open borders, equality and peace has earned Francis repeated praise and laud from the U.N., which stated in the past that Francis is “contributing to reaching many of [the U.N.’s] objectives.” [objectives like buggering children and protecting pedophiles]

The U.N., according to Francis, is currently not strong enough to run the world at full capacity, however. He says it needs to be fully reformed “so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth,” citing text from his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.

Francis: Nations need “legal limits” to prevent them from becoming too powerful individually​

The only way to give the U.N. the teeth that Francis thinks it needs in order to rule the world is to place “clear legal limits” on all individual nations – meaning a stripping of their sovereignty. This will prevent any one of them from acquiring too much power, which Francis says could result in “cultural impositions or a restriction of the basic freedoms of weaker nations on the basis of ideological differences.”

In order to bring about “universal fraternity,” Francis wants the “rule of law” to be standardized among all nations on the basis of “justice” and “a channel of peace,” which he says is an “essential condition” for the New World Order to work.

“There is need to prevent this Organization from being delegitimized, since its problems and shortcomings are capable of being jointly addressed and resolved,” Francis is quoted as saying about the U.N.

“The seventy-five years since the establishment of the United Nations and the experience of the first twenty years of this millennium have shown that the full application of international norms proves truly effective, and that failure to comply with them is detrimental.”

Ultimately, the plan is to instill a system of “common good” for the entire globe, with the U.N. supposedly ensuring that all “false intentions” and “partisan interests” are restricted from superseding the good of all. Francis believes that multilateral, rather than bilateral, agreements will best serve this end, creating a new system of global governance controlled by one single entity.

Continuing to allow multiple entities to follow their own paths comes with “shortcomings,” Francis warns, including “lack of coordination in complex situations,” as well as “lack of attention to fundamental human rights and … the critical needs of certain groups.” This presumably includes coordinating the mass distribution of Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) vaccines, which Francis believes need to be given “equitably.”

More related news about Pope Francis and his push towards a New World Order can be found at Deception.news.

Agenda 21/2030 all the way!

Related links:


RULED BY SATAN: Archbishop warns of collusion between Deep State and Deep Church to overthrow Trump and bring in New World Order - NaturalNews.com

Biden threatens religious freedom, suggests Christians with certain traditional views are ‘dregs of society’ - NaturalNews.com
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom