2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

Well, she's doing it with Trump's blessing. He has today tweeted out this report by OAN:


So this is strategy, not just Powell 'filling in the blanks'. Note that Santos in the above interview immediately likens the US election to "the recent one in Bolivia." What actually happened there is that false allegations of fraud were raised by the OAS, casting doubt on the result, and clearing a path for the coup d'etat against Evo Morales.

So they're really going with the narrative that the election was stolen and that 'winning it back' is synonymous with 'saving the USA from [Latin-American] socialism'.

Ironically, that the US election was so thoroughly and flagrantly rigged means it's the US that is now the biggest/worst 'banana republic' in the hemisphere! It would be so lucky to have the electoral integrity of its southern neighbors.



Spending around voting time is a parallel universe away from suggesting that the man only held power thanks to something comparable to what just took place in the USA. It's 'not even wrong'!



That's another shaky claim (specifically, that 'our forces' raided SCYTL offices in Germany). She's likely just repeating what Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert said he 'heard from a friend' last week. Heck, maybe such things are going on behind the scenes, but I'm with Carlson on this: 'cite your evidence or get outta here!'
Well, the problem with Tucker Carlson isn't just his Sidney Powell bashing (the Venezuela connection aside, when you hear her version of what happened with Carlson, you wonder why he wouldn't have interviewed the "numbers" person she offered who could speak in copious detail to Dominion's ballot switching and deleting capabilities, as well as how such "glitches" were specifically traced), it's also the fact that Carlson has entirely resisted, and then dragged his feet on reporting on the entire topic of this massive voter fraud in all its aspects.

As I pointed out previously, one of the first times he dealt "seriously" with the issue at all, he actually uses as one of three pitiful examples: ONE DEAD PERSON IN FLORIDA VOTING. ONE DEAD PERSON. I'll always remember that bit, because I'd been waiting for weeks with bated breath for his finally getting around to some serious coverage of what was emerging all over the place concerning this massive, multi-tiered voter fraud. So, for him to finally present us with "one dead person voting in Florida" was like being slapped in the face, and told to go to your room without any supper. It's no wonder why people are leaving Fox in droves. What he did was pathetic -- even dissociatively pathological.

Oh, and when he does get around to Sidney Powell -- but only because so many others have gotten there before him -- according to her he is "very insulting, demanding and rude," ignores what she has to offer, and then makes sure to trash her on his show. Why not instead incorporate the interview with the tech expert within a larger framework of serious, in depth reportage on this issue?

I had also mentioned earlier that when Tucker finally showed footage of Giuliani during his first press conference, he didn't allow his viewers to hear ANY of what the prosecutor was actually saying, nor did he paraphrase any of it either. The question is, WHY did he cover up this press conference? The answer is actually quite simple: it's because, unlike the one dead person voting in Florida routine, Giuliani was presenting the legal case for HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of illegal votes, and those are the kinds of election fraud numbers that are verboten on Fox -- or at least on their highest ranking news show (which of course airs on prime time). In other words, it's not just Tucker's demanding from Powell the type of evidence that he knows she is not going to disclose before going to court (as many knowledgeable lawyers have been saying on this specific topic*), it's that his hostile and dismissive attitude towards her supports the increasingly popular conclusion that Carlson is merely following the political line at Fox, which is to support Biden's win, and, in so doing, have his show rewarded with "expanded" coverage capability (with, one assumes, a nice pay raise in the package for himself).

* As to Powell's inability or reticence to disclose more details of the cases she is mounting, it also seems likely that the Trump team is deliberately keeping things especially close to the vest given the extraordinarily dangerous "enemy" apparatus they are confronting (including the threats being made to the lives of his lawyers and their children). In another context, Tucker might be sensitive to such nefarious goings on, and the obvious need for a defensive strategy -- but NOT if he's part of the controlled opposition. For, it's in THAT context that he's now the "big shot" playing hard ball, just as Powell is claiming. It's really quite a disgusting spectacle.

As for Powell, and the issue of foreign interference, particularly involving Venezuela, with the egregious history of U.S. foreign policy in South America, I think to bring this up at all is a huge mistake. But, as far as Tucker Carlson's poor treatment of Powell goes, that had more to do with Fox's decision to suppress even the possibility of systemic, algorithmic election fraud involving the "switching" of hundreds of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden, and the deletion of millions more. (Venezuela really has nothing to do with that.) But that's why Tucker is not going to lay out any coverage that speaks to the "real" numbers involved in Election Fraud 2020: it's part of the deal he made at Fox. It's also why the "one dead person voting in Florida" bit was, to me, the second serious nail in Tucker Carlson's lack of credibility coffin (the first being his virtual silence on the issue up to that point).

Still, just as Laura Ingraham on her Fox show The Angle seemed to change her tune on this topic, one can't help hoping that Tucker Carlson -- and his producers, presumably -- will start to question their approach seeing how it's not going over so well with certain viewers. I'm not holding my breath, but we'll see. Actually, I never watched the Friday show, which I have recorded... but since no one is commenting on that particular show, I'm pretty certain he didn't address the election fraud issue, or Powell's Friday morning response to his bashing her the previous night.
 
Last edited:
On the Powell - Tucker dispute, I think that Dinesh D'Souza has very good points below. He's basically saying, that if there were real investigative journalism in the US, as there should be (but there isn't), they'd have plenty of things to look into and provide clarity about, and for that they wouldn't need anything from Powell and her legal team:

1) Isn't it true that these Democratic run cities have a long history of election fraud? Apparently very true, but no journalists are producing anything on this

2) Is it true that the election results are being processed and counted in foreign countries? This could be investigated by journalists.

3) Can the voting machines in fact be manipulated? Can they in fact flip votes? Leaving aside if they did it in this election, is it possible for them to do it? Journalists could try to answer that question.

4) What is the cumulative value and weight of the hundreds of affidavits that have been gathered so far? Journalists could try to answer that question.

5) Who are the whistleblowers that have come forward, what do they have to say? Journalists could try to find out.

Yes, this is what I've been pointing to myself. Why isn't Carlson doing his job as a real news reporter? It makes his whole argument against Powell rather moot.
 
Well we really don’t know what happened to Carlson. Who knows what he has been threatened with. Knowing the power of the PTB , anything could have happened including mind control.

Indeed. Carlson has a wife and four children...

Tucker Carlson: After Violent Leftists Harassed My Family Out Of Our Home, The NYT Is Going To Reveal Our New Location

Tucker recalled previous harassment he received after his home address made it into the public eye, detailing how his wife and two children were threatened by "screaming Antifa lunatics," which prompted him and his family to move.

"But The New York Times followed us," Carlson said during the show. "Their story about where we live is slated to run in the paper this week. Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run."

During Monday's show, Carlson listed the individuals involved with the alleged story by name.
 
Wow! Two minutes of audio from Lin Wood.
"This country’s going to be shocked when it learns about who’s been occupying the oval office for some periods of years. They’re going to be shocked at the level of pedophilia. They're going to be shocked at what I believe is going to be a revelation in terms of people who are actually engaged in satanic worship."
 
Last edited:
Wow! Two minutes of audio from Lin Wood.

Looks like they've activated full Q mode. :lol: Would be wonderful if true, but I'm skeptical any of this will come to pass. Just as with a lot of the stuff Powell is saying, it just sounds too good to be true - justice is never served so justly. But I'm open to being pleasantly surprised while enjoying the show.
 
My wishful thinking side really likes the street justice idea of the elite getting what they deserve, and NOW. I also know that reality hasn’t worked that way in the past. The difference now is that the deep state is exposing themselves more by the day and they might actually get what they deserve. The C’s have even said that they will expose themselves and they are desperate. I don’t believe they have said that we won’t get justice. But as it stands this hope still resides in the “wishful thinking” category.
 
DoD did carry out a raid on Scytl servers in Frankfurt, Germany, gaining possession of irrefutable proof of treasonous vote rigging by the CIA.
The following information from WikiLeaks may be worth remembering. Part of the Vault 7 release in 2017, concerning CIA capabilities.

U.S. Consulate in Frankfurt is a covert CIA hacker base

In addition to its operations in Langley, Virginia the CIA also uses the U.S. consulate in Frankfurt as a covert base for its hackers covering Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

CIA hackers operating out of the Frankfurt consulate ( "Center for Cyber Intelligence Europe" or CCIE) are given diplomatic ("black") passports and State Department cover. [...] Once in Frankfurt CIA hackers can travel without further border checks to the 25 European countries that are part of the Schengen open border area — including France, Italy and Switzerland.

A number of the CIA's electronic attack methods are designed for physical proximity. These attack methods are able to penetrate high security networks that are disconnected from the internet, such as police record database.
 
Wow! Two minutes of audio from Lin Wood.
Keeping in mind that it is important for us to pay attention right and left, I'm more and more in the "where's the beef" and "show me the money" camp -- IOW, actions speak louder than words. How many times have we been told that the ax is going to fall any minute, any minute now . . . and nothing! I'll save my excitement and hurrahs for when something actually does happen and not just teasers like the "Kraken has been released"! Who wants to eat stale popcorn anyway.
 
Looks like they've activated full Q mode. :lol: Would be wonderful if true, but I'm skeptical any of this will come to pass. Just as with a lot of the stuff Powell is saying, it just sounds too good to be true - justice is never served so justly. But I'm open to being pleasantly surprised while enjoying the show.
Yeah, and I hate to say it but I just can't fathom how any serious and professional lawyer would say something like that publicly. Even knowing that the pedophile and satanic thing is probably true, at least to some degree and concerning some of the players, wouldn't you set yourself up to not being taken seriously if you just throw out in the open things like this?

One possibility, of course, is that these individuals are shenanigans and infiltrators, your classic agent provocateurs who's mission is to tarnish the whole movement and ultimately make it implode.
 
Keeping in mind that it is important for us to pay attention right and left, I'm more and more in the "where's the beef" and "show me the money" camp -- IOW, actions speak louder than words. How many times have we been told that the ax is going to fall any minute, any minute now . . . and nothing! I'll save my excitement and hurrahs for when something actually does happen and not just teasers like the "Kraken has been released"! Who wants to eat stale popcorn anyway.
That's why I've taken a step back from the topic, though I'm keeping an eye on things. The whole election saga, followed by staying up to the minute on a process that will unfold in days and weeks, with no control of the outcome, and getting too invested in outcomes I want, threatened to take over. [Oh yeah, riots, lock-downs, and vaccines too.] Stuff is going to happen, so maybe I need to focus a little more on my under-developed equanimity.
 
If you want to hear a more balanced and level headed take on the situation, here's a recent interview Devin Nunes. One of the things he stresses is that right now the most important thing is to fix the communication – to provide channels of information that are not censored. He mentions e.g. Rumble and Parler as good 'replacements'. Another thing that caught my attention in this interview was how he describes the Democrats' recent behavior. He says that "they are not acting as confident as someone who has just won the election" and "they are putting on a facade" [paraphrasing].

 
There are two basic ways this can go.

As things stand, it's Biden who becomes president. This won't have been China's doing, or Venezuela's, or Cuba's. The only foreign aspect is that the American establishment (the nexus of DNC, media, intelligence community, Wall Street, etc.) is 'co-linear' with like-minded 'globalist agenda' elites in charge in most other countries. So the 'fix' is very much internal, though 'in synch with the globalists'.

Trump supporters are wishfully thinking if they believe 'justice running its course through the system' will get Trump re-elected. The US is in an advanced state of pathocracy, so while not all individuals therein are corrupt, all key agencies and institutions are. The only way Trump wins is if the nexus of real power 'assists' him by carrying him over the line of 270 Electoral College votes. As widely discussed since 'election night', there are multiple legal routes to victory, but in the end it comes down to 'a big ask' of several key states effectively switching back, all told, several hundred thousand votes from Biden to Trump (and/or removing similar numbers from Biden's totals).

One 'deep state strategy' that may be afoot is to game things for maximal chaos. This would be achieved by declaring Trump the winner, but only at the eleventh hour, after it had seemed for so long that Biden won. It would happen in such a way that it appears to never-Trumpers that Trump has stolen the election thanks to 'backroom deals'. So justice will have been done, strictly speaking, because the legitimate winner becomes president, but because it seems to occur under 'outrageous' circumstances, tens of millions of people take to the streets.

That's the only 'victory' to be had here: chaos.
 
Two popular US Presidents, two problems for the Deep State, two assassinations, two coup d'etats. The first one, a bloody murder 57 years ago to the sound of triangulated fire from scoped rifles on the streets of Dallas. The second one, a different kind of assassination and ongoing. A free choice through ballot by the citizens of the US Republic delegitimized and demonised by the Control System and their propagandists. First baseless accusations of collusion with 'the enemy', Russia, then attempted impeachment over an issue that actually implicated his Presidential rival in sordid corruption. And now the final act in the modern day method of assassination, a rigged Presidential election.
Time will tell how this will play out and I honestly don't know if the judiciary will be able to stop it from doing so. But one thing is certain, creating your own reality by bloody or bloodless means sooner or later exposes the reality creators to the burning heat of objective reality.
The first assassination 57 years ago paved the way for the second. And the objective was the same:
"It's not me they're after, it's YOU". - President - elect by landslide for 2nd term, President Donald Trump.
 
But I'm open to being pleasantly surprised while enjoying the show.

Yeah, I was thinking about it recently and gamed the possible scenarios in an 'if/then' way.

Trump gets the vote overturned:

This could happen by:

a) legitimate error(s) that will be so transparent that even CNN will have to accept that he won fairly. This is unlikely, I think, since that level of legitimate error is implausible.

b) enough evidence of fraud is found (although it remains debatable whether or not the evidence is valid or not). If this were to happen it would suggest high level involvement in the vote rigging, a level high enough, I presume, to prevent the evidence of fraud from coming to light if so desired. So if Trump were to win in this way, we can assume that it was desired at this 'level'.

In that case, we're likely talking about people who want to see 2 things: widespread rioting and 'outrage' in the US in order to further divide and control the people AND hamstring Trump's 2nd term in the same way they did during his first term to the point that he is an international pariah.

How to achieve that? Well, allow the legal process to appear as feckless as it does for a while until, at a certain point, a 'hail mary' comes out of left field and wins the day, but this should be presented and perceived by many as a result of Trump manipulating and bullying, and corruption and dictator-like antics. Essentially, he wins but a lot of people and the MSM present it, and him, as totally illegitimate.

Trump's legal process continues as it is now and ends as a damp squib to much sneering from CNN. Biden is inaugurated on Jan. 21st.

The only problem with this last scenario that I can think of, from the PTB POV, is if they suspect that Trump might be planning to continue to build his political career outside of politics and that 'Trumpism' might become even more popular. It could be a concern for them that, in three years, either he or someone he has groomed over that period of time (Don Jr.?) could launch a Presidential bid, and very possibly win (and force them to rig it again). I include this as a possible explanation as to why the PTB might prefer that Trump gets 4 more years as a 'pariah president' rather than let him spend that time out of office gathering a head of steam, consolidate his base, increase his popularity and the popularity of 'Trumpism' as a political ideology. Also, with the Biden win scenario, they are unlikely to get much in the way of social chaos and further division.

Anyway, I'm not ruling out a 'December surprise'.
 
Back
Top Bottom