JGeropoulas
The Living Force
This article picked up on an idea that first intrigued me when reading SHOTW years ago: Indications in art and literature that people have only become able to see the color blue in relatively-recent centuries. (It's always been mystifying that, despite the richness of my imagination, it's impossible for me to imagine a new color, e.g. a 4th primary color.)
These current findings have tantalizing implications regarding those previous capacities that were disconnected by 4STS DNA tampering, and/or potential capacities that may lie ahead as we Work our Way to higher consciousness.
As this article points out, most of us in 3D use 3 types of cone cells to see the 1 million colors of all our 3-dimensional world. But now they've identified rare "tetrachromats" who use 4 types of cone cells to see 100 million colors...of a 4-dimensional world?...or of some bleed-through from 4D?
Maybe it's because I'm finishing up "Reality Of Being", but some of the author's comments about seeing beyond familiar colors (in the last paragraph) sound just like Jeanne de Salzmann's comments about seeing beyond familiar "reality."
Replace the word "trichromats" with "psychopaths" in the paragraph below to see a familiar theme ;)
These current findings have tantalizing implications regarding those previous capacities that were disconnected by 4STS DNA tampering, and/or potential capacities that may lie ahead as we Work our Way to higher consciousness.
As this article points out, most of us in 3D use 3 types of cone cells to see the 1 million colors of all our 3-dimensional world. But now they've identified rare "tetrachromats" who use 4 types of cone cells to see 100 million colors...of a 4-dimensional world?...or of some bleed-through from 4D?
Maybe it's because I'm finishing up "Reality Of Being", but some of the author's comments about seeing beyond familiar colors (in the last paragraph) sound just like Jeanne de Salzmann's comments about seeing beyond familiar "reality."
The Humans With Super Human Vision
An unknown number of women may perceive millions of colors invisible to the rest of us. One British scientist is trying to track them down and understand their extraordinary power of sight.
by Veronique Greenwood
Discover Magazine
July-August special issue: Science, Technology and the Future
An average human, utterly unremarkable in every way, can perceive a million different colors. Vermilion, puce, cerulean, periwinkle, chartreuse—we have thousands of words for them, but mere language can never capture our extraordinary range of hues. Our powers of color vision derive from cells in our eyes called cones, three types in all, each triggered by different wavelengths of light. Every moment our eyes are open, those three flavors of cone fire off messages to the brain. The brain then combines the signals to produce the sensation we call color.
Vision is complex, but the calculus of color is strangely simple: Each cone confers the ability to distinguish around a hundred shades, so the total number of combinations is at least a million. Take one cone away—go from being what scientists call a trichromat to a dichromat—and the number of possible combinations drops a factor of 100, to 10,000. Almost all other mammals, including dogs and New World monkeys, are dichromats. The richness of the world we see is rivaled only by that of birds and some insects, which also perceive the ultraviolet part of the spectrum.
Researchers suspect, though, that some people see even more. Living among us are people with four cones, who might experience a range of colors invisible to the rest. It’s possible these so-called tetrachromats see a hundred million colors, with each familiar hue fracturing into a hundred more subtle shades for which there are no names, no paint swatches. And because perceiving color is a personal experience, they would have no way of knowing they see far beyond what we consider the limits of human vision.
Over the course of two decades, Newcastle University neuroscientist Gabriele Jordan and her colleagues have been searching for people endowed with this super-vision. Two years ago, Jordan finally found one. A doctor living in northern England, referred to only as cDa29 in the literature, is the first tetrachromat known to science. She is almost surely not the last.
The first hint that tetrachromats might exist came in a 1948 paper on color blindness. Dutch scientist HL de Vries was studying the eyes of color-blind men, who, along with two normal cones, possess a mutant cone that is less sensitive to either green or red, making it difficult for them to distinguish the two colors.
Out of curiosity, De Vries tested the daughters of one subject and observed that even though they were not color-blind, they needed more red in their test light than normal people to make the match precise. If the women weren’t color-blind, what was going on?
Pondering the situation, De Vries thought he saw an explanation. Color blindness ran in families, affecting men but not women. While color-blind men had two normal cones and one mutant cone, De Vries knew that the mothers and daughters of color-blind men had the mutant cone and three normal cones—a total of four separate cones in their eyes. He suspected the extra cone could be why the women perceived color differently—not because they saw less than most people but because they saw more.
In 2007 Jordan, now at Newcastle, returned to testing using a new method. Sitting in a dark room, peering into a lab device, women saw three colored circles flash before their eyes. To a trichromat, they all looked the same. To a tetrachromat, though, one would stand out. That circle was not a pure color but a subtle mixture of red and green light randomly generated by a computer. Only a tetrachromat would be able to perceive the difference, thanks to the extra shades made visible by her fourth cone.
Jordan gave the test to 25 women who all had a fourth cone. One woman, code named cDa29, got every single question correct. “I was jumping up and down,” Jordan says. She had finally found her tetrachromat.
What would it be like to see through cDa29’s eyes? Unfortunately, she cannot describe how her color vision compares with ours, any more than we can describe to a dichromatic person what red looks like. “This private perception is what everybody is curious about,” Jordan says. “I would love to see that.” Jordan’s next challenge is discovering why cDa29 is different from the other women she tested. “We now know tetrachromacy exists,” Jordan says. “But we don’t know what allows someone [who's physically tetrachromatic] to become functionally tetrachromatic, when most four-coned women aren’t.”
Replace the word "trichromats" with "psychopaths" in the paragraph below to see a familiar theme ;)
Jay Neitz, a vision researcher at the University of Washington, thinks that potential tetrachromats may need practice to awaken their abilities. “Most of the things that we see as colored are manufactured by people who are trying to make colors that work for trichromats,” he says. “It could be that our whole world is tuned to the world of the trichromat.” He also suspects the natural [trichromat] world may not have enough variation in color for the brain to learn to use a fourth cone. Tetrachromats might never need to draw on their full capacity. They may be trapped in a world tailored to creatures with lesser powers.
Perhaps if these women regularly visited a lab where they had to learn—really learn—to tell extremely subtle shades apart, they would awaken in themselves the latent abilities of their fourth cone. Then they could begin to see things they had never tried to see before, a kaleidoscope of colors beyond their imagining.


It definitely is.
Gurdjieff makes you slow down, think and contemplate, that's why I love the man (I actually do love him, I'm not just saying that.)
:D