A candidate for a 4D game

RobertB

Padawan Learner
Oh how some of us do like to play our games, like checkers, backgammon, poker, even chess.
Way back in the early 70's, someone came up with a variant of chess that operates on a 4th dimension.
We called it Mad Mate. 2 teams of players, assuming the same level of ability compete on 2 different boards.
One team has a player on the white side of one board, and a player on the black side of the other board.
Here is where the extra dimension, and consequences, come in:
Whenever you take a piece, you hand it to your partner playing on the other board.
When it is your turn, you have the option of making a move, or placing a piece your partner captured and passed to you, but not both. Your move has consequences simultaneously on 2 different playing fields that operate in 3D.
There is no time limit in the game, no check, only the taking of 1 of 4 kings stops it. One has to play the game by paying attention to both boards progress, or lose quickly.
Now, I wonder what type of game the Lizzies play?
 
I somewhat understand how they manipulate, by creating situations that we react to in predictable manner.
I do not know what type of thinking they employ, such as bluffing & stakes in poker, lines of combinations and sacrifices in chess, etc.
I suppose that they are not playing in real-time, as it may take some sort of lag across the conduit.
 
Yesterday when turning right in heavy traffic, i thought how simple it would be to get wiped out by an oncoming car, if vision was psychically-altered just a little bit.

RobertB said:
I suppose that they are not playing in real-time, as it may take some sort of lag across the conduit.
What about that idea of how 4D can freeze time and then re-organise things within the target's environment, in what seems to us like a split-second?
 
Hi RobertB, to answer your question you need only look at our 3D psychopaths for the answer to there thinking.

RobertB said:
I do not know what type of thinking they employ
Wishful thinking

RobertB said:
such as bluffing & stakes in poker
They believe 100% everything they tell you/do to you....true or not. They will use any tactic they want to get the result they want.

RobertB said:
lines of combinations and sacrifices in chess
They would sacrifice an entire plannet (and all life on it) in a millisecond if it got them what they wanted.

RobertB said:
I suppose that they are not playing in real-time, as it may take some sort of lag across the conduit.
Have you read the Wave series?
They can play in real time with some effort (think UFO sightings)...but why bother when you can play in zero time? Or rewrite history?

My understanding (which may be incomplete) is that if it where a chess game (which is unfortunately too simple to fully describe the situation we find ourselves in) it would be as follows:
We get one piece each (pawns), there are a few billion players on our side. They get all the kings/queens/bishops/knights (psychopaths), they can change the layout of the board at any time in such a way that we don't notice (its 'always been that way'), they get to change the rules too - because as they play through our (psychopathic) rulers, they can set any rules they want. They may be limited to some extent in how much they can alter....but as to what this limit is I don't know.

Every piece on the board is the same colour (or so they tell us...but if you study there movement we are not all the same and you can spot there pieces). There pieces get to order ours around and set the rules we follow - they are (mostly) our rulers. We do battle (pawn vs pawn) on there behalf (they'll tell us that another pawn is the enemy).
They will use a verity of techniques to get us to move our pieces where they want them to be moved....this is what the 'game' is all about. There aim is total control of all pieces.

Half the pawns on the board are also authoritarian followers, and as 4D controll 99% of the leaders on the board...they control half the pawns movements by proxy.
One last point....we (the pawns) are limited to existing on the chess board (and thus have to struggle to see more than one move ahead). 'They' (4D) exist outside the chessboard (occasionally some of us pawns are 'lifted off the board' and placed back by there hidden hands - mostly without realising it because once off the board we exist in zero time). We can only see the moves by the traces they leave, never the hands that move them.
 
RedFox said:
Hi RobertB, to answer your question you need only look at our 3D psychopaths for the answer to there thinking.

RobertB said:
I do not know what type of thinking they employ
Wishful thinking

RobertB said:
such as bluffing & stakes in poker
They believe 100% everything they tell you/do to you....true or not. They will use any tactic they want to get the result they want.

RobertB said:
lines of combinations and sacrifices in chess
They would sacrifice an entire plannet (and all life on it) in a millisecond if it got them what they wanted.

RobertB said:
I suppose that they are not playing in real-time, as it may take some sort of lag across the conduit.
Have you read the Wave series?
They can play in real time with some effort (think UFO sightings)...but why bother when you can play in zero time? Or rewrite history?

My understanding (which may be incomplete) is that if it where a chess game (which is unfortunately too simple to fully describe the situation we find ourselves in) it would be as follows:
We get one piece each (pawns), there are a few billion players on our side. They get all the kings/queens/bishops/knights (psychopaths), they can change the layout of the board at any time in such a way that we don't notice (its 'always been that way'), they get to change the rules too - because as they play through our (psychopathic) rulers, they can set any rules they want. They may be limited to some extent in how much they can alter....but as to what this limit is I don't know.

Every piece on the board is the same colour (or so they tell us...but if you study there movement we are not all the same and you can spot there pieces). There pieces get to order ours around and set the rules we follow - they are (mostly) our rulers. We do battle (pawn vs pawn) on there behalf (they'll tell us that another pawn is the enemy).
They will use a verity of techniques to get us to move our pieces where they want them to be moved....this is what the 'game' is all about. There aim is total control of all pieces.

Half the pawns on the board are also authoritarian followers, and as 4D controll 99% of the leaders on the board...they control half the pawns movements by proxy.
One last point....we (the pawns) are limited to existing on the chess board (and thus have to struggle to see more than one move ahead). 'They' (4D) exist outside the chessboard (occasionally some of us pawns are 'lifted off the board' and placed back by there hidden hands - mostly without realising it because once off the board we exist in zero time). We can only see the moves by the traces they leave, never the hands that move them.
...and at some point in the game along comes the regulator (the wave) and with one swish of the cosmic arm clears the board saying 'play fair' and it all begins again. For a while the arms moving the figurines are visible and the game is equal and fair but later on, who knows...
 
hallowed said:
What about that idea of how 4D can freeze time and then re-organise things within the target's environment, in what seems to us like a split-second?

From a lot of abductions stories, it seems that they do it very often, indeed.
 
There are clearly limits and rules to their game, or they could just have us all killed in car accidents etc at birth. And I believe our game can be won no matter what odds are stacked against us :)
 
carlise said:
There are clearly limits and rules to their game, or they could just have us all killed in car accidents etc at birth.

You wouldn't destroy all your food, won't you ?
 
Maat said:
carlise said:
There are clearly limits and rules to their game, or they could just have us all killed in car accidents etc at birth.

You wouldn't destroy all your food, won't you ?

What I mean is that they could just blatantly do things such as take this forum down, destroy works by people like Gurdjieff or make it that they never happened, and just kill people who are getting too close to the truth. Therefore it seems they have rules they must play by too.
 
carlise said:
Maat said:
carlise said:
There are clearly limits and rules to their game, or they could just have us all killed in car accidents etc at birth.

You wouldn't destroy all your food, won't you ?

What I mean is that they could just blatantly do things such as take this forum down, destroy works by people like Gurdjieff or make it that they never happened, and just kill people who are getting too close to the truth. Therefore it seems they have rules they must play by too.

Ah ok, when you said "us all", I thought you mean the humankind not just a group of it.
Sorry
 
Back
Top Bottom