about bodies and the definitions of density and dimensions

andreaB

The Force is Strong With This One
I have read your definition of Densities and Dimension but I have some perplexity.
In the exoteric tradition there exist several “bodies”: the physical body, the etheric (or astral) one, the mind one and a “higher body”, often not referred as a body, defined akasic (or akashic). All these bodies, along the ordered sequence, are less and less dense respect our physical body.
This facts mix with a my “long time reflection”:
• If our psyche is merely a sum of EM fields, produced by our brain, is it means that these EM fields posses the very peculiar properties as that of feelings and thoughts? This sound very strange because physics property of EM fields seems up to now correlated only to electrical charges and its movements.
• Our science says that we are in a four-dimension space-time, this imply a defined past and also a fixed future, but this does not explain our free-will nor the unpredictability of chaotic physic situation (appearing in a very-very large number). So we need at least 5 dimensions space to contains 3-dimension-spaces for all times (along the 4° dimension) and different possibility at every times (along the 5° dimension). That is if exist a 3-dimension-space and we need also variations in times and in different combination of its properties for each times, we need a 5-dimension-space to contains all the 3-space “frames”.
• String theory predicts a “bulk-space” with 10 dimensions, moreover some branches of this theory consider the possibility of branes ( reduction of the word membranes) that is subdimension-realities in the range 1-10. A simple example of a brane is the surface of a hypothetical sea without boundaries (as in the case of a planet covered by water). If the waves of that sea are considered as particles and if these particles could form a sentient entity, this entity could not see (perceive) anything else out of waves of sea surface (2D brane). Every tool (instrument) that this entity could build, will be composed with that 2D-world particles, thus sea-waves, that interact only with other sea waves.
• Cassiopaeans, and also exoteric tradition, consider that souls, after death, live in 5° densities. For me density is the energy contained in a unit of volume (hyper-volume in space with more then 3 dimensions) and I think this 5-density-world would have also 5 dimensions, the our usual 3 (x,y,z), plus two other that probably are tone and color, that is two frequencies. For physic science, to have a space with some dimension proportional to wave length, is not a problem, because it is possible to transport energy also in frequency as in our space directions. In our world the particles are electron, proton, neutron etc, but that 5D-reality (or brane or world) will be populated with other particles, each with very less mass and width. There is not direct continuity with our world, also if they are overlapping. En entity from 5°-density will see our world (3d-universe) as a conglomerate of frames at different times and possibilities, so they would say to us that our concept of time is an illusion but that we perceive times moving between different static time-frames that, moreover, exist in innumerable possibilities for every times connected between them along different trajectory that often intersect each other.
• There are possible connections between our world and the 5°density world. These correlations or contacts between the two worlds are produced by structures with the same density, by resonance. For example, our nervous-system, the sum of all neurons and their connections, are quantistically correlate, because of the dimension of calcium-door of neuron-cell-contacts and the indetermination principle between position and speed, the Quantum-Function psi of every Ca++ is very large overlapping each other so that is not possible define a single Ca++ properties but is necessary to use a more complex PSI-Function that define all the Ca ions. So the nervous-system generate energy fields with the same width of our physical-body; the most energetic of these fields (most heavier also) depend strongly on the specific configurations of the neuron-links that characterize each of us (we act in our lives molding our brain to define who we are in this world). This most heavier energy-field, associated at our neuronal web, could be thought as our emotional-body and it generates (because it has the same density of structures in 5°density-world) a double of itself in 5°density-world named astral or etheric body.
• The same idea about the fact that our 3dimension-world needs a 5-dimensions-space could be extended to the 5°density-world (also 5-dimensions for me). That is if exists a 5dimensions world and this world has different configurations that change in time (5D-time) has to exist a 7-dimensions-space to contain all the possible 5D-frames. This 7D-brane-world will be composed of less dense structures, respect to the 5D ones, and I think that this 7D-world contain our mind-body that is a double of the lesser dense energy-fields of our neuronal-web representing our thoughts. For us it is easy to set our brain in a way to produce a thought but this is not the same for an emotion-like state of the mind as, for example, the sexual shaping associated to other people images ( that is the our psychic representation of other people).
• Also the 7-dimensions-world has its own configurations that evolve in time so it needs a 9-dimensions-space to contain all the 7D-frames for the various possibilities and times. This 9dimensions-space contain a 9D-reality which is the environment for our “akasic-body”. It is difficult to speculate about this 9D-Reality, but it has to be quite different from every point of view respect at the other realities (7D, 5D, 3D). There are no other parallel configurations but it changes only in something like time that the exoteric philosophy call feeling-capacity or awareness-capacity.
• Quantum science has a totally different conceptual base respect to our classic science. It use a very important “axiom”: each phenomenon (characterized by a set of particles and theirs properties) exist only in function of a subject whom observes that phenomenon. But the point is: what is a “subject” (I use purposely what and not who) ? For me there exist a property that has the capacity to became a subject and this property is owned by the akasic-structures. More these akasic-structures evolves complex and great is the capability of consciousness.
• Akasic-consciousness is the feature that define a subject, giving to it the ability to perceive, to feel, to represent, to conceive and other further functions that we actually do not posses. Consciousness is behind our mind-thought capability it permits us to feel-perceive a thought, and not, as usually conceived, the thoughts permit us to be conscious. Akasic-body, is not a correct way to speak of the Akasic-structures because whereas the mind-body and the emotional-astral-body exist in different configurations inside in (what we could call) a “composite-frames” where each of this composite-frame is composed by the 7DFrame-(with the mind-body) + 5DFrame-(with the astral-body) + 3DFrame, the 9D-akasic-structures are built by ( perhaps we could say the overlap on) the ensemble of all the “composed-frames” that constitute our history, not only for our present life but from the our very beginning (perhaps as minerals, say the exoteric traditions).
• None of the frames (7D, 5D, 3D) are objective, but each of these are purely subjective. However there is a link between a group of “souls-subjects” so that, especially for the 3D-Frames, Reality seems in common between them. Suppose to have N subjects, they act as a set of partial differential equations, if there are no constraining between them, each solutions result not-dependent on the other. The links between souls impose that 3D-Reality would be quite in common. This means that the 3D-Frames of each subjects intersect in a great lot of points, whereas 5D and 7D Frames remain quite subjective and poorly intersect each other in few points.
• In general there is none correlation between different realities-times (3D, 5D, 7D) but in the “composed-frames” the mind-body and the emotional-body are linked to our 3D-time. One way to see these 9D-structure of our akasic-body, is to imagine that, they are be built along our history and that during the successive lives and times they structure themselves to be more complex and to perform better toward conscious acting. The other way around, that I think it is closer to true, is that are these 9D-forms are linking with successive composite-frames giving origin to our 3D-time perceptions, so that there is a little connections between our 3D-times and the 9d-feeling-perceiving-capability (that acts as a 9D-time).
• We identify ourselves as the projection (in the geometrical meaning) of our true 9D-forms in the 3D-physical-body, whereas the true meaning is that our 9D-Reality continues to chose a succession of Frames. Remembering that the 9D-forms overlap a lot of possible 3D-configurations evolving in 3D-time, it is possible to understand the finding of Daryl Bem and group of research-psychologists of the Cornell University published in the “journal of Personality and Social Psychology” as a paper titled “Feeling the Future”. In this study Bem does a series of tests where people has to judge an image in terms of how much it is pleasant, and the quantity to observe is time of delay in answering. In these tests the images are linked to words and the usual findings (known from the beginning of psychology) is that the time-of-answering grows if the word is not homogenous with the images. In some of this Bem-tests, the words linked to the images were selected by chance using a computer but, this word where displayed after the answer of the person was just given. Well, also if the words came after the answers, the correlation that times-of-answering grows with words in contrast with images, still is valid, so that Bem argue that the future could be felt or smelled. This finding sounds less strange if we think that the true subject is in a 9D-reality that overlaps what could be our futures and chose a particular 3D-Frame (linked to 5D and 7D Bodies). The same understanding could be applied to the solution of a particular equation that up to now is not very understood. I am speaking of the equation of D’Alambert that is an equation that describe the time evolution of the quantum-function-Psi of a particular system. The equation is very complex to solve in a realistic case (it was used by Dirac to theorize the positron) but it has two qualitative solutions with very clear meaning. The (1) solution imply spherical-waves the expand toward future times (growing their radius) from every particles, and when these waves interact with the other particles, bring them information like the force of attracting or repulsing. This solution represent the causal effect and also the tendency to growing entropy. The (2) solution represent spherical-waves collapsing into particles, they come from the future and represent purpose-action opposed to chaotic action of the (1) solutions. The solution of the type (2) are neglected by actual science, instead they could explain phenomena as life. Also in this case if the real subject is in 9D-space overlapping possible future-3DFrames, it is not so strange that these purpose-wave could exist.
So I am sorry to bore you with this long writing, but it was necessary to clarify my point of view. Clearly this is only that, a mine, subjective point of view and finally the question for the Cassiopeans is very simple:
What about the bodies of which the exoteric philosophy speak?
For example I think reasonable the existence of a mind-body belonging to an other reality, that could explain some properties of ourselves.
In particular what about the akasic-reality?

andrea
 
andreaB said:
In particular what about the akasic-reality?

andrea

Hi,

In the future can you put in some paragraph breaks/spaces to make your posts easier to read?

thanks! :)
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom