Aliens on the moon - Syfy documentary

[Archaea]

A documentary about photos of potential alien structures on the moon from the Syfy channel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g01XfIDT_bE

I thought it was pretty interesting, seems to line up with some of the stuff in the Cass sessions as well.

It goes for 1 hour 25 minutes.

I recommend it if you're into alien moon base stuff. :)

 

[axj]

One thing I found with popular programs on controversial topics like this is that there is often a lot of disinformation mixed in. I'm not sure if it is intentional or if they simply fail to do the necessary amount of research. Even things that have been clearly disproven are presented as facts. So then it is easy for "serious scientists" to dismiss everything related to this topic.

One example was an alleged picture of a huge spacecraft close to the sun in a similar program. It took me two minutes to find the explanation that it was simply a solar flare moving along magnetic fields which was photographed from a certain angle and that it is nothing special.

 

[Archaea]

One thing I found with popular programs on controversial topics like this is that there is often a lot of disinformation mixed in. I'm not sure if it is intentional or if they simply fail to do the necessary amount of research. Even things that have been clearly disproven are presented as facts. So then it is easy for "serious scientists" to dismiss everything related to this topic.

One example was an alleged picture of a huge spacecraft close to the sun in a similar program. It took me two minutes to find the explanation that it was simply a solar flare moving along magnetic fields which was photographed from a certain angle and that it is nothing special.

Yeah, and there's also the fact that if it was all true and no one was able to falsify the evidence then it would never be available to the public.

 

[Michael B-C]

Having watched the documentary I concur with the above. It does suggest, as has been stated in many places, including regularly on this forum and in Laura’s writings, that the Moon holds many secrets including the likelihood that it is an STS outpost, (whether in the form of human or other density forms), and is a 'base' for their activities as targeted against the people of this Earth.

So much of the show comes across as unverifiable conjecture - in which anomalous features are instantly given credence as 'nuclear facilities' or 'forts' or 'bridges' or 'mining installations' or ‘crashed spacecraft’, when their reality is likely to be more subtle, complex and currently indeterminate. Such materialistic thinking completely blinds the viewer to the need to grasp a different form of paradigm. Further, it gives great credence to the voices of a range of extreme sensation seekers who specialise in emotionally based DISINFO so as to further spook and frighten the watcher - with plenty of talk of immediate threat and possible attacks from the Moon on the Earth (despite the inference that many of these 'facilities, show signs of great antiquity). Smacks of the never ending ramping up of the so called 'war on terror' i.e. state sponsored terrorism to keep the population in a perpetual state of red alert, and in need of their 'superiors' to protect them from attacks by the bogey man (in this case in the form of violent ETs).

Of course, sprinkled through out the lies are plenty of clues suggestive of a real higher density presence on the Moon and a history of that emergent planet that is quite different to that presented by mainstream science/media. Overall it would most likely put the serious investigator off looking any further, despite the sprinkling of data that is clearly supportive of the overall thesis that the Moon harbours forces of an other-worldly nature. Which is a shame; because the Moon is possibly the single greatest mystery hanging over all our lives, and its influence on all our activities of paramount importance.

 

[Archaea]

Having watched the documentary I concur with the above. It does suggest, as has been stated in many places, including regularly on this forum and in Laura’s writings, that the Moon holds many secrets including the likelihood that it is an STS outpost, (whether in the form of human or other density forms), and is a 'base' for their activities as targeted against the people of this Earth.

So much of the show comes across as unverifiable conjecture - in which anomalous features are instantly given credence as 'nuclear facilities' or 'forts' or 'bridges' or 'mining installations' or ‘crashed spacecraft’, when their reality is likely to be more subtle, complex and currently indeterminate. Such materialistic thinking completely blinds the viewer to the need to grasp a different form of paradigm. Further, it gives great credence to the voices of a range of extreme sensation seekers who specialise in emotionally based DISINFO so as to further spook and frighten the watcher - with plenty of talk of immediate threat and possible attacks from the Moon on the Earth (despite the inference that many of these 'facilities, show signs of great antiquity). Smacks of the never ending ramping up of the so called 'war on terror' i.e. state sponsored terrorism to keep the population in a perpetual state of red alert, and in need of their 'superiors' to protect them from attacks by the bogey man (in this case in the form of violent ETs).

Of course, sprinkled through out the lies are plenty of clues suggestive of a real higher density presence on the Moon and a history of that emergent planet that is quite different to that presented by mainstream science/media. Overall it would most likely put the serious investigator off looking any further, despite the sprinkling of data that is clearly supportive of the overall thesis that the Moon harbours forces of an other-worldly nature. Which is a shame; because the Moon is possibly the single greatest mystery hanging over all our lives, and its influence on all our activities of paramount importance.

I think that's an interesting take on the documentary. Being familiar with the idea that there is something else on the moon, I focused on the things that agreed with my cognitive model of what's happening on the moon and ignored the other things. I didn't really see the documentary as a way of manipulating the viewer while I was watching it, but I can see how that would work.