Archangels? Maybe!

[Ask-Seek-Knock]

Hi Everyone!

I am trying to gather information on Archangels from the C's transcripts and have come up short. I am hoping someone can point me to a section that I may have missed in my searching.

Here is what I found so far...during a session dated 12-28-96 Laura asks, "Well, are there such things as Archangels? The C's answer is "Maybe". None of the questions following that answer go any deeper, they actually veer off into talking about soul creation. I am unable to find any other sections within the information posted on the entire site that goes any deeper into Archangels either their existence or their motives etc...

Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks!

 

[Zadius Sky]

Hi Ask-Seek-Knock,

Seeing that this is your first post, I would like to welcome you to the forum and we would appreciate it if you would post a brief introduction about yourself in the Newbies section, telling us how you found this forum, a little bit about yourself, how long you've been reading it and/or the SOTT page, whether or not you've read any of Laura's books yet, etc. Thank you so much.

:)

 

[paralleloscope]

The concept of angels is heavily tied up with erroneous religious concepts throwing the searcher off course with old implied notions

Q: (L) According to shamanistic teachings, one can have animal spirits or guides. Is this correct?

A: Partly. You have them if you believe you have them.

Q: (RC) Will there be another war in heaven between the angels?

A: Assumptions are fun to deal with.

Q: (L) You are assuming that there are angels and that they are fighting a war. (RC) Well, in a metaphorical sense.

A: And you are assuming there is a "heaven."

Q: (RC) Yes. Are you saying that there is no heaven? No paradise? I don't believe that. (L) There is 5th density. (RC) Well, we are getting into semantics here.

A: "Heaven" is a concept more than semantics. Some think the 3rd density environment known popularly as Leavenworth is heaven, for one example. Could be called "Heavenworth!"

Which could be why the concept hasn't been explored more, since also a better explanation has been found in the concept of densities, to explain a 'hierarchy' of Knowledge and Being. Archangels do seem in some ways to correspond with sixth density (emissaries of light) and perhaps also soul units as a whole. If we take the legend of AA Lucifer:

Q: (L) Who is Lucifer?

A: You. The human race.

Q: (L) Are the souls of individual humans the parts of a larger soul?

A: Yes. Close. The One. All who have fallen must learn "the hard way."

Q: (L) Are you saying that the act of wanting to experience physical reality is the act of falling?

A: You are members of a fragmented soul unit.

(L) So, at some level we have chosen the mess we are in and that is the Super Ancient Legend of the Fallen Angel, Lucifer. That is us. We fell by falling into that door, so to speak, going after the pot of gold, and when we fell through the door, the serpent bit us!

A: But this is a repeating syndrome.

Q: (L) Is it a repeating syndrome just for the human race or is it a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation?

A: It is the latter.

Then an archangel could in ways correspond to a segment of the grand gradient between STO/STS?

 

[MusicMan]

The word Angel is derived from the Greek angelos = messenger. Arch is from archos = ancient.
So the ArchAngel is the Chief (most ancient) Messenger.
I'm guessing the C's would fill the bill in this instance.

 

[Ask-Seek-Knock]

Thanks everyone!

 

[MusicMan]

Re-reading this section, I see that the human race is referred to as Lucifer by the C's, and that we are a 'fragmented soul unit'. That is, Lucifer (us) is a fragmented soul unit. Now Lucifer was a fallen Arch-angel.
In the latest transcript I saw mention of Caesar replicating his soul each time he was called upon. Perhaps this is his (Caesar's) purpose, to match each of those elements of the fragmented Lucifer soul to one of his replicated souls, and perhaps to ultimately unify the fragments, of those that call, into one Arch-angel again.
Could these be of the 144,000 mentioned in the Revelation?

 

[WhiteRose]

I have a theory:

Because in esoteric there are "angels of the radius" that is also with them "archangels" in that case, according to our ancient point of view maybe in this case the essence of "higher consciousness" and which ended the "lessons" on the "physicality" Earth. And currently they are, for example, at a density level of 4-5-6?
We called them "guardians" (Guardians or keepers - I do not know which word better in English) which clearly defined the souls of "higher consciousness".

And so I feel - Cassiopeia's.

It's just a theory but I hope that will bring something to the discussion because it seems interesting.

 

[three]

Humans name and classify things, that's what we do and what we're good at. So ancient peoples trying to make sense of 'higher' realms have attempted to name and classify a place and beings that are impossible to name and classify because as the C's have said, 4th density is the first density with mutable physicality. This is why every religion is different even though they're all trying to see and describe the same thing.

I've had conversations with 6th density angels--- or at least I sincerely think that I have--- who the hell actually knows? :P And if my subjective experience is to be believed, they resist applying any labels to themselves. Some do not like the term "angel" because it implies that the only purpose of their existence is in relation to their function of service to humans. Some are insulted by the term 'alien' because they were here on earth before us and humans didn't originate on earth either. (most would be insulted that I used the term 'insulted' they're a real stickler about language) They didn't care much for 'anunnaki' either though I don't remember why. As for 'archangel', they don't exist. If you successfully pray to one of the archangels, you will get a light being which matches the profile of the thoughtform they think you're trying to reach, but assigning one name per being is a ridiculous concept to them, like trying to name drops of water or beams of light. So, if you believe that archangels exist they can become real enough, but whether or not they objectively exist is a little trickier to answer.

^Again this is just my own subjective opinion. Please use your own discernment. I hope you find what you're looking for.

 

[Michal]

Hi Everyone!

I am trying to gather information on Archangels from the C's transcripts and have come up short. I am hoping someone can point me to a section that I may have missed in my searching.

Here is what I found so far...during a session dated 12-28-96 Laura asks, "Well, are there such things as Archangels? The C's answer is "Maybe". None of the questions following that answer go any deeper, they actually veer off into talking about soul creation. I am unable to find any other sections within the information posted on the entire site that goes any deeper into Archangels either their existence or their motives etc...

Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks!

Hi Ask-Seek-Knock
I have made some search some time ago looking for phrases:
"angel"
"guardian angel"
"guardian"
in Cassiopean's transcripts, in "Bringers of the Dawn" and in "The Ra material".

Results are presented here:
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,42368.msg667812.html#msg667812
See also attached to the cited post excel files.